一、中文部分：
朱光潛（1983）。西方美學史下卷。台北：漢京。
朱光潛（1988）。西方美學家論美與美感。台北：天工。
朱光潛（1991）。文藝心理學。台南：大廈。
朱光潛（1994）。談美。台北：書泉。
牟宗三（譯）（1992）。I. Kant著。判斷力之批判：上冊（Critique of the power of judgment）。台北：台灣學生。（原著出版年：1790年）
朱啟華（1993）。康德德育方法之理論基礎研究。國立台灣師範大學教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，台北市。李明輝（譯）（1988）。H. M. Baumgartner著。康德純粹理性批判導讀(Kant’s “Kritik der reinen Vernunft”)。台北：聯經。（原著出版年：1988年）
李澤厚（1988）。美學四講。台北：人間。
李澤厚（1990）。批判哲學的批判。台北：台灣學生書局。
李醒塵（1996）。西方美學史教程。台北：淑馨。
宗白華（譯）（1986）。I. Kant著。判斷力批判：上卷（Critique of the power of judgment）。台北：滄浪。（原著出版年：1790年）
宗白華（1987）。美從何處尋。台北：駱駝。
林玉体（1997）。西洋教育思想史。台北：三民。
林逢祺（2001）。美感經驗與教育。載於伍振鷟、林逢祺、黃坤錦、蘇永明（合著），教育哲學（頁325-343）。台北：五南。
姚一葦（1985）。美的範疇論。台北：開明。
姚一葦（1993）。審美三論。台北：台灣開明。
孫振青(1987)。康德的批判哲學。台北：黎明文化。
崔光宙（1992a）。美感判斷發展研究。台北：師大書苑。
崔光宙（1992b）。由美學到美育—美學實用性的思考。載於國立台灣師範大學人文教育研究中心舉辦之「美學研習會」專輯（頁187-249），台北市。
崔光宙（2000）。美學中人的概念及其教育內涵。載於崔光宙、林逢祺（主編），教育美學（頁179-224）。台北：五南。
曹俊峰（2003）。康德美學導論。台北：水牛。
梁福鎮（2001）。審美教育學－審美教育起源、演變與內涵的探究。台北：五南。
黃允中（1995）。康德美學研究-論康德的孤立法及其審美判斷先天原理的發現。國立政治大學哲學系碩士論文，未出版，台北市。黃振華（1992）。康德的美學。鵝湖，18（2），25-32。楊深坑（1980）。美育在文化建設中的弁遄C教育研究所集刊，22，1-15。
楊深坑（1988）。柏拉圖美育思想研究。台北：水牛。
雷國鼎（2003）。教育的本質。載於王文科、吳清山、徐宗林、郭秋勳、陳奎憙、陳聰文、黃正傑、黃德祥、詹棟樑、雷國鼎（合著），教育概論（頁33-66）。台北：五南。
劉昌元（1994）。西方美學導論。台北：聯經。
蔣孔陽（1987）。德國古典美學。台北縣：谷風。
謝仲明（1991）。「無待」的美學地位。東海哲學研究集刊，1，165-176。馮至、范大燦（譯）。F. Schiller著。審美教育書簡（On the aesthetic education of man, in a series of letters）。台北：淑馨。（原著出版年：1794年）
二、西文部分：
Allison, H. E. (2001). Kant’s theory of taste. NY: Cambridge University Press.
Banham, G. (2000). Kant and the ends of aesthetics. London: Macmillan Press.
Beardsley, M. C.(1966). Aesthetics from classic Greece to the present： A short history. NY: Macmillan.
Beck, L. W. (Ed.) (1988). Kant: Selections. NY: Macmillan.
Budd M. (1998a) Delight inthe natural world: Kant on the aesthetic appreciation Of nature. Part I: Natural beauty. British Journal of Aaesthetics,38(1), pp.1-18.
Budd, M.(1998b).Delight in the natural world: Kant on the aesthetic appreciation of nature. Part III: The sublime in nature. British Jjournal of Aesthetics ,38(3), 223-250.
Bullough, E.(1969). ‘Psychical distance’ as a factor in art and as an aesthetic principle. In F. A. Tillman & S. M. Cahn (Eds.), Philosophy of Art and Aesthetics (pp.397-414). NY: Harper & Row. (Original work published 1912)
Burke, E.(1990).A philosophical enquiry into the origin of our ideas of the sublime and beautiful(A. Phillips, Ed.). NY: Oxford University Press. (Original work published 1757).
Caygill, H.(1995). A Kant dictionary. MA: Blackwell.
Coleman, F. X. J.(1974). The harmony of reason: A study in Kant’s aesthetics. London: University of Pittsburgh Press.
Crawford, D. W. (1974).Kant’s aesthetic theory. Madison, WI: The University of Wisconsin Press.
Crawford, D. W. (1985). The place of the sublime in Kant’s aesthetic theory. In R. Kennington (ed.), The philosophy of Immanuel Kant (pp.161-183). WA: The Catholic University of America Press.
Crowther, P. (1989). The Kantian sublime. NY: Oxford University Press.
Eaton, M. M. (1988). Basic issues in aesthetics. CA: Wadsworth.
Fenner, D. E. W. (1996). The aesthetic attitude. NJ: Humanities Press.
Guyer, P. (1996). Kant and the experience of freedom. NY: Cambridge University Press.
Guyer, P. (1997). Kant and the claims of taste. NY: Cambridge university press.
Hammermeister, K.(2002). The German aesthetic tradition. NY: Cambridge University Press.
Hume, D(1993) . The sceptic. In S. Copley＆A. Edgar(Eds.) , David Hume—Selected essays(pp.95-113). NY: Oxford University Press. (Original work published 1742)
Hume, D. (1969). A treatise of human nature(E. C. Mossner , Ed.). London: Penguin Books. (Original work published 1739)
Hume, D. (1993) . Of the standard of taste. In S. Copley＆A. Edgar(Eds.) , David Hume—Selected essays(pp.133-154). NY: Oxford University Press. (Original work published 1742)
Janaway, C. (1997). Kant’s aesthetics and the ‘empty cognitive stock’. The Philosophical Quarterly,47(189),459-475.
Kant, I. (1960). Observations on the feeling of the beautiful and sublime (J. T. Goldthwait, Trans.). Los Angeles: University of California Press.(Original work published 1764)
Kant, I. (1965).Critique of pure reason (N. K. Smith, Trans.). NY: St. Martin’s Press. (Original work published 1781)
Kant, I. (1992).Kant on education. (A. Churton, Trans.). London: Thoemmes Press. (Original work published 1803)
Kant, I. (1967). Philosophical correspondence, 1759-99(A. Zweig, Ed. & Trans.). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Kant, I. (1963). What is enlightenment. In L. W. Beck(Ed.), & L. W. Beck, R. E. Anchor, E. L. Fackenheim (Trans.), Kant on history(pp.3-10). NY: The Bobbs-Merrill. (Original work published 1784)
Kant, I. (1974). Anthropology from a pragmatic point of view (M. J. Gregor, Trans.). The Hague, Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff. (Original work published 1798)
Kant, I. (1974). Logic (R. S. Hartman ＆ W. Schwarz, Trans.). NY: Dover Publications. (Original work published 1800)
Kant, I. (2000).Critique of the power of judgment (P. Guyer, Ed., P. Guyer, ＆ E. Matthews, Trans.). NY: Cambridge University Press.(Original work published 1790)
Kemal, S. (1992). Kant’s aesthetic theory: An introduction. London: Macmillan.
Knox, I. (1936).The aesthetic theories of Kant, Hegel, and Schopenhauer. NJ: Humanities Press.
Leibniz, G. W.(1951). Leibniz : Selections (P. P. Wiener, Ed. & Trans.). NY: Scribner's.
Leibniz, G. W. (1989).Philosophical papers and letters (L. E. Loemker, Ed. & Trans.).MA: Kluwer Academic.
Makkreel, R. A.(1996). The Confluence of Aesthetics and Hermeneutics in Baumgarten, Meier, and Kant. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism,54 (1),65-75.
Makkreel, R. A. (2001). The beautiful and the sublime as guideposts to the human virtues in the early Kant. In T. Rockmore (Ed.), New essays on the precritical Kant(pp.50-65). NY: Humanity Books.
Matthews, P. M. (1996).Kant’s sublime: A form of pure aesthetic reflective judgment. The Journal of Aesthetic and Art Criticism,54(2),165-180.
Meerbote, R. (1982). Reflection on beauty. In T. Cohen & P. Guyer (Eds.), Essays in Kant’s aesthetics (pp.55-86). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Meerbote, R.(1991).Introduction. In R. Meerbote (Ed.), Kant’s aesthetics(pp.1-25). Atascadero, CA: Ridgeview.
Pateman, T.(1991).Key concepts: A guide to aesthetics, criticism and the arts in education. London: The Falmer Press.
Peters, G. (2004). Means without end: Production, reception, and teaching in Kant’s aesthetics. Journal of Aesthetic Education,38(1),35-52.
Rogerson, K. F. (1982).The meaning of universal validity in Kant’s aesthetics. Journal of Aesthetics & Art Criticism, 40(3),301-308.
Shaper, E. (1992). Taste, sublimity, and genius: The aesthetics of nature and art. In P. Guyer (Ed.), The cambridge companion to Kant(pp.367-393). NY: Cambridge University Press.
Jacobs, B. & Kain, P. (Eds.) (2003). Essays on Kant’s anthopology. NY: Cambridge University Press.