( 您好!臺灣時間:2022/05/25 23:46
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::


研究生(外文):Cheng-Wei Wang
論文名稱(外文):The Change of the US Security Policy after 911--Motivation、Context and Direction
指導教授(外文):Chi-Cheng Lo
外文關鍵詞:Bush DoctrineHomeland SecurityUnilateralismPreemption
  • 被引用被引用:8
  • 點閱點閱:522
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:121
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:1
美國因為九一一恐怖攻擊事件的影響,加速了對本土安全的重視,為了確保人民的安全,產生了所謂的「布希主義」(Bush Doctrine),在「布希主義」中強調「先發制人」、「單邊主義」、「遠勝於挑戰的力量」、「延伸民主、自由與安全到各區域」。也因為這樣,對未來國際局勢投下了不確定的因素,不過可以確定的是重大的國際事件會影響到一國的安全策略。
Our thoughts always have the impact on outside behavior, and it is the same way for a country. The way what a nation defines its security also affects its policy and actions. And that also affects the thinking of other nations and the reaction.
In this thesis, we will start from the terrorist attack on 911, and focus on the influence to the US policy. And because of the change of the recognization of the US security, it also brings the adjustment of its defense policy. In this adjustment, it affects the reaction of other nations, and the stable and direction of international tendency.
The US speeds up the focus of homeland security because of the terrorist attack on 911. To assure the safety of its people, it develops the Bush Doctrine, and it emphasizes preemption, unilateralism, strength beyond the challenge, and extending democracy, liberty and security to all regions. Because of this, it creates an uncertain factor in international tendency in the future, however, there is one thing we are sure, which is an important international issue will affect the security policy of a country.
中文摘要 1
英文摘要 2
章節目錄 3
附錄 4
表目錄 5

第一章 緒論 6
第一節 研究動機與研究目的 6
第二節 文獻檢閱 9
第三節 研究設計 24
第四節 預期結果 26

第二章 美國安全、戰略觀的發展 28
第一節 九一一事件之前美國安全、戰略觀的發展 28
第二節 九一一事件之後美國安全、戰略觀的發展 41
第三節 九一一恐怖攻擊事件前、後的比較 57

第三章 美國安全與戰略觀轉變的影響因素 64
第一節 從國際社會角度來看 64
第二節 從美國本身安全來看 77
第三節 布希主義與新保守主義的抬頭 86
第四章 案例檢驗 102
第一節 從美伊戰爭來看 102
第二節 美國與北韓 110
第三節 美國對伊拉克與北韓兩國態度之比較 115

第五章 俄羅斯、歐盟、日本與中國,對美國安全觀與戰略轉變的回應 120
第一節、俄羅斯的回應 120
第二節 歐盟的回應 127
第三節 日本的回應 134
第四節 中國的回應 143
第五節 總結 148

第六章 結論 152

附錄一 「布希總統關於《抗擊恐怖主義國家戰略》的聲明」 164
附錄二 「1993—2002世界各地區主要的國防預算」 168
附錄三 「美國國家網路安全策略」 170
參考書目 174
Abdullayeva, Sevindj and Viktor Shulman. 2001. “US Quitting ABM Treaty to Slow Down Arms Race—Ramsfeld.” ITAR-TASS News Wire. New York, December 15, 2001.
Agarkov, Valery. 2001. “US Quitting ABM Treaty may Affect Arms Nonproliferation.” ITAR-TASS News Wire New. York, December 28, 2001.
Aldinger, Charles. 2002. “Bush Orders Deployment of U.S. Missile Defense.” Yahoo News, December 18, 2002.
Andrews, Edmund L.. 2002. “U.S. Seeks to Abolish Many Tariffs.” MSNBC News. November 15, 2002.
Arquilla, John. 1994. “The Strategic Implications of Information Dominance.” Strategic Review 22, 3: 24-30.
Baker, Kevin. 2002. “War and our freedoms.” American Heritage 53, 2: 32-33.
Bayev, Alexei. 2002. “Russia Optimistic About New START Treaty with US in May.” ITAR - TASS News Wire. New York, May 23, 2002.
Biden, Joseph R.. 2001. “Missile Defense Will Make Us Less Secure.” Wall Street Journal. New York, N.Y., May 3, 2001.
Boniface, Pascal, 2001. “The Specter of Unilateralism.” The Washington Quarterly. 24, 3: 155-162.
Brooks, Stephen G. and William C. Wohlforth. 2002. “American Primacy in Perspective.” Foreign Affairs 81, 4: 20-33.
Bull, Hedley with the cooperation of a study group at the institute. 1965, “The Control of the Arms Race: Disarmament and Arms Control in the Missile Age.” New York: Praeger.
Carney, Timothy P. 2001. “ABM Treaty Blocks National Missile Defense Testing.” Human Events 57, 24: 5.
Carter, Ashton B. 2001/02. “The Architecture if Government in the Face if Terrorism.” International Security 26, 3: 5-23.
Carter, Ashton B., & William J. Perry, 1999. Preventive Defense: A New Security Strategy for America. Washington, D.C.: Brookings.
Chumakova, Inna. 2002. “US, Russia No Longer Consider Each Other Adversaries.” ITAR-TASS News Wire. New York, May 17, 2002.
Collins, John M. 1980. U.S.—Soviet Military Balance Concepts and Capabilities, 1960—1980. McGraw—Hill Publications Co.
Conference on Old Games. Old Players, New World, New Order. 2002. Proceeding of a Conference on Old Games, Old Players, New World, New Order. 1 June 2002. Taipei: Soochow University.
Cossa, Ralph A. 2002. “Changes in U.S. Northeast Asia Foreign Policy after the September 11, 2001 Attacks on the U.S..” Changes of U.S. Government and Policy After the September 11 Attacks.
Council for Security Cooperation in the Asia Pacific. International Working Group on Confidence and Security Building Measures. Oct. 29-31, 2001.
Dao, James. 2002. “U.S. and China Resume High-Level Military Talks.” New York Times. December 9, 2002.
Dean, Joshua. 2002. “System Failure.” Government Executive. 34, 2: 24-30.
DeNardo, James. 1995. The Amateur Strategist: Intuitive Deterrence Theories and the Politics of the Nuclear Arms Race. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.
Dougherty, James E. and Robert L. Pfaltzgraff Jr. 2001. Contending Theories of International Relations: A Comprehensive Survey. New York: Longman.
Dunham, Richard S.. 2002. “September 11 Warnings: The Damage from Too Much Damage Control.” Business Week.
Etzioni, Amitai. 2001. Political Unification: On Building Supranational Communities. Lanham, M.D.: Lexington Book.
Etzioni, Amitai. 2002. “Implications of the American Anti-Terrorism Coalition for Global Architectures.” European Journal of Political Theory. 1, 1: 9-30.
Fedoruk, Vladimir. 2001. “US anti-missile Defence System Will Trigger New Arms Race.” ITAR-TASS News Wire. New York, February 13, 2001.
Fetter, Steve. 1991. “Ballistic Missiles and Weapons of Mass Destruction: What is the Threat? What Should be Done?.” International Security 16,1: 5-42.
Fonte, John. 2002. “Homeland defense.” National Review 54, 10: 47-48.
Gerson, Joseph. 2002. “Bush's War: Where Is It Going & What Should We Do About It ?.” Address for the "Taking Our Message Home" Conference from ZNet "Terror War Watch." March 18, 2002.
Gilpin, Robert. 1987. The Political Economy of International Relations. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Glaser, Charles L. 1994/95. “Realists AS Optimists.” International Security 19, 3:

Gross, Martin. 2002. “Who's trying to stop the missile shield ?.” Human Events. 58, 20: 10.
Grushin, Boris. 2001. “Denunciation of ABM Can Lead to New Spiral of Arms Race-Duma.” ITAR - TASS News Wire. New York, August 2, 2001.
Hayden, Thomas. 2001. “Infectious Arms Race: Forging New Weapons Against Resurgent Bacterial Killers.” U.S. News & World Report 131, 25: 50.
Healy, Paul J. “ The Arms Race: How Technology Defined Our Identity.” in The Cold War. in http://www.pjhealy.com/coldwar/. Latest update 14 March 2004.
“Homeland security agency a reality.” 2002. MSNBC News. November 25, 2002.
Holloway, David. 1984. The Soviet Union and the Arms Race. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Hutcheson, Ron and Mark McDonald. 2002. “Nuclear Weapons Treaty Marks Historic Shift from Cold War.” Knight Ridder Tribute Buisness News. May 25, 2002.
Jervis, Robert. 1976. Perception and Misperception in International Politics. Princeton University Press
Jonathan Weisman, Jonathan and Bill Nichols. 2001. “U.S.-Russia Arms Race Nearing New Era : A Look at the History and Future of the Issue.” USA Today. Arlington, Va., November 2, 2001.
Kagan, Kimberly. 2002. “Hegemony, Not Empire.” The Weekly Standard 7, 33: 16-17.
Kalmykov, Mikhail. 2001. “Russia Imparts New Sense to International Security.” ITAR - TASS News Wire. New York, December 20, 2001.
Keohane, Robert O. 1980. "The Theory of Hegemonic Stability and Changes in International Economic Regimes, 1967-1977." in Ole R. Holsti, Randolph M. Siverson and Alexander L. George, eds. Change in the International System. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Keohane, Robert O. 1984. After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
Kinsella, David. 2002. “Rivalry, Reaction, and Weapons Proliferation: A Time-Series Analysis of Global Arms Transfer.” International Studies Quarterly 46, 2: 209-230.
Klare, Michael T. 1993. “The Next Great Arms Race.” Foreign Affairs 72, 3: 136-152.
Kugler, Jack and William Domke. “Comparing the Strength of Nations.”
Comparative Political Studies. 19, 1:39-69.
Lalman, David and Bruce Bueno De Mesquita. 1992. War and Reasons. Yale University Press.
Layne, Christopher. 1993.”The Unipolar Illusion: Why New Great Powers Will Rise.” International Security 17, 4: 5-51.
Lin, Bih-Jaw. 1995. “Confidence Building in the Taiwan Strait Area: An Adaptive Approach.” The Institute for National Policy Research and The International School on Disarmament an Research on Conflicts. April 12-14, 1995.
Lin, Cheng-Yi. 2002. “The Implications of 9-11 for Sino-American Relations.” Changes of U.S. Government and Policy After the September 11 Attacks.
Lin, Cheng-Yi. “Taiwan’s Security Strategies in the Post-Cold War Era.” Issues and Studies 31, 4: 78-97.
Luttwak, Edward. 1987. Strategy: The Logic of War and Peace. Cambridge, MA: Havard University Press.
Maddock, R. T. 1990. The Political Economy of the Arms Race. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Macmillan.
Mandelbaum, Michael. 1997. “Preserving the Unipolar Moment.” International Security 21, 4 :49-88.
Mann, Paul. 2001. “Arms Control Twilight: Blessing or Curse?.” Aviation Week & Space Technology 155, 25: 100-103.
Marks, Susan J. 2002. “New-age Arms Race.” ColoradoBiz. 29, 1: 30-34.
Miles, Stephanie. 2002. “Web Pop-Up Ads Spawn Arms Race.” Wall Street Journal New York, N.Y., July 24, 2002.
Morris, Jefferson. 2001. “Analysts: U.S. Missile Defense May Not Lead to Arms Race with China.” Aerospace Daily. 200, 29: 4.
Newhouse, John. 2001. “The Missile Defense Debate.” Foreign Affairs 80, 4: 97-109.
Noel-Baker, Philip John. 1958. The Arms Race: Programme for World Disarmament. London: Stevens.
Nye, Joseph S. 1990. Bound to Lead: The Changing Nature of American Power. New York: Basic Book.
Pell, Eve. 2002. “Homeland Security X 50.” The Nation 274, 21: 20-24.
Pentagon Brief. 2001. “Powell on ABM: No New Arms Race.” December 15, 2001.
Ragin, Charles C. 1987. The Comparative Method: Moving Beyond Qualitative and Quantitative Strategies. Berkeley & Los Angeles: University of California Press.
Roberts, Chalmers McGeagm. 1972. The Nuclear Years: The Arms Race and Arms Control. New York: Pyramid.
Rumsfeld, Donald H.. 2002. “Transforming the Military”, Foreign Affairs in http://www.foreignaffairs.org/20020501fasessay8140/donald-h-rumsfeld/transforming-the-military.html. Latest update 25 May 2004.
Russett, Bruce M. and Paul Huth. 1984. “What Makes Deterrence Work? Cases from 1900 to 1980.” World Politics 36: 496-526.
“Russian MPs, Analysts Predict Success of Putin-Bush Summit.” 2002. ITAR - TASS News Wire. New York, May 23, 2002.
Schelling, Thomas. 1966. Arms and Influence. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Schmitt, Eric. 2002. “Bush Ordering Limited Missile Shield.” The New York Times December 18, 2002.
Selinger, Marc. 2001. “Missile Defense Unlikely to Spur Arms Race, Pentagon Official Says.” Aerospace Daily 199, 101: 3.
Shalo, Sibyl. 2002. “Arms race' drives sales force change.” Pharmaceutical Executive 22, 5: 118.
Sloss, Leon. 2001. “The New Arms Race.” The Washington Quarterly 24, 4: 135-147.
“Star Wars Arrives.” 2002. Wall Street Journal New York, N.Y., December 18, 2002.
Stevenson, Mark. 2002. “Bush Pushes Congress on Homeland Security.” MSNBC News November 8, 2002.
Tertrais, Bruno. 2001. “Do Arms Races Matter ?.” The Washington Quarterly 24, 4: 123-133.
Thee, Marek. 1986. Military Technology, Military Strategy and the Arms Race. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
Ulman, Harlan K. and James P. Wade. 1996. “Shock and Awe: Achieving Rapid Dominance.” Washington, D.C.: U.S. National Defense University Press. in http://www.dodccrp.org/Publications/ShockAndAwe.pdf. Latest update 16 June 2004.
Volkhonsky, Boris. 2002. “Moving Toward a New Arms Race.” The Current Digest of the Post - Soviet Press 53, 50: 7.
Waltz, Kenneth N. and Robert J. Art. 1993. The Use of Force: Military Power and International Politics. Maryland: University Press of America.
“World-Wide.” 2002. Wall Street Journal New York, N.Y., December 19, 2002.
Yurkin, Anatoly. 2001a. “US NMP System May Provoke Arms Race.” ITAR - TASS News Wire New York, June 15, 2001.
Yurkin, Anatoly. 2001b. “NMD Laser of USA May Trigger New Arms Race – Experts.” ITAR - TASS News Wire. New York, November 13, 2001.
Yurkin, Anatoly. 2001c “US Abrogation of ABM Treaty May Trigger Nuclear Arms Race.” ITAR-TASS News Wire. New York, December 13, 2001.

王振東。2003。〈從美國自由霸權看美伊戰爭〉。http://www.mnd.gov.tw/division/~defense/mil/mnd/mhtb/%E7%A9%BA%E8%BB%8D%E5%AD%B8%E8%A1%93%E6%9C%88%E5%88%8A/558/558-3.htm。 2004/05/13。
李文志。2002。〈杭亭頓的戰略思想與美國全球戰略的關係〉。《問題與研究》 41,4:1-20。
李明。2003。〈北韓核武計畫對朝鮮半島安全情勢之影響〉。http://cgpss.nchu.edu.tw/modules/wfsection/article.php?articleid=115 。2004/03/12。
李英明、羅曉南。1997。〈資訊科技對總體社會的影響〉。http://www.contest.edu.tw/87/endshow/5/wellbeing/hightech/article3.htm 2004/03/15。
《人民網》。http://www.people.com.cn/BIG5/guoji/1030/2307669.html 。2004/01/22。
林治波。2004。〈先發制人戰略概念日本最早提,布希晚了一年〉。《環球時報》。 http://big5.xinhuanet.com/gate/big5/news.xinhuanet.com/world/2004-03/29/content_1389979.htm。2004/03/29。
吳志中。2001。〈911事件後亞洲局勢之變遷對兩岸局勢之影響〉。台灣政治學會年會暨政黨輪替後台灣政治學術研討會。民國90年12月16日。台 北:東吳大學政治學系。
吳志中。2003。〈從美伊戰爭談美國與歐洲觀點之差異性〉。http://eusa-taiwan.org/News-A1.htm 。
段復初。2001。〈矛與盾的對話:建構兩岸軍備控制典則〉。http://www.future-china.org/csipf/activity/20010619/mt200106_07.htm。 2004/05/10。
〈美國攻打伊拉克是"正義戰爭"嗎? 〉。 2002。《華盛頓觀察周刊》。http://www.washingtonobserver.org/big5/AntiTerrorism-JustWar-100902CN5.cfm。 2004/06/12。
http://www.future-china.org.tw/fcn/ideas/fci20000612-1.htm。 2004/05/10。
莫大華。1996。〈後冷戰時期東協的軍備競賽與區域安全〉。《問題與研究》35, 3:51--64。
郭基譯。Chalmers Johnson著。1993,《革命性的轉變(Revolutionary Change)》。台北:時報文化。
許綬南譯。Perry, William J. and Ashton B. Carter著。2000。《預防性防禦:後冷戰時代美國的新安全戰略》。台北:麥田出版公司。
紐先鍾譯。David C. Gompert著。1981。《核子武器與世界政治---未來的選擇》。台北:台灣商務印書館
蔡裕明。2002。〈美國的軍事全球化與東亞國際安全〉。《國防政策評論》2,3: 54-78。
薛 釗。2002b。〈布希政府決意推翻伊拉克海珊政權問題之研析〉。http://fuhrer.myweb.hinet.net/articlesdownload.htm。2004/05/12。
瞿宛文。2000。〈什麼才是真正的新經濟?〉。《天下雜誌》。http://www.issp.sinica.edu.tw/chinese/researcher/economic/0500.htm。 2004/08/10。
關中。2002。〈後冷戰時代美國外交政策的批判〉。http://www.future-china.org/csipf/press/quarterly/pq2002-1/pq2002-1_1.PDF 。2004/10/10。
鐵穆真譯。David V. Edwards著。1976。《軍備管制與國際政治》。香港:今日世界出版社。
國防部史政編譯局譯印。2002。《2001美國四年期國防總檢報告(Quadrennial Defense Review Report)》。台北:國防部史政編譯室。

辛提森中心 www.stimson.org
洛杉磯時報 www.latimes.com
澳洲政府-外交與貿易部 www.dfat.gov.au
人民網 www.people.com.cn
台灣安全研究 http://taiwansecurity.org
新銳文化工作坊 http://intermargins.ncu.edu.tw
Z Net恐怖戰爭網 http://www.zmag.org/terrorframe.htm
自由網站 http://www.libertocracy.com
BBC Chinese.com「美國遇襲與反恐怖戰特別報導」http://news.bbc.co.uk/
蓋世GAIS網 http://gais.ccu.edu.tw/
國際戰略研究室 http://www2.tku.edu.tw
國家政策研究基金會 http://www.npf.org.tw
戰略與國際研究所 http://www.dsis.org.tw
美國國務院國際信息局 http://usinfo.state.gov
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
1. 瞿宛文。2000。〈什麼才是真正的新經濟?〉。《天下雜誌》。http://www.issp.sinica.edu.tw/chinese/researcher/economic/0500.htm。 2004/08/10。
2. 謝奕旭。2002。〈從美國QDR論我國國防政策之制定〉。《復興崗學報》。76:89-112。
3. 盧福偉。2003。〈第二次波斯灣戰爭:對伊拉克大戰略的評估〉。《國防政策評論》3,3:74-96。
4. 鄭端耀。2003。〈國際關係攻勢與守勢現實主義理論爭辯之評析〉。《問題與研究》42,2:1-21。
5. 羅致政。1996。〈台灣安全多邊化戰略〉。《問題與研究》35,9:1-16。
6. 蔡裕明。2002。〈美國的軍事全球化與東亞國際安全〉。《國防政策評論》2,3: 54-78。
7. 楊永明。1997。〈美國亞太安全戰略之理論分析〉。《美歐季刊》12,3:35-71。
8. 張雅君。2003。〈反彈道導彈條約爭議與中俄關係的發展〉。《問題與研究》42,3:27-56。
9. 陳偉華。2001。〈軍備控制之理論與實際〉。《中華戰略學刊》90:143--172。
10. 莫大華。1996。〈後冷戰時期東協的軍備競賽與區域安全〉。《問題與研究》35, 3:51--64。
11. 時殷弘。2001。〈論恐怖襲擊後美國的世界態勢〉。《二十一世紀》。http://www.cuhk.edu.hk/ics/21c/issue/article/019100.htm。2004/05/10。
12. 金榮勇。2001。〈布希政府的東南亞政策與挑戰〉。《問題與研究》40,6:53-67。
13. 李黎明。2003。〈典範的創新與驗證-二次波灣戰爭的戰略檢視〉。《國防政策評論》3,4:136-159。
14. 李文志。2002。〈杭亭頓的戰略思想與美國全球戰略的關係〉。《問題與研究》 41,4:1-20。
15. 李大中。2000。〈後冷戰時期美國飛彈防禦政策-爭辯與邏輯〉。《問題與研究》39,5:17-45。