(18.232.55.103) 您好!臺灣時間:2021/04/23 01:50
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果

詳目顯示:::

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:李淳羽
研究生(外文):Chun-yu Lee
論文名稱:尚未解開的結:探討濟慈的男性焦慮
論文名稱(外文):The Gordian Knot Not Yet Unraveled: Understanding Masculine Anxiety in Keats
指導教授:吳雅鳳吳雅鳳引用關係
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立臺灣大學
系所名稱:外國語文學研究所
學門:人文學門
學類:外國語文學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2005
畢業學年度:93
語文別:英文
論文頁數:112
中文關鍵詞:濟慈男性焦慮女性化性別女性
外文關鍵詞:Keatsmasculine anxietyeffeminacygenderwomen
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:168
  • 評分評分:系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:0
摘 要

本研究所採取的是性別研究的觀點,旨在探討男性焦慮對浪漫時期詩人濟慈所造成的影響,這些影響包括他在現實生活中與女性的關係以及他在作品中對女性角色的呈現。本研究主要分為三章。在第一章中,討論十八世紀末十九世紀初,文學論述的改變以及女性文人(包括作者與讀者)的興起,如何帶給當時的男性文人男性焦慮,以及他們處理焦慮的方式。在第二章中,討論濟慈身為一個新興中產階級作家,為何特別容易被批評為女性化。面對這樣的批評,濟慈一直希望藉由與女性化清界線,或是展現優於他們的權力,來證明自己的男子氣慨。以濟慈的信件當作主要證據,探討他與女性作家以及讀者的權力鬥爭,並分析這樣的鬥爭如何對他與愛人間的關係造成影響。在第三章中,主要討論濟慈四部作品,Endymion, The Eve of St. Agnes, Lamia, The Fall of Hyperion,中對於女性角色的呈現。這些作品皆顯示出濟慈一方面對女性力量崇拜,但另一方面又希望透過對這個力量的掌控和挪用,來展現自己成熟的男性氣慨。一直到The Fall of Hyperion,他才發展出一個模式,在此模式之中,男性力量的展現並不奠基在否認或是挪用女性力量之上,相反的,此模式對於女性力量的獨特性給予很高的尊重。縱使濟慈在最後的作品中,仍未跳脫男性中心的意識形態,但透過本研究,我們所得到結論是,男性焦慮有時也可能是刺激男性文人發展新型態的兩性模式的動力。
Table of Contents
1.Introduction: Changes in the Criticism on Keats.………………………………1
2.Chapter One: The Matrix of Masculine Anxiety: Changes in Literary Discourse at the End of the 18th century………………………………………………………9.
3.Chapter Two: Attraction or Rejection: Keats’s Masculine Anxiety and His Ambivalence toward Women and the Feminine…………………………………34
4.Chapter Three: Empowering Force or Overpowering Threat: Keats’s Representation of Female Figures………………………………………………63..
5.Conclusion: The Positive Power of Keats’s Masculine Anxiety………………103..
6.Works Cited …………………………………………………………………105.
Works Cited
Abrams, M. H. The Mirror and the Lamp: Romantic Theory and the Critical Tradition. 1953. London: Oxford UP, 1979.
Allott, Miriam, ed. Keats: the Complete Poems. London: Longman, 1970.
Alwes, Karla. Imagination Transformed: the Evolution of the Female Character in Keats’s Poetry. Carbondale: Southern Illinois UP, 1993.
Arseneau, Mary. “Madeline, Mermaids, and Medusas in ‘The Eve of St. Agnes.’” PLL 33 (1997): 227-43.
Ballaster, Ros. “Romancing the Novel: Gender and Genre in Early Theories of Narrative.” Living by the Pen: Early Women Writers. Ed. Dale Spender. New York: Teachers College P, 1992. 188-200.
Banerjee, Argha. “Gaining a Voice: Femininity in Endymion.” The Keats-Shelley Review 16 (2002): 130-47.
Barker-Benfield, G. J. The Culture of Sensibility: Sex and Society in Eighteenth-Century Britain. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1992.
Bate, Walter Jackson. John Keats. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 1963.
Bewell, Alan. “Keats’s ‘Realm of Flora’.” Studies in Romanticism 31 (1992): 71-98.
Blades, John. John Keats: The Poems. Hampshire: Palgrave, 2002.
Blain, Virginia. “Women Poets and the Challenge of Genre.” Women and Literature in Britain 1800-1900. Ed. Joanne Shattock. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2001. 162-88.
Bloom, Harold. John Keats. Broomall: Chelsea House. 2001.
---. The Anxiety of Influence: A Theory of Poetry. London: Oxford UP, 1973.
Brittan, Arthur. Masculinity and Power. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1989.
Burke, Edmund. A Philosophical Enquiry into the Origin of Our Ideas of the Sublime and Beautiful. New York : Oxford UP, 1990.
Byron, George Gordon. Poetical Works. Ed. Frederick Page. Oxford: Oxford UP, 1970.
Colbert, Benjamin. “Popular Romanticism? Publishing, Readership and the Making of Literary History.” Authorship, Commerce and the Public: Scenes of Writing, 1750-1850. Ed. E. J. Clery, Caroline Franklin and Peter Garside. London: Palgrave, 2002. 153-68.
Coleridge, Samuel Taylor. “On the Slave Trade.” The Collected Works of Samuel Taylor Coleridge: Lectures 1795 on Politics and Religion. Ed. Lewis Parron and Peter Mann. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1971. 235-51.
---. Biographia Literaria. 1817. Ed. J. Shawcross. rpt. ed. London: Oxford UP, 1965.
Cox, Jeffrey, N. “Leigh Hunt’s Cockney School: The Lakers’ ‘Other’.” Romanticism on the Net 14 (1999) Apr. 29 2005 <http://users.ox.ac.uk/ ~scat0385/huntlakers.html>.
Curran, Stuart. “Romantic Poetry: The ‘I’ Altered.” Mellor, Romanticism and Feminism 185-207.
---. “Women Writers, Women Readers.” The Cambridge Companion to British Romanticism. Ed. Stuart Curran. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1993. 177-95.
Dart, Gregory. “The Cockney Moment.” The Cambridge Quarterly 32 (2003): 210-23.
De Man, Paul. “The Negative Road.” Selected Poetry of John Keats. New York, 1966.
De Montluzin, Emily Lorraine. “Killing the Cockneys: Blackwood’s’ Weapons of choice against Hunt, Hazlitt, and Keats.” Keats-Shelley Journal 47 (1998): 87-107.
Dickstein, Morris. Keats and His Poetry: A Study in Development. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1971.
Engell, James. The Creative Imagination: Enlightenment to Romanticism. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 1981.
Elfenbein, Andrew. “Contesting the Heterodoxy: Mrs. Hemans vs. Lord Byron.”1993. Romantic Circles. 31 May 2005 <http://www.rc.umd.edu/ editions/sceptic/contestingheterodoxy.html >
Finney, Claude Lee. The Evolution of Keats’s Poetry. New York : Russell & Russell, 1963.
Fleenor, Julian E., ed. The Female Gothic. Montreal: Eden, 1983.
Frye, Northrop. “Towards Defining an Age of Sensibility.” Poets of Sensibility and the Sublime. Ed. Harold Bloom. New York: Chelsea, 1986. 11-18.
Gilbert, Sandra M., and Susan Gubar. The Madwoman in the Attic: The Woman Writer and the Nineteenth-Century Literary Imagination. New Haven: Yale UP, 1979.
Goslee, Nancy Moore. “The Envisioning of Women: From Endymion to the Later Romances.” Approaches to Teaching Keats’s Poetry. Ed. Walter H. Evert and Jack W. Rhodes. New York: MLA of America, 1991. 112-19.
Gray, Thomas. Works of Thomas Gray: In Prose and Verse. Ed. Edmund Gosse. New York: AMS, 1968.
Hazlitt, William. Lectures on the English Poets and Spirit of the Age. 1818. London: J. M. Dent and Sons, 1910.
---. “On Effeminacy of Character.” 1908. Table talk; or Original Essays. London: J.M. Dent, 1925. 248-55.
Higonnet, Margaret Randolph. Introduction. British Women Poets of the 19th Century. Ed. Margaret Randolph Higonnet. New York: Meridian, 1996. xvii-xxxv.
Hoeveler, Diane Long. Romantic Androgyny: The Women Within. London: the Pennsylvania State UP, 1990.
Hofkosh, Sonia. Sexual Politics and the Romantic Author. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1998.
Homans, Margaret. Women Writers and Poetic Identity: Dorothy Wordsworth, Emily Bronte, and Emily Dickinson. Princeton: Princeton UP, 1980.
---. “Keats Reading Women, Women Reading Keats.” Studies in Romanticism 29 (1990): 341-70.
Horney, Karen. “The Dread of Woman.” Feminine Psychology. Ed. Harold Kelman. New York: Norton, 1967. 133-46.
Jones, Chris. Radical Sensibility: Literature and Ideas in the 1790s. London: Routledge, 1993.
Jones, Elizabeth. “Keats in the Suburbs.” Keats-Shelley Journal 45 (1996): 23-43.
Kairoff, Cludia Thomas. “Eighteenth-Century Women Poets and Readers.” The Cambridge Companion to Eighteenth-Century Poetry. Ed. John Sitter. 157-76.
Keats, John. The Poems of John Keats. Ed. Miriam Allott. New York: Longman, 1970.
---. The Letters of John Keats 1814-1821. Ed. Hyder Edward Rollins. 2 vols. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 1958.
Kucich, Greg. “Gender Crossings: Keats and Tighe.” Keats-Shelley Journal 44 (1995): 29-39.
---. Keats, Shelley and Romantic Spenserianism. Pennsylvania: the Pennsylvania State UP, 1991.
Labbe, Jacqueline M.. Romantic Visualities: Landscape, Gender and Romanticism. Hampshire: Macmillan, 1998.
Lockhart, John Gibson. “Cockney School of Poetry, No. IV.” Blackwood’s Edinburgh Magazine (Aug. 1818): 519-24. Rpt. in Matthews, John Keats: the Critical Heritage. 97-110.
Lowell, Amy. John Keats. 2vols. London: J. Cape, 1925.
Marshall, David. The Surprising Effects of Sympathy: Marivaux, Diderot, Rousseau, and Mary Shelley. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1988.
Masson, David. “The Life and Poetry of Keats.” Macmillan’s Magazine (Nov. 1860): 1-16. Rpt. in Matthews, John Keats: the Critical Heritage. 368-83.
Mathias, Thomas. The Pursuits of Literature. London: T. Becket, 1797.
Matthews, G. M., ed. John Keats: the Critical Heritage. 1971. London: Routledge, 1995.
McCarhty, Thomas J. Relations of Sympathy: The Writer and the Reader in British Romanticism. Hampshire: Scolar, 1997.
Mellor, Anne K., ed. Romanticism and Feminism. Bloomington: Indiana UP, 1988.
---. Romanticism and Gender. New York: Routledge, 1993.
---. “Keats and the Complexities of Gender.” The Cambridge Companion to Keats. Ed. Susan J. Wolfson. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2001. 214-29.
Mitchell, W. J. T. “Ekphrasis and the Other.” South Atlantic Quarterly 91 (1992): 695-719.
Mizukoshi, Ayumi. Keats, Hunt, and the Aesthetic of Pleasure. Hampshire: Palgrave, 2001.
---. “The Cockney Politics of Gender—the Case of Hunt and Keats.” Romanticism on the Net 14 (1999). 30 January 2004 <http://users.ox.ac.uk/ ~scat0385/cockneygender.html>.
Mulvey, Laura. “Visual Pleasures and Narrative Cinema.” Screen 16 (1975). Rpt. in Feminisms: An Anthology of Literary Theory and Criticism. Ed. Robyn R. Warhol and Diane Price Herndl. New Brunswick: Ruthers UP, 1991. 432-42.
Myers, Mitzi. “Sensibility and the ‘Walk of Reason’: Mary Wollstonecraft’s Literary Reviews as Cultural Critique.” Sensibility in Transformation: Creative Resistance to Sentiment from the Augustans to the Romantics. Ed. Syndy McMillen Conger. London: Associated UP, 1990. 120-44.
Novak, Maxmillian E. and Anne Mellor. Introduction. Passionate Encounters in a Time of Sensibility. Ed. Maxmillian E. Novak and Anne Mellor. London: Associated UP, 2000. 11-26.
Parke, Catherine N. “What Kind of Heroine Is Mary Wollstonecraft?” Sensibility in Transformation: Creative Resistance to Sentiment from the Augustans to the Romantics. Ed. Syndy McMillen Conger. London: Associated UP, 1990. 103-19.
Plaisant, Michele. “Sensibility.” A Handbook to English Romanticism. Ed. Jean Raimond and J. R. Watson. New York: St. Martin’s, 1992. 242-46.
Probyn, Clive T. English Fiction of the Eighteenth Century, 1700-1789. London: Longman, 1987.
Rich, Adrienne. “Three Conversations.” Adrienne Rich’s Poetry. Ed. Barbara Charlesworth Gelpi and Albert Gelpi. New York: W. W. Norton, 1975. 105-22.
Richardson, Alan. “Romanticism and the Colonization of the Feminine.” Mellor, Romanticism and Feminism 13-24.
Roe, Nicholas. John Keats and the Culture of Dissent. Oxford: Clarendon, 1997.
Rosen, David. The Changing Fictions of Masculinity. Urbana: U of Illinois P, 1993.
Ross, Marlon B. The Contours of Masculine Desire: Romanticism and the Rise of Women’s Poetry. New York: Oxford UP, 1989.
---. “Beyond the Fragmented Words: Keats at the Limits of Patrilineal Language.” Out of Bounds: Male Writers and Gender(ed) Criticism. Ed. Laura Claridge and Elizabeth Langland. U of Massachusettes P, 1990. 110-31.
Sanders, Valerie. “Women, Fiction and the Marketplace.” Women and Literature in Britain 1800-1900. Ed. Joanne Shattock. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2001. 142-61.
Schapiro, Barbara A. The Romantic Mother: Narcissistic Patterns in Romantic Poetry. Baltimore: The John Hopkins UP, 1983.
Schoemaker, Jacqueline. “Female Empathy to Manliness: Keats in 1819.” Victorian Keats and Romantic Carlyle: The Fusions and Confusions of Literary Periods. Ed. C. C. Barfoot. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 1999.
Scott, Grant F. The Sculpted Word: Keats, Ekphrasis, and the Visual Arts. Hanover: UP of New England, 1994.
Spacks, Patricia Meyer. “The Poetry of Sensibility.” The Cambridge Companion to Eighteenth-Century Poetry. Ed. John Sitter. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2001. 249-69.
Spender, Dale. “Introduction: A Vindication of the Writing Woman.” Living by the Pen: Early Women Writers. Ed. Dale Spender. New York: Teachers College P, 1992. 1-35.
Sperry, Stuart M. Keats the Poet. Princeton: Princeton UP, 1973.
Swann, Karen. “Harassing the Muse.” Mellor, Romanticism and Feminism 81-92.
Tetreault, Ronald. “Women and Words in Keats (with an Instance from La Belle Dame Sans Merci).” The Mind in Creation: Essays on English Romantic Literature in Honour of Ross G. Woodman. Ed. J. Douglas Kneale. Montreal: McGill-Queen''s UP, 1992. 58-73.
Tighe, Mary. Psyche. Romantic Women Poets: an Anthology. Ed. Duncan Wu. Oxford: Blackwell, 1997.
Todd, Janet. Sensibility: An Introduction. London: Methuen, 1986.
Trott, Nicholas. “The Picturesque, the Beautiful and the Sublime.” A Companion to Romanticism. Ed. Duncan Wu. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, 1998. 72-90.
Turley, Richard Marggraf. “ ‘Strange longs’: Keats and Feet.” Studies in Romanticism 41(2002): 89-106.
Van Ghent, Dorothy. Keats: The Myth of the Hero. Princeton: Princeton UP, 1983.
Vendler, Helen. The Odes of John Keats. Cambridge: The Belknap P of Harvard UP, 1983.
Waldoff, Leon. Keats and the Silent Work of Imagination. Urbana: U of Illinois P, 1985.
Ward, Alienne. John Keats: The Making of a Poet. 1963. Rev. ed. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 1986.
Weller, Earle Vonard, ed. Keats and Mary Tighe; the Poems of Mary Tighe with Parallel Passages from the Works of John Keats. New York: Kraus, 1966.
Wolfson, Susan J. “Romanticism and Gender.” A Companion to Romanticism. Ed. Duncan Wu. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, 1998. 385-96.
---. “Feminizing Keats.” Critical Essays on John Keats. Ed. Hermione de Almeida. Boston: G.K. Hall, 1990. 317-56.
---. “Keats and the Manhood of the Poet.” European Romantic Review 6 (1995): 1-37.
Wordsworth, William. “Essay, Supplementary to the Preface (1815).” William Wordsworth. Ed. Stephen Gill. Oxford: Oxford UP, 1984. 640-62.
Wu, Duncan. Introduction. Romantic Women Poets: An Anthology. Ed. Duncan Wu. Oxford: Blackwell, 1997.xviiii-xxviii.
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
1. 洪昌文,〈澳洲公務人員培訓制度探討〉,《人力發展月刊》,第72期,民89,頁1-11。
2. 林水波、任可怡,〈人事服務理念之探討-評述全國行政單一窗口化方案〉,《公務人員月刊》,第19期,民87,頁3-9。
3. 江岷欽,〈論行政中立與公共利益〉,(上),《人事月刊》,第21卷,第6期,民84,頁8-12。
4. 王旭統,〈公務人員核心職能之形成途徑與評選面向〉,《公務人員月刊》,第81期,民89.2,頁34-42。
5. 林逸舒,〈人事人員在組織變革中所應扮演角色之探討〉,《人事月刊》,第36卷,第5期,民93.,頁24-27。
6. 林公孚,〈核心能力-企業致勝要素〉,《品質月刊》,第39卷,第3期,民92,頁45-47。
7. 林海清,〈從公務人員核心職能談專業發展〉,《公務人員月刊》,
8. 李美雲,〈政府中高階管理人才之培訓與養成〉,《人事月刊》,第33卷,第4期,民90,頁63-69。
9. 李聲吼,〈人力資源發展的能力內涵〉,《就業與訓練》,第15卷,第2期,民86,頁51-57。
10. 吳三靈,〈公務人力資源管理者的願景〉,《人事月刊》,第37卷,第6期,民92.12,頁8-11。
11. 吳佩君,〈人事人員的核心能力與角色-以「人事人員之核心能力」問卷調查結果〉,《人事月刊》,第36卷,第1期,民92.1,頁20-30。
12. 洪榮昭,〈建立學習型組織發展企業核心能力之研究〉,《成人教育》第49期,民88.5,頁38-48。
13. 施能傑,〈人事部門的新責任〉,《人事月刊》,第29卷,第3期,民88,頁22-26。
14. 陳金貴,〈人力資源管理應用在公部門的探討(上)〉,《人事月刊》第21卷3期,民84,頁33-37。
15. 莊雅淑,〈建構公部門人力資源管理新思維:以核心能力為觀點〉,《人事月刊》,第39卷,第4期,民93.10,頁63-68。
 
系統版面圖檔 系統版面圖檔