在南北貿易的議題裡，技術移轉與散佈是全球化的一個重要過程。本文將傳統南北兩國貿易議題拓展至三國來討論，深入探討國內產業結構在面臨邊緣化與空洞化之危機的同時，政府對國內產業所應採取的態度。本文參照Lin(2004)，並在第II國加入了爭取專利授權以及智慧財產權來說明技術散佈的事實與政府的角色，再利用動態一般均衡理論清楚描述各個國家的經濟行為，然後以數值解來分析各個經濟行為的長短期變化，發現了技術於全球擴散的同時，各國之間經濟力有相互追趕的現象；在廠商爭取專利授權與智慧財產權的保護下以及政府的FDI限制干預政策會促使第II國的工資會不斷朝向先進國家邁進，漸漸與第III國拉開。

In the issues of North-south trade, technology transfer and diffusion are important processes of globalization. This paper presents the issues of three countries trade about the “marginalized-hollowed” problem. Follow Lin (2004), we add licensing and intellectual property rights to the second country (country II), and take advantage to dynamic general equilibrium theory to describe various economical behaviors. Then we resort to numerical simulations in the solutions of model in order to analyze the time paths of various economical behaviors. Thus we can discover that three countries have a relationship between playing catch-up and reverse catch-up. While licensing and intellectual property rights exist in country II, a tightening of outbound FDI by country II can make the wage of country II play catch-up toward country I and away from country III.

目次
一、緒論…………………………………………….……………………1
1.1 研究背景與動機……………………...…………………………………….1
1.2 研究目的………………………………...………………………………….3
1.3 研究架構…………………………………...……………………………….3
二、文獻回顧……………………………………….…………………….6
2.1 南北貿易模型建構之相關文獻.…….………….…………………………6
2.2 南北貿易模型拓展之相關文獻.…………….………………..………….7
三、基本模型設定……………………………….……………………..11
3.1 生產面………………………………………….…………………………13
3.1.1 技術散佈與政府政策…………...………..………………………...13
3.1.2 資源配置與定價…………...……………..………………………...18
3.2 消費面.……………………………...….…………………………………..23
3.2.1 產品需求與均衡.………….…………..…………………………...23
3.2.2 貿易條件…………………………..………………………………..25
3.3 靜態均衡………………………...……….…………………………………..26
四、動態性與自發性一階非線性聯立微分方程組…………………...28
4.1 總合消費…………………………………………………………………….28
4.2 財貨市場裡的非套利條件…………………………………………………..31
4.3 自發性一階非線性聯立微分方程組………………………………………..32
五、政策干預與動態移轉……………………………………………..35
5.1 動態移轉下的技術散佈……………………………………………...……..38
5.2 動態移轉下的資源重置…………………………………………………......41
5.3 動態移轉下之貿易條件以及FDI佔第II國生產價值之比率的探討…….45

六、結論………………………………………………………….……. 49
附錄A………………………………………………………….….……..52
附錄B…………………………………………………………..………..55
附錄C.......................................................................................................56
參考文獻………………………………………………………………..57


表次
表1 靜態均衡摘要表………………………………………………………..……...26
表2 動態市場均衡摘要圖表…………………………………………………….....32
表3 長短期技術散佈之情形…………………………………………………..…...45


圖次
圖1:三國之間技術移轉以及各自所從事的經濟行為之互動…………………...…4
圖2: 全球技術散佈動態體系圖………………………………………...………….11
圖3: 各國廠商間競爭的流程…………………………………………...……...….20
圖4: 的時間路徑……………………………………...…………………...….38
圖5: 的時間路徑…………………………………………………………...…38
圖6: 的時間路徑……………………………...…………………………….39
圖7: 的時間路徑………………………….……..…………………………39
圖8: 的時間路徑……………………………...……………………………….42
圖9: 的時間路徑…………………….…..……………………………………42
圖10: 的時間路徑…………………………………………………………..42
圖11: 的時間路徑…………………………………..………………………....45
圖12: 的時間路徑…………………………………………………………….45
圖13: 的時間路徑………………………………………………………………46

Dollar, D. (1986). ”Technological Innovation, Capital Mobility, and the Product Cycle in North-south Trade,” American Economic Review, 76, p.p.177-190.
Glass, A. J., and K. Saggi(2002). “Licensing versus Direct Investment: Implications for Economic Growth,” Journal of International Economics, 56, p.p.131-153.
Grinols, Earl L., and Lin, Hwan C(2004). ”Global Patent Protection: Channels of North & south Welfare Gain,” Journal of Economics Dynamics and Control, In Press, Corrected Proof, Available online 19 February 2005, p.p.1-23.
Grossman, Gene M., and E., Helpman(1991a). “Quality Ladder and Product cycles,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106, p.p.557-586.
Grossman, Gene M., and E., Helpman (1991b). “Endogenous Product Cycles.” Economic Journal, 101, p.p.1214-1229.
Helpman, E. (1993). “Innovation, Imitation, and Intellectual Property Rights,” Econometrica, 61, No. 6, p.p.1247-1280.
Jensen, Richard A., and Thursby, Marie C.(1986). “A Decision-Theoretical Model of Innovation, Technology Transfer, and Trade,” Review of Economic Studies, 21, p.p.631-647.
Krugman, Paul (1979). ”A Model of Innovation, Technology Transfer, and the World Distribution of Income,” Journal of Political Economy, 87, No. 2, p.p.253-266.
Lai, E.L.C (1998). “International Intellectual Property Rights Protection and the Rate of Product Innovation,” Journal of Development Economics, 55, p.p.133-153.
Lin, Hwan C. (2004). ”Optimal Intervention in Global Technology Diffusion: Play Catch-up or Reverse Catch-up?” Working Paper, p.p.1-36.
Segerstrom, P., Anant, T.C.A., and Dinopoulos, E.(1990). “A Schumpeterian Model of the Product Life Cycle,” American Economic Review, 80, No. 5, p.p.1077-1091.
Vernon, R. (1966). ”International Investment and International Trade in the Product Cycle,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 80, No. 2, p.p.190-207.
Yang, G., and K.E. Maskus(2001). “Intellectual Property Rights, Licensing, and Innovation in an Endogenous Product-Cycle Model,” Journal of International Economics, 53, p.p.169-187.