臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

摘 要
台灣光復初期，國民所得水準偏低，政府為了推行民生主義之社會福利政策，頒佈「台灣省興建平價住宅實施計畫」以解決低收入戶居住的問題。但歷經三十多年的社會與經濟環境變遷，當時設計每戶約十坪之平價住宅因缺乏公部門維修與管理，已破舊不堪。
由國外平價住宅社區更新管理之成功經驗案例，運用社區土地信託於平價住宅社區更新管理之影響因素，可分為：社區型態、區位條件、社區土地產權、社區土地價值、溝通協調合作、信託組織技術援助、財政籌措能力、相關信託法令配套、賦予地方自治權力、相關信託法令宣導等。
考量國內現有之法律制度、社區產業及文化背景特色等不同因素，本研究以台南市安南區大同平價住宅社區為研究案例，並分別以該社區居民、地方政府主管信託業務人員、信託相關專業人員為問卷調查對象，透過敘述統計法分析調查結果，探討平價住宅社區更新管理執行時之影響因素。
最後彙整受訪者意見，依不同性質區分為社區情況、公私部門發展、政策法令、經濟情況等四大條件，並加以細分為互動性、背景條件、角色參與、發展目的、執行面、制度面、財務面、地政面等八類，綜合整理相關影響因素共計三十二項，作為提供土地信託制度運用於平價住宅社區更新管理之重要評估參考。

Abstract
At the beginning of Taiwan’s retrocession, the national income was lower. In order to pursue a social welfare policy, the Government issued the “Taiwan Affordable Housing Plan,” to solve the living problems of low income families. But after 30 years of social, economic and environmental changes, the 33 square meters space of affordable housing for each household has deteriorated. This is due to the lack of maintenance and control from government.
Case studies in foreign countries show success in upgrading and renovating affordable housing communities. From these successful experiences we find different elements that influence community's land trust application: community type, position and condition, land property and land value. Communication and collaboration, technical assistance from trust organizations and fund-raising are also relevant factors along with Trust laws form a complete set, establish community authority and declare relevant leadership factors.
We must consider the legal system which we have now, the industries of the community and cultural background characteristics. This study researches the Da-Tong affordable housing community located in Annan district of Tainan City. Questionnaires were completed by residents of the community, local government personnel in the trust business and relevant professional trust personnel. The data of the investigation were analyzed through descriptive statistics methods. Influencing factors are discussed concerning the renovation and management of affordable housing communities.
In conclusion, the opinions of the questionnaires results are organized according to four conditions: community circumstances, department public and private development, policy laws and economic conditions. These four major conditions subdivided into eight categories: interaction, background conditions, participant roles, purpose of development, management, the system, financial affairs and land administration policy. In total, there are 32 relevant influence factors. This offers land trust systems for affordable housing communities an important new synthesis and analysis of management factors.

摘 要
ABSTRACT IV
謝 誌 V
第一章 緒論 10
第一節 研究動機與目的 10
第二節 研究範圍與限制 13
第三節 研究課題定義 14
第二章 文獻回顧 19
第一節 國內目前公有土地開發方式 19
第二節 土地信託制度探討 23
第三節 國外土地信託運用於平價住宅社區之相關研究 29
第三章 研究設計 41
第一節 調查對象 41
第二節 問卷設計 45
第三節 資料建立 47
第四節 分析方法 48
第四章 實證分析 54
第一節 地理環境分析 54
第二節 實証案例背景分析 56
第三節 問卷調查分析 64
第四節 交叉分析及可行性分析 90
第五章 結論與建議 106
第一節 結論 106
第二節 建議 107
參考文獻 108

附錄一 113
附錄二 117

英文部份
1.Bassett, E.M., and Jacobs, H. M., 1997, “Community-based tenure reform in urban Africa: the community land trust experiment in Voi, Kenya,” Land Use Policy, Vol. 14, No.3, pp. 215-229.
2.Campbell, M.C., and Salus, D.A., 2003, “Community and conservation land trusts as unlikely partners? The case of Troy Gardens, Madison, Wisconsin,” Land Use Policy, Vol. 20, No. 2, pp. 169-180.
3.Daniels, T., and Bowers, D., 1997, Holding Our Ground. Island Press, Washington, DC.
4.Davis, J.E., 2000, Homemaking： the pragmatic politics of third sector housing. In： Geisler, C., Daneker, G. (Eds.), Property and Values：Alternatives to Public and Private Ownership. Island Press,Washington, DC, pp. 233–260.
5.Henderson, E., van En, R., 1999, Sharing the Harvest： a Guide to Community-supported Agriculture. Chelsea Green, White River Junction, VT.
6.Jacobs, H.M., 1999, Market-based regulatory approaches in a system of decentralized governance (Regolanzioni basate su meccanismi di mercato in un sistema di governo decentro). In： Curti, F.(Ed.), Urbanistica e Fiscalita Locale： Orientamenti di Riforma e Buone Pratiche in Italia e all’estero. Maggioli Editore, Milan, pp. 135–150.
7.Jacobs, H.M., 2000, “The ambiguous role of private voluntary methods in public land use policy： a comment,” Journal of Planning Education and Research 19, 424–426.
8.Kaufman, J., and Bailkey, M., 2000, Farming Inside Cities： Entrepreneurial Agriculture in the United States. Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, Cambridge, MA.
9.Land Trust Alliance. http：//www.lta.org.
10.Levin, S., 2000, (former) Executive Director, Madison Area Community Land Trust, personal interview, 17 November 2000, Madison,WI.
11.Libby, J.M., and Bradley, D., 2000, Vermont housing and conservation board： a conspiracy of good will among land trusts and housing trusts. In： Geisler, C., Daneker, G. (Eds.), Property and Values：Alternatives to Public and Private Ownership. Island Press,Washington, DC, pp. 261–282.
12.Madison Area Community Land Trust. http：//www.emill.com/maclt/.
13.Mann, H., 2000, Executive Director, Urban Open Space Foundation, personal interview, 15 November 2000, Madison, WI.
14.Matthei, C., Hahn, R., 1991. (Equity Trust,Ltd.), Community Land Trusts and the Delivery of Affordable Shelter to the Urban Poor in Kenya. Prepared for The Ford Foundation, Nairobi.
15.Nelson, A.C., 2000, “Comment on voluntary methods of land use control in planning,” Journal of Planning Education and Research 19, 426.
16.Ogero, B., Omwando, Z.P., and Bassett, E., 1992, Background Paper on the Kenyan Experience in Urban Upgrading, Ministry of Local Government, Urban Development Department,GTZ Small Towns Development Project, Nairobi.
17.Small Towns Development Project (Undated). Tanzania Bondeni community land trust project, Voi Municipality, Taita Taveta District, Kenya. STDP, Nairobi.
18.Smoke, P. J., 1994, Local Government Finance in Developing Countries: The Case of Kenya. Oxford University Press, Nairobi.
19.Taylor, W.E., 2004. , “ Property rights—and responsibilities? The case of Kenya. ,” Habitat International ,Vol. 28, No.2, pp. 275~287.
20.Troy Drive Gardens Letter of Cooperation, 1997. April 28, 1997.
21.Urban Open Space Foundation. http://www.uosf.org.
22.Vermont Housing and Conservation Board. http://www.vhcb.org/ coalitions.html.
23.Wright, J.B., and Czerniak, R.J., 2000, “The rising importance of voluntary methods of land use control in planning,” Journal of Planning Education and Research 19, 419~423.