跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(18.97.14.86) 您好!臺灣時間:2025/02/08 02:57
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:陳家興
論文名稱:從內因性與外因性導引線索的角度探討重疊面的注意力選擇作用
指導教授:黃淑麗黃淑麗引用關係
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立政治大學
系所名稱:心理學研究所
學門:社會及行為科學學門
學類:心理學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2005
畢業學年度:93
語文別:中文
論文頁數:99
中文關鍵詞:內因性導引線索外因性導引線索
外文關鍵詞:Attentional SetSurface-based Attention
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:1
  • 點閱點閱:491
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:1
  在探討注意力的選擇基礎時,一般可區分為空間為基、物體為基、特徵為基以及面為基四類論點。直至目前為止,各類注意力選擇基礎的論點,都有其支持證據以及可解釋之處。本研究的主要目的在探討,當實驗操弄較適合面為基的注意力選擇時,內因性與外因性導引線索的注意力作用情況為何?本研究採用快速物體運動改變(RSOT)實驗典範,此乃由於該典範的刺激呈現方式,能排除空間為基以及特徵為基的解釋,並且受試者實際上是知覺到兩個重疊面,所以適合作為討論面為基注意力的實驗典範。
  在探討注意力選擇的議題上,導引線索的內因性與外因性,常被用以觀察注意力選擇的作用情況。由於內因性與外因性導引線索的注意力控制機制是不同的,而且在時間向度的發展也不一樣,故本研究欲觀察內因性與外因性導引線索,在重疊面的情況下,注意力控制的作用情形。
  實驗一主要探討外因性導引線索之攫取注意力的作用以及在時間向度上的發展情況,並為RSOT實驗典範提供在反應時間面向上的資料。實驗二則是以目標刺激與干擾刺激同時呈現的方式,探討內因性導引線索的集中注意力效果,在時間向度上的發展情況,並進一步觀察不同的目標刺激與干擾刺激相對關係所造成的影響。
  研究結果發現,在重疊面的實驗典範中,以反應時間為依變項,外因性導引線索須在持續時間方面符合注意力設定(attentional set)的情況下,才能發揮攫取注意力的效果。而內因性導引線索則須在SOA的時間間隔夠長時,才會發揮集中注意力的效果,而可排除另一面上的干擾刺激所產生的干擾作用,研究結果顯示適當的SOA時間間隔約為300毫秒。而此內因性與外因性注意力控制的作用情況,與空間為基以及物體為基的相關研究結果相符合。
謝辭………………………………………………………………………… I
摘要…………………………………………………………………………III
目次………………………………………………………………………… IV
表次………………………………………………………………………… VI
圖次…………………………………………………………………………VII

緒論………………………………………………………………………… 1
空間為基、物體為基、特徵為基與面為基……………………………… 3
空間為基………………………………………………………………… 3
物體為基………………………………………………………………… 7
特徵為基…………………………………………………………………10
面為基……………………………………………………………………11
內因性與外因性的注意力控制……………………………………………16
快速物體運動改變實驗典範………………………………………………21
快速物體運動改變實驗典範,RSOT……………………………………21
RSOT與空間為基、特徵為基、物體為基及面為基的關係……………23
內因性與外因性注意力控制在RSOT中之作用…………………………26
RSOT相關研究的整理與比較……………………………………………31
本研究的目的………………………………………………………………34
實驗一………………………………………………………………………39
實驗一A:RSOT中外因性導引線索在反應時間向度上的作用表現 …39
實驗一B:影響第一次運動改變的注意力攫取效果之條件 …………48
實驗一C:單獨注意力設定因素對注意力攫取效果的影響 …………54
實驗一綜合討論…………………………………………………………58
實驗二
在集中注意力觀點下同時出現的干擾刺激在RSOT典範中的作用………60
綜合討論……………………………………………………………………67
與Valdes-Sosa等人一系列的研究之比較 ……………………………67
與其他注意力選擇單位上內因性與外因性注意力控制作用之比較…70
運動改變持續時間也是一種注意力設定………………………………71
未來研究方向……………………………………………………………72
結論…………………………………………………………………………75
參考文獻……………………………………………………………………76
附錄…………………………………………………………………………87
附錄一:實驗一A統計數 ………………………………………………87
附錄二:實驗一B統計數 ………………………………………………89
附錄三:實驗一C統計數 ………………………………………………90
附錄四:實驗二統計數…………………………………………………91
附錄五:等亮度調整程序指導語………………………………………93
附錄六:實驗一A與實驗一C指導語……………………………………94
附錄七:實驗一B指導語 ………………………………………………96
附錄八:實驗二指導語…………………………………………………98
Abrams, R. A., & Law, M. B. (2000). Object-based visual attention with endogenous orienting. Perception & Psychophysics. 62, 818-833

Bacon, W. F., & Egeth, H. E. (1994). Overriding stimulus-driven attentional capture. Perception & Psychophysics. 55, 485-496.

Broadbent, D. E., Broadbent, M. H. P. (1987). From detection to identification: response to multiple targets in rapid serial visual presentation. Perception & Psychophysics. 42, 105-130.

Duncan, J. (1984). Selective attention and the organization of visual information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113(4), 501-517.

Driver, J. & Baylis, G.C. (1989). Movement and visual attention: The spotlight metaphor breaks down. Journal of Experimental psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15(3), 448-456.

Egly, R., Driver, J., & Rafal, R. D. (1994). Shifting visual attention between objects and locations: evidence from normal and parietal lesion subjects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 123(2), 161-177.

Eriksen, B. A., & Eriksen, C. W. (1974). Effect of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task. Perception & Psychophysics, 16(1), 143-149.

Eriksen C. W., & Hoffman, J. E. (1972). Temporal and spatial characteristics of selective encoding from visual displays. Perception and Psychophysics, 12, 201-214

Eriksen, C. W., & Hoffman, J. E. (1973). The extent of processing noise elements during selective encoding from visual displays. Perception and Psychophysics, 14, 155-160.

Eriksen, C. W., & St. James, J. D. (1986). Visual attention within and around the field of focal attention: A zoom lens model. Perception and Psychophysics 40, 225-240.

Eriksen, C. W., & Yeh, Y. Y. (1985). Allocaion of attention in the visual field. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 11(5), 583-597.

Folk, C. L., Remington, R. W., & Johnston, J. C. (1992). Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 1030-1044.

Folk, C. L., & Annett, S. (1994). Do locally defined feature discontinuities capture attention? Perception and Psychophysics, 56, 277-287.
Folk, C. L., Leber, A. B., & Egeth, H.E. (2002). Made you blink! Contingent attentional capture produces a spatial blink. Perception & Psychophysics, 64, 41-753.

Folk, C. L., & Remington, R. (1998). Selectivity in distraction by irreevant feature singletons: evidence for two forms of attentional capture. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 847-858.

Folk, C.L., Remington, R.W., Johnston, J.C. (1992). Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 1030- 1044.

Folk, C.L., Remington, R.W., Wright, J.H. (1994). The structure of attentional control: contingent attentional capture by apparent motion, abrupt onset, and color. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 317- 329.

Gibson, B. S. (1996a). The masking account of attentional capture: A reply to Yantis and Jonides (1996). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 22, 1514-1520.

Gibson, B. S. (1996b). Visual quality and attentional capture: A challenge to the special role of abrupt onsets. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 22, 1496-1504.

Gibson, B. S. & kelsey, E. M. (1998). Stimulus-driven attentional capture is contingent on attentional set for displaywide visual feature. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 699-706.

Hillstrom, A. P., & Yantis, S. (1994). Visual motion and attentional capture. Perception & Psychophysics, 55, 399-411

He, Z. J., & Nakayama, K. (1994). Apparent motion determined by surfacelayout not by disparity or 3 - dimensional distance. Nature 367: 173-175.

Ives, H. E. (1912). On heterochromatic photometry. Philosophical Magazine, 24, 845-853.

Johnson, J. C., Hutchison, K. A., & Neill, W. T. (2001). Attentional Cature by Irrelevant Color Singletons. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 841-847.

Johnston, W. A., & Dark, V. J. (1986). Selective attention. Annual Review of Psychology, 37, 43-75

Jonides, J. (1981). Voluntary versus automatic control over the mind's eye movement. In J.B. Long & A.D. Baddeley (Eds.), Attention and performance IX (pp. 187-203). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Jonides, J., Naveh-Benjamin, M., & Palmer, J. (1985). Assessing automaticity. Acta Psychologica, 60, 157-171.

Jonides, J., & Yantis, S. (1988). Uniqueness of abrupt visual onset in capturing attention. Perception & Psychophysics, 43, 346-354

Joseph, J. S., & Optican, L. M. (1996). Involuntary attentional shifts due to orientation differences. Perception & Psychophysics, 58, 651-665

Kahneman, D., & Chajczyk, D. (1983). Tests of the automaticity of reading: dilution of Stroop effects by color-irrelevant stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 9, 497-509.

Kahneman, D., & Henik, A. (1976). Effects of visual grouping on immediate recall and selective attention. In S. Dornic (Ed.), Attention and Performance V. New York: Academic Press, 307-332.

Kahneman, D. & Henik, A. (1981). Perceptual organisation and Attention. In: M. Kubovy & J.R. Pomerantz (Eds.), Perceptual organisation, Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum, 181-211.

Kahneman, D., & Treisman, A. (1984). Changing views of attention and automaticity. In R. Parasuraman & R. Davies (Eds.) Varieties of Attention. New York: Academic Press, 29- 61.

Kramer, A. F., & Jacobson, A. (1991). Perceptual organization and focused attention: the role of objects and proximity in visual processing. Perception and Psychophysics, 3, 267-284.

Laberge, D. (1981). Automatic information processing: A review. In Long, J. B. & Baddeley, A. D. (Eds.), Attention and performance IX, Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 173-186.

Lavie, N. & Driver, J. (1996). On the spatial extent of attention in object-based visual selection. Perception & Psychophysics, 58, 1238-1251.

Lopez, M., Rodriguez, V., Valdes-Sosa, M. (2004). Two-object attentional interference depends on attentional set. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 53, 127-134

Mitchell, J. F., Stoner, G. R., Fallah, M., & Reynolds, J. H. (2003). Attentional selection of superimposed surfaces cannot be explained by modulation of the gain of color channels. Vision Research, 43, 1323-1328

Muller, H. J. & Rabbitt, P. M. A. (1989). Reflexive and voluntary orienting fo visual attention: Time course of activation and resistance to interruption. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15, 315-330.

Nakayama, K., & He, Z. J. (1995). Attention to surfaces: beyond a Cartesian understanding of visual attention. In: Early Vision and Beyond, T. V. Papathomas (ed.), M.I.T. Press, Cambridge.

Nakayama, K. , He, Z.J. and Shimojo, S. (1995). Visual surface representation: a critical link between lower-level and higher level vision. In: Kosslyn, S.M. and Osherson, D.N. Vision. In Invitation to Cognitive Science. M.I.T. Press, 1-70.

Neumann, O. (1984). Automatic processing: A review of recent findings and a plea for an old theory. In Prinz, W. & Sanders, A. F. (Eds.), Cognition and Motor Processes, Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 255-290.
O'Craven, K. M., Downing, P. E., & Kanwisher, N. (1999). fMRI evidence for objects as the units of attentional selection. Nature, 401(6753), 584-587.

Palmer, S. E. (1999). Vision science: photons to phenomenology. The MIT press.

Pashler, H. (1988). Cross-dimensional interaction and texture segregation. Perception & Psychophysics, 43, 307-318.

Pinilla, T., Cobo, A., Torres, K., Valdes-Sosa, M. (2001). Attentional shifts between surfaces: effects on detection and early brain potentials. Vision Research, 41, 1619- 1630.

Posner, M. I. (1980). Orienting of attention. Q. Journal of Experimental Psychology 32, 3-25.

Posner, M. I., & Cohen, Y. (1984). Components of visual orienting. In: H. Bouma & D. Bouwhuis (Eds.), Attention and performance X, 531-556. Earlbaum.

Posner, M. I., Nissen, M. J., & Ogden, W. C. (1978). Attended and unattended processing modes: The role of set for spatial location. In: H.I. Pick, Jr., & E. Saltzman (Eds.) Modes of perceiving and processing information. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erblaum.

Posner, M. & Peterson, S. (1990). The attention system of the human brain. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 13, 25-42.

Posner, M. I., Snyder, C. R. R., Davidson, B. J. (1980) Attention and the detection of signals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 109, 160-174.

Posner, M. I., Walker, J. A., Freidrich, F. J., & Rafal, R. D. (1984). Effects of parietal injury on covert orienting of visual attention. Journal of Neuroscience, 4(7), 135-145

Ramachandran, V. S., & Anstis, S. M. (1983). Perceptual organization in moving patterns. Nature, 304, 529-531.

Remington, R. W., Folk, C. L., & McLean, J. P. (2001). Contingent attentional capture or delayed allocation of attention? Perception & Psychophysics, 63, 298-307.

Remington, R. W., Johnston, J. C., & Yantis, S. (1992). Involuntary attentional capture by abrupt onsets. Perception & Psychophysics, 51, 279-290

Reynolds, J.H., Alborzian, S., Stoner, G.R. (2003). Exogenously cued attention triggers competitive selection of surfaces. Vision Research, 43, 59- 66.

Saenz, M., Buracas, G. T., & Boynton, G. M. (2002). Global effects of feature-based attention in human visual cortex. Nature Neuroscience, 5(7), 631-632.

Santee, J. L., & Egeth, H. E. (1982). Do reaction time and accuracy measure the same aspects of letter recognition? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 8, 489-501.
Shulman, G.L., Remington, R.W., & McLean, J.P. (1979). Moving attention through space. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 5, 522-526.

Shulman, G. L., & Wilson, J. (1987). Sptial frequency and selective attntion to spatial location. Perception, 16(1), 103-111.

Theeuwes, J. (1991a). Cross-dimensional perceptual selectivity. Perception & Psychophysics, 50, 184-193.

Theeuwes, J. (1991b). Exogenous and endogenous control of attention: the effect of visual onsets and offsets. Perception & Psychophysics, 49, 83-90.

Treisman, A. (1985). Preattentive processing in vision. Computer Vision, Graphics and Image Processing, 31, 156-177.

Treisman, A., & Gelade, G. (1980). A feature integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 97-136.

Treisman, A., & Gormican, S. (1988). Feature analysis in early vision: Evidence from search asymmetries. Psychological Review, 95, 15-48.
Treisman, A., Kahneman,D., & Burkell, J. (1983). Perceptual objects and the cost of filtering. Perception and Psychophysics, 33, 527-532.

Treue, S., & Martinez Trujillo, J. (1999). Feature-based attention influences motion processing gain in macaque visual cortex. Nature, 399(6736), 575-579.

Tsal, Y. (1983). Movement of attention across the visual field. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 9(4), 523-530.

Valdes-Sosa, M., Cobo, A., & Pinilla, T. (1998). Transparent motion and object-based attention. Cognition, 66(2), B13-B23.

Valdes-Sosa, M., Cobo, A., & Pinilla, T. (2000). Attention to object files defined by transparent motion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26(2), 488-505.

Vecera, S. P., & Farah, M. J. (1994). Does visual attention select objects or locations? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 123, 146-160.

Wolfe, J. M. (1994). Guided search 2.0: A revised model of visual search. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 1, 202–238.

Wolfe, J., Cave, K. R., & Franzel, Q. (1989). Guided search: An alternative to the feature integration model for visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 15, 419-433.

Yantis, S., & Jonides, J. (1984). Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: evidence from visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 10, 601-621.

Yantis, S., & Jonides, J. (1990). Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: voluntary versus automatic allocation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16(1), 121-134.

Yantis S, Jonides J. 1996. Attentional capture by abrupt visual onsets: new perceptual objects or visual masking? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 22, 1505-1513.
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
無相關論文
 
1. 01、施慧玲著,身分法,二00四年學界回顧,月旦法學雜誌第一二三期,民國九十四年八月。
2. 02、楊華嚴著,民事訴訟法重要釋字分析:釋字第五八七號重點整理與分析,司法新趨勢第二十期,民國九十四年八月。
3. 03、黃國昌著,否認子女與確認親子關係之訴,月旦法學教室第三十三期,民國九十四年七月。
4. 06、林正雄著,從釋字第五八七號解釋檢視民法第一千零六十三條之否認權人,司法新趨勢第十八期,民國九十四年四月。
5. 07、林秀雄著,婚生推定,臺灣本土法學雜誌第六十六期,民國九十四年一月。
6. 08、李立如著,朝向子女最佳利益的婚生推定制度,中原財經法學雜誌,民國九十三年十二月。
7. 09、魏大喨著,親子關係存否之實體規範及其確認之訴,臺灣本土法學雜誌第六十二期,民國九十三年九月。
8. 10、李木貴著,否認子女之訴與確認親子關係不存在之訴-最高法院九十二年度臺上字第一六四三號判決解釋論之批判,月旦法學雜誌第一一0期,民國九十三年七月。
9. 14、呂太郎著,第三人撤銷訴訟-所謂有法律上利害關係之第三人,月旦法學雜誌第九十九期,民國九十二年八月。
10. 15、郭振恭著,論婚生子女與非婚生子女,臺灣本土法學雜誌第四十五期,民國九十二年四月。
11. 16、呂太郎著,身分判決之對世效力與程序保障,臺灣本土法學雜誌第三十七期
12. 17、鄧學仁著,虛偽出生登記之親子關係--評最高法院八十八年度臺上字第二三一八號判決,月旦法學雜誌第八十七期,民國九十一年八月。
13. 20、戴東雄著,否認子女之訴,萬國法律第一二0期,民國九十年十二月。
14. 21、黃虹霞著,子女與婚生子女、非婚生子女暨直系血親概念之迷思-兼談民法親屬編之修正及否認子女之訴,萬國法律第一二0期,民國九十年十二月。
15. 24、鄧學仁,邁入新世紀之親屬法,月旦法學雜誌第六十二期,民國八十九年七月。