臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

近年來西方針對教師評語的研究發現，能力稱讚相對於努力稱讚對學童的成就動機有較為不良的影響，接受能力回饋的學童在成就目標上會偏向表現目標，進而於學業挫折之後，顯示較低的內在動機和較強的能力歸因，並且有較差的後續表現。但是，華人社會之儒家文化相當強調努力對學習的影響、忽略能力差異在學習中的角色，如此之學習價值觀體系與西方有很大的差異，因此，能力及努力稱讚對華人的影響，也可能不同。本研究根基於此，以台灣樣本重複Mueller與Dweck（1998）的研究結果。實驗一以58名國小五年級學童為樣本完整重複Mueller與Dweck的實驗三。結果發現，能力稱讚、努力稱讚及中性稱讚對華人學童成就動機的影響皆相同，他們在成就目標傾向、失敗後實際表現、作業持續力、能力及努力歸因傾向、訊息尋求偏好上皆無差異。實驗二修正部份實驗用語，使之更符合中文使用者的語言習慣，以63名受試者重複實驗一的程序，亦獲得相同的結果。除了稱讚效果的結果，實驗一與實驗二亦同時發現傾向表現目標的學習者和傾向學習目標的學習者，在前列的依變項上無顯著差異，此結果不符合傳統成就動機理論的預期。實驗三因此以268位大學生為樣本，透過因素分析及迴歸分析探討華人的成就目標結構，結果發現華人的成就目標可以區分為三個因素，包括學習目標、成果目標與能力目標，其中學習目標可以預測最為適應的學習組型，能力目標則預測不適應的習得無助反應，成果目標則於內在動機上偏向受挫、但行為上則較趨於精熟反應。因此，同屬於表現目標範疇之成果目標與能力目標中，只有能力目標才會引發華人學童的不適應性學習傾向。根據前三個實驗的結果，實驗四先操弄受試者對能力訊息的敏感度，再重複實驗一與實驗二的研究程序，以45位受試者進行實驗的結果，與實驗一及實驗二一致，即使增加學生在乎能力的傾向，能力與努力稱讚對華人學童而言，仍不會造成不同的效果，選擇學習目標或表現目標的受試者也傾向相同的成就動機趨勢。本研究揭示成就動機研究領域中，文化差異會對理論的適用性造成影響。

Past research has shown that praise aimed at the child''s ability results in a helpless response and that praise directed at the child''s effort fosters a mastery- oriented response. However, in Chinese society, effort is always encouraged but ability is rarely mentioned. The value system for learning in Chinese culture differs from that in the Western culture. The present research attempted to replicate the paradigm applied in Mueller and Dweck (1998) to demonstrate cultural differences of children’s reaction to ability and to effort praises. Fifty-eight and sixty-three Chinese fifth graders in Taiwan participated in Study 1 and Study 2 respectively. They were praised for ability, effort, or a neutral reason after success. No group differences were found on achievement goals, responses after failure, or failure attribution. Ability praise neither caused negative impact on performance nor decreased task-enjoyment and task-persistence more than effort praise among Chinese children. In addition to the findings of praises, Study 1 and Study 2 also revealed that traditional achievement goal classification of learning and performance goals could not predict differential behavioral and motivational patterns. Thus, Study 3 was performed aiming to explore Chinese students’ achievement goal structure. Two hundred and sixty-eight college students were recruited in Study 3. Factor analysis revealed that Chinese students have three different achievement goals, including learning goal, outcome goal, and ability goal. The regression analyses showed that learning goal predicted mastery orientation, and ability goal was highly related with maladaptive learning pattern, while outcome goal was helpful to learning behavior but harmful to intrinsic motivation. The result of Study 3 indicated that traditional goal structure is not suited for Chinese learners. Thought ability goal and outcome goal are both performance goals, only ability goal predict learned helplessness. With the findings from the previous three experiments, Study 4 was conducted aiming to replicate the findings of Study 1 and Study 2 while subjects’ sensitivity to ability praise were induced. Forty-five students were included in Study 4, all of the subjects received ability goal manipulation before they were praised. The results were consistent with Study 1 and Study 2. To sum, the present research found ability and effort praises do not cause different effects on Chinese students among three experiments. Possible Culture explanations are discussed.

緒論……………………………………………………………………………… 1
前言………………………………………………………………………… 1
西方成就動機模式………………………………………………………… 2
成就行為、目標、內隱理論的個別差異之來源………………………… 4
能力稱讚及努力稱讚……………………………………………………… 6
晚近之成就目標理論……………………………………………………… 9
華人的努力文化…………………………………………………………… 13
本研究之目的……………………………………………………………… 15
實驗一……………………………………………………………………………19
方法………………………………………………………………………… 19
結果………………………………………………………………………… 23
討論………………………………………………………………………… 32
實驗二…………………………………………………………………………… 35
方法………………………………………………………………………… 35
結果………………………………………………………………………… 39
討論………………………………………………………………………… 45
實驗三…………………………………………………………………………… 49
方法………………………………………………………………………… 50
結果………………………………………………………………………… 54
討論………………………………………………………………………… 64
實驗四…………………………………………………………………………… 67
方法………………………………………………………………………… 69
結果………………………………………………………………………… 72
討論………………………………………………………………………… 81
綜合討論………………………………………………………………………… 85
能力及努力稱讚的效果…………………………………………………… 86
華人成就動機的性別差異………………………………………………… 87
華人成就目標對成就動機的影響………………………………………… 88
華人成就目標的類型與特色……………………………………………… 89
提高能力目標後，能力努力稱讚的效果………………………………… 91
總結………………………………………………………………………… 92
研究限制與未來研究方向………………………………………………… 94
參考文獻………………………………………………………………………… 99
附錄………………………………………………………………………………105
附錄一 邀請學校協助研究說明函……………………………………105
附錄二 致實驗班級導師說明函………………………………………107
附錄三 實驗一成就目標測……………………………………………108
附錄四 實驗一學習態度問卷…………………………………………109
附錄五 實驗一歸因問卷………………………………………………113
附錄六 實驗一給同學的信……………………………………………115
附錄七 實驗一信件內文質性資料……………………………………116
附錄八 實驗二自我表現預期測量……………………………………119
附錄九 實驗二歸因問卷………………………………………………120
附錄十 與Grant往來信函 ……………………………………………121
附錄十一 實驗三測量題項一覽…………………………………………122
附錄十二 實驗四內隱理論問卷…………………………………………128

王素華（1998）。「情境因素、教師評語及歸因歷程在學童能力與努力覺知中所扮演的角色」（未發表之碩士論文）。台北：國立台灣大學心理學研究所。
李仁豪、余民寧（2003）。2 × 2目標理論架構之驗證。「教育與心理研究」，26，433-470。
林貴寶（2005）。「家庭情緒表達模式與青少年學業失敗後對父母負向言語之反應特性」（未發表之碩士論文）。台北：國立台灣大學心理學研究所。
黃光國（1995）。「知識與行動：中華文化傳統的社會心理詮釋」。台北：巨流。
蔡宜妙（2003）。「成就動機的文化特徵：台灣地區青少年的努力信念」（未發表之碩士論文）。台北：國立台灣大學心理學研究所。
蔡宜妙與雷庚玲（2003）。「成就動機的文化特徵：台灣地區青少年的努力信念」。未發表之論文手稿。
曾慧芸（2002）。「負向言語對國中小學生自我效能、自我喜愛及關係品質之影響」（未發表之碩士論文）。台北：國立台灣大學心理學研究所。
Ames, C. (1984). Achievement attributions and self-instructions under competitive and individualistic goal structures. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 478-487.
Ames, C. (1992). Classroom: Goals, structures, and student motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 261-271.
Ames, C., & Archer, J. (1988). Achievement goals in the classroom: Students’ learning strategies and motivation process. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 260-267.
Barron, K. E., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2001). Achievement goals and optimal motivation: Testing multiple goal models. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 706-722.
Carver, C. S., Scheier, M. F., & Weintraub, J. K. (1989). Assessing coping strategies: A theoretically based approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 267-283.
Corpus, J. H., Love, K. E., & Ogle, C. M. (2005, April). Social-comparison praise undermines intrinsic motivation when children later doubt their ability. Poster session presented at the biennial meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Diener, C. I., & Dweck, C. S. (1978). An analysis of learned helplessness: Continuous changes in performance, strategy, and achievement cognitions following failure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 451-461.
Diener, C. I., & Dweck, C. S. (1980). An analysis of learned helplessness: II. The processing of success. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 940-952.
Dweck, C. S. (1986). Motivational processes affecting learning. American Psychologist, 41, 1040-1048.
Dweck, C. S. (1999). Self-theories: Their role in motivation, personality, and development. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
Dweck, C. S. (2002a). The development of ability concepts. In A. Wigfiled & J. Eccles (Eds.), Development of achievement motivation. A volume in the educational psychology series (pp. 57-88). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Dweck, C. S. (2002b). Messages that motivate: How praise molds students’ beliefs, motivation, and performance (in surprising ways). In J. Aronson (Ed.), Improving academic achievement (pp.37-60). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Dweck, C. S., Chiu, C., & Hong, Y. (1995a). Implicit theories and their role in judgments and reactions: A world from two perspectives. Psychological Inquiry, 6, 267-285.
Dweck, C. S., Chiu, C., & Hong, Y. (1995b). Implicit theories: Elaboration and extension of the model. Psychological Inquiry, 6, 322-333.
Dweck, C. S., & Leggett, E. L. (1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 95, 256-273.
Dweck, C. S., & Sorich, L. A. (1999). Mastery-oriented thinking. In C. R. Snyder (Ed.), Coping: The psychology of what works ( pp.232-251). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Elliot, A. J.（1999）. Approach and avoidance motivation and achievement goals. Experimental Psychologist, 34, 169-189.
Elliot, A. J., & Dweck, C. S. (1988). Goals: An approach to motivation and achievement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 5-12.
Elliot, A. J., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (1996). Approach and avoidance achievement goals and intrinsic motivation: A mediational analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychological, 70, 968-980.
Elliot, A. J., & McGregor, H. (2001). A 2 × 2 achievement goals, study strategies, and exam performance: A mediational analysis. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 91, 549-563.
Grant, H., & Dweck, C. S. (2001). Cross-cultural response to failure: Considering outcome attributions with different goalk. In F. Salili, Chi-yue Chiu, & Ying-yi Hong (Eds.), Student motivation: The culture and context of learning (pp.203-219). New York, NY: Kluwer Academic / Plenum Pulbishers.
Grant, H., & Dweck, C. S. (2003). Clarifying achievement goals and their impact. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 541-553.
Heine, S. J., Lehman, D. R., Markus, H. R., & Kitatyama, S. (1999). Is there a universal need for positive self-regard? Psychological Review, 106, 766-794.
Hess, R. D., Chang, C.-M., & McDevitt, T. M. (1987). Culture variations in family beliefs about children’s performance in mathematics: Comparisons among People’s Republic of China, Chinese-American, and Caucasian-American families. Journal of Educational Psychology, 79, 179-188.
Hong, Y., Chiu, C., Dweck, C. S., Lin, D. M., & Wan, W. (1999). Implicit theories, attributions, and coping: A meaning system approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 588-599.
Kamins, M. L., & Dweck, C. S. (1999). Person versus process praise and criticism: Implications for contingent self-worth and coping. Developmental Psychology, 35, 835-847.
Kaplan, A., Middleton, M. J., Urdan, T., & Midgley, C. (2002). Achievement goals an goal structure. In C. Midgley (Ed.), Goals, goal structures, and patterns of adaptive learning (pp. 21-53). Mahwah, NJ: LEA Press.
Koestner, R., Zuckerman, M., & Koestner. J. (1987). Praise, involvement, and intrinsic motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 383-390.
Li, J. (2002). Learning models in different cultures. In J. Bempechat & J. G. Elliot (Eds.), Learning in culture and context: Approaching the complexities of achievement motivation in student learning (pp. 45-63). San Francisco, CA: Wiley Periodicals.
Mueller, C. M., & Dweck, C. S. (1998). Praise for intelligence can undermine children’s motivation and performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 33-52.
Nicholls, J. G. (1984). Achievement motivation: Conceptions of ability, subjective experience, task choice, and performance. Psychological Review, 91, 328-346.
Pintrich, P. R. (2000). Multiple goals, multiple pathways: The role of goal orientation in learning and achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 544-555.
Raven, J. C. (1976). Standard progressive matrices. Oxford, England: Oxford Psychologists Press.
Schunk, D. H. (1983). Ability versus effort attributional feedback: Differential effects on self-efficacy and achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 75, 848-856.
Schunk, D. H. (1984). Sequential attributional feedback and children’s achievement behaviors. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 1159-1169.
Stevenson, H. W., Lee, S., Chen, C., Stigler, J., Hsu, C. C., & Kitamura, S. (1990). Contexts of achievement: A study of American, Chinese, and Japanese. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 55, 1-2.
Tsai, Y.-M., & Lay, K.-L. (2005a, April). Moral, pragmatic, and entity concepts of academic effort among Chinese adolescents: A developmental perspective. In Keng-Ling Lay (Chair), Reconsidering the effects of entity and incremental feedbacks in academic situations: Findings from a Chinese population. Symposium conducted at the biennial meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Tsai,Y.-M., & Lay, K.-L. (2005b, April). Do Chinese adolescents fit into an ability-driven western framework of achievement motivation? A developmental perspective. Poster session presented at the biennial meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Tweed, R. G., & Lehman, D. R. (2002). Learning considered within a cultural context: Confucian and Socratic approaches. American Psychologist, 57, 89-99.
Wang, S.-H., & Lay, K.-L. (1999, April). The effect of the normative information accompanied with teacher''s comments. In Keng-Ling Lay (Chair), Reconsideration of the effects of teachers'' and parents'' verbal comments and disciplines: Findings from a Chinese population. Symposium conducted at the biennial meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, Albuquerque, NM, USA.
Weiner, B. (1985). An attributional theory of achievement motivation and emotion. Psychological Review, 92, 54-573.
Weiner, B. (1986). An attributional theory of emotion and motivation. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
Weiner, B. (2001). Intrapersonal and interpersonal theories of motivation from an attribution perspective. In F. Salili, Chi-yue Chiu, & Ying-yi Hong (Eds.), Student motivation: The culture and context of learning (pp. 203-219). New York, NY: Kluwer Academic / Plenum Publishers.
Weiner, B., Frieze, I., Kukla, A., Reed, L., Rest, S., & Rosenbaum, R. M. (1971). Perceiving the causes of success and failure. In E. E. Jones, D. E. Kanouse, H. H. Kelley, R. E. Nisbett, S. Valins, & B. Weiner (Eds.), Attributions: Perceiving the causes of behavior (pp. 151-174). Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press.
Weiner, B., & Kulka, A. (1970). An attributional analysis of achievement motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 15, 1-20.
Yang, C.-W., & Lay, K.-L. (2001, April). Perception of parental attitude as a buffer for the impact of verbal abuse on self-esteem. Poster session presented at the biennial meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, Minneapolis, MI, USA.