(3.230.154.160) 您好!臺灣時間:2021/05/08 00:42
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果

詳目顯示:::

: 
twitterline
研究生:楊富強
研究生(外文):Fu-Chiang Yang
論文名稱:創意都市模糊綜合評估體系之研究
論文名稱(外文):Evaluation Indicators of the Creative City
指導教授:何友鋒何友鋒引用關係
指導教授(外文):Yu-Feng Ho
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:朝陽科技大學
系所名稱:建築及都市設計研究所
學門:建築及都市規劃學門
學類:建築學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2005
畢業學年度:93
語文別:中文
論文頁數:122
中文關鍵詞:評估指標體系創意都市模糊理論
外文關鍵詞:evaluation indicators systemcreative cityfussy theory
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:17
  • 點閱點閱:384
  • 評分評分:系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔
  • 下載下載:90
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:0
都市設計的首要任務是為人們各種活動設計出具有創意的實質環境,內容包括各種建築、公共設施及設備、都市景觀等硬體建設,以及各種軟體活動等。其內容必須確切現今社會、經濟、都市功能、美學等等各方面的需求。在經濟全球化的大趨勢下,就都市而言,創意是非常重要的指標,然而台灣現今的都市普遍缺乏具有創意性的設計,此外國內有關創意都市的研究付之闕如,其創意相關的研究多在文化與藝術方面。然在經濟全球化的大趨勢下,創意不應單單只針對文化及藝術範圍,就都市而言,創意亦是非常重要的因素之一。建構創意都市評估指標體系,供都市發展決策者參考,是值得研究的課題。有鑑於此,本研究計畫擬依據都市設計的理論與方法,採用模糊理論、模糊層級分析法、模糊德爾菲等相關技術,建立創意都市評估指標體系,並以台灣地區都市為例評估都市的創意程度與發展潛力,供都市設計者參考,以期台灣都市更具國際競爭力。
經過創意都市評估指標的評比之後我們發現台北市在所有評估因子的得分上皆為偏高,但其中以文化層級方面表現最為亮眼,而高雄市則是以經濟產業項目最為突出,而台中市則是平均發展的型態,由以上評估結果得知台北市為文化型的都市,高雄市為工業型的都市,至於台中市則屬於服務型的都市。
The task of urban design is to make the environment creative, and the contents include all kinds of architectures, public facilities, and urban landscapes. It must be fitted in the needs for society, economy, urban function and also art at present. However, it is common to see that cities in Taiwan lack of creative design, and there is less related research on creative city in our country. What we can find is only the research on culture and art design. In fact, we should not only aim at the two domains of design because the originality of city is also a significant factor in the trend of economic globalization. Therefore, the evaluation indicators system for the creative city is a worthy issue for us to investigate and then we can provide reference materials for policymakers of urban development. The researches on the creative city are based on the theory of urban design, including fussy assessment method. Then, take examples of cities in Taiwan to assess the creative degree and developmental possibilities. After assessing in different angels, the result in this research shows that Taipei city gains higher score in all factors than other cities in Taiwan, especially in the domain of cultural factor. Kaohsiung city stands out for economic industry while Taichung city has average development. In conclusion, Taipei city stands for cultural city, Kaohsiung city stands for industrial city and Taichung city stands for service city.
謝誌.............................................................Ⅰ
中文摘要.........................................................Ⅱ
Abstract...............................................................Ⅲ
目錄.............................................................Ⅳ
圖目錄...........................................................Ⅵ
表目錄...........................................................Ⅶ
第一章 緒論
第一節 研究動機與目的............................................1
第二節 研究範圍與內容............................................3
第三節 研究方法與流程............................................4
第二章 理論與方法
第一節 創意都市之概念............................................8
第二節 創意都市理論.............................................11
第三節 模糊數學概論.............................................24
第四節 模糊綜合評估.............................................26
第五節 小結.....................................................34
第三章 創意都市模糊綜合評估指標體系之建立
第一節 評價的原則與程序.........................................37
第二節 評估層級體系的建立.......................................38
第三節 因子檢定的方法...........................................43
第四節 因子權重建立的方法.......................................47
第五節 方案的模糊綜合評估.......................................51
第六節 小結.....................................................53
第四章 實證研究
第一節 實證研究調查基地.........................................56
第二節 基地分析.................................................57
第三節 問卷調查結果分析.........................................66
第四節 評估因子之權重值分析.....................................75
第五節 方案問卷評估結果.........................................77
第六節 都市之模糊綜合評估.......................................78
第五章 結論與建議............................................85
參考文獻.........................................................87
附錄一...........................................................93
附錄二..........................................................104
附錄三..........................................................115
附錄四..........................................................121
一、中文參考文獻
1.丁致成, 1997,城市多贏策略-都市計畫與公共利益,創興出版社,台北。
2.朱啟勳, 1982,都市更新-理論與範例,台隆書局,台北。
3.吳綱立,李麗雪譯, Leitmann, J,2001,永續都市-都市設計
4.向殿政男, 1993, FUZZY手法進階,全華科技,台北, P.30
5.李沛良, 1992,社會研究的統計分析,巨流,台北, PP.163∼165
6.施鴻志, 1997,都市規劃,建都文化出版社, P.3-14
7.施鴻志,段良雄,凌瑞賢, 1984,都市交通計劃 理論、實務,國立編譯館出版,茂昌發行, P.45
8.施鴻志, 2000,地區經營管理,建都文化出版社, P.3-77
9.許聖傑, 1995,模糊計畫評核術,碩士論文,私立東海大學工業工程研究所,台中,台中, PP.27∼31
10.粘淑惠, 1995,模糊AHP法應用在交通運輸計畫評估之研究,碩士 論文,高雄工學院,高雄,PP.27∼28
11.陳景堂, 1999, SPSS for Windows入門與應用,儒林出版社,台北, P.17-2, PP.17-4∼17-7, PP.23-2∼23-17
12.莊翰華, 1995,都市行銷理論與實務,建都文化出版社。PP.2-3∼ 2-10
13.黃瑞茂, 1994,新的都市設計理論,六合出版社,台北。
14.馮正民、江俊良, 1988,計畫評估方法之評述,規劃學報(15) , P.80
15.詹立光, 1996,大坑坡地住宅開發景觀生態環境影響因子及開發 評價之研究,碩士論文,東海大學, P.57
16.柯比意,葉朝憲譯, 2002,都市學,田園城市文化,台北。
17.劉道遠, 1994,語意化交感式覺模式之研究,碩士論文,私立東海大學工業工程研究所,台中, P.233。
18.謝慶達譯, Shirvai, S,1990,都市設計程序,創興出版社,台北。
環境管理,六合,台北。
19.謝慶達譯, Truncik, R, 1996,尋找失落的空間-都市設計理論,田園城市文化,台北。
二、英文參考文獻
1.Ache, P., 2000, Vision and Creativity-Challenge for City, Futures, 32.
2.Bianchini, F., & Landry, C., 1994, A Methodology for Assessing Urban Vitality and Viability, COMEDIA, London.
3.Brisbane City Council, 2003, Living in Brisbome 2010-Creative City Strategy, Australia.
4.Bohigas, O., 1998, Ten points for an urban methodology, Architectural Review.
5.Broadent, G., 1996, Emerging Concepts in Urban Space Design, E & FN Spon, London.
6.Bentley, I., Responsive environment, a manual for designers, the Architectural press, London.
7.Buckley, J.J. , 1985,”Fuzzy hierarchical analysis, Fuzzy Sets and Systems” , Vol.17. , PP.223∼247
8.Castells, M., 1989, The informational city, Information technology, economic restructuring, and the urban-regional process, Oxford:Basil Blackwell.
9.Csikszentmihalyi, M., 1990, The domain of creativity. In:Runco, M., Albert, R. (Eds.), Theories of Creativity. Sage, London.
10.Collaborative Economics, 1998, Linking the New Economy to the Livable Community, The James Irvine Foundation.
11.Collaborative Economics, 1999, Innovative Regions: The Importance of Place and Networks in the Innovative Economy, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania: Heinz Endowments.
12.Drake, G., 2003, “This place gives me space”:place and creativity in the creative industries, Geoforum, 34.
13.Delgado, m., kacprzyk, j., Verdegay, J.L., and Vila, M.A., (editors), 1994, “Fuzzy Optimization: Recent Advances”, physica-Verlag heidelberg, Germany.
14.DCMS, 2000, Creative Industries, Report of the Regional Issues Working Group. DCMS, London.
15.DCMS Creative Industries Task Force, 1998, Creative Industries: Mapping Document, DCMS, London.
16.Grabher, G., 2001, Ecologies of creativity: the village, the group, and the heptarchic organization of the British advertising industry, Environment and Planning A 33, pp.351-374.
17.G.B. Government Office for London, 1996, Four world cities: a comparative study of London, Paris, New York and Tokyo, London: Llewelyn Davies Planning.
18.Greed, C., & Roberts, M., 1998, Introducing Urban Design, Longman, Harlow.
19.Hall, P., 1999, The future of cities, computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 23.
20.Hambleton, R., 1996, Urban Innovation:Creative Strategies for Turbulent Times, Cities, Vol.13, issue 3.
21.HUD, 2000, Strategies for Success:Reinventing Cities for the 21st Century, U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.
22.Hall, P., 1998, Cities in Civilization, Weidenfeld and Nicholson, London.
23.Hall, P., 1995, Towards a general urban theory, In J. Brotchie, M. Batty, E. Blakely, P. Hall, & P. Newton, Cities in competition: productive and sustainable cities for the 21st century, Melbourne: Longman Australia.
24.Hall, P, 1998, Cities in civilization: culture, technology and urban order, London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.
25.Hall, A., 1996, Design Control-Towards a New Approach, Butterworth, Oxford.
26.Hillier, B., 1996, Space in the Machine, Cambridge.
27.Jacobs, A., 1999, Great Streets, MIT.
28.Kanter, R. M., 2001, eVolve:Succeeding in the Digital Culture of Tomorrow.
29.Kacprzyk, J. and Orlovski, S.A., 1987, “Optimization Models Using Fuzzy Sets and Possibility Theory”, Kluwer Academic Publishers, London, UK.
30.Kanter, R.M. , 2001, Evolve: Succeeding in the Digital Culture of Tomorrow, Boston, Massachusetts: Harvard Business School Press.
31.Kotkin, J. and Ross, D., 2000, The Renewed City in the Digital Age, Santa Monica, California: Milken Institute.
32.Kotler, P.&Haider D.H.&Rein I.,1993,Marketing Places:Attracting Investment,Industry,and Tourism to Cities,States,and Nation,New York :The Free,A Division of Macmillan Inc.
33.Kaufmann, A., & Gupta, M., 1991, Introduction to Fuzzy arithmetric-theory and application, Van Nostrand Reinhold, N.Y.
34.Katz, P., 1994, The New Urbanism-Toward and Architecture of Community, McGraw-Hill.
35.Kostof, S., 1991, The City Shaped; Urban Patterns and Meanings Through History, Thames and Hudson, London.
36.Landry, C., 2002, The Creative City, COMEDIA, London.,PP.166∼176
37.Landry, C., 1996, The Creative City in Britain and Germany, London.
38.Lai, Y.J. and Hwang, C.L., 1994, “Fuzzy Multiple Objective Decision Making,” Springer-Verlag, New York, USA.
39.Lai, Y.J. and Hwang, C.L., 1992, “Fuzzy Mathematical Programming,” Springer-Verlag, New York, USA.
40.Mitchell, W.J., 1995, City of bits: space, place, and the infobahn, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
41.Negus, K., Pickering, M., 2000, Creativity and cultural production, International Journal of Cultural Policy 6(2), 259-282.
42.Pratt, A.C., 1997, The cultural industries production system: a case study of employment change in Britain, 1984-91, Environment and Planning A, 29, 1953-1974.
43.Porter N.R. , 1990, The Competitive Advantage of Nations, The free press: a division of Macmillan, Inc.
44.Rogers, R., 1999, Towards an Urban Renaissance, E & FN Spon, London.
45.Szidarovszky, F., Gershon, M.E., and Duckstein, L, 1986, “Techniques for Multiobjective Decision Making in Systems Management”, Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
46.Sassen S. 1995.08, The impact of the new technologies and globalization of cities. In: Pre-Habitat Tokyo Conference on the World Cities and the Urban Future, PP.23∼25.
47.Shirvani, H., 1985, The Urban Design Process, Van Nostrand Reinhood, N.Y.
48. Saskia, S. , 1994, Cities in a world economy. Thousand Oaks CA: Pine Forge/Sage.
49. Tafuri, M. , 1976, Theories and History of Architecture, Cambridge university press, PP.132∼133.
50.Urban Land Institute, 1998, “Smart Growth for Center Cities”, by David C. Peterson, in Smart Growth: Economy, Community, Environment, Washington, D.C.
51.Voogd,H.& Ashworth,G.J.,1990,Selling the City: Marketing Approachesnin Public Sector Urban Planning,Belhave Press.
52.Worpale, K., & Greenhalgh, L., 1996, The Freedom of the City, DEMOS, London.
53.Zeleny, M., 1982, “Mmulticriteria Decision Marking”, McGraw-Hill, USA.
54.Zimmermann, H. J., 1991, Fuzzy Set Theory and 1ts Applications, 2ndEd, Kluwer Academic Publisers.
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
系統版面圖檔 系統版面圖檔