臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

本研究欲探討物體概念與記憶扭曲之間的關係，延伸Subbotsky（1996）的實驗，讓成人觀看一系列符合或違反物體恆存概念的事件，觀察其記憶扭曲的現象。本研究以照片排序或選擇的方式測驗參與者對物體移動事件的記憶。參與者對於不合理事件的回憶，除了正確回憶之外，有幾種錯誤的可能：參與者可以改變事件起始步驟或結果步驟的內容（實驗二和實驗三），或刪減、增加事件步驟和改變事件步驟順序（實驗一），使得回憶出的事件成為另一個不合理事件或另一個合理事件。此設計可用以檢視參與者對無法解釋的不合理物體移動事件（物體不合理消失或不合理出現）可能產生的記憶錯誤和扭曲的型態。實驗一結果發現合理事件與不合理事件記憶扭曲程度沒有差別，不合理出現事件與不合理消失事件兩者之間的記憶扭曲沒有差異。實驗二將事件合理性換為組間變項，結果參與者回憶錯誤類型皆依據要旨記憶回憶，合理事件的回憶錯誤類型皆為合理錯誤，不合理事件的回憶錯誤類型大多為不合理錯誤，極小比例為合理錯誤。實驗三將事件合理性變為組內變項，結果發現參與者經過一段時間延遲後，其回憶的錯誤類型在不合理消失事件中，參與者的回憶錯誤類型會扭曲為合理錯誤。

緒論……………………………………………………………………………………1 研究目的…………………………………………………………………..12
實驗一………………………………………………………………………………..14 方法………………………………………………………………………..14 結果………………………………………………………………………..18 討論………………………………………………………………………..20
實驗二………………………………………………………………………………..23 方法………………………………………………………………………..23 結果………………………………………………………………………..26 討論………………………………………………………………………..28
實驗三………………………………………………………………………………..30 方法………………………………………………………………………..30 結果………………………………………………………………………..31 討論………………………………………………………………………..37
綜合討論……………………………………………………………………………..38
參考文獻……………………………………………………………………………..42

Baillargeon, R. (1987). Young infants’ reasoning about the physical and spatial properties of a hidden object. Cognitive Development, 2, 179-200.Baillargeon, R., Spelke, E. S., & Wasserman, S. (1985). Object permanence in five-month-old infants. Cognition, 20, 191-208.Bartlett, F. C. (1932). Remembering: A study in experimental and social psychology. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Bransford, J., Barclay, J. R., & Franks, J. J. (1972). Sentence memory: A constructive versus interpretive approach. Cognitive Psychology, 3, 193-209.Bower, G. H., Black, J. B., & Turner, T. J. (1979). Scripts in memory for text. Cognitive Psychology, 11, 177-220.Bower, T. G. R. (1967). The development of object-permanence: Some studies existence constancy. Perception & Psychophysics, 2, 411-418.Bobrow, C. G., & Norman, D. A. (1975). Some principles of memory schema. In D. B. Bobrow, & A. Collins (Eds.), Representation and understanding (pp. 72-79). New York: Academic Press.Carey, S., & Spelke, E. S. (1994). Domain-specific knowledge and conceptual change. In L. A. Hirschfeld, & S. A. Gelman (Eds.), Mapping the mind: Domain specificity in cognition and culture (pp. 169-200). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Deese, J. (1959). On the prediction of occurrence of particular verbal instructions in immediate recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58, 17-22.Diamond, A. (1991).Frontal lobe involvement in cognitive changes during the first year of life. In K. R. Gibson & A. C. Petersen (Eds.), Brain maturation and cognitive development: Comparative and cross-cultural perspectives (pp.127-160). New York: Aldine de Gruyter.Friedman, A. (1979) Framing pictures: The role of knowledge in automat zed encoding and memory for gist. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 108, 316-355.Goodman, G. S. (1980). Picture memory: How the action schema affects retention. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 473-495.Hannigan, S. L., & Reinitz, M. T. (2001). A demonstration and comparison of two types of inference-based memory errors. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 931-940.Kahneman, D., Treisman, A., & Gibbs, B. J. (1992). Reviewing object files. Cognitive Psychology, 24, 175-219.Lampinen, J. M., Copeland, S M. & Neuschatz, J. S. (2001). Recollections of things schematic: Room schemas revisited. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 1211-1222. Maki, R. H. (1987). Memory for script actions: Effects of relevance and expectancy. Memory & Cognition, 18, 5-14.Mandler, J. M., & Rabinowitz, M. (1983). Organization and information retrival. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning , Memory & Cognition ,19, 430 - 439.Piaget, J. (1954). The construction of reality in the child. New York: Basic books.Pezdek, K., Whetsone, T., Reynolds, K., Askari, N., & Dougherty, T. (1989). Memory for real-world scenes: The role of consistency with schema expectation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 587 -595.Roediger, H. L., III, & McDermott, K. B. (1995). Creating false memories: Remembering words not presented in lists. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 803 -814. Roediger, H. L., III, & McDermott, K. B. (2000). Distortions of memory. In E. Tulving, & F. I. M. Craik (Eds.), The handbook of memory (pp.149-162). New York: Oxford University Press.Reyna, V. F., & Brainerd, C. J. (1995). Fuzzy-trace theory: An interim synthesis. Learning and Individual Differences, 7, 1-75.Schank, R. C., & Abelson, R. (1977) Scripts, plans, goals, and understanding. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Srull, T. K., Lichtenstein, M., & Rothbart, M. (1985). Associative storage and retrieval processes in person memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 11, 316 - 345.Spelke, E. S. (1994). Initial knowledge: Six suggestions. Cognition, 50, 431-445.Spelke, E. S., Breinlinger, K., Macomber, J., & Jacobson, K. (1992). Origins of knowledge. Psychological Review, 99, 605-632.Subbotsky, E. V. (1996). Explaining impossible phenomena: Object permanence beliefs and memory failures in adults. Memory, 4, 199-223.Trick, L. M., & Pylyshyn, Z. W. (1994). Why are small and large numbers enumerated differently? A limited capacity preattentive stage in vision. Psychological Review, 101, 80-102.vanMarle, K., & Wynn, K. (2002, April). Young children’s sensitivity to magical events. Poster presented at ICIS, Toronto, Canada.Waldmann, M. R., Holyoak, K. J., & Fratianne, A. (1995). Causal models and the acquisition of category structure. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 181- 206.Wynn, K. (1992). Addition and subtraction by human infants. Nature, 358, 749-750.Wynn, K., & Chiang, W-C. (1998). Limits to infants’ knowledge of objects: The case of a magical appearance. Psychological Science, 9, 448-455.Xu, F., & Carey, S. (1996). Infants’ metaphysics: The case of numerical identity. Cognitive Psychology, 30, 111-153.