臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

台商赴大陸投資後，大陸子公司規模逐漸增大，甚至超越母公司，形成特殊的子大母小情況下，本文以資源基礎觀點與多國籍企業國際化理論為基礎，探討當子公司規模或是技術優於母公司時，是否會有技術回流至母公司，進而影響母公司技術能力，提升母公司技術能力。
研究主題在於，一、台商在大陸投資初期，台商大陸子公司由台灣母公司與地主國獲取何種資源？二、當台商大陸子公司具備優於台灣母公司的技術或擁有母公司缺乏的資源，子公司能否對母公司有所貢獻。三、對於子公司所提供的資源，母公司是否能加以整合利用，提升自身技術能力。
本研究採取個案研究法，赴大陸訪談已在大陸進行投資的八間台灣廠商，發現台商母子公司間，子公司獲得來自母公司重要核心資源轉移與結合地主國資產後，經由從做中學(Learning by Doing)，以提升子公司技術能力，並以最佳實務轉移(Best practices transfer)的方式，將子公司技術能力回饋母公司。
根據研究結果，將台商子公司與母公司之間現階段技術資源回饋歸納為四種，包括接收者、持有者、挖掘者與整合者，各類型代表台商母子公司間的實務移轉情形，並發展出”複製-發展”過程，期望能有助於台商母公司瞭解在大陸投資子公司角色與能力的轉變。

This text is crescent in scale in the mainland subsidiary with the Taiwan business, even surmount the parent company, form it under the special situation of subsidiary's scale is excellent than parent , is based on the resource basic view and MNC theories , probing into when subsidiary's scale or technology are superior to the parent company, there is technological feedback current to the parent company, and then influence the technological ability of parent company , improve the technological ability of parent company.
This research theme lies in , first, Taiwan business are on the initial stage of investing in the mainland, which kind of resource is subsidiary of Taiwan business in mainland obtained by parent company of Taiwan and host country? Second, as the subsidiary of Taiwan business in mainland possess the technology superior to the parent company of Taiwan or resources which the possession parent company lacks, whether the subsidiary could make some contribution to parent company . Third, to resources offered of subsidiary, the parent company can combine and utilize , improve one's own ability .
Take the case study method in this research, go to eight manufacturers of Taiwan already invested in at the continent in mainland interview , find that has already had subsidiaries to feedback resources to the parent company among Taiwan parent company , subsidiary can even help to improve the ability of parent company to develop , can do some good to development of the parent company , accord with the trend that inference MNC subsidiary role and ability of enterprise's subsidiary of this research institute change .
According to the interview result, it is four kinds to feedback and sum up technological resources of the present stage between Taiwan business's subsidiary and parent company, including resource recipient , resource holder , the person who develops resource and integration of the resources person, all kinds of represent resource , Taiwan business of parent company and subsidiary company use situation , is it help Taiwan parent company understand make an investment in mainland subsidiary role and transition of ability to expect to be able.

第一章 緒論 .........................................................................................1
第一節 研究動機...............................................................1
一、 實務面..........................................................................2
二、 理論面..........................................................................3
第二節 研究問題與研究目的...........................................5
第三節 研究流程...............................................................7
第二章 文獻探討.................................................................................10
第一節 背景理論……………...……………………….10
一、 多國企業的演化………………………...………….10
二、 子公司角色研究發展………………………....……14
三、 資源基礎觀點............................................................19
第二節 主要概念.............................................................23
一、 子公司能力移轉………………………...………….23
二、 從做中學………………………...………………….26
三、 實務移轉………………………...………………….29
第三章 研究設計.................................................................................31
第一節 研究概念架構與推論.........................................31
一、研究概念架構……………...…………….……….….31
二、架構推論………………………….………….………34
第二節 研究方法…..……………………...……………37
一、 質性研究………………………...............……….…38
二、 個案研究方法……………………..…….........…….38
三、 資料分析方法 ……………………..……...........… 42
四、 研究範圍與研究限制 ……………………..…..…44
第三節 個案預試…………………………………….…46
第四節 修正研究架構……………...……………......…67
第四章 個案描述………………………...………………………..…70
第一節 巨大機械工業股份有限公司………………….70
第二節 美利達工業股份有限公司 ……..…..……...…77
第三節 C橡膠工業股份有限公司…………………..…82
第四節 帝寶工業股份有限公司……………………….88
第五節 力山工業股份有限公司……………………….94
第六節 濱中松勤工業有限公司……………………...100
第五章 個案分析與討論……………………..……...……………..104
第一節 跨個案分析與實務研究發現……………...…104
一、台商子公司技術能力形成…………………...…...104
二、台商子公司技術能力提升…………………...…...109
三、台商子公司技術能力回饋母公司…………...…...115
四、台商子公司技術能力對母公司技術能力的影響.118
第六章 結論………………………...………………………………121
第一節 研究結果討論………………………...……....121
第二節 理論與實務之涵義………………………...…127
一、理論貢獻………………………...………...………127
二、實務貢獻………………………...………...………128
第三節 結論與建議……………...…………..…..……128
參考文獻………………………...……………………….........……130
一、中文…………………………….…...………………...……...…130
二、英文………………………...………….………………..........…133
附錄A：訪談大綱………………………...………………………….145

ㄧ、中文部分
1.方至民，2002，企業競爭優勢，台北：前程企業管理
2.毛倩文，1990，我國廠商國際技術移轉成敗關鍵因素之研究，國立政治大學國際貿易研究所未出版碩士論文
3.朱柔若 譯，W.Lawrence Neuman 著，2000，社會研究方法 –質化與量化取向，台北 : 揚智文化
4.司徒達賢、林晉寬、詹聖生，1994，資源基礎理論與企業競爭優勢關係之探討，行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告
5.林永達，跨疆域的技術移轉與技術整合之研究--以台商鑫昌機械赴大陸投資為例，國立政治大學企業管理研究所碩士論文
6.余明助，1999，多國籍企業組織、策略與控制關係之研究 - 以台商海外子公司為例，國立成功大學企業管理學系未出版博士論文
7.李獻宗，1997，台灣績優中小企業海外投資決策與績效關係之研究--以製造業大陸及東協五國投資為例，國立成功大學企業管理學系未出版碩士論文
8.尚榮安 譯，Robert K. Yin 著，2001，個案研究方法，台北 : 弘智文化
9.吳思華，2000，策略九說：策略思考的本質，台北 : 臉譜
10.高長，1996，製造業赴大陸投資對台灣經濟的影響，國立政治大學學報，第73期，pp.209-233
11.陳向明，2002，社會科學：質的研究，台北: 五南圖書
12.陳添枝，2004，「運籌台灣 決勝全球」，經濟日報
13.黃營杉、楊景傅、汪志堅、梁富梅 譯，Jay B. Barney 著，2003，高階策略管理，台北: 華泰文化
14.經濟部中小企業處，2002，中小企業白皮書，經濟部統計處
15.經濟部統計處，2001，製造業對外投資實況調查報告，經濟部統計處
16.曾志弘，2001，多國籍企業子公司自主權與主導行為影響因素之研究 - 以多國籍企業在台子公司為例，國立中山大學企業管理學未出版博士論文
17.賴士葆，1991，科技管理論文集，台北 : 大葉文教基金會
18.賴士葆、謝龍發、陳松柏，2004，科技管理，台北 : 華泰文化
19.趙子巖，2004，影響子公司技術能力提升因素之研究–以大陸台商為例，大葉大學國際企業管理學系未出版碩士論文
20.曾紀幸，1995，多國籍企業在台子公司網路組織型態及其母公司管理機制之選擇，國立政治大學企業管理研究所未出版博士論文
21.詹亞霓，2001，台商母子公司間知識移轉與策略控制之關係研究，國立臺灣大學國際企業學研究所碩士論文
22.蔡裕源，1993，移轉技術類型、管理機制與移轉績效關係之研究，國立政治大學企業管理研究所未出版博士論文
23.廖明坤，2002，台商大陸子公司決策自主權影響因素之研究，國立政治大學企業管理學系未出版博士論文
24.鍾小琴，2001，技術收授雙方互動機制對國際技術移轉績效影響之研究 - 以台商赴大陸投資為例，中國文化大學國際企業管理學系未出版碩士論文






二、英文部分
1.Alan M Rugman,；Alain Verbeke. , “Subsidiary-specific advantages in multinational enterprises”, Strategic Management Journal. Chichester: Mar 2001. Vol. 22, Iss. 3; p. 237
2.Andersson, U., Forsgren,M. ,and Pedersen,T. 2001. Subsidiary performance in multinational corporations: the importance of technology embeddedness. International Business Review.
3.Andersson, U., Forsgren,M. ,and Holm,U. 2002. The strategic impact of external networks: Subsidiary performance and competence development in the multinational corporation. Strategic Management Journal, 23(11): 979.
4.Andersson.U. , a. P., C. 1997. Subsidiary Influence on Strategic behaviour in MNCs: An Empirical Study. International Business Review.
5.Appleyard, M. M. 1996. How does knowledge flow? Interfirm patterns in the semiconductor industry. Strategic Management Journal, 17: 137.
6.Barney, J. B. 1986. Strategic Factor Markets: Expectation, Luck, and Business Strategy. Management Science: 1231.
7.Barney, J. B. 1991. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1): 99.
8.Barney, J. B. 2001. Is the Resource-Based "View" A Useful Perspective for Strategic Management Research？Yes. The Academy of Management Review(1): 41.
9.Bartlett, C. A., and Ghoshal,S. 1987. Global Strategy: An Organizing Framework. Strategic Management Journal, 8(5): 425.
10.Bartlett, C. A., and Ghoshal,S. 1990. The Multinational Corporation as an Interorganizational Network. The Academy of Management Review, 15(4): 603.
11.Bartlett, C. A. a. G., S. 1991. Global Strategic Management: Impact on the New Frontiers of Strategy Research. Strategic Management Journal, 12.
12.Birkinshaw, J. M., and Morrison,A.J. 1995. Configurations of strategy and structure in subsidiaries of multinational corporations. Journal of International Business Studies, 26(4): 729.
13.Birkinshaw, J. M. 1996. How multinational subsidiary mandates are gained and lost. Journal of International Business Studies, 27(3): 467.
14.Birkinshaw, J. M., Hood,N. ,and Jonsson,S. 1998. Building Firm-Specific Advantages in Multinational Corporations: The Role of Subsidiary Initiative. Strategic Management Journal, 19(3): 221.
15.Birkinshaw, J. M., and Hood,N. 1998. Multinational subsidiary evolution: Capability and charter change in foreign-owned subsidiary companies. The Academy of Management Review, 23(4).
16.Butler, R. L. P. J. E. 2001. Tautology in the Resource-based View and the Implicatons of Externally Determined Resource Value: Further Comments. The Academy of Management Review, 26(1): 57.
17.Carroll, S. D. D. ,and Glenn, R.C. ,2003. Size (and competition) among Organizations: Modeling Scale-based Selection among Automobile Producers in Four major Countries , 1885~1981. Strategic Management Journal, 24(6): 541.
18.Castanias, R. P., and Helfat,C.E. 1991. Managerial Resources and Rents. Journal of Management, 17(1): 155.
19.Chatterjee, S. W., Birger. 1991. The Link Between Resources and Type of Diversification: Theory and Evidence. Strategic Management Journal, 12(1).
20.Christopher D, I., Venky,N. ,and Madhav V,R. 2001. An empirical examination of dynamic quality-based learning models. Management Science: 563.
21.Conner, K. R. 1991. A Historical Comparison of Resource-Based Theory and Five Schools of Thought Within Industrial Organization Economics: Do We Have a New Theory of the Firm? Journal of Management, 17(1): 121.
22.Connor, T. 2002. The Resource-based View of Strategy and its Value to Practising Managers. Strategic Change, 11(6): 307.
23.Constance, E. H., and Lieberman,M.B. 2002. The birth of capabilities: Market entry and the importance of pre-history. Industrial and Corporate Change, 11(4): 725.
24.Cui, G. 1998. The Evolutionary Process of Global Market Expansion: Experiences of MNCs in China. Journal of World Business, 33(1): 87.
25.Delany, E. 2000. Strategic Development of the Multinational Subsidiary through Subsidiary Initiative-taking. Long Range Planning, 33: 220.
26.Dunning, J. H. 1980. Toward an Eclectic Theory of International Production: Some Empirical Tests. Journal of International Business Studies, 11(1): 9.
27.Dunning, J. H., and Mathew,M. 1981. The Eclectic Theory of International Production: A Case Study of the International Hotel Industry. Managerial and Decision Economics, 2(4): 197.
28.Dunning, J. H. 1992. Multinational enterprises and the global economy: Addison-Wesley Publishers Ltd.
29.Dunning, J. H. 1998. Location and the multinational enterprise: A neglected factor. Journal of International Business Studies, 29(1): 45.
30.Dutton, J. M., and Thomas,A. 1989. Relating Technological Change and Learning by Doing: Jai.
31.Ethier, W. J. 1986. A Multinational Firm. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 101(4): 805.
32.Fahy, J. 2002. A Resource-Based Analysis of Sustainable Competitive Advantage in a Global Environment. International Business Review 57.
33.Foss, K. 2001. Organizing Technological Interdependencies: A Coordination Perspective on the Firm.
34.Foss, N. J., and Pedersenb,T. 2002. Transferring knowledge in MNCs:The role of sources of subsidiary knowledge and organizational context. Journal of International Management: 49.
35.Francisco, M. J., and Fuerst,W.L. ,and Barney,J.B. 1995. Information Technology and Sustained Competitive Advantage: A Resource-Based Analysis. MIS Quarterly. Minneapolis, 19(4): 487.
36.Frost, T. S., Birkinshaw,J.M. ,and Prescott C.E. 2002. Centers of excellence in multinational corporations. Strategic Management Journal, 23(11): 997.
37.Fryxell, G. E. B., John；Choi, Amanda. 2004. Successful Localization Programs in China: an Important Element in Strategy Implementation. Journal of World Business, 39(3): 268.
38.Gautam, R., Barney,J.B. ,and Waleed,A.M. 2004. Capabilities, Business Processes, and Competitive advantage: Choosing the dependent variable in empirical test of Resource-Based View. Strategic Management Journal: 23.
39.Ghoshal, S., Harry,K. ,and Szulanski,G.. 1994. Interunit Communication in Multinational Corporations. Management Science, 40(1): 96.
40.Grant, R. M. 1991. The Resource-Based Theory of Competitive Advantage: Implications for Strategy Formulation. California Management Review, 33(1): 114.
41.Grosse, R. 1985. An Imperfect Competition Theory of the MNE. Journal of International Business Studies, 16(000001): 57.
42.Gupta, A. K. G., V. 1991. Knowledge Flows and the Structure of Control Within Multinational Corporations. The Academy of Management Review: 768.
43.Henderson, R., and Cockburn,I. Measuring competence? Exploring firm effects in pharmaceutical research. Strategic Management Journal, 15: 63.
44.Henderson, R., and Cockburn,I. 1994. Measuring competence? Exploring Firm Effects in Pharmaceutical Research. Strategic Management Journal, 15: 63.
45.Holm, U., and Pedersen,T. 2000. The Dilemma of Centres of Excellence Contextual Creation Knoeledge Versus Global Transfer of Knowledge: Copenhagen Business School Department of International Economics and management
46.Jarillo, J. C., and Martinez,J.I. 1990. Different Roles for Subsidiaries: The Case of Multinational Corporations in Spain. Strategic Management Journal: 501.
47.Johanson, J., and Vahlne,J.E. 1977. The Internationalization Process of the Firm--A Model of Knowledge Development and Increasing Foreign Market Commitments. Journal of International Business Studies, 8(000001): 23.
48.Johanson, J., and Wiedersheim,F.P. 1977. The Internationalization of the Firm: Four Swedish Case Studies. Journal of Management Studies.
49.Johanson, J., and Vahlne,J.E. 2003. Business Relationship Learning and Commitment in the Internationalization Process. Journal of International Entrepreneurship, 1(1): 83.
50.Jones., C. W. L. H. a. C. R. 2002. Strategic management theory. New York: Houghton Mifflin Company.
51.Junttila, R. G. S. K. A. B. M. A. 2002. A Resource-based View of Manufacturing Strategy and the Relationship to Manufacturing Performance. Strategic Management Journal, 23(2): 105.
52.Karl, J. M. 2001. A Strategy for Subsidiaries: Centres of Excellences to Build Subsidiary Specific Advantages. Management International Review, 41(3): 75.
53.Kogut.B. , a. Z. U. 1993. Knowledge of the firm and the evolutionary theory of the multinational corporation. Journal of International Business Studies: 625.
54.Kostova, T. 1999. Transnational Transfer of Strategic Organizational Practices: a Contextual Perspective. Academy of Management Review, 24(2): 308.
55.Lilach, N. 2003. International Business in a World of Increasing returns. Management International Review, 43(3): 219.
56.Lioukas, Y. E. S. S. 2001. An examination into the causal logic of rent generation: contrasting Porter's competitive strategy framework and the resource-based perspective. Strategic Management Journal, 22(10): 907.
57.Michael, D. L., and Annette,L.R. 2000. Organizational learning about new international markets: Exploring the internal transfer of local market knowledge. Journal of International Business Studies, 31(4): 573.
58.Minbaeva, D., Pedersen,T. ,Björkman,I. ,Fey,C.F. ,and Park,H.J. 2003. MNC knowledge transfer, subsidiary absorptive capacity, and HRM. Journal of International Business Studies: 586.
59.Mudambi, R. 2002. Knowledge Management in Multinational Firms. Journal of International Management, 8(1): 1.
60.Namgyoo, K. P., Mezias,J.M. ,and Song,J. A Resource-based View of Strategic Alliances and Firm Value in the Electronic Marketplace. Journal of Management, 30(1): 7.
61.Nilsson, E. A. 1995. Innovating-by-doing: Skill innovation as a source of technol. Journal of Economic, 29(1): 33.
62.O'Donnell, S. B., Timothy. 1999. The Contribution of Foreign Subsidiaries to Host Country National Competitiveness. Journal of International Management, 5(3): 187.
63.Pearce, R. D. Decentralised R&D and strategic competitiveness: globalised approaches to generation and use of technology in multinational enterprises (MNEs). Research Policy: 157-178.
64.Porcano, T. M. 1993. Factors affecting the Foreign Direct Investment Decision of Firms from and into major Industrialized Countries. Multinational Business Review, 1(2): 26.
65.Porter, M. E. 1980. Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors. New York: the Free press.
66.Porter, M. E. 1986. The changing patterns of international competition. California Management Review, 28(2): 9.
67.Porter, M. E. 1990. The Competitive Advanatge of Nations. New York: Macmillan.
68.Porter, M. E. 1991. Towards a Dynamic Theory of Strategy. Strategic Management Journal, 12: 95.
69.Pugh, T. L. G. 1997. High-tech investment and learning-by-doing: An alternative training strategy. Education & Training: 316.
70.Ram, M. 2002. Knowledge Management in Multinational Firms. Journal of International Management, 18: 1.
71.Raphael, A. S., P. 1993. Strategic assets and organizational rent. Strategic Management Journal, 14(1): 33.
72.Raubitschek., C. E. H. a. R. S. 2000. Product sequencing: Co-evolution of knowledge, capabilities and products. Strategic Management Journal, 21(10/11): 961.
73.Rebentisch, E. S., and Ferretti,M. 1995. A knowledge asset-based view of technology transfer in international joint ventures. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 12: 1.
74.Richard, H. 1993. A framework linking intangible resources and capabilities to sustainable competitive advantage. Strategic Management Journal, 14(8): 607.
75.Richard, L. P., and John,E.B. 2001. Is the Resource-based "View" a Useful Perspective for Strategic Management Research? The Academy of Management Review, 26(1): 22.
76.Richard, M. 2001. Toward a Synthesis of the Resource-based and Dynamic-capability Views of Rent Creation. Strategic Management Journal, 22(5): 387.
77.Roth, K. M., Allen J. . 1992. Implementing global strategy: Characteristics of global subsidiary mandates. Journal of International Business Studies, 23(4): 715.
78.Roth, K. M., Allen J. 1992. Business-Level Competitive Strategy: A Contingency Link to Internationalization. Journal of Management. Bloomington, 18(3): 473.
79.Rugman, A. M. 1980. Internalization Theory and Corporate International Finance. California Management Review, 23(2): 73.
80.Sanden, P., and Vahlne,J.E. The growth rates of Swedish multinational corporations. Journal of International Business Studies, 5(000001): 91.
81.Schlegelmilch, B. B., and Chini,T.C. 2003. Knowledge transfer between marketing functions in multinational companies: a conceptual model. International Business Review, 12(2): 215.
82.Spender, J. C., and Grant,R.M. 1996. Knowledge and the firm:Overview. Strategic Management Journal, 17: 5.
83.Sundaram, A. K., and Black,J.S. . 1992. The Environment and Internal Organization of Multinational Enterprises. The Academy of Management Review, 17(4): 729.
84.Szulanski, G. 1996. Exploring internal stickiness: impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm. Strategic Management Journal: 27.
85.Teece, D. J., Pisano,G. ,and Shuen,A. 1997. Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7): 509.
86.Trimarchi, M. T., Rick. 2004. Coordinations in Business Interactions between Hong Kong Chinese, mainland Chinese, and Western actors. International Business Review, 13(3): 331.
87.Verbeke, R. A. M. a. A. 2001. Subsidiary-specific advantages in multinational enterprises. Strategic Management Journal, 22(3): 237.
88.Verbeke.A. 2003. The evolutionary view of the MNE and the future of internalization theory. Journal of International Business Studies, 34: 498.
89.Vernon, R. 1966. International investment and international trade in the product cycle. Quarterly Journal of Economics: 190.
90.Vicente, A. L. 2001. An overview review of the resource-based view (RBV) of the firm, drawing on recent Spanish management research. Irish Journal of Management, 22(2): 105.
91.Vickers, I., and Martyn,C.H. 1999. Cleaner Production and Organizational Learning. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 11(1): 75.
92.Wernerfelt, B. 1984. A Resource – based View of the Firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5: 171.
93.Wernerfelt, B. 1995. The Resource-based View of the Firm: Ten years after. 16(3): 171.
94.Winter, S. G. & Szulanski, G. 2001. Replication as strategy. Organization Science, 12(6): 730.
95.Yasar, F. J., and Zairi,M. 2000. Best practice transfer for future competitiveness: A study of best practices. Total Quality Management: 734.
96.Yves, L. D. 1980. Multinational Strategy and Structure in Government Controlled Business. Columbia Journal of World Business, 15(3): 14.