(54.236.58.220) 您好!臺灣時間:2021/03/04 23:42
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果

詳目顯示:::

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:張家盛
研究生(外文):Chia-Sheng Chang
論文名稱:考量鷹架撤除於概念構圖輔助網路學習活動對學習成效影響之研究
論文名稱(外文):A Study of the Effect on Learning Achievement by Utilizing Scaffold Fading in Web-based Concept Mapping Learning Activities
指導教授:李建億李建億引用關係
指導教授(外文):Chien-I Lee
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立臺南大學
系所名稱:資訊教育研究所教學碩士班
學門:教育學門
學類:教育科技學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2005
畢業學年度:93
語文別:中文
論文頁數:77
中文關鍵詞:鷹架撤除鷹架教學網路學習概念構圖
外文關鍵詞:Web-based LearningScaffold FadingConcept MappingScaffolding Instruction
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:17
  • 點閱點閱:445
  • 評分評分:系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔
  • 下載下載:75
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:4
本研究目的在探討運用三種不同的鷹架撤除策略於概念構圖輔助網路學習活動中,來了解其各自對學習者概念構圖成效與學習成就的影響,並探討學習者參與概念構圖輔助網路學習活動後的意見。本研究以256名國小五年級學童為樣本,受試者依班級隨機分配至無鷹架組與三個提供不同鷹架撤除策略的實驗組。研究結果發現:
一、在槪念構圖成效方面,考量鷹架撤除策略的三個實驗組學習者,其構圖成效顯著優於無鷹架組的學習者。其次,接受鷹架輔助最多的實驗組學習者,其構圖成效顯著優於鷹架輔助較少的其他兩個實驗組的學習者。
二、在學習成就表現方面,接受最多鷹架輔助的實驗組學習者,其學習成就顯著優於無鷹架組與鷹架輔助較少的兩個實驗組的學習者。其次,無鷹架組與鷹架輔助較少的兩個實驗組的學習者,其學習成就並無顯著差異。
三、學習者在接受概念構圖輔助網路學習活動後的態度大多數持正向且積極的看法,並認為概念構圖輔助網路學習活動對其學習有所助益。
The purpose of this thesis is to investigate the efficiency of concept mapping as well as the improvement of nature science learning achievement for elementary school students. To achieve the goods of this study, several activities of web-based concept mapping learning were designed using scaffold fading. In this thesis, two hundred and fifty six fifth grade primary school students were chosen and randomly divided into four groups, which are “No scaffolding group”, “Learning with scaffold-fading group”, “Mapping with scaffold-fading group”, and “Learning and mapping with scaffold-fading group”. After finishing the web-based concept mapping learning activities, the students must work on the test of nature science learning achievement and finally complete the questionnaire on utilization web-based concept mapping learning activities. The research results indicated that “Learning and mapping with scaffold-fading” could efficiently improve both students’ efficiency of concept mapping and students’ learning achievement. Where as “Learning with scaffold-fading”, and “Mapping with scaffold-fading” improve only students’ efficiency of concept mapping. A questionnaire indicated that most students desire to take more lessons in web-based concept mapping learning activities from which most students thought that they could benefit more.
第一章 緒論
第一節 研究背景與動機 1
第二節 研究目的 4
第三節 研究問題 4
第四節 名詞解釋 5
第五節 研究限制 6
第二章 文獻探討
第一節 概念構圖 7
第二節 應用概念構圖於網路學習相關研究 15
第三節 鷹架輔助概念構圖相關研究 18
第四節 綜合評述 24
第三章 研究方法
第一節 系統鷹架設計 26
第二節 研究設計 34
第三節 研究對象 36
第四節 研究工具 37
第五節 實施程序 41
第六節 資料處理與分析方法 42
第四章 研究結果與討論
第一節 實驗結果 44
第二節 討論 53
第五章 結論與建議
第一節 結論 56
第二節 建議 57
參考文獻
中文部分 59
英文部分 62
附錄
附錄一 自然與生活科技學習成就前測試卷 70
附錄二 自然與生活科技學習成就後測試卷 72
附錄三 概念構圖輔助網路學習問卷 75
附錄四 認識植物之單元概念圖 76
中文部分
朱延平(1999)。多媒體在教育上的運用。資訊與教育雜誌,72期,頁15-25。
余民寧(1997)。有意義的學習─概念構圖之研究。台北市:商鼎文化出版社。
宋德忠、陳淑芬、張國恩(1998)。電腦化概念構圖系統在知識結構測量上的應用。中國測驗學會測驗年刊,45輯,2期,頁37-56。
李秀娟(1998)。不同教學策略對國中生學習生物的影響。國立台灣師範大學科學教育研究所碩士論文。台北市:國立台灣師範大學。
林達森(2001)。合作建構教學與認知風格對國中學生生物能量概念學習之效應。國立台灣師範大學科學教育研究所博士論文。台北市:國立台灣師範大學。
林達森(2003)。「運用概念構圖之科學教學模式」在高中生物科教學的實徵研究。國科會計畫:NSC91-2511-S-041-001。
邱垂昌、黃華山、謝佳惠(2004)。以超媒體輔助之概念圖建構教學教材之實證研究-以會計存貨教材為例。國立臺北師範學院學報,17卷2期,頁57-84。
邱慧玲(2003)。以概念構圖輔助學習之教學網站建置研究。國立彰化師範大學商業教育學系碩士論文。彰化縣:國立彰化師範大學。
邱瓊慧(2004)。國小學童於網路上進行小組學習之鷹架策略及互動模式之研究(2/2)。國科會計畫:NSC92-2520-S-024-002。
邱瓊慧、陷撰W、吳偉碩、莊巧華(2002)。CoCoMap:網路概念構圖系統。第六屆全球華人計算機教育應用,北京。
張史如(1998)。從建構主義的觀點探討網路超文件/超媒體應用於教學上的意義。資訊與教育,58期,頁39-48。
張春興(1996)。教育心理學:三化取向的理論與實踐。台北市:台灣東華書局。
張國恩(2000)。使用開放式或固定式聯結語的電腦化概念構圖對學習效果之研究。Fourth Global Chinese Conference on Computers in Education(第四屆全球華人教育資訊科技會議)。新加坡。
張國恩(2003)。整合探索學習與概念圖在網頁化教學與學習之研究。國科會計畫:NSC 89-2520-S-003-006。
張菀珍(1997)。鷹架理論在成人教學實務之應用。成人教育,40期,頁43-53。
陴��?2003)。應用改良式加權概念圖建構網路課程體之研究。國立彰化師範大學資訊管理學系碩士論文。彰化縣:國立彰化師範大學。
游于仙(2002)。應用整合式三維加權概念圖在網路教學課程體建構之探討。國立彰化師範大學資訊管理學系碩士論文。彰化縣:國立彰化師範大學。
陳年興、蔡旻芳(2001)。網路學習之學習歷程分析系統。TANET 2001 & ELCPE 2001研討會論文集,頁231-236。
陳沅、林宜樺、洪碧霞(2003)。心智工具在融入式網路數學專題學習中應用效益之探討。網路專題學習與多元動態評量模式發展趨勢研討會論文集,頁103-117。台南市:國立台南師範學院測驗發展中心。
陳俊源(2002)。概念構圖式網路學習環境對認知結構影響之研究-以國小五年級學生岩石概念為例。國立台南師範學院資訊教育研究所碩士論文。台南市:國立台南師範學院。
陳裕隆(2001)。運用概念引導機制支援真實的網路探究學習環境。國立臺灣師範大學資訊教育研究所碩士論文。台北市:國立臺灣師範大學。
陳櫻代(1998)。概念構圖策略促進嬝玨z解能力之研究。國立臺灣師範大學資訊教育研究所碩士論文。台北市:國立臺灣師範大學。
陳嘉成、余民寧(1998)。以概念構圖為學習習策略之教學對自然科學習的促進效果之研究。政大學報,77期,頁201-235。
黃文聖(2003)。概念構圖應用在網路專題製作之成效研究。國立高雄師範大學資訊教育研究所碩士論文。高雄市:國立高雄師範大學。
黃台珠(1995)。概念圖在國中生物教學上的成效研究(II)。國科會計畫:NSC84-25511-S-017-003。
楊世麒(2002)。以概念構圖作為探究國小高年級學童水循環概念的概念改變研究。國立台北師範學院數理教育研究所碩士論文。台北市:國立台北師範學院。
溫嘉榮、吳明隆(1999)。新時代資訊教育的理論與實務應用。台北:松崗。
蔡惠蓉(2004)。構圖框架與認知型態對國小學童概念構圖學習成效之影響。國立台南師範學院資訊教育研究所碩士論文。台南市:國立台南師範學院。
蔡義本、陳斐卿(1999)。網路上高中地球科學學習環境之研究。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告: NSC88-2511-S-008-001。
謝真華(1999)。概念構圖教學對國小四年級學童在自然科學習成效之研究。國立台南師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文。台南市:國立台南師範學院。
謝富榮(2003)。概念構圖策略與認知型態對自然科網路化教學影響之研究。東海大學教育研究所碩士論文。台中市:東海大學。
簡文偉(2004)。網路多媒體概念構圖學習系統之建置與對學習成效影響之研究。國立台南師範學院資訊教育研究所碩士論文。台南市:國立台南師範學院。
顏榮泉(1995)。媒體發展與遠距學習。視聽教育,37卷,4期,頁12-19。
羅豪章(1998)。鷹架理論在電腦輔助教學上之應用。視聽教育,42卷,4期,頁20-30。

西文部分
Alpert, S. R., & Grueneberg, K. (2000). Concept Mapping with Multimedia on the Web. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 9(4), 313-330.
Alverman, D. E. (1981). The compensatory effect of graphic organizers on descriptive text. Journal of Educational Research, 75, 44-48.
Anderson, J. R. (1983). The architecture of cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Anderson-Inman, L., Ditson, L., & Ditson, M.T. (1998). Computer-based concept mapping: Promoting meaningful learning in science for students with disabilities. Information Technology and Disabilities [Online serial], 5(1-2). Available: http://www.rit.edu/~easi/itd/itdv05n1-2/article2.html.
Anderson-Inman, L., & Zeitz, L. (1993). Computer-based concept mapping: Active studying for active learners. The Computing Teacher, 21(1), 1-5.
Astleitner, H., & Leutner, D. (1995). Learning strategies for unstructured hypermedia. A framework for theory, research, and practice. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 13, 387-400.
Ausubel, D. P. (1968). Educational psychology: A cognitive view. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Chang, K. E., Sung, Y. T., & Chen, I. D. (2002). The Effect of Concept Mapping to Enhance Text Comprehension and Summarization. The Journal of Experimental Education, 71(1), 5-23.
Chang, K. E., Sung, Y. T., & Chen, S. F. (2001). Learning through computer-based concept mapping with scaffolding aid. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 17, 21-33.
Chang, K. E., Sung, Y. T., & Chiou, S. K. (2002). Use of Hierarchical Hyper Concept Map in Web-Based Courses. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 27(4), 335-353.
Chiu, C. H., Huang, C. C., & Chang, W. T. (2000). The evaluation and influence of interaction in network supported collaborative concept mapping. Computers and Education, 34(1), 17-25.
Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt. (1990). Anchor instruction and its relationship to situated cognition. Educational Researcher, 19(5), 2-10.
Collis, B., & Meeuwsen, E. (1999). Learning to Learn in a WWW- based Environment. In Deanie French, Charles Hale, Charles Johnson, & Gerald Farr (Eds.), Internet-based Learning: An Introduction and Framework for Higher Education and Business (pp 25-46).
Conklin, J. (1987). Hypertext: An introduction and survey. IEEE Computer, 20(9), 17-41.
Collins, A. M., & Quillian, M. R. (1969). Retrieval time from semantic memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 8, 240-247.
Day, J. D., & Cordon, L. A. (1993). Static and dynamic measures of ability: An experimental comparison. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 75-82.
Dias, P. & Sousa, P. (1997). Understanding navigation and disorientation in hypermedia learning environments. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 6(2), 173-185.
Duffy, T. M., Lowyck, J., & Jonassen, D.H.(1991). Designing environment for constructive learning. NATO ASI series. New York: Spring-verlag.
Dyson, A. H. (1990). Weaving possibilities: Rethinking metaphors for early literacy development. The Reading Teacher, 44(3), 202-213.
Edmondson, K. (1995). Concept mapping for the development of medical curricular. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32, 777-793.
Fisher, K. M. (1990). Semantic-Networking: The new-kid on the block. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27, 971-995.
Flavell, J. H. (1977). Speculations about the nature and development of metacognitive. In F. E. Weinert & R. H. Kluwe (Eds.), Metacognition, Motivation and Understanding (pp 21-29). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
Gaffney, J. S., & Anderson, R. C. (1991). Two-tiered scaffolding: Congruent processes of teaching and learning. In E. H. Hiebert (Ed.), Literachy for a diverse society: Perspectives, programs and policies. NY: Teachers College Press.
Goldsmith, T. E., Johnson, P. J., & Acton, W. H. (1991). Assessing structural knowledge. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 88-96.
Hannafin, M., Land, S., & Oliver, K. (1999). Open learning environments: Foundations, methods, and models. In C. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional design theories and models (Vol. 2, 115-140). Mahway, NJ: Erlbaum.
Hatano, G. (1993). Time to Merge Vygotskian and Constructivist Conceptions of Knowledge Acquisition. In Contexts for learning , eds. E. A. Forman, N. Minick, & C. A. Stone. New York:Oxford University Press.
Heinze-Fry, J. A., Novak, J. D. (1990). Concept mapping brings long-term movement toward meaningful learning. Science Education, 74(4), 461-472.
IHMC (2000). The Institute for Human & Machine Cognition (IHMC) Concept Map Software: A Knowledge Construction Toolkit. http://cmap.coginst.uwf.edu/.
Jackson, S., Stratford, S., Krajcik, J., & Soloway, E. (1995). Making system dynamics modeling accessible to pre-college science students. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.
Jonassen, D. H., Beissner, K., & Yacci, M. (1993). Structural knowledge: Techniques for representing, conveying, and acquiring structural knowledge. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Kao, M. T., Lehman, J. D., & Cennamo, K. S. (1996). Scaffolding in hypermedia assisted instruction: An example of integration. Paper presented at the Association for Educational Communication and Technology (AECT) 1996 Annual Meeting, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Katayama, A. D., & Robinson, D. H. (2000). Getting students “partially” involved in note-taking using graphic organizers. The Journal of Experimental Education, 68, 119–133.
Khan, B. H. (1997). Web-based instruction(WBI): What is it and why is it ? In B. H. Khan (Eds.), Web-based Instruction (pp 5-18). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
Kinchin, I. M. (2000). Case study: Concept mapping in biology. Journal of Biological Education, 34(2), 61-68.
Komers, P., & Lanzing, J. (1997). Students’ concept mapping for hypermedia design: navigation through World Wide Web (WWW) space and self- assessment. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 8, 421-455.
Krajcik, J., Soloway, E., Blumenfeld, P., & Marx, R. (1998). Scaffolded technology tools to promote teaching and learning in science. In C. Dede (Ed.), ASCD 1998 yearbook: Learning with technology (pp. 31-45). Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
Laffey, J. M., & Singer, J. (1997). Using mapping for cognitive assessment in project-based science. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 8(3-4), 363-87.
Linn, M. (1995). Designing computer learning environments for engineering and computer science: The Scaffolded Knowledge Integration Framework. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 4(2), 103-126.
McCagg, E. C., & Dansereau, D. F. (1991). A convergent paradigm for examining knowledge mapping as a learning and recall strategy. Journal of Educational Research, 84, 317-324.
McClure, J.R., Sonak, B., & Suen, K.H. (1999). Concept map assessment of classroom learning: Reliability, validity, and logistical practicality. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36, 475-492.
Moore, D. W., & Readence, J. E. (1984). A quantitative and qualitative review of graphic organizers research. Journal of Educational Research, 78, 11-17.
Nakhleh, M., & Krajcik, J. S. (1994). Influence of levels of information as presented by different technologies on students’ understanding of acid, base, and PH concepts. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31, 1077-1096.
Newman, D., Griffin P., & Cole M. (1989). The construction zone: working for cognitive change in school. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.
Novak, J. D., (1990). Concept maps and vee diagrams: Two met cognitive tools to facilitate meaningful learning. Instructional Science, 19, 29-52.
Novak, J. D. (1993). Human constructivism: A unification of psychological and epistemological phenomena in meaning making. International Journal of Personal Construct Psychology, 6, 167-193.
Novak, J. D., & Gowin, D. B. (1984). Learning how to learn. Cambridge, Lonndon:Cambridge University Press.
Novak, J. D., & Musonda, D. (1991). A twelve-year longitudinal study of science Concept learning. American Education Research Journal, 28(1), 117-153.
Odom, A. L., & Kelly, P. V. (2001). Integrating concept mapping and the learning cycle to teach diffusion and osmosis concepts to high school biology students. Science Education, 85 (6), 615-635.
Okebukola, P. A., & Jegede, O. J. (1989). Cognitive preference and learning model as determinates of meaningful learning through concept mapping. Science Education, 71, 232-241.
Oughton, J., & Reed, W. (1999). The influence of learner differences on the construction of hypermedia concepts: A case study. Computers in Human Behavior, 15(1), 11-50.
Piaget, J. & Garcia, R. (1991). Toward a Logic of Meanings. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Reader, W., & Hammond, N. (1994). Computer-based tools to support learning from hypertext: concept mapping tools and beyond. Computers and Education, 12,99-106.
Ritchie, D., & Gimenez, F. (1996). Effectiveness of graphic organizers in computer-based instruction with dominant Spanish-speaking and dominant English-speaking students. Journal of research on Computing in Education, 28(2), 13-17.
Rivard, L., & Yore, L. D. (1992). Review of Reading Comprehension Instruction: 1985-1991. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 354-144).
Robinson, A. H.(1982). Early thematic mapping in the history of cartography. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Roehler, L., & Cantlon, D. (1997). Scaffolding: A powerful tool in social constructivist classrooms. In K. Hogan & M. Pressley (Eds.), Scaffolding student learning: Instructional approaches and issues (pp. 27-37). Cambridge, MA: Brookline.
Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking: Cognitive development in social context. New York: Oxford University Press.
Roth, W. M, & Roychoudury, A. (1992). The social construction of scientific concepts or the concept map conscription device and tool for social thinking in high school science. Science Education, 76, 531-557.
Roth, W. M., & Roychoudhury, A. (1994). Science discourse through collaborative concept mapping: New Perspectives for the teacher. International Journal of Science Education, 16, 437-455.
Ruddell, R. B. & Boyle, O. F. (1989). A study of cognitive mapping as a means to improvement summarization and comprehension of expository text. Reading Research and Instruction, 29(1), 12-22.
Ruiz-Primo, M. A. (2000). On the use of concept maps as an assessment tool in science: What we have learned so far. Revista Electrónica de Investigación Educativa, 2(1). Retrieved Oct. 1, 2003. From http://redie.ens.uabc.mx/vol2no1/contenido-ruizpri.html
Ruiz-Primo, M. A., & Shavelson, R. J. (1996). Problems and issues in the use of concept maps in science assessment. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33, 569-600.
Ruiz-Primo, M. A., Schultz, S. E., Li, M., & Shavelson, R. J. (2001). Comparison of the reliability and validity of scores from two concept-mapping techniques. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 260–278.
Santhanam, E., Leach, C. & Dawson, C. (1998). Concept mapping: How should it be introduced, and is there evidence for long term benefit? Higher Education, 35, 317-328.
Schmid, R. F., & Telaro, G. (1990). Concept mapping as an instructional strategy for high school biology. Journal of Educational Research, 84, 78-85.
Solso, R.L. (1995). Cognitive psychology(4th ed.). Boston: Allyn & bacon.
Starr, M. L., & Krajcik, J. S. (1990). Concept maps as heuristic for science curriculum development: Toward improvement in process and product. Journal of Research of Science Teaching, 27, 987-1000.
Stuart, H.A. (1985). Should concept maps be scored numerically? European Journal of Science Education, 7, 73-81.
Tan, S. C. (2000). The effects of incorporating concept mapping into computer assisted instruction. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 23(2), 113-131.
Vivacqua, A. S. (1999). Agents for Expertise Location. Proceedings 1999 AAAI Spring Symposium on Intelligent Agents in Cyberspace . Technical Report SS-99-03 Stanford, CA, USA [online] Available:http://web.media.mit.edu/~adriana/projects/EF/ EFssymp.pdf
Von Glasersfeld, E.(1987). Learning as constructive activity. In C. Janvier(ED.), Problems of representation in the teaching and learning of mathematics(pp.3-17). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Vygotsky, L. S.(1962). Thought and language. (E. Hanfmann & G. Vakar, Eds. And Trans.). Cambridge, MA: The MIT. Press(Original work published 1934)
Vygotsky, L. S.(1978). Mind in society : The development of higher psychological processes,(M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, Scribner, E. Souberman. Eds,. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press)
Wang, B. Y. L. (1985). Metacognition and learning disabilities. In D. L. Forrest-Pressley, G. E. Mackinnon, & T. G. Waller (Eds). Metacognition , Cognition and human performance, pp137-180.
Wang, M.C., & Peverly, S.T. (1986). The self-instructive process in learning contexts. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 11, 370-404.
Wood, D., Bruner, J. S. & Ross, G.. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem-solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17, pp.89-100.
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
1. 張菀珍(1997)。鷹架理論在成人教學實務之應用。成人教育,40期,頁43-53。
2. 張史如(1998)。從建構主義的觀點探討網路超文件/超媒體應用於教學上的意義。資訊與教育,58期,頁39-48。
3. 宋德忠、陳淑芬、張國恩(1998)。電腦化概念構圖系統在知識結構測量上的應用。中國測驗學會測驗年刊,45輯,2期,頁37-56。
4. 朱延平(1999)。多媒體在教育上的運用。資訊與教育雜誌,72期,頁15-25。
5. 王俊民(民86b)。民營化之理論研究。人力發展月刊,45,15-20。
6. 王鶴松(民87)。BOT計畫--基本架構與成它]素。金融研訓季刊,90,23-35。
7. 史英(民87)。世界理念學校聯盟(WISA)芻議。人本教育札記,l06,72-73。
8. 江樹人(民85)。美國委辦學校運動的源起與發展。教師天地,84,62-66。
9. 朱雲鵬(民79)。公營事業民營化的國際觀。財稅研究,22(3),45。
10. 李國偉(民85)。教育基本法的理念分析。教改通訊,17、18,8-11。
11. 李天健 (民87)。他們,一群教育理想的播種人-台灣「理念學校」三部曲。人本教育札記,106,77-86。
12. 吳清山(民88)。台北市國民中小學實施「公辦民營」之可行性分析。教育政策論壇,2(1),l57-l79。
13. 林天祐(民87)。特鳥ヴ?-公立學校組織再造的新機制。國教月刊,45(l),46-54。
14. 張明輝(民87a)。美國學校教育改革的成幼蚳牷G委辦學校運動及其相關研究。教育資料集刊,23,277-289。
15. 馬信行(民86)。國民教育公辦民營的可行性之探討。研考報導季刊,38,44-58。
 
系統版面圖檔 系統版面圖檔