臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

醫院醫療管理一直都是社會大眾關心的焦點，醫院各部門中，手術室人員面對的工作繁多且風險性高。醫療不良事件發生的場所有39.5%發生在手術室，可知手術室不良事件的發生率較醫院其他部門有偏高的情形。能在手術室服務流程上作有效管理，對提升病人安全及促進醫療服務品質，將可以較迅速之發揮成效，因此本研究以基隆長庚醫院的手術室為導入標的。

對於手術與全醫療界業而言，最重要的事莫過於提升病人安全，利用本研究提出之RFID(無線射頻辨識系統)手術室醫療系統將有助益。

目前台灣醫療業界導入RFID之現況多從事件觀點(例如以防範SARS而以RFID進行病人追蹤之用)及少部分病人辨識點之介入來導入RFID系統，無法真正落實提升病人安全之理想。

本研究將分析目前RFID於國內醫療系統的使用狀況，並針對手術室容易出錯的環節發展出一套RFID管理系統，如依照本系統流程進行手術的各項核對細節，可避免因醫療人員疏失所造成的傷害。

本研究設計並提出具有「提升病人安全(Improve patient safety)、自動驗證(Auto-checking)、 作業記錄(Proof-of-action)、精簡資訊顯示(Essential-display)、自動提示(Auto-reminder)」等五大特點之系統，設計與規劃主要分為兩項來說明：

一、邏輯設計：
本研究應用企業資源規劃(ERP)之觀念，以全面性之系統、組織結構、作業流程之整體架構來設計以提升病人安全的RFID醫療管理系統，化被動的資訊系統為主動的管控系統。

二、實體設計：
為實現RFID手術室醫療管理系統之理想，必須考量實體設備之特性、規格。本研究除了流程之邏輯設計外，亦設計實體系統之手術室電腦系統流程與畫面設計、基礎系統設施、行動化RFID 讀寫器、RFID標籤、內含RFID之手圈及其印製機與碎紙機等五項。

在個案研究中詳細敘述醫院於未導入RFID系統時的不便與易容出錯的狀況，提出導入之後的便利性與正確性的差異，可清楚驗證RFID手術室醫療系統的優點與實用性。

As hospital medical care management continues to be a focus concern of the general public, among all hospital departments, the tasks of surgical room personnel are not only fastidious but also with greater risks. 39.5% of medical malpractice incidents take place at the surgical room, a telltale sign reaffirming the scenario that ratio of surgical room malpractice occurred tends to be higher than that at the other departments. Hence the ability to effectively manage the surgical room service procedure that would poise to safeguard patient safety and enhance the overall medical care service quality can help to derive an instantaneous yield. With that, the study has chosen the Chang Gung Memorial Hospital in Keelung as the introductory study subject.

As far as the surgical community and the entire medical care industry are concerned, the most critical element lies in how best to enhance patient safety. While utilizing the Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) system’s surgical room medical care system proposed by the study would help to achieve the goal.

The current state of RFID induction by Taiwan’s medical care industry has largely broached from the event perspective, i.e. using RFID for patient tracking in SARS prevention, and from the identification point of a small number of patients that keep from truly realizing the ideology of enhancing patient safety.

The thesis has focused on the present state of RFID adaptation in the local medical care system, together with focusing on some of the links at the surgical room that are prone to error, to develop a RFID management system, which is posed to greatly reduce harm caused by medical staff negligence when used to validate the surgical checklist.

The study has devised and presented a system backed by five major characteristics of Improve Patient Safety, Auto-checking, Proof-of-action, Essential-display and Auto-reminder; the design and development can be described in two major categories,

1.Logical Design
The study adopts the Enterprising Resource Planning (ERP) concept to devise an overall framework backed by comprehensive system, organization structure and operating flow for devising a RFID medical care management system that serves to enhance patient safety, and transforming a passive information system into an active control and monitoring system.

2.Tangible Design
To achieve the ideology of the RFID surgical room medical care system, there is a necessity to take into account the characteristic and specification of the tangible equipment. For which, the study not only focuses on the logistical design of the flow, but also emphasized on devising a tangible system’s surgical room computer system flow and drawing design, infrastructure system facilities, encompassing five categories of mobile RFID scanner, RFID tagging, built-in RFID manual drawing, as well as a printer and a shredder.

The case study that describes in-depth the inconvenience before a hospital inducts a RFID system and the state of errors that prone to occur, together with the differences in convenience and accuracy following the system induction duly presented, clearly validates the RFID surgical room medical care system’s advantage and practicality, and its tangible yield in excelling patient safety and improving the overall medical care service quality.

目 錄

第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景、動機與目的 1
第二節 研究架構與流程 4
第三節 研究範圍與限制 6
第二章 文獻探討 7
第三章 RFID無線射頻辨識技術介紹 10
第一節 RFID在本研究範圍內之特性分析 10
第二節 RFID在國內醫療產業之現況 14
第四章 系統設計 19
第一節 邏輯設計(Logical design) 19
第二節 實體設計(Tangible design) 30
第三節 系統設計特點 36
第五章 個案研究 37
第一節 個案基本資料 37
第二節 個案導入RFID系統之目標 38
第三節 未導入前手術室醫療系統流程 39
第四節 導入後之RFID手術室醫療系統流程 41
第五節 執行結果分析 49
第六章 結論 51
參考資料 53

一、中文參考資料
1.日經BP RFID技術編輯部，2004，RFID技術與應用，旗標。
2.台灣醫院協會，2005。醫院安全作業指導參考指引，http://www.hatw.org.tw/0/sop/index.htm
3.田方男，1993。大型醫院手術室空間配置及業務量之調查分析，國立台灣大學公共衛生研究所碩士論文。
4.江怡如，2000。醫療糾紛與醫療品質相關性探討，中國醫藥學院醫務管理研究所碩士論文。
5.江美欣，2004十月。RFID技術應用面面觀(醫療產業篇，工研院IEK-ITIS計畫報告
6.何曉琪，2001。醫療錯誤之國際發展與研究取向之優劣分析–美國、澳洲、英國及台灣之實證分析，台灣大學衛生政策與管理研究所碩士論文。
7.吳昭慧，2000。以網頁設計手術器械電腦輔助教學系統-以國立成功大學附設醫院器械影像資料庫為基礎，中國醫藥學院醫務管理研究所碩士論文。
8.李采珍，2001。手術室品質促進團隊績效評量之研究-以台北市某市立醫院為例，國防醫學院護理研究所碩士論文。
9.林東宏，2004十月。抗SARS專案成果發表，經濟部技術處示範型資訊應用開發計畫，「阻抗SARS疫情相關技術研發計畫」聯合成果發表暨研討會。
10.林淑娟， 2004六月，運用失效模式與效應分析於手術流程之病人安全評估-以中部某區域教學醫院為例，中國醫藥大學醫務管理研究所碩士論文
11.段雷，2003。醫院手術室現有缺失及改善策略之研究，中華大學營建管理研究所碩士論文。
12.唐國智，2002。開刀房人因工程危害評估與改善設計，高雄醫學大學公共衛生研究所碩士論文。
13.陳春枝，2003。流程管理介入對手術室服務效能之影響，台北醫學大學護理研究所碩士論文。
14.無線射頻辨識技術網站，2005。http://www.rfid.org.hk/。
15.黃進興，2002。醫療資訊管理系統研究議題之探討，資訊管理學報，第九卷專刊。
16.廖珮君，2005。提升醫病關係之RFID致能門診系統規劃與研究，國立台灣大學管理學院商學管理研究所碩士論文。

二、英文參考資料
1.2004 JCAHO(Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations) National Patient Safety Goals Approved. Joint commission Perspectives 2003.
2.2005 JCAHO(Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations), 2005. Special Report-2004 JCAHO National Patient Safety Goals:Practical Strategies and Helpful Solutions for Meeting These Goals.Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations. Available http://www.jcrinc.com/subscribers/patientsafety.asp?durki=5308
3.2005 Solutions with Intel® Architecture for Transforming Healthcare Industry, Intel.
4.Accenture News Release, 2004,Accneture Hepls Form RFID Industry Group to Evaluate Technology’s Value in Pharmaceutical Industry, Washington, US.
5.Advocacy Whaite Paper: Bar Coding for Patient Safety, HIMSS.
6.Brennan, T.A., Leape, L. L., Laird, N.M., Hebert, A.R., Localio, A. R., Lawthers, A.G., et al. (1991).Incidence of adverse events and negligence care in Hospitalized patients. New England Journal of Medicine.

7.Christine Leath, 2005. RFID promising as new healthcare technology, Intel.
8.Dunn, D. (2003).Incident reports-Correcting processes and reducing errors. AORN Journal.
9.Gawande, A. A., Zinner, M. J., Studdert, D.M., Brennan, T. A.(2003).Analysis of errors reported by surgeons at three teaching hospital. Surgery.
10.Klaus Finkenzeller,2003. RFID Handbook, 2nd ed.
11.Kohn, L. T., J. M. Corrigan and M. S. Donaldson (eds), 2000. To Err is Human: Building a Safer Health System. Institute of Medicine Report. Institute of Medicine (IOM), Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
12.Kohn, L. T., J. M. Corrigan and M. S. Donaldson (eds), 2000. To Err is Human: Building a Safer Health System. Institute of Medicine Report. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
13.National Patient Safety Foundation.Agenda for Research and Development in Patient Safety. Available http//www.ama.assn.org/med-sci/npsf/research/research.htm.
14.RFID Delivers Healthy Return for Hospital, RFID Journal, http://www.rfidjournal.com/article/archive/4/
15.Thomas, E.J., Studdert, D.M., Burstin, H. R., Oraw, E. J., Zeena, T., Willian, E. J., et al., 2000. Incidence and types of adverse events and negligent care in Utah and Colorado. Medical care.