1. 王金山,談財務資訊透明度,彰化師範大學會計學系EMBA班企業經營管理理論與實務專題演講談話記錄,2005年4月23日。
2. 吳修辰 (2005年1月3日),專訪勤業眾信會計師事務所總裁談太電案教訓—避免財務弊病,首重獨立的稽核人員,商業週刊,893,70-72。
3. 沃克(2002年3月11日),分析,Arthur Anderson譽毀名滅?BBC中文網。2005年3月29日,取自:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/chinese/trad/hi/newsid_1860000/newsid_1866900/1866964.stm
4. 林坤鎮(2002年),國際證券暨期貨市場簡訊:從美國Enron公司事件看會計師業者之自律與利益衝突之迴避。證管雜誌,20,2005年3月29日,取自:http://www.sfb.gov.tw/reference/magazine/9104/SS2.htm
5. 林杰兒 (2004年9月13日),會計師接案 飢不擇食?經濟日報,第A7版稅務法規。
6. 林杰兒 (2005年6月1日),魏永篤:勤業眾信 審慎篩選客戶。經濟日報,第A2版經濟要聞。
7. 林柄滄 (2002年),新新會計大戰,臺北市:林柄滄。
8. 邱金蘭、林杰兒 (2004年12月17日),12位會計師遭金籲會處分,經濟日報,第A1版。
9. 范碧珍 (2002年10月),張忠謀:不談管理,公司治理才重要,突破雜誌,279,98。10. 陳依蘋、鄭惠之 (2004年),專業組織的未來—會計師、律師向前走!會計研究月刊,226,30-40。11. 萬敏婉 (2004年11月1日),公司治理,說穿了就是「實」,遠見雜誌,221,248-251。
12. 謝偉姝、林杰兒 (2005年3月11日),遠離風險—會計師嚴選客戶,經濟日報,第A7版稅務法規。
13. 魏永篤,企業舞弊與會計師偵測,彰化師範大學管理學院座談會談話記錄。2004年12月20日。
14. 羅子強,公司治理,2004年會計理論與實務研討會談話記錄,2004年10月24日。
15. American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA), (1983), Audit risk and materiality in conducting an audit, Statement on Auditing Standards No. 47 AU 312.02. New York, Y: AICPA.
16. American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA), (1988), Consideration of control structure in a financial statement audit, Statement on Auditing Standards No. 55. New York, NY: AICPA.
17. American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA), (1993), Audit Risk Alert, New York, NY: AICPA.
18. American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA), (1994a), Acceptance and continuation of audit clients, Practice Alert No. 94-3. New York, NY: AICPA.
19. American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA), (1994b), Client acceptance and continuance procedures for audit client, New York, NY: AICPA.
20. American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA), (1995), Consideration of internal control in a financial statement audit: An amendment to statement on auditing standards no. 55. Statement on Auditing Standards No. 78, New York, NY: AICPA.
21. American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA), (1997a), System of quality control for a CPA firms accounting and auditing practice, New York, NY: AICPA.
22. American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA), (1997c), Consideration of fraud in a financial statement audit, Statement on Auditing Standards No. 82, New York, NY: AICPA.
23. American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA), (1998), Consideration of the Internal Control Structure in a Financial Statement Audit, Statement on Auditing Standards No. 55, New York, NY: AICPA.
24. Apostolou, B. A., Hassell, J. M., Webber, S. A., & Summers, G. E. (2001), The relative importance of management fraud risk factors, Behavioral Research in Accounting, 13, 1-24.
25. Arthur Andersen, Coopers & Lybrand, Deloitte & Touche, Ernst & Young, KPMG Peat Marwick, & Price Waterhouse, (1992), The liability crisis in the United States: Impact on the accounting profession, Statement of Position, New York, NY.
26. Asare, S. K., Cohen, J. R., & Trompeter, G. M. (2002), The effect of management integrity and non-audit services on client acceptance and staffing decisions, Working paper, University of Florida.
27. Asare, S., & Knechel, W. R. (1995), Termination of information evaluation in auditing, Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 8, 21-31.
28. Asare, S., Hackenbrack, K., & Knechel, W. R. (1994), Client acceptance and continuation decision. In Auditing Symposium XII: Proceedings of the 1994 Deloitte & Touche/ University of Kansas Symposium on Auditing Problems, edited by R. P. Srivastava, 163-178, Lawrence, KS: University of Kansas.
29. Ayers, S., & Kaplan, S. (1998), Potential differences between engagement and risk review partners and their effect on client acceptance judgments, Accounting Horizons, 12(2), 139-153.
30. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986), The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical consideration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182.
31. Beasley, M. S. (1996), An empirical analysis of the relation between the board of director composition and financial statement fraud, The Accounting Review, 71(4), 443-465.
32. Beasley, M. S., Carcello, J. V., & Hermanson, D. R. (1999), Fraudulent financial reporting: 1987-1997, New York, NY: COSO.
33. Bedard, J. C., & Johnstone, K. M. (2004), Earnings manipulation risk, corporate governance risk, and auditors' planning and pricing decisions, The Accounting Review, 79(2), 277-304.
34. Bell, T. B., Bedard, J. C., Johnstone, K. M., & Smith, E. F. (2002), KRiskSM: A computerized decision aid for client acceptance and continuance risk assessments, Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 21(2), 97-113.
35. Bell, T. B., Landsman, W. R., & Shackelford, D. A. (2001), Auditor's perceived business risk and audit fees: Analysis and evidence, Journal of Accounting Research, 39(1), 35-43.
36. Bernardi, R. A. (1994), Fraud detection: the effect of client integrity and competence and auditor cognitive style, Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 13(1), supplement, 68-84.
37. Brockhaus, R. H. (1980), Risk-raking propensity of entrepreneurs, Academy of Management Journal, 23(3), 509-520.
38. Bromiley, P. (1991), Testing a causal model of corporate risk taking and performance, Academy of Management Journal, 34(1) 37-59.
39. Carcello, J .V., & Neal, T. L. (2000), Audit committee composition and auditor reporting, The Accounting Review, 75(4), 453-467.
40. Chattopadhyay, P., Glick, W. H., & Huber, G.. P. (2001), Organizational actions in response to threats and opportunities, Academy of Management Journal, 44:5, 937-959.
41. Cohen, J. R., & Hanno, D. M. (2000), Auditors' consideration of corporate governance and management control philosophy in preplanning and planning judgments, Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 19(2), 133-146.
42. Cohen, J. R., & Trompeter, G. M. (1998), An examination of factors affecting audit practice development, Contemporary Accounting Research, 15(4), 481-504.
43. Cohen, J., Krishnamoorthy, G., & Wright, A. M. (2002), Corporate governance and the audit process, Contemporary Accounting Research, 19(4), 573-594.
44. Colbert, J. L., Luehlfing, M. S., & Alderman, C. W. (1996), Engagement risk, The CPA Journal, 66(3), 54-56.
45. Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO), 1992, Internal control-Integrated framework, Jersey City, NJ: AICPA.
46. Dan Simunic, A. (1980), The pricing of audit services: Theory and evidence, Journal of Accounting Research, 18(1), 161-190.
47. Dan Simunic, A., & Stein, M. T. (1990), Audit risk in a client portfolio context, Contemporary Accounting Research, 6(2), 329-343.
48. DeFond, M. L., & Jiambalvo, J. (1991), Incidence and circumstances of accounting errors, The Accounting Review, 66(3), 643-655.
49. Deis Jr., D. R. & Giroux, G.. (1996), The effect of auditor changes on audit fees, audit hours, and audit quality, Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, Spring, 15(1), 55-76.
50. DeZoort, F. T., & Salterio, S. E. (2001), The effects of corporate governance experience and financial-reporting and audit knowledge on audit committee members' judgments, Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 20(2), 31-47.
51. Economist, (2004), Called to account, 373(8402), 69-71.
52. Emby, C., (1994), Framing and presentation mode effects in professional judgment: Auditors' internal control judgments and substantive testing decisions, Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 13, 102-115.
53. Fiegenbaum, A., & Thomas, H., (1988), Attitude toward risk and the Risk-Return Paradox: Prospect theory explanations, Academy of Management Journal, 33(1), 85-106.
54. Houston, R. W., Peters, M. F., & Pratt, J. H. (1999), The audit risk model, business risk and audit-planning decisions, The Accounting Review, 74(3), 281-298.
55. Houston, R. W., Peters, M. F., & Pratt, J. H. (2002), How auditors price business risk: A framework and experiment, Working paper, University of Maryland.
56. Huss, H. F., & Jacobs, F. A. (1991), Risk containment: exploring auditor decisions in the engagement process, Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 10(2), 16-32.
57. Johnstone, K. M. (2000), Client-acceptance decisions: Simultaneous effects of client business risk, audit risk, auditor business risk, and risk adaptation, Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 19(1), 1-25.
58. Johnstone, K. M., & Bedard, J. C. (2002), Client acceptance decisions: Evidence of risk management through specialist personnel and engagement pricing, Working paper, University of Wisconsin-Madison.
59. Johnstone, K. M., & Bedard, J. C. (2003), Risk management in client acceptance decisions, The Accounting Review, 78(4), 1003-1025.
60. Johnstone, K. M., & Bedard, J. C. (2004), Audit firm portfolio management decisions, Journal of Accounting Research, 42(4), 659-690.
61. Johnstone, K. M., Bedard, J. C., & Ettredge, M. L. (2004), The effect of competitive bidding on engagement planning and pricing, Contemporary Accounting Research, 21(1), 25-53.
62. Kaplan, S. E., & Reckers, P. M. (1984), An empirical examination of auditor’s initial planning process, Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 4(1), 1-19.
63. Kinney, W. R., Jr. (2000), Information quality assurance and internal control for management decision making, Boston, Irwin; McGraw-Hill.
64. KPMG. (1999), Fraud survey results 1999, New York, NY: KPMG.
65. Latham, C. K., & Linville, M. (1998), A review of the literature in audit litigation, Journal of Accounting Literature, 17, 175-213.
66. Levitt, A. (1999), Levitt plays up shareholder rights to directors, Investor Relations Business, 1.
67. MacCrimmon, K. R., & Wehrung, D. A. (1990), Characteristics of risk taking executives, Management Science, 36(4), 422-435.
68. MacDonald, E. (1997, April 25), More accounting firms are dumping risky clients --Big six worry about their reputations and chance of costly litigation, Wall Street Journal, pp. A.2.
69. March, J. G., & Shapira, Z. (1987), Managerial perspectives on risk and risk taking. Management Science, 33(11), 1404-1418.
70. McMullen, D. A. (1996), Audit committee performance: An investigation of the consequences associated with audit committees, Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 15(1), 87-103.
71. McNamara, G., & Bromiley, P. (1997), Decision making in an organizational setting: Cognitive and organizational influence on risk assessment in commercial lending, Academy of Management Journal, 40(5) 1063-1088.
72. Pratt, J., & Stice, J. D. (1994), The effects of client characteristics on auditor litigation risk judgments, required audit evidence and recommended audit fees, The Accounting Review, 69(4), 639-656.
73. Public Oversight Board (POB), (1993), Issues confronting the accounting profession, Stamford, CT: POB.
74. Public Oversight Board (POB), (1994), Strengthening the professionalism of the independent auditor, Stamford, CT: POB.
75. Public Oversight Board (POB), (2000), Panel on audit effectiveness report and recommendations, Stamford, CT: POB.
76. Reckers, P. M., & Shultz, J. J. Jr. (1993), The effects of fraud signals, evidence order, and group-assisted counsel on independent auditor judgment, Behavioral Research in Accounting, 5, 124-144.
77. Schneider, S. L., & Lopes, L. L. (1986), Reflection in preferences under risk: Who and when may suggest why, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 12(4), 533-548.
78. Sitkin, S. B., & Pablo, A. L. (1992), Reconceptualizing the determinants of risk behavior, Academy of Management Review, 17(1), 9-39.
79. Sitkin, S. B., & Weingart, L. R. (1995), Determinants of risky decision-making behavior: A test of the mediating role of risk perceptions and propensity, Academy of Management Journal, 38(6), 1573-1592.
80. Tversky, A. & Kahneman, D. (1981), The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice, Science, 211(30), 453-458.