財務預警模型之發展由來已久，其目的就是幫助銀行或投資人能及早發現問題公司，而國內地雷股及公司弊案如博達、衛道、皇統、訊碟等事件接二連三爆發，雖然如類神經或KMV等較複雜預警模型近年來頗受廣泛研究，但傳統之財務預警模型如「區別分析模型」與「Logit迴歸模型」至今日是否仍然適用是本研究關心的問題，以協助投資大眾從簡易財報數字及早發現危機公司。
本研究以民國七十九年至九十三年國內發生危機之上市櫃公司為例，除了實證原始Altman Z-Score模型之辨識率，另以原始之Altman Z-Score區別分析模型中認為有用之五個財務變數，重新迴歸計算新的區別模型參數，亦針對財務上常用之五大類財務比率及市場因子，以統計方式在五大類中各挑選一個最能夠預測企業體質良窳的指標，據以建構實務與理論上常用的「區別分析模型」、「Logit迴歸模型」等兩種財務危機預警模型，並將兩種財務預警模型比較其辨識率，得到以下之結果:
1.單變量變異數分析法之結果為，在五大類財務比率指標中，前10大顯著差異財務比率依序為「淨值/總資產％」、「負債比率％」、「常續性EPS（元）」、「現金流量比率％」、「稅前純益╱實收資本」、「每股稅前淨利（元）」、「稅後淨利率％」、「速動比率％」、「資產報酬率(稅後息前折舊前)％」與「稅前淨利率％」。
2.「區別分析模型」在財務危機發生前一年、前二年、前三年預測正確率分別 為88.75%、80.00%、73.75%；「Logit迴歸模型」在財務危機發生前一年、前二年、前三年預測正確率分別為90.00%、72.50%、67.50%，在危機發生前一年以Logit迴歸模型預測正確率較佳，但在危機發生前二年與前三年以區別分析模型預測正確率較佳。

Financial Crisis Warning Models have been developed for a long time and it main purpose is to find out the financial problems within companies in advance for bankers or investors. Though some complicated warning models, such as Artificial Neural Net Work Model or KMV Model have been investigated recently, in order to assist investors aware the finial crisis in advance by using the brief financial report, this study focuses on whether some traditional financial crisis warning models, such as The Discriminate Model and Logistic Regression Model are still available presently.
Companies with the financial crisis which listed on TSE and OTC between 1990 and 2004 in Taiwan were targets of this study. This study investigates not only the identification ratio of original Altman Z-Score model, but re-regress the parameters of the five financial variables within the original Altman Z-Score models. In addition, this study focuses on the market factors and financial ratios in five main divisions that have been used frequently. Furthermore, the statistics methods were used to find out the most dependable indication within the six main divisions which predicts the financial systems of the enterprise and then to build up the two popular financial crisis warning models that has been used theoretically and practically (i.e., the Discriminate Model and the Logistic Regression Model). This study compares the identification ration of these two warning models and the findings reveal that:
1.The results of T-test: It can be understood that within the six main divisions the net worth/total assets and total liability/ total assets ratio are the most important variables of the indication of company paying ability followed by the variables of EPS and cash flow ratio which means the distinguishable differences between companies with and without financial crisis is the degree of paying and earning ability. The findings coincide with people’s intuition to the companies with financial crisis. Moreover, the cash flow ratio is not only a distinguishable variable which is used to analyze the asset of the companies, but it also coincides with the present scholars’ concept of cast flow.
2.Starting from one to three years prior to the financial crisis, the justified predication rate of the Discriminate Model in order is 88.75%, 80.00%, and 73.75%. On the other hand, the justified predication rate of the Logistic Regression Model in order is 90.00%, 72.50% and 67.50%. Based on these findings, it suggests that one year before the financial crisis, the Logistic Regression Model provides a more correct predication while the Discriminate Model provides a better predication two and three years before the financial crisis.

第一章 緒論
第一節 研究背景與動機 ---------------------------------------1
第二節 研究的問題 -------------------------------------------2
第三節 研究架構與流程 ---------------------------------------2
第二章 文獻探討
第一節 財務危機公司成因及因應之會計準則 ---------------------5
第二節 財務危機預警模型介紹 --------------------------------6
第三節 文獻彙整 --------------------------------------------11
第三章 研究設計
第一節 資料來源與研究期間 ----------------------------------22
第二節 財務比率選取與說明 ----------------------------------25
第三節 財務危機模型實證方法 --------------------------------28
第四章 實證結果與分析
第一節 單變量分析實證結果 ----------------------------------33
第二節 區別分析模型實證結果 --------------------------------36
第三節 羅吉斯迴歸模型分析實證結果 --------------------------47
第四節 區別分析模型與羅吉斯迴歸模型實證比較 ----------------51
第五節 近期財務危機事件實證 --------------------------------52
第五章 結論與建議
第一節 研究結論 --------------------------------------------54
第二節 研究限制及未來研究建議 ------------------------------55
參考文獻 -----------------------------------------------------56
附錄一 96家財務危機公司危機事件一覽表-----------------------58
附錄二 各項財務比率說明-------------------------------------60
附錄三 訓練樣本財務比率實證列表-----------------------------62
附錄四 96家財務危機公司財務危機發生前Altman Z_Score值-------65

一、國內部份
1、王保進(2004)，多變量分析:套裝程式與資料分析，高等教育文化事業。
2、何太山(1977) ，「運用區別分析建立商業放款信用評分制度」，國立政治大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
3、李命志(1999)，「從轉投資揭露資訊探討台灣股票上市公司之財務危機」，淡江大學財務金融研究所未出版碩士論文。
4、邱志榮(1991) ，「公司營運危機之預測- 財務比率輿現金流量比率之比較」， 國立成功大學工業管理研究所碩士論文。
5、黃小玉(1988)，「銀行放款信用評估模式之研究－最佳模式之選擇」，淡江大學管理科學研究所碩士論文。
6、黃美月(1997)，「上市公司營運危機預測模型建立之研究」，管理會計雜誌，第41 期，P53--P82。
7、黃文隆(1993) ，「財務危機預警模式建立與驗證」，東吳大學/管理科學研究所碩士論文。
8、陳業寧、王衍智、許鴻英(2004)，「台灣企業危機之預測:信用評分法與選擇權評價法孰優」，風險管理月報。
9、陳明賢(1986)，「財務危機預警之計量分析研究」，台灣大學商學研究所碩士論文。
10、陳蘊如(1991) ，「財務危機預警制度之研究」，國立政治大學會計研究所碩士論文論文。
11、賴耀群(1978) ，「銀行放款信用評估模式之研究」，淡江大學管理科學研究所碩士論文。
12、謝俊宏(1996) ，「植基於類神經網路的分類模式建構之研究-以財務資料應用為例」，淡江大學/管理科學研究所博士論文。
二、國外部份
1、Altman, Edward(1968)，Financial Ratios, Discriminant analysis and the prediction of corporate bankruptcy，The Journal of Finance, Vol. 23, No. 4, September, 589-609.
2、Altman, Edward I., G. G. Haldeman, & P. Narayanan(1977)，ZETA Analysis: A new model to identify the bankruptcy risk of corporations, Journal of Banking and Finance, 29-54.
3、Altman Edward I. (2000)，PREDICTING FINANCIAL DISTRESS OF COMPANIES:REVISITING THE Z-SCORE AND ZETA® MODELS，Journal of Finance, September 19683
4、Beaver, W.H., 1966, Financial ratios as predictors of failure, Journal of Accounting Research 4, 71-111.
5、Black, F. and M. Scholes (1973), “The Pricing Of Options And Corporate Liabilities.” Journal of Political Economy, 81, pp.637-659.
6、Gentry( 1987), Funds flow components, financial rations, and bankruptcy, Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Winter, 14(4), pp.595-606
7、Jarrow, R.A., and S.M. Turnbull (2000), “The Intersection of Market and Credit Risk.” Journal of Banking & Finance, 24, pp.271-299.
8、Jarrow, R.A. (2001), “Default Parameter Estimation using Market Prices.” Financial Analysts Journal, Vol.57, No. 5, pp.75-92.
8、Merton, R. C. (1974), “On The Pricing of Corporate Debt: The Risk Structure of Interest Rates.” The Journal of Finance, 28, pp.449-470.
9、Meyer & Pifer (1970), “Prediction of banking failure,” The Journal of Finance , September , pp.853-868
10、Ohlson J.M., (1980), “Financial Ratios and the Probabilistic Prediction of Bankruptcy”, Journal of Accounting Research, 18, 1, 109-131.