跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(18.97.14.86) 您好!臺灣時間:2025/02/09 03:08
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:張惇喬
研究生(外文):Chang Tun-Chiao
論文名稱:偵測盈餘管理
論文名稱(外文):Detecting earnings management
指導教授:葉疏葉疏引用關係
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立臺灣大學
系所名稱:會計學研究所
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:會計學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2005
畢業學年度:93
語文別:中文
論文頁數:63
中文關鍵詞:盈餘管理裁量性應計數模型選擇
外文關鍵詞:Earnings managementDiscretionary accrualsModels selection
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:1
  • 點閱點閱:302
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:2
目前臺灣學者進行盈餘管理方面研究主要採用方法為應計基礎模型,其中以Healy模型、DeAngelo模型、Jones模型、Modified Jones模型、與Industry模型最為廣泛被使用,但是仍未有一研究評估此五種模型於臺灣資本市場之適用情形。
本文採用DeChow與Sloan(1995)之研究方法,建立兩組可能導致型一錯誤的樣本以測試五個模型分別之精確度(Specification),與另外兩組可能導致型二錯誤的樣本以測試五個模型的辨別力(Power),描述、解釋所得之結果,並與Dechow與Sloan以美國資本市場資料進行實驗所得之結果互相比較。
結果發現:
一. 第一組樣本顯示,Jones與Modified Jones模型較不易產生型一錯誤;DeAngelo模型較易產生型一錯誤。
二. 第二組樣本顯示,五個模型皆未能產生與給定信賴水準接近的型一錯誤比例,表示五個模型精確度皆不佳。
三. 第三組樣本中,普遍而言,Modified Jones模型較能產生不偏的估計值,且辨別力曲線上升較快,是較佳的估計。
四. 第四組樣本中,五個模型皆導致型二錯誤,但是這可能是樣本過小,或是實施情況與應計基礎模型前提假設不符合的結果。
When Researchers in Taiwan deal with earnings-management-related issues, they adopt accrual- based models frequently. Especially, the Healy, DeAngelo, Jones, Modified Jones, and Industry Model are most commonly considered among these accrual-based models. However, there is no study about the fitness of these five models when they are applied to the Taiwan capital market.
This article adopts Dechow and Sloan (1995)’s methodology. We build two samples which probably lead to the type I error to access the relative specification of these five models. Also, we prepare another two samples which could give rise to the type II error to test the relative power of each model. We describe and explain the empirical results and compare them with the original Dechow and Sloan’s experiment. The conclusions we draw are as follows:
1 In the first sample, the Jones and Modified Jones Model are more seldom to lead to type I error; DeAngelo Model has the lowest specification.
2 Sample (ii) shows that all these five models cannot produce the reject frequency close to the given confidence level. This result indicates that all these models perform not well.
3 Sample (iii) demonstrates that the Modified Jones Model produces more unbiased estimators than the other four and its power curve rises most steeply. We can infer that the Modified Jones Model estimate nondiscretionary accruals better.
4 In the last sample, all five models fail to reject the null hypothesis and make the type II error. This may be the result of the too small sample size or the lack of the assumptions accrual-based models require.
謝辭...........................I
中文摘要.........................IV
英文摘要.........................V
目錄..........................VII
表目錄..........................IX
圖目錄..........................IX


第一章 緒論..................... 1
第一節 研究背景與動機................ 1
第二節 研究簡介與範圍................ 2
第三節 研究架構................... 6
第二章 文獻探討................... 8
第一節 範圍...................... 8
第二節 估計可裁量之應計數...............10
第三節 統計問題....................25
第四節 結語......................29
第三章 研究方法................... 31
第一節 建立樣本....................31
第二節 資料分析....................36
第四章 實證結果....................38
第一節 隨機樣本....................38
第二節 經歷極端表現的樣本...............39
第三節 加入盈餘操縱的樣本...............42
第四節 遭證期局起訴的樣本...............44
第五章 結論及建議.................. 49
參考文獻.........................63
1.Brown, S., and J. Warner. 1980. Measuring security price performance. Journal of Financial Economics 14: 3-31.
2.Brown, S., and J. Warner. 1985. Using daily stock returns: The case of event studies. Journal of Financial Economics 8: 205-258.
3.DeAngelo, L. 1986. Accounting numbers as market valuation substitutes: A study of management buyouts of public stockholders. The Accounting Review 61: 400-420.
4.Dechow, P. M., and R. G. Sloan. 1991. Executive incentives and the horizon problem: An empirical investigation. Journal of Accounting and Economics 14: 51-89.
5.Dechow, P. M., and R. G. Sloan. 1994. Detecting earnings management. The Accounting Review 70:193-224.
6.Defond, M.L., and J. Jiambalvo, 1994. Debt covenant violations and manipulation of accruals. Journal of Accounting and Economics 17: 145-176.
7.Healy, P. M. 1985. The effect of bonus schemes on accounting decisions. Journal of Accounting and Economics 7: 85-107.
8.Jones, J. 1991. Earnings management during import relief investigations. Journal of Accounting Research 29: 193-228.
9.Kaplan, R. S. 1985. Comments on Paul Healy: Evidence on the effect of bonus schemes on accounting procedures and accrual decisions. Journal o f Accounting and Economics 7: 109-113.
10.McNichols, M., and G. P. Wilson. 1988. Evidence of earnings management from the provisions for bad debts. Journal of Accounting Research 26 (Supplement): 1-31.
11.余智蓉,民國93年,遞延所得稅費用與盈餘管理關係之研究,國立台灣大學會計學研究所碩士論文。
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
無相關期刊