跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(18.97.9.170) 您好!臺灣時間:2024/12/08 14:47
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:吳冠穎
論文名稱:他們是社會人嗎?—兩名啟智學校畢業青年的生活樣貌
論文名稱(外文):Are They Social Members?—The Lives of Two Young Adults with Intellectual Disability
指導教授:王天苗王天苗引用關係
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立臺灣師範大學
系所名稱:特殊教育學系
學門:教育學門
學類:特殊教育學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2005
畢業學年度:93
語文別:中文
論文頁數:196
中文關鍵詞:智能障礙融合生活品質社會關係質性研究
外文關鍵詞:Intellectual DisabilityIncludsionquality of lifesocial relationshipqualitative study
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:13
  • 點閱點閱:430
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:5
摘要
本研究採用質性研究方法,深入探究兩名智能障礙青年的生活樣貌。資料蒐集是透過觀察和訪談的方式,與16名研究參與者進行互動,共為期七個月。

經過資料蒐集、分析與詮釋,研究者先分別呈現兩位智能障礙青年的生活脈絡,再進一步提出其共同的核心議題,研究主要發現如下:

一、工作不但讓青年成為一個生產者,增加經濟和生活的獨立,更是拓展社交網絡的重要媒介,使生活變得有意義。

二、家長對於子女的關愛和協助,可能是促進他們融合的推力,但是過度擔心和保護,反而形成智能障礙青年融入社會的拉力。

三、他人對於「智能障礙」的刻板印象,可能刻意或不經意地形成工作、友誼的柵欄,阻絕了他們真正融入社會的機會。

四、智能障礙青年藉由人際互動的經驗形成自我概念和評價。

五、智能障礙青年如能獲得更多參與和扮演各種角色的機會,並得到更多社會支持,就更能融入社會。

整體而言,智能障礙青年的生活深受「關係」的影響。各種社會關係中是否給予青年參與的機會和支持,將會建構成不一樣的生活樣貌。換言之,他們所經驗到的生活品質因社會支持和參與的機會而有不同。
Are They Social Members?—The Lives of Two Young Adults with Intellectual Disability

ABSTRACT

Taking two cases as the examples, the lives of young adults with intellectual disability (ID) were explored in this qualitative study. The data was collected within seven months through participation observation and interviewing with Haw, Hwai, and other 14 participants including parents, siblings, workmates, teachers, classmates, and neighbors.

As the results, the daily lives of two young adults with intellectual disabilities were described and five core themes were synthesized:
(1) Work not only allows Haw to become a productive and independent person but also makes his lives more meaningful. (2) Parents’ love and caring enable their ID child to integrate into the community but too much worry and protection may hold back their further participation. (3) With low-functioning characteristics and the label of ID, the young adults are treated differently and may experience more difficulties getting jobs and making friends. (4) The experience of interacting with others affects ID young adults’ self value and self concept. (5) More opportunity to participate a variety of social activities, play multiple social roles with counterparts, and gain social supports, more chances for them to be integrated successfully in the society.

Taken together, young adults with ID can become true social members only when they have more opportunity of participation and social supports which promote their social relationship with others. In other words, social supports and participation determines the quality of live young adults with ID may experience.
目 錄

第 一 章 研究背景與目的
第一節 研究動機 ……………………………………………… 1
第二節 我的初步探索 ………………………………………… 2
第三節 研究目的 ……………………………………………… 5

第 二 章 進行探究的概念脈絡
第一節 「融合」帶來的啟示 ………………………………… 7
第二節 「社會人」和人際關係 ……………………………… 12
第三節 智障成人的生活品質 ………………………………… 17

第 三 章 研究方法與歷程
第一節 研究設計 ……………………………………………… 20
第二節 研究參與者 …………………………………………… 22
第三節 研究現場 ……………………………………………… 27
第四節 進入研究現場 ………………………………………… 29
第五節 我的角色 ……………………………………………… 37
第六節 資料的蒐集、處理與分析 …………………………… 42
第七節 我對研究信賴度所做的努力 ………………………… 51

第 四 章 研究結果
第一節 小豪的生活脈絡 ……………………………………… 56
第二節 阿輝的生活脈絡 ……………………………………… 102
第三節 我看到的事實 ………………………………………… 125

第 五 章 回顧反思與繼續前行
第一節 我的回顧與反思 ……………………………………… 152
第二節 繼續前行 ……………………………………………… 159

參考文獻 ………………………………………………………… 161
附錄 ……………………………………………………………… 172


圖 表 目 次

圖一、小豪生活場域圖…………………………………………… 60
圖二、小豪在工作場所的人際網絡圖…………………………… 62
圖三、站長與小豪的相處示意圖………………………………… 67
圖四、一般工讀生與小豪的相處示意圖………………………… 82
圖五、阿輝沒有工作示意圖……………………………………… 107
圖六、小豪與阿輝兩位智障青年的生活脈絡示意圖…………… 148
圖七、影響社會關係的因素及其運作圖………………………… 150
表一、資料研究資料編碼範例 ………………………………… 49
表二、小豪與工讀生對工作伙伴的稱呼對照表 ……………… 72
表三、工讀生之間及與寶寶們的互動情形對照表 …………… 76
參考文獻
中正大學教育研究所(主編)(民89):質的研究方法。高雄市:麗文。
內政部(民90)。身心障礙者生活需求調查報告(社會福利服務篇)。台北市:內政部。
王昭正與朱瑞淵(譯)(民88): D. L. Jorgensen 著。參與觀察法(Participant Observation)。台北市:弘智。
朱志賢(主編)(1989):心理學大辭典。北京:北京師範大學出版社。
余光弘(民90):參與觀察與參加觀察—以蘭嶼經驗為例略論參與觀察的類型與深度。未出版手稿。
李伯黍(譯)(民91): A. S. Reber. 著。心理學辭典(The Penguin Dictionary of Psychology)。台北市:五南。
李奉儒、高淑清、鄭瑞隆、林麗菊、吳芝儀、洪志成、蔡清田(譯)(民90):R. C. Bogdan & S. K. Biklen 著。質性教育研究理論與方法(Qualitative Research For Education)。嘉義市:濤石文化。
林宏熾(民86):台灣地區身心障礙青年「社區生活素質」之研究。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告(NSC 86-2413-H-018-011-F8)。彰化市:國立彰化師範大學特殊教育系。
林宏熾(民87):台灣地區身心障礙青年「社區生活素質」之研究(Ⅱ)。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告(NSC-87-2413-H-018-005-F8)。彰化市:國立彰化師範大學特殊教育系。
林宏熾(民89):身心障礙青年社區生活品質狀況之分析。特殊教育研究學刊,20,1-21。
胡幼慧(主編)(民85):質性研究理論、方法及本土女性研究實例。台北市:巨流。
時容華(主編)(1988):社會心理學辭典。四川:四川人民出版社。
時蓉華(民85):社會心理學。台北市:東華。
陸洛(譯)(民85):M. Argyle著。日常生活社會心理學。台北市:巨流。
彭文賢(民81):人群關係的生態面。台北市:幼獅。
張秋珍(民81):影響智能不足者人際關係之因素及因應之道。特殊教育季刊,44,17-19。
張淑燕(民86):轉銜階段障礙青少年父母應扮演的角色。特殊教育季刊,64,17-20。
許天威(民87):身心障礙者「生活素質」之研究。載於「身心障礙教育研討會」會議實錄。台北市:國立台灣師範大學。
潘淑滿(民92):質性研究理論與應用。台北市:心理。
蔡敏玲(民90):尋找教室團體互動的節奏與變奏—教育質性研究歷程的展現。台北市:桂冠。
蕭昭君(民92):國內教育行動研究解放了什麼?一個師資培育者的閱讀與困惑。載於「教育研究方法論」學術研討會會議手冊。台北市:國立台灣師範大學。
嚴祥鸞(民85)。參與觀察法。載於質性研究理論、方法及本土女性研究實例(頁195-22)。台北市:巨流。
America Association of Mental Retardation (2002). Mental retardation: Definition, classification, and systems of supports (10th ed.). Washington, DC: The Author.
Asher, S. R., & Paquette, J. A. (2003). Loneliness and peer relations in childhood. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 12(3), 75-78.
Biklen, S. K., & Moseley, C. R. (1988). “Are you retarded?” “No, I’m catholic”: Qualitative methods in the study of people with severe handicaps. The Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 13(3), 155-162.
Bogdan, R., & Taylor, S. (1976). The judged, not the judges. An insider's view of mental retardation. America Psychology, 31(1), 47-52.
Bramston, P., Bruggerman, K., & Pretty, G. (2002). Community perspectives and subjective quality of life. Community Integration, 49(4), 305-397.
Brimer, R. W. (1990). Students with severe disabilities: current perspectives and practices. Chapter14: Community and adult programs for persons with severe disabilities. 307-328.
Carnaby, S. (1998). Reflection on social integration for people with intellectual disability: Does interdependence have a role? Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disability, 23(3), 1-8.
Chadsey, J., & Beyer, S. (2001). Social relationships in the workplace, mental retardation and developmental disabilities. Research Reviews, 7, 128-133.
Chappell, A. L. (1998). Still out in the cold: people with learning disabilities and the social model of disability. In T. Shakespeare (Ed.), The disability reader: Social science perspectives (pp. 211-220). London: Cassell.
Chappell, A. L., Goodley, D., & Lawthom, R. (2001). Making connections: The relevance of the social model of disability for people with learning difficulties. British Journal of Learning Disabilities, 29, 45-50.
Cooley, C. A. (1956). Human Nature and Social Order. (Original York published 1902) Free Press, New York.
Culham, A. (2003). Deconstructing normalization: Clearing the way for inclusion. Journal of Intellectual and Development Disability, 28(1), 65-78.
Cummins, R. A., & Lau, A. L. D. (2003). Community integration or community exposure? A review and discussion in relation to people with intellectual disability. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disability, 16, 145-157.
Dagnan, D., & Waring, M. (2004). Linking stigma to psychological distress: Testing a social-cognitive model of the experience of people with intellectual disabilities. Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, 11, 247-254.
Dagnan, E. M. (1999). Personality-motivation: New ties to psychopathlogy, etiology and intervention. In E. Aigler & D. Bennett-Gates(Eds.), Personality development inindividual with mental retardation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,.
Dewees, M., Pulice, R., & McCormick, L. L. (1996). Community integration of former state hospital patients: Outcomes of a policy shirt in Vermont. Psychiatric Services, 47, 1088-1092.
Dixon, R. M., & Reddacliff, C. A. (2001). Family contribution to the vocational lives of vacationally competent young adults with intellectual disabilities. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 48(2), 193-206.
Essex, E. L. (2002). Mothers an fathers of adults with mental retardation: feelings of integration closeness. Family Retardation, 51, 156-165.
Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison process. Human Relations, 7, 117-140.
Finlay, W. M. L., & Lyons, E. (2000). Social categorizations, social confusions and stigma: Presentations of self in people with learning difficulties. British Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 129-146.
Forrester-Jones, R., & Grant, G.. (1997). Resettlement form Large Psychiatric Hospital to Small Community Residence. Aldershot: Avebury.
Forrester-Jones, R., Jones, S., Heason, S., & Di’Terlizzi, M. (2004). Supported employment: A route to social networks. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 17, 199-208.
Gracia, E., & Herrero, J. (2004). Determinations of social integration in the community: An exploratory analysis of personal, interpersonal and situational variables. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 14, 1-15.
Hughes, C., Hwang, B., Kim, J. H., Eisenman, L. T., Killian, D.J. (1995). Quality of life in applied research: A review and analysis of empirical measures. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 99(6), 623-641.
Jahoda, A., & Markova, I. (2004). Coping with social stigma: People with intellectual disabilities moving from institutions and family home. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 48(8), 719-729.
Jahoda, A., Cattermole, M., & Markova, I. (1998). Stigma and the self-concept of people with mild mental handicap. Journal of Mental Deficiency Research, 32, 103-115.
Kennedy, C. H. (2001). Social interaction interventions for youth with severe disabilities should emphasize interdependence. Mental Retardation and Development Disabilities Research Reviews, 7, 122-127.
Kraemer, B., McIntyre, L. L., & Blacher, J. (2003). Quality of life for young adults with mental retardation during transition. Mental Retardation, 41(4), 250-262.
Lin, N. (1986). Conceptualizing social support. In N. Lin, A. Dean, & W. Ensel (Eds.), Social support, life events, and depression. New York: Academic Press.
Lunsky, Y., & Benson, B. A. (2001). Association between perceived social support and strain, and positive and negative outcome for adults with mild intellectual disability. Journal of Intellectual Disabilities Research, 45(2). 106-144.
Markowitz, F. E. (1998). The effects of stigma on the psychological well-being and life satisfaction of persons with mental illness. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 39, 335-347.
Martin, R. (2003). A real life, a real community: The empowerment and full participation of people with an intellectual disability in their community. A speech presented at the 16th ACMR, Tsukuba, Japan.
McColl, M. A., Carlson, P., Johnston, J., Davies, D., & Karlovits, T. (1998). The definition of community integration: Perspectives of people with brain injuries. NeuroRehabilitation, 16(1), 15-29.
McDonnell, J. J., Hardman, M. L., McDonnell, A. P., & Kiefer-O’Donnell, R. (1995). An introduction to persons with severe disabilities: Educational and social issues. Boston: Ally & Bacon.
Minnes, P., Carlson, P., McColl, M. A., Nolte, M. L., Johnston, J. & Buell, K. (2003). Community integration: A useful construct, but what does it really mean? Brain Injury, 17(2), 149-159.
Minnes, P., Carlson, P., McColl, M. A., Nolte, M. L., Johston, J., & Buell, K. (2002). Community integration: A useful construct, but what dose it really mean? Brain Injury, 17(2), 149-159.
Nirje, B. (1969). The normalization principle and its human management implications. In R. Kugel & W. Wolfensberger(Eds.), Changing patterns in residential services for the mentally retarded (pp. 179-195). Washington, DC: Presidents’ s Committee on Mental Retardation.
Nirje, B. (1985). The basis and logic of the normalization principle. Australia and New Zealand Journal of Development Disabilities, 11(2), 65-68.
O’Brien. J., & O’Brien, C. L. (1992). Member of each other. Perspectives on social support for people with severe disabilities. In J. Nisbet (Ed.), Natural supports in school, at work, and in the community for people with severe disabilities. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
Pearson, V., Wong, Y. C., & Pierini, J. (2002). The structure and content of social inclusion: Voices of young adults with learning difficulties in Guangzhou. Disability and Society, 17(4), 365-382.
Phillips, C. (2001). Re-imaging the (Dis)Abled Body. Journal of Medical Humanities, 22(3), 195-208.
Pottie, C., & Sumarah, J. (2004). Friendships between persons with and without developmental disabilities. Mental Retardation, 42(1), 55-66.
Pretty, G., Rapley, M., & Bramston, P. (2002). Neighbourhood and community experience, and the quality of life of rural adolescents with and without an intellectual disability. Journal of Intellectual and Development Disability, 27(2), 106-116.
Rapley, M., & Beyer, S. (1996). Daily life, community participation and quality of life in an ordinary housing network. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 9, 31-39.
Renblad, K. (2000). Persons with intellectual disability, social interaction and video telephony. An interview study. Technology and Disability, 13, 55-65.
Renzaglia, A., Karvonen, M., & Drasow, E. (2003). Promoting a lifetime of inclusion. Focus on Autism and Other Development Disabilities , 18(3), 140-149.
Riches, V. C., & Green, V. A. (2003). Social integration in workplace for people with disabilities: An Australian perspective. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 19, 127-142.
Schalock, R. L. (2000). Three decades of quality of life. Focus on Autism and Other Development Disabilities, 15(2), 116-127.
Schalock, R. L. (2004). The concept of quality of life: What we know and do not know. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 48(3), 203-216.
Schutz, W. C. (1958). A Three-Dimensional Theory of Interpersonal Behavior. New York: Rinehart & Company.
Seltzer, M. M., & Krauss, M. W. (2001). Quality of life of adults with mental retardation/ development disabilities who live with family. Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews, 7, 105-114.
Smith. P., & McCarthy, G.. (1996). The development of a semi-structured interview to investigate the attachment-related experience of adults with learning disabilities. British Journal of Learning Disabilities, 24, 154-160.
Souza, G., & Kennedy, C. (2003). Facilitating social interaction in the community for a transition-age student with severe disabilities. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 5(3), 179-182.
Taylore, S.J., & Racino, J.A. (1991). Community living-Lessons for today. In L. Meyer, C. Peck, & L. Brown, Critical issues in the lives of people with severe disabilities(235-238). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
Thibault, J. W., & Kelley, H. H. (1952). The social psychology of groups. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Wagner, B. R. (2000). Presidential address 2000—Changing vision into reality. Mental Retardation, 38(5), 436-443.
Wall, K. (1998). Friendship Skills and Opportunities among People with Learning Disabilities. Social Work Monographs. University of East Anglia, Norwich.
Wolfensberger, W. (1983). Social Role Valorization: A proposed new term for the principle of normalization. Mental Retardation, 21, 234-239.
Yates, P. (2003). Psychological adjustment, social enablement and community integration following acquired brain injury. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 13(2), 291-306.
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top