壹、中文部份
一、書籍
周棟俊、陳友，《美國對華政策50年》。廣東︰廣東人民，民90。
鈕先鐘，《現代戰略思潮》。台北：黎明文化，民76。
鈕先鐘，《西方戰略思想史》。台北：麥田，民84。
鈕先鐘，《戰略研究入門》。台北：麥田，民87。
二、期刊
鄭端耀，〈國際關係攻勢與守勢現實主義理論爭辯之評析〉，《問題與研究》，第42卷，第2期，民92.3，頁1-21。三、網路
江澤民，〈江八點〉，http://www.mac.gov.tw/big5/rpir/1_4.htm，民
84. 1. 31。
中國政府、美國政府，〈中華人民共和國和美利堅合眾國聯合公
報〉，http://usinfo.org/docs/basic/817_c.htm, 民71. 8. 17。
中國政府、美國政府，〈中華人民共和國和美利堅合眾國聯合公
報〉，http://usinfo.org/docs/basic/shanghai_c.htm，民61.2.28。
中國政府、美國政府，〈中華人民共和國和美利堅合眾國關於建立
外交關係的聯合公報〉，http://usinfo.org/docs/basic/prc_c.htm，民68.1.1。
中華民國行政院大陸委員會，〈兩岸大事記〉，
http://www.mac.gov.tw/index1.htm。
貳、西文部份
(I)Books
Appleman, Roy, South to the Naktong, North to the Yalu. Washington D. C.: Department of the Army, 1961.
Bernstein, Richard and Munro, Ross, The Coming Conflict with China. New York: Vintage, 1998.
Brown, Michael, Lynn-Jones, Sean and Miller, Steven eds., The Perils of Anarchy. Massachusetts: MIT Press, 1995.
Buckley, Mary andFawn, Rick ed., Global Responses to Terrorism. London: Routledge, 2003.
Carney Jr., John T. and Schemmer, Benjamin F., No Room for Error. New York: Ballantine Books.
Clausewitz, von Karl, On War. Harmondsworth: Pengium, 1968.
Cooper, Harris, The Integrative Research Review.London: Sage, 1984.
Eckert, Carter J., Korea Old and New. Seoul: Ilchokak, 1990.
Goldstein, Joshua, International Relations. New York: Longman, 1999.
Harding, Harry, A Fragile Relations. Washington, D. C.: Brookings Institution, 1992.
Hatada, Takashi, A History of Korea. California: Santa Barbara, 1969.
Hosking, Geoffrey, Russia and the Russians. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2001.
Isserman, Maurice, Vietnam War. New York: Facts on File, 2003.
Kaiser, David, American Tragedy. Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2000.
Kennedy, Paul, The Rise and Fall of the Great Powers. New York: Random House.
Kissinger, Henry, Diplomacy. New York: Simon & Schuster, 1994.
________, Ending the Vietnam War. New York: Simon & Schuster, 2003.
Kleiner, Juergen, Korea: A Century of Change. Singapore: World Scientific, 2001.
Lasater, Martin L., The Taiwan Conundrum in U.S. China Policy. Boulder: Westview, 2000.
Liddell Hart, Basil Henry, History of the Second War. New York: Putnam, 1971.
Lowe, Peter, The Vietnam War. New York: St. Martin's Press, 1998.
Machiavelli, Niccolo, The Prince. Oxford: Oxford, 1984.
Maclear, Michael, Vietnam: The Ten Thousand Day War. London: Methuen, 1981.
Mearsheimer, John, The Tragedy of Great Power politics. New York: Norton, 2001.
Morgenthau, Hans J., Politics Among Nations. New York: Knopf, 1985.
Rees, David, Korea: The Limited War. New York: St. Martin, 1964.
Schaller, Michael, The United States and China. New York: Oxford, 2002.
Sheehan, Michael, The Balance of Power. New York: Routledge, 1996.
Spanier, John and Hook, Steven, American Foreign policy. Washington D.C.: Congressional Quarterly, 1995.
Summer, Jr., Harry G., Historical Atlas of the Vietnam War. New York: Houghton Mifflin, 1995.
Van Evera, Stephen, Guide to Methods for Students of Political Science. New York: Cornell University Press.
Viotti, Paul and Kauppi, Mark, International relations theory. Boston: Allyn and Bacon, 1999.
Zakaria, Fareed, From Wealth to Power. Princeton: Princeton Univ., 1998.
Zhao, Dingxin, The Power of Tiananmen. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2001.
(II)Periodicals
Labs, Eric J., “Beyond Victory: Offensive Realism and the expansion of war aims,” Security Studies, Vol. 6, No. 4, Summer 1997, pp. 1-49.
Mearsheimer, John, “The False Promise of International Institutions,”International Security, Vol. 19, No. 3, 1994, pp. 5-49.
Rose, Gideon, “Neoclassical Realism and Theories of Foreign Policy, ” World Politics, Vol. 51, Oct 1998, pp. 144-172.
Schweller, Randall L. ,“Bandwagoning for Profit: Beinging the Revisionist State Back In,” International Security, Vol. 19, No. 1, (Summer 1994), pp. 72-107.
(III)Documents
Roosevelt, Franklin, Churchill, Winston, Kai Shek, Chiang, “Cairo Declaration,” http://www.yale.edu/lawweb/avalon/wwii/cairo.htm, 1943. 11. 27.
Roosevelt, Franklin, Churchill, Winston, Stalin, Josef, “Yalta Agreement,” http://www.yale.edu/lawweb/avalon/wwii/yalta.htm, 1945. 2. 11.
Truman, Harry, “Truman Doctrine,” http://www.yale.edu/lawweb/avalon/trudoc.htm, 1947. 3. 12.
U.S. Congress, “Taiwan Relations Act,” http://www.ait.org.tw/en/about_ait/tra/, 1979. 1. 1.
U.S. Department of State, “Background note: China,” http://dosfan.lib.uic.edu/ERC/bgnotes/eap/china9611.html, 1996. 11.
United Nations Security Council, “84. Resolution”. http://daccessdds.un.org/doc/RESOLUTION/GEN/NR0/064/97/IMG/NR006497.pdf?OpenElement, 1950. 7. 7.
United Nations, “Resolution 1368,” http://daccessdds.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/N01/533/82/PDF/N0153382.pdf?OpenElement, 2001.9.12.
(IV)Internet
BBC News, “Bush calls attacks ‘acts of war’,” http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/1537534.stm, 2001.9.12.
CNN, “Powell Singles out bin Laden,” http://archives.cnn.com/2001/US/09/13/administration.terrorism/, 2001.9.14.
National Commission on Terrorist Attack upon the United States, “The 9/11 Commission Report,” http://www.9-11commission.gov/report/911Report_Ch9.htm, 2004.8.21.
NATO, “What is Article 5?,” http://www.nato.int/terrorism/five.htm.
Reuters, “Bush descries attacks as acts of war,” http://news.com.com/2100-1023-272906.html?legacy=cnet, 2001.9.12.
White House, “Operation Enduring Freedom Overview,” http://www.state.gov/s/ct/rls/fs/2001/5194.htm, 2001.10.1.