跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(44.220.247.152) 您好!臺灣時間:2024/09/10 21:21
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:洪銘澤
研究生(外文):Ming-Tse Hung
論文名稱:LT模型與KMV模型之EDF預測性
論文名稱(外文):The EDF Predictability of LT and KMV Model
指導教授:丘駿飛丘駿飛引用關係夏侯欣榮夏侯欣榮引用關係
指導教授(外文):Jiun-Fei ChiuShin-Rong Shiah Hou
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:元智大學
系所名稱:財務金融研究所
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:財務金融學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2004
畢業學年度:92
語文別:英文
論文頁數:40
中文關鍵詞:違約機率障礙選擇權結構模型
外文關鍵詞:Probability of DefaultBarrier OptionStructural Model
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:186
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:0
本研究想比較structural model裡的LT模型與Leland在2002年所修正的KMV模型的績效表現。希望藉由引入Barrier 選擇權的評價模型衡量違約機率,並比較LT模型與KMV模型何者的績效表現較佳。研究發現,在投資等級和C等級,LT模型的預測能力較KMV模型佳。而在投機等級方面,兩模型的預測績效都不佳。本研究亦利用比較靜態分析以檢視違約機率和參數之間的關係。最後,本研究建議引入動態default barrier,及放寬固定default barrier之假設,以符合實際發生之狀況。
In this paper we intend to compare the default prediction performance of two alternative structural models, Leland & Toft (1996) model and KMV model which is modified by Leland (2002). The purposes are to measure the probability of default (PD) of obligors by using barrier option pricing formula and then to distinguish which model will have better predictability. We can see that the LT model’s performance of prediction is better than KMV model in investment and C grade. In speculative grade, the both models have a poor performance. We also do comparative static to see the relationship between probability of default and parameters. Finally, we suggest to introduce dynamic default barrier to suit for real world.
Abstract…………………………………………………………………0
1. Introduction…………………………………………………………1
2. Data and Methodology………………………………………………4
2.1 Data description…………………………………………………4
2.2 The LT Model……………………………………………………5
2.3 The KMV Model…………………………………………………7
3. Empirical result………………………………………………………12
4. Conclusion……………………………………………………………17
References………………………………………………………………19
Black, Fischer and John C. Cox, 1976, “Valuing Corporate Securities: Some Effects of Bond Indenture Provisions,” Journal of Finance 31, 351-376.
Brys, E. and F. de Varenne, 1997, “Valuing Risky Fixed Rate Debt: An Extension,” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 32, 239-248.
Collin-Dufrense, P. and R. Goldstein, 2001, “Do Credit Spreads Reflect Stationary Leverage Ration?,” Journal of Finance, 56, 1929-1957.
C. H. Hui & C. F. Lo and H. C. Lee, “Valuation of corporate Bonds with Stochastic Default Barriers,” Banking Policy Department Hong Kong Monetary Authority & Physics Department, The Chinese University of Hong Kong.
Crosbie, P., and Bohn, J., “Modeling Default Risk,” KMV, 2002.
Didier Cossin and Hugues Pirotte, “Advanced Dredit Risk Analysis”, John Wiley & Sons, LTD.
Don R. Rich, 1994, “The Mathematical Foundations of Barrier Option-Pricing Theory,” Advances in Futures and Options Research 7, 267-311.
Geske, R., 1977, “The Valuation of Corporate Liabilities as Compound Options,” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 12, 541-552.
Huang, Jing-zhi and Ming Huang, 2002, “How Much of the Corporate-Treasury Yield Spread is Due to Credit Risk? Results from A New Calibration Approach,” Working Paper, GSB.
Leland, Haye E., 1994, “Corporate Debt Value, Bond Covenants and Optimal Capital Structure,” Journal of Finance 49, 1213-1252.
Leland, Haye E. and Klaus Toft, 1996, “Optimal Capital Structure, Endogenous Bankruptcy, and the Term Structure of Credit Spreads,” Journal of Finance 51, 987-1019.
Leland, Haye E., 1998, “Agency Cost, Risk Management and Capital Structure,” Journal of Finance 53, 1213-1243.
Leland, Haye E., 2002, “Predictions of Expected Default Frequencies in Structural Models of Debt,” Haas School of Business University of California, Berkeley.
LingZhi Yu, “Pricing Credit Risk as ParAsian Options with Stochastic Recovery Rate of Corporate Bonds,” Manchester Business School, August 2003.
Longstaff, Francis and Eduardo Schwartz, 1995, “Valuing Risky Debt: A New Approach,” Journal of Finance 50, 789-820.
Lyden, S., and D. Saraniti, 2000, “An Empirical Examination of the Classical Theory of Corporate Security Valuation,” Barclays Global Investors.
Michel Crouhy, Dan Galai and Robert Mark, 2000, “A comparative analysis of current credit risk models,” Journal of Banking and Finance 24, 59-117.
Merton, Robert C., 1974, “On the pricing of corporate debt: The risk structure of interest rates,” Journal of Finance 29, 449-470.
Paul Brockman and H. J. Turtle, 2001, “A Barrier Option Framework for Corporate Security Valuation,” Department of Accountancy, Hong Kong Polytechnic University & Department of finance, Insurance, and Real Estate, College of Business and Economics.
Uhrig-Homburg, Marliese, 2002, “Valuation of Defaultable Claims: A Survey,” Schmalenbach Business Review 54, 24-57.
Vasicek, O., 1977, “An Equilibrium Characterization of the Term Structure,” Journal of financial Economics, 5, 177-188.
Young Ho Eom, Jean Helwege and Jing-zhi Huang, April 14, 2003, “Structural Models of Corporate Bond Pricing: An Empirical Analysis,” working paper.
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top