臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

本研究係以量化與質性觀察方式探討園藝活動對療養院慢性精神病患生心理之影響，以及園藝經驗與活動時間長短是否會影響病患之活動表現及效果。共進行兩次為期三個月的試驗，第一次試驗有18位病患參與，實驗組與對照組各9位；第二次試驗則有29位參與，實驗組與對照組分別為15與14位，兩組研究對象在人口學資料沒有顯著差異。兩次試驗之病患疾病診斷型多為精神分裂症。第一次試驗實驗組參與每週一次、每次1.5小時之園藝活動，第二次試驗活動頻率增加為每週二次；對照組仍進行療養院安排之例行活動。活動內容包含植物認識、栽種繁殖、採收及成品運用與手工藝等項目。評估方面，兩組成員均於團體前後以自評方式，接受注意力測驗、手功能測驗、園藝知識測驗與偏好與滿意度調查表測試，而實驗組還會進行職能治療綜合評估表與園藝活動影響量表之評估，前者前後測皆由成員之主治職能治療師評估，後者則於活動前測由個案之主治護士與主治職能治療師評估，團體結束後測由活動執行者與活動助手對個案表現進行評估。
園藝活動對慢性精神病患生理上的影響，由量化結果顯示，對病患工作技巧的培養與體力訓練有幫助，但短期並未增進手功能；心理方面，園藝活動對個案的情感表現、心情、興趣、責任感、認知功能上的注意力與記憶力等都有顯著助益，並在短時間即能觀察到效果，以注意力為例，園藝活動組的前後測平均得分分別為45.78及52.89，對照組的前後測平均得分分別為53.11及47.66，顯示園藝組的得分有顯著進步，而對照組卻有顯著退步的現象；社交互動方面，參加園藝活動的個案增加在團體中的適應能力、人際互動、溝通技巧及言語表達能力，以社區性╱適應能力為例，園藝活動組的前後測平均得分分別為3.34及3.77，顯示園藝組的得分有極顯著的進步。另外，在園藝經驗與活動時間的影響上，無園藝經驗組在園藝知識的學習與一般操作性活動上的表現改善較多，而園藝經驗組則在團體適應、對壓力挫折的忍耐度與對命令的反應上表現較好。參加園藝活動時間的長短並未影響個案園藝知識的學習，但個案在社區性╱適應能力、工作技能、服從性與紀律性╱組織性的進步，則以參與活動時間越長越易觀察到。質性研究中透過課堂觀察，可注意到個案在園藝活動期間生心理正向的改變，與護理人員及職能治療師的訪談結果，能進一步得到確認。以上結果顯示療養院慢性精神病患若身處於自然環境，透過對植物的照顧及收穫物的利用，可以改善生心理狀態。

This study was conducted to evaluate the beneficial effects of horticultural therapy（HT）activities and the influence of horticultural experiences and the duration of activities on patients with chronic mental illness in a public psychiatric center. The study was conducted twice each covering a period of three months at Bali, Taipei. The patient’s change in both physical and psychological are observed along with questionnaire and measurable tests. In the first study, 18 participants were divided into two groups as the activity group (n=9) and control group (n=9). In the second study, 29 participants were divided into two groups as the activity group (n=15) and control group (n=14). Demographic data for both groups showed no significant different and most diagnoses of the participants were schizophrenia. The activity group attended a 1.5 hr horticultural program once a week in first study and twice a week program in second study. The control group participated in the otherwise scheduled routine activities at the center. The types of the horticultural activities included knowing plants, planting and propagation, harvest and products use, and craft work. For evaluation, four instruments, including attention test, hand dexterity, horticultural knowledge test and preference and satisfaction questionnaire were used as self-evaluation to both activity and control groups right before and at the end of HT programs. The activity group was also evaluated by a comprehensive occupational therapy examination and a rating scale for measuring the effects of horticultural therapy, conducted by the occupational therapists in charge for the former test both before and after the activity. The latter test was carried out by the nursing staffs and occupational therapists in charge before the activity and by activity leader and assistant at the end of programs.
The activity group showed improvement in work skills and physical strength but not in hand dexterity during the period of the program. On the other hand, significant improvement was obtained in patients’ affect, mood, interest, the sense of responsibility, attention and memory in cognitive function during the same period In attention test, the average scores of horticultural group increased from 45.78 before to 52.89 after the activity, and the corresponding values of control group decreased from 53.11 to 47.66. In social interaction, the patients’ community, organizational skills, communication skills and verbal expressiveness showed significant improvement for the activity group. In community skills, the average scores of horticultural group increased from 3.34 to 3.77 after the activity. Moreover, patients with no previous gardening experience showed much progress in their horticultural knowledge and work behaviors which patients with previous gardening experience performed better in group adaptation, coping with the pressures and order. The program duration did not affect the participants’ learning of horticultural knowledge. However, the longer the program extends, the more obvious benefits in community skills, basic work skills, dealing with authority and organizational skills would be observed. Furthermore, the positive impacts of horticultural program monitored through observation on site and with the nursing staffs and occupational therapists were confirmed. Therefore, it could be concluded that patients with chronic mental illness in a psychiatric center can benefit and positively influence their own health state from gardening program by contact with nature, working with soil, caring plants, watching their growth and harvest them for use.

中文摘要 Ⅵ
英文摘要 Ⅷ

第一章 緒論 ………………………………………………1
第一節 研究動機及重要性 ………………………………1
第二節 研究目的 …………………………………………2
第二章 文獻回顧 …………………………………………3
第一節 園藝治療的定義 …………………………………3
第二節 園藝治療的發展歷史與近況 ……………………4
第三節 慢性精神疾患之概況 ……………………………7
第四節 園藝治療於慢性精神疾患之應用 ………………8
第三章 研究方法 …………………………………………14
第一節 研究架構 …………………………………………14
第二節 研究假設 …………………………………………16
第三節 研究範圍及對象 …………………………………16
第四節 研究設計 …………………………………………16
第五節 研究工具 …………………………………………22
第六節 資料分析方法 ……………………………………24
第四章 研究結果 …………………………………………26
第一節 研究對象之樣本人口學基本資料 ………………26
第二節 園藝活動對慢性精神病患生心理之影響 ………29
第三節 園藝經驗對慢性精神病患活動表現之影響 ……52
第四節 參加園藝團體時間長短對慢性精神病患
活動表現之影響 ……………………………………………58
第五節 質性研究 ……………………………………………60
第五章 討論…………………………………………………75
第六章 結論與建議…………………………………………83
第一節 結論 …………………………………………………83
第二節 研究限制與建議……………………………………84
參考文獻 ……………………………………………………85
附錄 …………………………………………………………90

1.內政部. 2004. 內政統計通報. 內政部統計處. 11.Nov.2004.〈www.moi.gov.tw/stat/week/list.htm〉
2.孔繁鐘 孔繁錦. 2000. DSM-IV精神疾病診斷準則手冊. 合記. 台北.
3.王銘琪. 1993. 從醫療觀點談綠美化. 科學農業 41：192-196.
4.李美華、孔祥明、林嘉娟、王婷玉譯. 社會科學研究方法. 時英出版社. 台北.
5.林忠蔚. 2002. 精神分裂症病人的錯誤記憶. 國立中正大學心理學研究所碩士論文.
6.林惠玲、陳正倉. 2000. 應用統計學.雙葉書廊有限公司. 台北.
7.胡海國. 1999. 精神疾患之診斷與分類. p.71-82. 刊於：李明濱主編. 實用精神醫學. 國立台灣大學醫學院. 台北.
8.張俊彥. 2001. 景觀生心理相關研究. 造園季刊 41：53-58.
9.張俊彥、曾慈慧. 2000. 醫院景觀環境差異對病人生心理反應之研究-以消化性潰瘍與膽（輸尿管）結石病患住院期間為例. 中國園藝46：231-246
10.許榮輝、徐德生編著. 1999. 工業區環境綠美化規範. 經濟部工業局出版. 台北.
11.郭毓仁、王靖雯、李子芬. 2000. 唐氏症患者在園藝訓練上之表現. 中國園藝 46：443-449.
12.曾文星、徐靜. 1994. 現代精神醫學. 水牛出版社. 台北.
13.曾兆良. 2003. 台北啟智學校園藝課程對智能障礙者身心差異之影響. 台灣大學園藝系碩士論文.
14.曾美智. 1999. 精神科症狀學. p.49-57. 刊於：李明濱主編. 實用精神醫學. 國立台灣大學醫學院. 台北.
15.曾慈慧. 2001. 園藝治療活動與其場所之介紹. 造園季刊 41：47-52.
16.黃宗正. 1999. 情感疾病. p.143-154. 刊於：李明濱主編. 實用精神醫學. 國立台灣大學醫學院. 台北.
17.黃秋明. 1993. 園藝療法復健傳奇. 綠生活雜誌 50：43-50.
18.褚增輝. 1991. 精神病人復健潛能評量工具之探討. 職能治療學會雜誌. 9:43-63.
19.褚增輝. 1997a 褚氏注意力測驗使用手冊. 褚氏職能測驗工具組使用手冊. 12pp. 華健國際企業股份有限公司印製.
20.褚增輝. 1997b 褚氏手部靈巧度測驗使用手冊. 褚氏職能測驗工具組使用手冊. 14pp. 華健國際企業股份有限公司印製.
21.褚增輝、胡國海. 1981. 精神病患手部協調動作遲緩狀態研究. 台北市立療養院70年年報. P.143-154. 台北市立療養院發行.
22.劉富文. 1999. 人與植物的關係. 科學農業.47：2-10.
23.劉智民. 1999. 精神分裂症. p.129-138. 刊於：李明濱主編. 實用精神醫學. 國立台灣大學醫學院. 台北.
24.鄭泰安. 1985. 台灣地區精神患者之社會文化特徵及療養結果研究. 中華心理衛生學刊2（1）:117-133.
25.謝瑞娟. 1982. 園藝治療在休憩利用研究. 中興大學園藝系碩士論文.

26.Aldous, D. E. 2000. Perspectives on horticultural therapy in Australia. HortTechnology 10：18-23.
27.Airhart, D. L. and K. M. Doutt, 1990. Measuring client improvement in vocational horticultural training, p.181-184. In：D. Relf (ed). The role of horticulture in human well-being and social development. Timber Press, Inc.
28.American Horticultural Therapy Association (AHTA). Nov. 18, 2003. Voluntary Professional Registration. [On-line]. Available：http://www.ahta.org/professional_advancement/
29.Azar, J. A. and T. Conroy. 1989. The development of an empirical instrument designed to measure the effects of horticultural therapy. J. Therap. Hort. 4：21-28.
30.Barnicle, T. and K. S. Midden. 2003. The effects of a horticulture activity program on the psychological well-being of older people in a long-term care facility. HortTechnology 13：81-85.
31.Bennett, C., N. K. So and W. B. Smith. 1999. Horticultural therapy in an epilepsy clinic. Epilepsia 40(Suppl. 2):107-108.
32.Cammack, C., T. M. Waliczek and J. M. Zajicek. 2002. The green brigade: the educational effects of a community-based horticultural program on the horticultural knowledge and environmental attitude of juvenile offenders. HortTechnology 12：77-81.
33.Canadian Horticultural Therapy Association (CHTA). Nov. 18, 2003. What is the Canadian Horticultural Therapy Association. [On-line]. Available：http://www.chta.ca/about_us.htm
34.Chambers, N. K. and P. N. Williams. 1990. Developing a new computer- accessed data base for horticultural therapy research at Rusk Institute. In：The role of horticulture in human well-being and social development: A National Symposium. NY. p.172-174.
35.Chung, S. H. and W. K. Sim. 1998. Effects of interior plants on social behaviors and psychological disorders of psychiatric patients in a hospital ward. J. Therap. Hort. 9：77-80.
36.Davis, S. 1998. Development of profession of horticultural therapy. p.3-20. In： Simson, S. P. and M. C. Straus. (eds.). Horticulture as therapy-principles and practice. Haworth Press, NY.
37.Frazel, 1998. Botanical gardening: design, techniques, and tools. p.355-376. In： Simson, S. P. and M. C. Straus. (eds.). Horticulture as therapy-principles and practice. Haworth Press, NY.
38.Goodban, A. and D. Goodban. 1990a. Horticultural therapy: A growing concern, part1. Brit. J. Occup. Therap. 53：425-429.
39.Goodban, A. and D. Goodban. 1990b. Horticultural therapy: A growing concern, part 2 . Brit. J. Occup. Therap. 53：468-470.
40.Jarrott, S. E., H. R. Kwack and D. Relf. 2002. An observational assessment of a dementia-specific horticultural therapy program. HortTechnology 12:403-410.
41.Kaiser, M. 1976. Alternative to therapy: garden program. J. Clin. Child Psychol. 5(2):21-24.
42.Kaplan, R. 1993. The role of nature in the context of the workplace. Landsc. Urban Plan. 26:193-201.
43.Kaplan, R. and S. Kaplan. 1989. The experience of nature: a psychological perspective. Cambridge University Press. NY. p.177-201.
44.Kidd, J. L., N. A. Pachana and F. M. Plpass. 2000. Benefits of gardening: an exploratory study of mid-aged women in New Zealand. J. Therap. Hort. 11：4-19.
45.Kwack, H. R. and P. D. Relf. 2002. Current status of human issues in horticulture in Korea. HortTechnology 12：415-419.
46.Lewis, C. A. 1992. Effects of plants and gardening in creating interpersonal and community well-being. p.55-65. In: D. Relf (ed.). The Role of Horticulture in Human Well-Being and Social Development: A National Symposium. Timber Press, Portland, OR.
47.Matsuo, E. 2000. Education, research, and use of human-horticulture relationships in Japan and Korea. HortTechnology 10：14-17.
48.Matsuo, E., Y. Fujiki and K. Fujiwara. 1997. Research survey on the therapeutic use of horticulture in welfare institutions and psychiatric hospitals in Fukuoka Prefecture. Sci. Bull. Fac. Agr., Kyushu Univ. 52(1/2):11-20.
49.Matsuo, E., H. Takafuji and H. Hirano. 2000. Introduction and development of horticultural therapy in Japan. J. Therap. Hort. 11：22-37.
50.Moore, E. O. 1982. A prison environment’s effect on health care service demands. J. Environ. Syst. 11:17-34.
51.O'' Reilly, P. O. and J. R. Handforth. 1955. Occupational therapy with ''refractory'' patients. Am.J. Psychiatr. 111:763-766.
52.Perrins-Margalis, N. M., J. Rugletic, N. M. Schepis, H. R. Stepanski and M. A. Walsh. 2000. The immediate effects of a group-based horticulture experience on the quality of life of persons with chronic mental illness. Occup. Therap. Ment. Heal. 16(1)：15-31.
53.Salamon, B. 1998. Bob. J. Therap. Hort. 9：23-24.
54.Schwebel, A. I. 1993. Psychological principles applied to horticultural therapy. J. Therap. Hort. 7:3-12.
55.Seller, J., J. Fieldhouse and M. Phelan. 1999. Fertile imaginations: an inner city allotment group. Psychiatr. Bull. 23:291-293.
56.Sellers, K. D. 2000. Cultivating life skills: Prairie Treasures vocational horticulture workshop. J. Therap. Hort. 11：38-41.
57.Sellers, K. D. 2001. Effectiveness of horticultural therapy activities in a psychiatric hospital. J. Therap. Hort. 12：9-19.
58.Son, K. C., S. J. Um, S. Y. Kim, J. E. Song and H. R. Kwack. 2004. Effect of horticultural therapy on the changes of self-esteem and sociality of individuals with chronic schizophrenia. Acta Hort. 639:185-191.
59.Talbott, J. A., Stern, D., Ross, J. and Gillen, C. 1976. Flowering plants as a therapeutic environmental agent in a psychiatric hospital. HortScience 11:365-366.
60.Uehara, I. and S. Itoh. 1999. Importance of multiple outdoor activities for persons with developmental disabilities. J. Therap. Hort. 10：22-27.
61.Ulrich, R. S. 1984. View through a window may influence recovery from surgery. Science 224:420-421.
62.Virginia, I. L., Pearson-Mims, C.H., and Goodwin, G.K. 1996. Interior plants may improve worker productivity and reduce stress in a windowless environment. J. Environ. Hort. 14(2):97-100.
63.Williams, S. 1989. Evaluation of a horticultural therapy program in a short term psychiatric ward. J. Therap. Hort. 4：29-38.
64.Wilson, L. M. 1972. Intensive care delirium-the effect of outside deprivation in a windowless unit. Arch. Intern. Med. 130:225-226
65.Woodward, S. and P. Holden. 1984. A rating scale for use in horticultural therapy. Brit. J. Occup. Therap. 47(7)：211-214.
66.Zhou, W. and D. Relf. 1991. Horticulture for special populations in china. J. Therap. Hort. 6：10-15.