跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(18.97.14.87) 您好!臺灣時間:2025/01/17 19:58
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:游承霖
研究生(外文):Cheng-Ling Yu
論文名稱:決定論與道德責任的不相容
論文名稱(外文):The Incompatibility of Determinism and Moral Responsibility
指導教授:黃懿梅黃懿梅引用關係
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立臺灣大學
系所名稱:哲學研究所
學門:人文學門
學類:哲學學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2005
畢業學年度:93
語文別:中文
論文頁數:114
中文關鍵詞:決定論道德責任自由意志PAPTransfer NR富蘭克弗式反例
外文關鍵詞:determinismmoral responsibilityfree willPAPTransfer NRFrankfurt-style counterexamples
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:524
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:0
本篇論文所要討論的是富蘭克弗 (Frankfurt)和菲雪 (Fischer)/拉維薩(Ravizza)對「其它可能性原則」(the principle of alternative possibilities;簡稱PAP)以及「無道德責任轉移原則」(the principle of transfer of non-responsibility;簡稱Transfer NR)所提出的「富蘭克弗式反例」(Frankfurt-style counterexamples)。一般而言,「決定論」和「道德責任」不相容的論證被哲學家們分為「間接論證」(indirect argument)和「直接論證」(direct argument),這兩個論證分別仰賴PAP和Transfer NR。富蘭克弗和菲雪/拉維薩則是試圖以例子證明PAP和Transfer NR是錯誤的原則。
在本篇論文我試圖說明富蘭克弗和菲雪/拉維薩的「富蘭克弗式反例」並沒有成功,所以「間接論證」和「直接論證」並沒有受到「富蘭克弗式反例」的威脅。我的論證將仰賴某個關於道德責任、並且被我稱為「最終源頭」的原則(the principle of the ultimate source;簡稱US)。
本篇論文分為三大章。第一章討論「間接論證」和PAP、富蘭克弗對PAP的攻擊以及我對富蘭克弗的回應。第二章討論「直接論證」和Transfer NR、菲雪和拉維薩對Transfer NR的攻擊以及我對菲雪和拉維薩的回應。在回應富蘭克弗和菲雪/拉維薩時,我也討論了幾位哲學家對「富蘭克弗式反例」的看法。第三章為總結。
In this thesis I shall discuss Frankfurt and Fischer/Ravizza’s “Frankfurt-style counterexamples” to the principle of alternative possibilities (PAP) and the principle of transfer of non-responsibility (Transfer NR). It is common among contemporary philosophers to distinguish between two kinds of arguments for the incompatibility of determinism and moral responsibility: the indirect argument and the direct argument. The indirect argument relies upon PAP and the direct argument relies upon Transfer NR. However, PAP and Transfer NR have come under attacks. Frankfurt, in his influential paper, “Alternate Possibilities and Moral Responsibility”, has questioned the plausibility of PAP; and Fischer and Ravizza have similarly questioned the validity of Transfer NR in Responsibility and Control: A Theory of Moral Responsibility.
The aim of this thesis is to defend PAP and Transfer NR from the so-called “Frankfurt-style counterexamples.” I shall argue that “Frankfurt-style counterexamples” fail to invalidate both PAP and Transfer NR. In my defense of PAP and Transfer NR, I shall rely upon a principle which I call “the principle of the ultimate source” (US).
This thesis has three chapters. The first chapter deals with PAP, the indirect argument, Frankfurt’s attack on PAP and the responses to Frankfurt’s attack. The second chapter deals with Transfer NR, the direct argument, Fischer and Ravizza’s attack on Transfer NR and the responses to Fischer and Ravizza’s attack. In the responses to Frankfurt, Fischer and Ravizza’s attacks, besides presenting my own argument, I shall also discuss responses from some other philosophers. The last chapter is the conclusion.
前言 1

第一章 其它可能性原則 (PAP)
第一節 間接論證和其它可能性原則 13
第二節 富蘭克弗對其他可能性原則的挑戰 22
第三節 對富蘭克弗的回應 26

第二章 無道德責任轉移原則 (Transfer NR)
第一節 直接論證和無道德責任轉移原則 77
第二節 菲雪和拉維薩對無道德責任轉移原則的挑戰 83
第三節 對菲雪和拉維薩的回應 89

第三章 總結 101

附錄─中英對照表 105

參考文獻 107
Anscombe, Elizabeth. “Causality and Determination” in Agency and Responsibility: Essays on the Metaphysics of Freedom, Laura Waddell Ekstrom ed. Oxford: Westview Press, 2001
Aune, Bruce. “Hypotheticals and ‘Can’: Another Look” in Free Will, Gary Watson ed. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press, 1982
Ayer, A.J. “Freedom and Necessity” in Free Will, Gary Watson ed. Oxford, New
York: Oxford University Press, 1982.
Berofsky, Bernard. “Ultimate Responsibility in a Deterministic World” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. Vol. LX, No.1, January 2000: 135-140.
------. “Ifs, Cans, and Free Will: The Issues” in The Oxford Handbook of Free Will, Robert Kane ed. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 2002
Blumenfeld, David. “The Principle of Alternate Possibilities” The Journal of Philosophy. LXVII, 10 (1970): 339-45.
Bok, Hilary. Freedom and Responsibility. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1998.
Bramhall, John. The Works of John Bramhall. Oxford: John Henry Parker, 1844.
Chisholm, Roderick. “Freedom and Action” in Freedom and Determinism, Keith Lehrer ed. New York: Random House, 1966.
------. “Human Freedom and the Self” in Free Will, Gary Watson ed. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press, 1982.
------. “Agents, Causes, and Events: The Problem of Free Will” in Agents, Causes, and Events: Essays on Indeterminism and Free Will, Timothy O’Connor ed. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995.
Clark, Randolph. “Toward a Credible Agent-Causal Account of Free Will” in Agents, Causes, and Events: Essays on Indeterminism and Free Will, Timothy O’Connor ed. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995
------. “Agent Causation and Event Causation in the Production of Free Action” in Free Will, Derk Pereboom ed. Indianapolis and Cambridge: Hackett, 1997.
------. “Libertarian Views: Critical Survey of Noncausal and Event-Causal Accounts of Free Agency” in The Oxford Handbook of Free Will, Robert Kane ed. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 2002
Dennett, Daniel. “Mechanism and Responsibility” in Free Will, Gary Watson ed. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press, 1982
------. Elbow Room. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1984.
------. “On Giving Libertarians What They Say They Want” in Agents, Causes, and Events: Essays on Indeterminism and Free Will, Timothy O’Connor ed. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995
------. “I Could Not Have Done Otherwise—So What?” in Free Will, Robert Kane ed. Malden and Oxford: Blackwell, 2002
Dennett, Daniel and Taylor, Christopher. “Who’s Afraid of Determinism? Rethinking Causes and Possibilities” in The Oxford Handbook of Free Will, Robert Kane ed. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 2002
Double, Richard. “How to Frame the Free Will Problem” Philosophical Studies 75: 149-172, 1994.
------. “Libertarianism and Rationality” in Agents, Causes, and Events: Essays on Indeterminism and Free Will, Timothy O’Connor ed. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995
------. “Metaethics, Metaphilosophy, and Free Will Subjectivism” in The Oxford Handbook of Free Will, Robert Kane ed. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 2002
Edwards, Paul. “Hard and Soft Determinism” in Free Will, Robert Kane ed. Malden and Oxford: Blackwell, 2002
Ekstrom, Laura Waddell. “Indeterminist Free Action” in Agency and Responsibility: Essays on the Metaphysics of Freedom, Laura Waddell Ekstrom ed. Oxford: Westview Press, 2001
------. “Libertarianism and Frankfurt -style Cases” in The Oxford Handbook of Free Will, Robert Kane ed. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 2002
Fischer, John Martin. “Responsibility and Control” in Moral Responsibility, John Martin Fischer ed. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press, 1986
------. “Responsiveness and Moral Responsibility” in Responsibility, Character, and the Emotions: New Essays in Moral Psychology, Ferdinand Schoeman ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987
------. The Metaphysics of Free Will. Oxford and Cambridge: Blackwell, 1994 & 1995.
------. “The Significance of Free Will by Robert Kane” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. Vol. LX, No.1, January 2000: 141-148.
------. “A New Compatibilism” in Agency and Responsibility: Essays on the Metaphysics of Freedom, Laura Waddell Ekstrom ed. Oxford: Westview Press, 2001
------. “Frankfurt -style Examples, Responsibility and Semi-compatibilism” in Free Will, Robert Kane ed. Malden and Oxford: Blackwell, 2002a
------. “Frankfurt -type Examples and Semi-Compatibilism” in The Oxford Handbook of Free Will, Robert Kane ed. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 2002b
------. “Frankfurt -Style Compatibilism” in Contours of Agency: Essays on Themes from Harry Frankfurt, Sarah Buss and Lee Overton ed. Cambridge and London: The MIT Press, 2002c
------. “Van Inwagen on Free Will” The Philosophical Quarterly vol. 36, no. 143:252-260.
Fischer, John Martin, and Mark Ravizza, “When the Will is Free” in Agents, Causes, and Events: Essays on Indeterminism and Free Will, Timothy O’Connor ed. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995
------. “Free Will and the Modal Principle” Philosophical Studies S 96, 83(3): 213-230.
------. Responsibility and Control: A Theory of Moral Responsibility. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.
Frankfurt, Harry. “Freedom of the Will and the Concept of a Person” Free Will, Gary Watson ed. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press, 1982
------. “Three Concepts of Free Action: II” in Moral Responsibility, John Martin Fischer ed. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press, 1986a
------. “Alternate Possibilities and Moral Responsibility” in Moral Responsibility, John Martin Fischer ed. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press, 1986b
Ginet, Carl. “Might We Have No Choice?” in Freedom and Determinism, Keith Lehrer ed. New York: Random House, 1966
------. “In Defense of Incompatibilism” Philosophical Studies 44 (1983): 391-400
------. On Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.
------. “Reasons Explanation of Action: An Incompatibilist Account” in Agents, Causes, and Events: Essays on Indeterminism and Free Will, Timothy O’Connor ed. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995
------. “Freedom, Responsibility and Agency” in Free Will, Robert Kane ed. Malden and Oxford: Blackwell, 2002
Honderich, Ted. “Determinism as True, Compatibilism and Incompatibilism as False, and the Real Problem” in The Oxford Handbook of Free Will, Robert Kane ed. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 2002
Hume, David. An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding. L.A. Selby-Bigge and P.H. Nidditch ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1975.
------. “from An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding” in Free Will, Derk Pereboom ed. Indianapolis/Cambridge: Hackett, 1997a.
------. “from A Treatise of Human Nature” in Free Will, Derk Pereboom ed. Indianapolis/Cambridge: Hackett, 1997b.
Kane, Robert. “Two Kinds of Incompatibilism” in Agents, Causes, and Events: Essays on Indeterminism and Free Will, Timothy O’Connor ed. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995
------. The Significance of Free Will. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996.
------. “Precis of The Significance of Free Will” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. Vol. LX, No.1, January 2000a: 129-134.
------. “Responses to Bernard Berofsky, John Martin Fischer and Galen Strawson” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. Vol. LX, No.1, January 2000b: 157-167.
------. “Responsibility, Luck, and Chance: Reflections on Free Will and Indeterminism” in Agency and Responsibility: Essays on the Metaphysics of Freedom, Laura Waddell Ekstrom ed. Oxford: Westview Press, 2001
------. “Free Will: New Directions for an Ancient Problem” in Free Will, Robert Kane ed. Malden and Oxford: Blackwell, 2002a
------. “Some Neglected Pathways in the Free Will Labyrinth” in The Oxford Handbook of Free Will, Robert Kane ed. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 2002b
Kant, Immanuel. Religion Within the Bounds of Reason Alone. Trans. by T. Greene and H. Hudson. New York: Harper & Row, 1960.
------. “from the Critique of Pure Reason” in Free Will, Derk Pereboom ed. Indianapolis/Cambridge: Hackett, 1997a.
------. “from the Critique of Practical Reason” in Free Will, Derk Pereboom ed. Indianapolis/Cambridge: Hackett, 1997b.
Klein, Martha. Determinism, Blameworthiness, and Deprivation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1990.
Lehrer, Keith. “An Empirical Disproof of Determinism?” in Freedom and Determinism, Keith Lehrer ed. New York: Random House, 1966
------. “Cans without Ifs” in Free Will, Gary Watson ed. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press, 1982
Lewis, David. “Are We Free to Break the Laws?” in Agency and Responsibility: Essays on the Metaphysics of Freedom, Laura Waddell Ekstrom ed. Oxford: Westview Press, 2001
Locke, John. An Essay Concerning Human Understanding. Maurice Cranston ab. and ed. New York: Collier, [1690] 1965.
Lucretius. “On the Nature of Things” in Free Will, Derk Pereboom ed. Indianapolis/Cambridge: Hackett Publishing Company, 1997.
Malcolm, Norman. “The Conceivability of Mechanism” in Free Will, Gary Watson ed. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press, 1982
McKenna, Miachel. “Alternative Possibilities and the Failure of the Counterexample Strategy” Journal of Social Philosophy, vol. 28, no.3, Winter 1997: 71-85.
------. “Source Incompatibilism, Ultimacy, And the Transfer of Non-Responsibility” American Philosophical Quarterly, vol. 38, Number 1, January 2001.
Mele, Alfred R, and David Robb. “Rescuing Frankfurt -Style Cases” in Agency and Responsibility: Essays on the Metaphysics of Freedom, Laura Waddell Ekstrom ed. Oxford: Westview Press, 2001
Moore, G.E. “Free Will” in Determinism, Free Will, and Moral Responsibility. Gerald Dworkin ed. N. J.: Prentice-Hall, 1970
Nagel, Thomas. “Moral Luck” in Free Will, Gary Watson ed. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press, 1982
------.The View From Nowhere. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1986
Naylor, Margery Bedford. “Frankfurt on the Principle of Alternate Possibilities” Philosophical Studies 46 (1984): 249-258.
Nielsen, Kai. “The Compatibility of Freedom and Determinism” in Free Will, Robert Kane ed. Malden and Oxford: Blackwell, 2002
O’Connor, Timothy. “Agent Causation” in Agents, Causes, and Events: Essays on Indeterminism and Free Will, Timothy O’Connor ed. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995
------. “Causality, Mind, and Free Will” in Philosophical Perspectives 14: Action and Freedom, 2000, James E. Tomberlin ed. Boston and Oxford: Blackwell, 2000
------. “The Agent as Cause” in Free Will, Robert Kane ed. Malden and Oxford: Blackwell, 2002a
------. “Libertarian Views: Dualist and Agent-Causal Theories” in The Oxford Handbook of Free Will, Robert Kane ed. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 2002b
Paprzycka, Katarzyna. “Flickers of Freedom and Frankfurt -Style Cases in the Light of the New Incompatibilism of the STIT Theory” Journal of Philosophical Research vol. 27, 2002: 553-565
Pereboom, Derk. “Determinism al Dente” in Free Will, Derk Pereboom ed. Indianapolis and Cambridge: Hackett, 1997
------. “Alternative Possibilities and Causal Histories” in Philosophical Perspectives 14: Action and Freedom, 2000, James E. Tomberlin ed. Boston and Oxford: Blackwell, 2000
------.Living Without Free Will. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.
------.. “The Explanatory Irrelevance of Alternative Possibilities” in Free Will, Robert Kane ed. Malden and Oxford: Blackwell, 2002a
------. “Living without Free Will: The Case for Hard Incompatibilism” in The Oxford Handbook of Free Will, Robert Kane ed. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 2002b
Ravizza, Mark. “Semi-Compatibilism and the Transfer of Non-Responsibility” Philosophical Studies 75: 61-93, 1994.
Reid, Thomas. The Works of Thomas Reid. Ed. by W. Hamilton. Hildeshein: George Ulm, 1983.
Slote, Michael. “Selective Necessity and the Free Will Problem” The Journal of Philosophy. Vol. LXXIX, No. 1. January 1982: 5-24
------. “Understanding Free Will” in Moral Responsibility, John Martin Fischer ed. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press, 1986
Strawson, Galen. Freedom and Belief. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1986.
------. “The Impossibility of Moral Responsibility” Philosophical Studies 75: 5-24, 1994.
------. “Libertarianism, Action, and Self-Determination” in Agents, Causes, and Events: Essays on Indeterminism and Free Will, Timothy O’Connor ed. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995
------. “The Unhelpfulness of Indeterminism” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. Vol. LX, No.1, January 2000: 149-155.
Strawson, Peter. “Freedom and Resentment” in Free Will, Gary Watson ed. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press, 1982
Stump, Eleonore. “The Direct Argument for Incompatibilism” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research vol. LXI, no.2, Sept 2000.
------. “Control and Causal Determinism” in Contours of Agency: Essays on Themes from Harry Frankfurt, Sarah Buss and Lee Overton ed. Cambridge and London: The MIT Press, 2002
Stump, Eleonore, and John Martin Fischer. “Transfer Principles and Moral Responsibility” in Philosophical Perspectives 14: Action and Freedom, 2000, James E. Tomberlin ed. Boston and Oxford: Blackwell, 2000
Taylor, Charles. “Responsibility for Self” in Free Will, Gary Watson ed. Oxford, New
York: Oxford University Press, 1982
Taylor, Richard. Metaphysics. Third Edition. N.J.: Prentice-Hall Inc, 1983.
Van Inwagen, Peter. “The Incompatibility of Free Will and Determinism” in Free Will, Gary Watson ed. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press, 1982
------. An Essay on Free Will. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1983.
------. “Ability and Responsibility” in Moral Responsibility, John Martin Fischer ed. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press, 1986a
------. “The Incompatibility of Responsibility and Determinism” in Moral Responsibility, John Martin Fischer ed. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press, 1986b
------. Metaphysics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993.
------. “When the Will is Not Free” Philosophical Studies 75:95-113, 1994.
------. “When Is the Will Free?” in Agents, Causes, and Events: Essays on Indeterminism and Free Will, Timothy O’Connor ed. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995
------. “The Mystery of Metaphysical Freedom” in Free Will, Robert Kane ed. Malden and Oxford: Blackwell, 2002a
------. “Free Will Remains a Mystery” in The Oxford Handbook of Free Will, Robert Kane ed. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 2002b
------. “Fischer on Moral Responsibility” The Philosophical Quarterly, vol. 47, No 188: 373-381.
Vihvelin, Kadri. “John Martin Fischer, The Metaphysics of Free Will” Nous 32:3(1998): 406-420.
Warfield, Ted A. “Determinism and Moral Responsibility Are Incompatible” Philosophical Topics, vol. 24, no. 2, Fall 1996.
------. “Causal Determinism and Human Freedom and Incompatible: A New Argument for Incompatibilism” in Philosophical Perspectives 14: Action and Freedom, 2000, James E. Tomberlin ed. Boston and Oxford: Blackwell, 2000
Watson, Gary. “Free Agency” in Free Will, Gary Watson ed. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press, 1982
------. “Responsibility and the Limits of Evil: Variations on a Strawsonian Theme” in Free Will, Robert Kane ed. Malden and Oxford: Blackwell, 2002
Widerker, David. “Libertarian Freedom and the Avoidability of Decisions” Faith and Philosophy. Vol. 12, No.7, January 1995: 113-7.
------. “Frankfurt’s Attack on the Principle of Alternative Possibilities: A further Look” in Philosophical Perspectives 14: Action and Freedom, 2000, James E. Tomberlin ed. Boston and Oxford: Blackwell, 2000
------. “Libertarianism and Frankfurt’s Attack on the Principle of Alternative Possibilities” in Agency and Responsibility: Essays on the Metaphysics of Freedom, Laura Waddell Ekstrom ed. Oxford: Westview Press, 2001
------. “Responsibility and Frankfurt -type Examples” in The Oxford Handbook of Free Will, Robert Kane ed. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 2002
------. “Farewell to the Direct Argument” The Journal of Philosophy 2002, 99(6): 316-24.
Wolf, Susan. “Asymmetrical Freedom” in Moral Responsibility, John Martin Fischer ed. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press, 1986
------. Freedom Within Reason. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1990.
------. “The Reason View” in Agency and Responsibility: Essays on the Metaphysics of Freedom, Laura Waddell Ekstrom ed. Oxford: Westview Press, 2001
------. “Sanity and the Metaphysics of Responsibility” in Free Will, Robert Kane ed. Malden and Oxford: Blackwell, 2002
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top