隨著廣告環境變得競爭與雜亂，注意力缺乏已成為一大問題，如何獲得消費者對廣告的注意力已變成是重要的議題。對於廣告主和廣告代理商的最大挑戰，就是去找出能夠在高度競爭環境下，讓自家廣告的品牌能夠獲得最大的注意力和記憶。而其中一個能夠突破競爭的廣告環境的策略就是採取播出比其它品牌更多大量的廣告方式(Rossiter and Percy 1997)。其中以夾心式廣告最為盛行。
本研究以固定重複次數下採用不同的夾心式廣告策略(內容重複與位置重複)進行實驗設計，目的是為了瞭解夾心式廣告採用不同的內容與位置重複對於受測者而言是否會對其廣告記憶效果產生差異影響。研究結果顯示出在相同的廣告曝光次數下，夾心式廣告採用相似內容呈現比相同內容呈現有較佳的記憶效果。並且，屬於高節目專注程度者對於夾心式廣告採用相似內容重複的目標廣告記憶效果，相較於採用相同內容重複的目標廣告記憶效果，具有顯著的正向提升；而低節目專注者則無顯著差異。因此，本研究成功地證明節目專注程度與廣告理解程度具有正向的關係存在。除此之外，夾心式廣告採用中間或是頭尾位置重複在目標廣告記憶效果上沒有顯著的差異，則可以提供廣告主與廣告代理商一個新的思考方向，讓其能先行評估再決定廣告所要購買的破口位置，即可以較低的金錢購買以獲得相同廣告的記憶效果。

Because competitive clutter is on the rise, attention has been referred to as the scarcest resource in the today’s business. This makes the capture of consumers’ attention an increasingly important aim for television commercials. The challenges advertisers and ad agencies to maximize attention and memory for their brands under highly competitive conditions. One strategy of breaking through the clutter is to outspend the competition by running more and larger ads than other brands. Sandwich advertisement is the most popular of all.
Our study provides that the effects of varied versus same executions of ads on brand name memory are the same when the number of exposures to the ads is held constant. And we also show that consumers under high attention to programming will have better brand name memory on varied executions of ads than same executions. We concluded that there is a positive relationship between attention to programming and comprehension of commercials successfully. Besides, there is no difference between intermediate and two extremities of advertising zone on brand name memory. Therefore, we can provide a useful suggestion to advertisers and ad agencies that they can estimate their budget and direction before and then buy it on the right way.

目錄………………………………………………………………………………Ⅰ
表目錄……………………………………………………………………………Ⅴ
圖目錄……………………………………………………………………………Ⅶ
第一章 緒論………………………………………………………………….… 1
第一節 研究背景與動機…………………………………………………...1
第二節 研究目的…………………………………………………………...3
第三節 研究範圍…………………………………………………………...3
第四節 研究流程…………………………………………………………...4
第二章 文獻探討…………………………………………………………….….5
第一節 廣告定義與類型 …………… …………………………….……...5
一、廣告的定義與作用………………………………………………..5
二、電視廣告的類別與特性……………………………………….….6
第二節 廣告效果…………………………………………………………...8
一、廣告效果之測定.………………………….………………………8
二、廣告效果之特性…………………………………………………12
第三節 重複策略與廣告效果……………………………………………14
一、重複-變化假說……………………………………………………19
二、編碼變化假說……………………………………………………20
三、差異注意解釋……………………………………………………21
第四節 訊息位置與廣告效果…………………………………………….23
第五節 專注程度與廣告效果…………………………………………….26
第三章 研究方法…………………………………………………………….....31
第一節 研究架構………………………………………………….………31
第二節 研究變項定義…………………………………………………..…32
一、構成性定義…………………………………………………….....32
二、操作性定義……………………………………………………….34
第三節 實驗設計…………………………………………………………..35
一、實驗設計 ………………………………………………………. .35
二、樣本對象………………………………………………………….36
第四節 前測實驗………………………………………………………….37
一、可能實驗材料………………………………………………….....37
二、最終實驗材料…………………………………………………….45
第五節 正式實驗………………………………………………………….53
一、問卷內容………………………………………………………….53
二、實驗程序………………………………………………………….53
三、統計方法………………………………………………………….55
第四章 研究結果與分析…………………………………………………….....57
第一節 資料處理方法……………………………………………………..57
一、廣告的產品與品牌回想……………………………………….....57
二、廣告具體內容回想……………………………………………….58
第二節 信度與效度……………………………………………………….62
一、信度分析………………………………………………………….62
二、效度分析………………………………………………………….63
第三節 樣本資料………………………………………………………….64
一、性別分佈………………………………………………………….64
二、學院分佈………………………………………………………….64
三、年級分佈………………………………………………………… 65
第四節 假說檢定─主效果………………………………………………..66
一、內容重複策略對目標廣告記憶效果的影響…………………….66
二、位置重複策略對目標廣告記憶效果的影響…………….………70
三、中間位置重複策略對插入廣告記憶效果的影響……………….71
第五節 假說檢定─干擾效果……………………………………………... 71
一、內容重複策略與節目專注程度對目標廣告記憶效果的影響….74
二、位置重複策略與節目專注程度對目標廣告記憶效果的影響….83
三、中間位置重複策略與節目專注程度對插入廣告記憶效果的干擾
影響………………………………………………………………….…84
第五章 討論與建議……………………………………………………….…....87
第一節 研究結果討論……………………………………………………..87
一、 研究結果發現…………………………………………………….87
二、 研究假說結果彙整…………………………...…………………..91
第二節 學術意涵與廣告實務意涵…………………………………………93
一、學術意涵………………………………………………………….93
二、廣告實務意涵…………………………………………………….94
第三節 研究限制……………………………………………………………96
一、實驗情境限制…………………………………………………….96
二、實驗場地限制…………………………………………………….96
三、 實驗資源限制…………………………………….……………....96
四、 實驗材料限制…………………………………………………….97
五、 廣告回想限制…………………………………………………….97
第四節 未來研究方向……………………………………………………...98
一、目標廣告材料挑選建議…………………………………………98
二、插入廣告的產品涉入程度………………………………………99
三、改變節目內容性質………………………………………………99
參考文獻………………………………………………………………………..100
附錄一：前測問卷……………………………………………………………..107
附錄二：正式問卷………………………………………….………………….110

1. Fred N. Kerlinger and Howard B. Lee. 著，黃營杉、汪志監編譯，「研究方法」，華泰文化事業股份有限公司，民國九十一年。
2. 李秀英，「重複方式、間隔時間與插入項目型態對廣告記憶效果之影響」，中央大學企業管理研究所論文，民國八十七年六月。
3. 東方消費者行銷資料庫2004年(Eastern Integrated Consumer Profile，EICP)
4. 林佑聲，「廣告配置與典型性對認知資源之心裡預算影響之研究」，中央大學企業管理研究所未出版論文，民國八十七年六月。
5. 邱皓政，「量化研究與統計分析：SPSS中文視窗版資料分析範例解析」，五南圖書出版股份有限公司，民國八十九年。
6. 高端訓，「策略性廣告媒體計畫架構之建立理論與實務運作」，中興大學企業管理研究所論文，民國八十二年六月。
7. 陳亭蓁，「廣告音樂與主題在文化意涵上之不一致性對廣告效果的影響」，元智大學企業管理研究所論文，民國九十二年六月。
8. 黃見雯，「廣告基調與媒體內容基調一致性對廣告效果之影響」，元智大學管理研究所論文，民國九十年六月。
9. 鄭自隆主編，許安琪、樊志育著，「廣告學原理」，揚智文化事業股份有限公司，民國九十一年。
10. 樊志育，「廣告學新論」，三民書局，民國八十四年。
11. 潘雨青，「廣告重複與內容差異對品牌不一致延伸之影響」，中央大學企業管理研究所論文，民國九十年六月。
12. PC HOME搜尋引擎(http://dir.pchome.com.tw/news/tv/list/)
13. 台灣CF歷史資料館網站(http://cf.nctu.edu.tw/)
14. Adams, H. G. (1916), Advertising and Its Mental Laws. New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.
15. Anderson, D. R., and Levin, S. R. (1976), “Young Children''s Attention to Sesame Street,” Child Development, Vol. 47, 806-811
16. Appel, Valentine (1971), “On Advertising Wearout,” Journal of Advertising Research, 11 (February), 11-13.
17. Atkinson, R. C., and R. M. Shiffrin (1971), “The Control of Short-Term Memory,” Scientific American, Vol. 224, 82-91.
18. Belch, George E. (1982), “The Effects of Television Commercial Repetition on Cognitive Response and Message Acceptance,” Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 9 (June), 56-66.
19. Berlyne, Donald E. (1970), “Novelty, Complexity, and Hedonic Value,” Perception and Psychophysics, Vol. 8, 279-286.
20. Burnkrant, Robert E. and Hanumantha R. Unnava (1987), “Effect of Variation in Message execution on the Learning of Repeated Brand Information,” in Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 14, M. Wallendorf and P. Anderson, eds. Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research, 173-176.
21. Burns Daniel J. and Deborah God (1999), “An Analysis of Item Gains and Losses in Retroactive Interference,” Journal of Experimental Psychology, Vol. 25 (April), 978-985.
22. Cacioppo, John T. and Richard E. Petty (1979), “Effects of Message Repetition and Position on Cognitive Response, Recall and Persuasion,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 37 (January), 97-109.
23. Cameron, Glen T., Joan Schleuder and Esther Thorson (1991), “The Role of News Teasers in the Processing of News and Commercials,” Communication Research, Vol. 18, (May), 667-684.
24. Clancy, Kevin J., Lyman E. Ostlund, and Gordon A. Wyner (1979), “False Reporting of Magazine Readership,” Journal of Advertising Research, Vol. 19 (October), 23-30.
25. Craig, C. S., Brian Sternthal, and Clark Leavitt (1976), “Advertising Wearout: An Experimental Analysis,” Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 13 (November), 365-372.
26. Crowder, Robert G. (1976), Principles of Learning and Memory. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
27. Dellarosa, D. and L. E. Bourne, Jr. (1985), “Surface Form and the Spacing Effect,” Memory and Cognition, Vol. 13 (June), 529-537.
28. Fishbein, M. (1963), “An Investigation of Relationship between Beliefs about an Object and the Attitude toward the Object,” Human Relation, Vol. 16, 233-240.
29. Glenberg, A. M. (1976), “Monotonic and Nonmonotonic Lag Effects in Paired-Associate and Recognition Memory Paradigms,” Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, Vol. 15, 1-16.
30. Greene, Robert L. (1980), “Sources of Recency Effects in Free Recall,” Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 99 (March), 387-403.
31. Hauser, John R. and Birer Wernerfelt (1990), “An Evaluation Cost Model of Consideration Sets,” Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 16 (March), 393-408.
32. Heeler, R. M. (1972), “Laboratory Investigation of Inter-Related Effects of Mixed Insertions in Advertising Campaigns,” unpublished dissertation, Business Administration Department, Stanford University.
33. Hintzman, Douglas L. and L. D. Stern (1978), “Contextual Variability and Memory for Frequency,” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, Vol. 4 (September), 539-549
34. Hung, Kineta (2000), “Narrative Music in Congruent and Incongruent TV Advertising,” Journal of Advertising, Vol. 24 (January), 25-34.
35. Hunt, R. R. and G. O. Einstein (1981), “Relational and Item-Specific Information in Memory,” Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, Vol. 20, 497-514.
36. Kent, R. J. and Allen, C. T. (1994), “Competitive interference effects on consumer memory for advertising: The role of brand familiarity.” Journal of Marketing, Vol. 58 (March), 94-107.
37. Krugman, Dean M, Cameron, Glen T, and White, Candace McKearney (1995), “Visual Attention to Programming and Commercials: The Use of In-home Observations,” Journal of Advertising, Vol. 24 (Spring)
38. Krugman, Herbert E. (1965), “The Impact of Television Advertising: learning Without Involvement,” Public Opinion Quarterly, Vol. 29 (Fall), 349-356.
39. Krugman, Herbert E. (1972), “Why Three Exposures May Be Enough,” Journal of Advertising Research, Vol.12 (December), 11-14.
40. Krugman, Herbert E. (1977), “Memory Without Recall , Exposure Without Perception,” Journal of Advertising Research, Vol. 17 (August), 7-12.
41. Lloyd, David W. and Kevin J. Clancy (1991), “CPMs Versus CPMIs: Implications For Media Planning,” Journal of Advertising Research, Vol. 31 (April), 34-44.
42. Macinnis, Deborah J. and Park, C. Whan (1991), “The Differential Role of Characteristics of Music on High- and Low-Involvement Consumers'' Processing of Ads,” Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 18 (September), 161-173.
43. Margenau, H. (1977), The Nature of Physical Reality, Woodbridge, CT: Ox Bow Press. (Original Work Published 1950)
44. Mazursky, David and Schul, Yaacov (1988), “The Effects of Advertisement Encoding on the Failure to Discount Information: Implications for the Sleeper Effect,” Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 15 (January), 24-36.
45. McCullough, James L. and Thomas Ostrom (1974), “Repetition of Highly Similar Messages and Attitude Change,” Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 59 (February), 395-397.
46. Melton, A. W. (1970), “The Situation With Respect of the Spacing of Repetitions and Memory,” Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, Vol. 9, 596-606.
47. Murdock, B. B. Jr. (1960), “The Distinctiveness of Stimuli,” Psychological Review, Vol. 57, 16-31.
48. Pechmann, Cornelia and David W. Stewart (1988), “Advertising Repetition: A Critical Review of Wearin and Wearout,” in Current Issues and Research in Advertising, eds. James H. Leigh and Claude R. Martin, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 285-330.
49. Petty, Richard E. and John T. Cacioppo (1986), Communication and Persuasion: Central and Peripheral Routes to Attitude Change, New York: Springer.
50. Poffenberger, A. T. (1925), Psychology in Advertising. New York: Shaw.
51. Raymond R. Burke and Thomas K. Srull (1988), “Competitive Inference and Consumer Memory for Advertising,” Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 15 (June), 55-68.
52. Rossiter, John R., Larry Percy (1997), Advertising Communication and Promotion Management. McGraw-Hill, New York.
53. Rundus, Dewey (1971), “Analysis of Rehearsal Processes in Free Recall,” Journal of Experimental Psychology, Vol. 89 (July), 63-77.
54. Sacharin, Ken (2001), Attention! How to Interrupt, Yell, Whisper, and Touch Consumers. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
55. Sawyer, Alan G. (1981), “Repetition and Cognition Response,” in Cognitive Responses in Persuasion, Richard E. Petty, Thomas C. Ostrom, and Timothy E. Brock, eds. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 237-262.
56. Schumann, W. David, Richard E. Petty and D. Scott Clemons (1990), “Predicting the Effectiveness of Advertising Variation: A Test of the Repetition-Variation Hypotheses,” Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 17 (September), 192-202.
57. Slamecka, Norman J. (1987), “The Law of Frequency,” in Memory and Learning: The Ebbinghaus Centennial Conference, David S. Gorfien and Robert R. Hoffman, eds. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
58. Solomon, R. Michael (1999), “Consumer Behavior: Buting, Having and Being,” Prentice-Hall International, Inc., New Jersey.
59. Sperber R. D. (1974), “Developmental Changes in Effects of Spacing of Trials in Retardate Discrimination Learning and Memory,” Journal of Experimental Psychology, Vol. 103, 204-210.
60. Thorson, E., Reeves, B. and Schleuder, J. (1985), “Message Complexity and Attention to Television,” Communication Research, Vol. 12, 427-454.
61. Thorson, Esther, Marian Friestad, and Xinshu Zhoa (1987), “Attention to Program Content in a Natural Viewing Environment: Effects on Memory and Attitudes Toward Commercials,” Paper Presented at Association for Consumer Research, Boston.
62. Tyler, Sherman W., Paula T. Hertel, Marvin C. McCallum, and Henry C. Ellis (1979), “Cognitive Effort and Memory,” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning, Memory, Vol. 5 (June), 607-617.
63. Webb, P. H. and Ray, M. L. (1979), “Effects of TV Clutter,” Journal of Advertising Research, Vol. 19 (March), 7-12.
64. Wickens, Delos D. (1972), “Characteristics of Word Encoding,” Coding Processes in Human Memory. Washington, DC: V. H. Winston & Sons.
65. Wells, Willam, John Burnett, and Sandra Moriarty (2000), Advertising Principles & Practice, 5th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ:Prentice Hall.