跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(34.204.172.188) 您好!臺灣時間:2023/09/28 13:03
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:陳巧育
研究生(外文):Chiao-Yu Chen
論文名稱:分析TTK/hMps1、CHK2及Ramp/L2DTL等分子在乳癌細胞中的表現情形
論文名稱(外文):Analysis of the status of TTK/hMps1、CHK2 and Ramp/L2DTL in breast cancer
指導教授:許金玉許金玉引用關係
指導教授(外文):Jin-Yuh Shew
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立臺灣大學
系所名稱:生物化學暨分子生物學研究所
學門:生命科學學門
學類:生物化學學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2005
畢業學年度:93
語文別:中文
論文頁數:60
中文關鍵詞:TTK/hMps1CHK2Ramp/L2DTL乳癌
外文關鍵詞:TTK/hMps1CHK2Ramp/L2DTLbreast cancer
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:156
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:1
根據2004年統計,乳癌 (breast Cancer) 是全世界女性最常見的惡性腫瘤,也是引起女性死亡癌症的第二名。而台灣地區,乳癌是女性十大死因的第四位,所以對於乳癌的發生、治療及術後情形的進一步了解,是刻不容緩的事情。
本實驗室多年來致力於乳癌的相關研究,尤其對於乳癌病患治療之後systemic recurrence的情形,更是我們探討的重點。在臨床上,乳癌病人接受乳房切除手術後,會分析乳房組織附近的淋巴結是否有癌細胞,來判斷病人術後復發的情形,根據本實驗室統計lymph node metastasis與 systemic recurrence關連性p值達0.00134,但lymph node negative的病人仍有6.4%的人會復發。由過去實驗室分析的結果顯示,p53 mutation和systemic recurrence有非常高的關連性,p值為0.00193,與臨床上以lymph node metastasis觀察systemic recurrence幾乎是相同重要,故p53 可以當作bio-marker輔助病人觀察術後復發的情形。但我們也發現有一些病人p53是正常的,但一樣會有術後復發的情形,因此才會引導我們想要更進一步探討p53 signaling pathway中相關分子,希望找其他的bio-marker來輔助觀察病人術後復發的情形。我們主要選擇了三個基因來分析,分別為TTK/hMps1、CHK2及Ramp/L2DTL,原因如下: CHK2是活化p53重要上游分子,而TTK/hMps1除了與細胞增生有關,最新研究更顯示此kinase可以活化CHK2;而Ramp/L2DTL也是與細胞增生有關的核蛋白,由Dr.許輝吉(台大病理科)之研究顯示,後者的過度表現與肝癌的轉移有關。希望藉由分析這三個基因,能找到輔助性的bio-marker幫助評估lymph node negative或p53正常但仍會術後復發的乳癌病人systemic recurrence的情形。
本研究利用定序分析法檢測台灣乳癌檢體中TTK/hMps1第1638nt至2645nt的變異情形,分析結果沒有發現TTK/hMps1的特殊變異﹐卻發現兩個polymorphism(I527I,P789P);而利用semi–quantitative RT-PCR 的方法觀察乳癌檢體中TTK/hMps1表現量,經統計結果顯示TTK/hMps1高表現量與systemic recurrence有很強的關聯性(p值達0.0022),且與p53 mutation關聯性也很高(p值達0.0001),故TTK/hMps1表現量高時幾乎可以當作一個bio-marker來輔助臨床上觀察病人術後復發的情形。同樣利用semi–quantitative RT-PCR 的方法觀察乳癌檢體中Ramp/L2DTL表現量,結果顯示Ramp/L2DTL高表現量與systemic recurrence也有關(p值為0.0247),但是與病人是否會術後復發的關聯性並沒有如TTK/hMps1表現量強烈。另外利用定序分析法觀察台灣乳癌檢體中CHK2核苷酸序列的變異情形,分析結果只發現CHK2 polymorphism (E84E),由文獻已知CHK2有11種主要不同的splice variants,經分析後發現有較特殊的splice variants,但探討 CHK2 splicing異常是否與乳癌有關,尚待進一步分析。
Worldwide, breast cancer is one of the most common cancer among women, and is the second leading cause of cancer death in women as well. In Taiwan, breast cancer ranks fourth among the caures of overall female cancer-related deaths and the incidence of age in this disease tends to early onset. It is important to understand tumorgenesis and systemic recurrence in breast cancer.
Our laboratory has studied the breast carcinogenesis for few years. Lymph node metastasis is a bio-marker for poor prognosis in breast cancer. However, approximately 6.4% of lymph node negative patients that acquire systemic recurrence. We are particularly interested in setting up new supplemental bio-markers for systemic recurrence. According to the previous study, p53 mutation has shown a strong correlation with recurrence (p=0.00193). p53 is a supplemental bio-marker useful for clinical diagnosis as well as lymph node metastasis. Nevertheless, there are a few wild-type p53 patients that acquired recurrence. Therefore, we examine the status of other molecular components such as CHK2 and TTK/hMps1 in the p53 signaling pathway. Inaddition, we have also analyzed the status of Ramp/L2DTL, a nuclear protein Ramp/L2DTL has shown the correlation with early metastasis of hepatoma (personal communication with Dr. H-J Hsu, NTUH).
By sequence analysis, we identified two TTK/hMps1 polymorphism, I527Iand P789P. We determined the expression level of TTK/hMps1 by semi-quantitative RT-PCR. According to the statistical analysis, high expression level of TTK/hMps1 correlatd strongly both with systemic recurrence (p=0.0022) and p53 mutation (p=0.0001). TTK/hMps1 can be a supplemental bio-marker useful for clinical diagnosis. We also determined the expression level of Ramp/L2DTL by semi-quantitative RT-PCR. According to the resules of statistical analysis, high expression level of Ramp/L2DTL showns correlation with systemic recurrence (p=0.0247). We identified one CHK2 polymorphism (E84E) by sequencing analysis. According to the study by other groups, CHK2 with 11 major splice variants were detected in their tumor series. We have found some splice variants in breast cancer specimens. How the splice variants of CHK2 influence breast carcinogenesis remain to be addressed.
中文摘要 1
英文摘要 3

第一章 緒論 4
乳癌簡介 4
乳癌的病理組織分類 4
乳癌的分期 5
乳癌的治療 5
罹患乳癌之高危險族群成因探討: 6
本論文相關研究: 7
1. TTK/ hMps1蛋白激酶基因介紹 9
2. CHK2基因介紹 10
3.Ramp/L2DTL基因介紹 12
本論文研究目的 13

第二章 實驗材料與方法 14
實驗材料 14
一、實驗藥品 14
二、實驗儀器 15
三、乳癌細胞株 16
四、乳癌檢體 16
五、寡核苷酸引子 16


實驗方法 17
一、膠片電泳、製備及純化 17
1.1.5%洋菜膠(agarose gel)電泳分析與製備 15
2. 4%或6%非變性聚丙烯醯氨凝膠(natural PAGE)電泳分析及製備 18
3.自1.5%洋菜電泳膠片或4%非變性聚丙烯醯氨凝膠中純化DNA片段 19
二、實驗技術 20
1.反轉錄作用(Reverse transcription) 20
2.DNA聚合酶連鎖反應(DNA polymerase chain reaction ) 20
a) S26基因的RT-PCR analysis 20
b) TTK/hMps1基因的semi–quantitative RT-PCR analysis 21
c) TTK/hMps1基因的sequence analysis 21
d) CHK2基因的sequence analysis 21
e) CHK2基因的splice variants analysis 22
f) Ramp/L2DTL基因的semi–quantitative RT-PCR analysis 23
3.核苷酸序列分析(Direct DNA sequencing method) 24
三、生物統計 25

第三章 結果 26
1. 序列分析(sequence analysis)TTK/hMps1的第521胺基酸至第857胺基酸,發現台灣地區特有的polymorphism 26
2.在乳癌檢體中TTK/hMps1的表現量與幾個乳癌相關的重要因子有關 27
3.序列分析(sequence analysis)CHK2的第762nt至2390nt(即為coding region),發現CHK2的一個polymorphism 28
4.在乳癌檢體中發現CHK2基因中insZ、del7、del4及sub3四種splice variant form出現的比例最高,且CHK2表現與癒後復發有關 29
5.在乳癌檢體中Ramp/L2DTL的表現量與幾個乳癌相關的重要因子有關 30

第四章 討論 32
第五章 圖表 36
參考文獻 56
Bartek, J., and Lukas, J. (2003). Chk1 and Chk2 kinases in checkpoint control and cancer. Cancer Cell 3, 421-429.

Bell, D. W., Varley, J. M., Szydlo, T. E., Kang, D. H., Wahrer, D. C., Shannon, K. E., Lubratovich, M., Verselis, S. J., Isselbacher, K. J., Fraumeni, J. F., et al. (1999).

Heterozygous germ line hCHK2 mutations in Li-Fraumeni syndrome. Science 286, 2528-2531.

Cheung, W. M., Chu, A. H., Chu, P. W., and Ip, N. Y. (2001). Cloning and expression of a novel nuclear matrix-associated protein that is regulated during the retinoic acid-induced neuronal differentiation. J Biol Chem 276, 17083-17091.

Cornelisse, C. J., Cornelis, R. S., and Devilee, P. (1996). Genes responsible for familial breast cancer. Pathol Res Pract 192, 684-693.

Dong, X., Wang, L., Taniguchi, K., Wang, X., Cunningham, J. M., McDonnell, S. K., Qian, C., Marks, A. F., Slager, S. L., Peterson, B. J., et al. (2003). Mutations in CHEK2 associated with prostate cancer risk. Am J Hum Genet 72, 270-280.

Donovan-Peluso, M., Contento, A. M., Tobon, H., Ripepi, B., and Locker, J. (1991). Oncogene amplification in breast cancer. Am J Pathol 138, 835-845.

Dufault, M. R., Betz, B., Wappenschmidt, B., Hofmann, W., Bandick, K., Golla, A., Pietschmann, A., Nestle-Kramling, C., Rhiem, K., Huttner, C., et al. (2004). Limited relevance of the CHEK2 gene in hereditary breast cancer. Int J Cancer 110, 320-325.

Fisk, H. A., Mattison, C. P., and Winey, M. (2003). Human Mps1 protein kinase is required for centrosome duplication and normal mitotic progression. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 100, 14875-14880.

Gorgoulis, V. G., Vassiliou, L. V., Karakaidos, P., Zacharatos, P., Kotsinas, A., Liloglou, T., Venere, M., Ditullio, R. A., Jr., Kastrinakis, N. G., Levy, B., et al. (2005). Activation of the DNA damage checkpoint and genomic instability in human precancerous lesions. Nature 434, 907-913.

Guan, X. Y., Fang, Y., Sham, J. S., Kwong, D. L., Zhang, Y., Liang, Q., Li, H., Zhou, H., and Trent, J. M. (2000). Recurrent chromosome alterations in hepatocellular carcinoma detected by comparative genomic hybridization. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 29, 110-116.

Herzog, C. R. (2002). Chk2 meets Plk3 in damage control. Cell Cycle 1, 408-409.
Hsiao, W. C., Young, K. C., Lin, S. L., and Lin, P. W. (2004). Estrogen receptor-alpha polymorphism in a Taiwanese clinical breast cancer population: a case-control study. Breast Cancer Res 6, R180-186.

Ingvarsson, S., Sigbjornsdottir, B. I., Huiping, C., Hafsteinsdottir, S. H., Ragnarsson, G., Barkardottir, R. B., Arason, A., Egilsson, V., and Bergthorsson, J. T. (2002).
Mutation analysis of the CHK2 gene in breast carcinoma and other cancers. Breast Cancer Res 4, R4.

Kilpivaara, O., Vahteristo, P., Falck, J., Syrjakoski, K., Eerola, H., Easton, D., Bartkova, J., Lukas, J., Heikkila, P., Aittomaki, K., et al. (2004). CHEK2 variant I157T may be associated with increased breast cancer risk. Int J Cancer 111, 543-547.

Kurzik-Dumke, U., Neubauer, M., and Debes, A. (1996). Identification of a novel Drosophila melanogaster heat-shock gene, lethal(2)denticleless [l(2)dtl], coding for an 83-kDa protein. Gene 171, 163-170.

Kusano, N., Shiraishi, K., Kubo, K., Oga, A., Okita, K., and Sasaki, K. (1999). Genetic aberrations detected by comparative genomic hybridization in hepatocellular carcinomas: their relationship to clinicopathological features. Hepatology 29, 1858-1862.

Langston, A. A., Malone, K. E., Thompson, J. D., Daling, J. R., and Ostrander, E. A. (1996). BRCA1 mutations in a population-based sample of young women with breast cancer. N Engl J Med 334, 137-142.

Lindberg, R. A., Fischer, W. H., and Hunter, T. (1993). Characterization of a human protein threonine kinase isolated by screening an expression library with antibodies to phosphotyrosine. Oncogene 8, 351-359.

Matsuoka, S., Huang, M., and Elledge, S. J. (1998). Linkage of ATM to cell cycle regulation by the Chk2 protein kinase. Science 282, 1893-1897.

McGowan, C. H. (2002). Checking in on Cds1 (Chk2): A checkpoint kinase and tumor suppressor. Bioessays 24, 502-511.

Mills, G. B., Schmandt, R., McGill, M., Amendola, A., Hill, M., Jacobs, K., May, C., Rodricks, A. M., Campbell, S., and Hogg, D. (1992). Expression of TTK, a novel human protein kinase, is associated with cell proliferation. J Biol Chem 267, 16000-16006.

Morabia, A., Bernstein, M., Heritier, S., and Khatchatrian, N. (1996). Relation of breast cancer with passive and active exposure to tobacco smoke. Am J Epidemiol 143, 918-928.

Neer, E. J., Schmidt, C. J., Nambudripad, R., and Smith, T. F. (1994). The ancient regulatory-protein family of WD-repeat proteins. Nature 371, 297-300.

Oldenburg, R. A., Kroeze-Jansema, K., Kraan, J., Morreau, H., Klijn, J. G., Hoogerbrugge, N., Ligtenberg, M. J., van Asperen, C. J., Vasen, H. F., Meijers, C., et al. (2003). The CHEK2*1100delC variant acts as a breast cancer risk modifier in non-BRCA1/BRCA2 multiple-case families. Cancer Res 63, 8153-8157.

Pathak, D. R., and Whittemore, A. S. (1992). Combined effects of body size, parity, and menstrual events on breast cancer incidence in seven countries. Am J Epidemiol 135, 153-168.

Rosenberg, L., Metzger, L. S., and Palmer, J. R. (1993). Alcohol consumption and risk of breast cancer: a review of the epidemiologic evidence. Epidemiol Rev 15, 133-144.

Sancar, A., Lindsey-Boltz, L. A., Unsal-Kacmaz, K., and Linn, S. (2004). Molecular mechanisms of mammalian DNA repair and the DNA damage checkpoints. Annu Rev Biochem 73, 39-85.

Simon, R., Burger, H., Brinkschmidt, C., Bocker, W., Hertle, L., and Terpe, H. J. (1998). Chromosomal aberrations associated with invasion in papillary superficial bladder cancer. J Pathol 185, 345-351.

Singletary, S. E., Allred, C., Ashley, P., Bassett, L. W., Berry, D., Bland, K. I., Borgen, P. I., Clark, G., Edge, S. B., Hayes, D. F., et al. (2002). Revision of the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system for breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 20, 3628-3636.
Staalesen, V., Falck, J., Geisler, S., Bartkova, J., Borresen-Dale, A. L., Lukas, J., Lillehaug, J. R., Bartek, J., and Lonning, P. E. (2004). Alternative splicing and mutation status of CHEK2 in stage III breast cancer. Oncogene 23, 8535-8544.

Stucke, V. M., Sillje, H. H., Arnaud, L., and Nigg, E. A. (2002). Human Mps1 kinase is required for the spindle assembly checkpoint but not for centrosome duplication. Embo J 21, 1723-1732.

Tamimi, R. M., Hankinson, S. E., Spiegelman, D., Kraft, P., Colditz, G. A., and Hunter, D. J. (2004). Common ataxia telangiectasia mutated haplotypes and risk of breast cancer: a nested case-control study. Breast Cancer Res 6, R416-422.

Tirkkonen, M., Tanner, M., Karhu, R., Kallioniemi, A., Isola, J., and Kallioniemi, O. P. (1998). Molecular cytogenetics of primary breast cancer by CGH. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 21, 177-184.

Vahteristo, P., Tamminen, A., Karvinen, P., Eerola, H., Eklund, C., Aaltonen, L. A., Blomqvist, C., Aittomaki, K., and Nevanlinna, H. (2001). p53, CHK2, and CHK1 genes in Finnish families with Li-Fraumeni syndrome: further evidence of CHK2 in inherited cancer predisposition. Cancer Res 61, 5718-5722.

Van de Vijver, M. J., and Nusse, R. (1991). The molecular biology of breast cancer. Biochim Biophys Acta 1072, 33-50.

van der Voorn, L., and Ploegh, H. L. (1992). The WD-40 repeat. FEBS Lett 307, 131-134.

Wei, J. H., Chou, Y. F., Ou, Y. H., Yeh, Y. H., Tyan, S. W., Sun, T. P., Shen, C. Y., and Shieh, S. Y. (2005). TTK/hMps1 participates in the regulation of DNA damage checkpoint response by phosphorylating CHK2 on threonine 68. J Biol Chem 280, 7748-7757.

Winey, M., and Huneycutt, B. J. (2002). Centrosomes and checkpoints: the MPS1 family of kinases. Oncogene 21, 6161-6169.

Wu, X., Webster, S. R., and Chen, J. (2001). Characterization of tumor-associated Chk2 mutations. J Biol Chem 276, 2971-2974.

Yang, J., Xu, Z. P., Huang, Y., Hamrick, H. E., Duerksen-Hughes, P. J., and Yu, Y. N. (2004). ATM and ATR: sensing DNA damage. World J Gastroenterol 10, 155-160.

Zhou, B. B., and Bartek, J. (2004). Targeting the checkpoint kinases: chemosensitization versus chemoprotection. Nat Rev Cancer 4, 216-225.
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
無相關論文
 
1. 吳武典、林繼盛(1985)。加強家庭聯繫對兒童學習效果與家庭氣氛的影響。師大教育心理學報,18,97-116。
2. 余德慧(1985)。從日本式的「依愛」到中國式的「親子愛」。張老師月刊,96,72-76。
3. 陳小娥、蘇建文(1977)。父母教養行為與少年生活適應。師大教育心理學報,10,91-106。
4. 張景媛(1992)。自我調整、動機信念、選題策略與作業表現關係的研究暨自我調整訓練課程效果之評估。教育心理學報,25,201-243。
5. 洪福源(2000)。自我調節學習在教學上的應用。國教輔導,39(6),49-53。
6. 林義男(1993):國中學生家庭社經背景、父母參與及其學業成就的關係。輔導學報,16,157-212。
7. 林惠雅(1999b)。母親信念、教養目標與教養行為(二):問卷編製與相關分析。應用心理研究,3,219-244。
8. 林惠雅(1999a)。母親信念、教養目標與教養行為(一):內涵意義之探討。應用心理研究,2,143-180。
9. 林惠雅(1995)。父母教養行為問卷之編製。應用心理學報,4,39-72。
10. 林清文(2003)。高中高職學生基礎學科自我調整課業學習策略研究。中華輔導學報,13,1-44。
11. 林清文(2002)。自我調整課業學習模式在課業學習諮商的應用。彰化師大輔導學報,23,229-275。
12. 林清山、程炳林(1995)。國中生自我調整學習因素與學習表現之關係暨自我調整的閱讀理解教學策略效果之研究。教育心理學報,28,15-27。
13. 林紀慧(2002)。國小學童自我調節學習特質與不同電腦教學環境對自然概念學習之成效研究。新竹師院學報,15,69-89。
14. 林邦傑(1995)。我國國小、國中、高中學生學習及讀書策略之比較分析。測驗年刊,42,349-370。
15. 李美枝(1998)。中國人親子關係的內涵與功能:以大學生為例。本土心理學研究,9,3-53。