(3.236.100.86) 您好!臺灣時間:2021/05/06 14:53
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果

詳目顯示:::

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:陳維君
研究生(外文):Wei chun
論文名稱:台灣地區使用者之輕航機儀表與控制之相容性研究
論文名稱(外文):A study on Control-display Compatibility of Ultralight Aircraft for Taiwan User
指導教授:蔡登傳蔡登傳引用關係
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立雲林科技大學
系所名稱:工業設計系碩士班
學門:設計學門
學類:產品設計學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2005
畢業學年度:93
語文別:中文
論文頁數:78
中文關鍵詞:輕航機顯示控制配對刻板印象相容性
外文關鍵詞:CompatibilityStereotypeMatch of Display and ControlUltralight aircraft
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:4
  • 點閱點閱:196
  • 評分評分:系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔
  • 下載下載:29
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:0
輕航機飛行運動是融合科技與趣味的一種休閒運動。符合人因,安全舒適及學習效益的輕航機操作介面主要著重於顯示器與控制器兩者的設計是否符合人員的預期。本研究旨在探討台灣地區人員對於圖形顯示器指針旋轉方向與滑動控制器在不同位置上移動方向的配對。實驗包含紙筆測試及電腦模擬操作測試。實驗結果發現以下的顯示控制配對有較佳之一致性:1) 當控制拉桿移動方向與指針方向垂直,且指針指向控制器時控制器移動的方向與指針移動方向有很高的一致性。若控制拉桿移動方向與指針方向為平行則方向一致性不明。2) 指針順時針移動,若指針位置位於上半圓則預期的水平(橫)滑動控制器移動方向為右;若於下半圓則方向向左。3) 指針順時針移動,若指針位置位於右半圓則預期的垂直(直)滑動控制器移動方向為往下;若於左半圓則方向往上。 4) 指針逆時針移動,若指針位置位於右半圓則預期的垂直(直)滑動控制器移動方向為上;若於左半圓則方向往下。 5) 指針逆時針移動,若指針位置位於上半圓則預期的水平(直)滑動控制器移動方向為左;若於下半圓則方向向右。 6) 控制器之操作方向會於圓形顯示器對稱指針位置發生反轉效應或過削弱的現象。
Ultralight Aircraft is one kind of leisure activities which integrated with science and pleasure. The emphasis of a friendly, safe, comfortable and learning efficient operational interface is to see if the design of display and controller will be able to meet the expectations from people. This study aims to discuss the matches with different moving directions from an indicator’s rotation of a circle display and the sliding controller. There are paper-based tests and computer-analogue operational tests in this experiment. The result shows: 1. The result suggests higher directional consistency when the operational direction to crisscross the indicator. Moreover, the result also shows weaker consistency when the operational direction is parallel with the indicator. 2. Using row controller, if indicator rotates clockwise and indicator position in the upper display, move to right; and move left in the lower indicator position. 3. Using vertical controller, if indicator rotates clockwise and indicator position in the right of display, move vertical controller down; and move up in the left indicator position. 4. Using vertical controller, if indicator rotates anticlockwise and indicator position in the right of display, move vertical controller up; and move down in the left indicator position. 5. Using row controller, if indicator rotates anticlockwise and indicator position in the upper display, move to left; and move right in the lower indicator position. 6. The operational direction of the controller will come up with the reverse effect or weakening phenomenon in oppositional indicator position.
1 緒論
1 1 研究動機與背景
1 2 研究目的
1 3 研究架構與流程
文獻探討
2 1輕航機的儀表及控制器
2 1 1 儀表判讀的可能資訊輸入過程
2 1 2 飛機位置顯示器的原則
2 1 3 輕航機的控制器
2 2相容性
2 2 1群體刻板印象
2 2 2控制器對於儀表之移動相容性探討
2 2 3方向相容性
2 2 4安排控制器的原則與指引
2 2 5空間一致性及生理上的一致性
2 3 小結
3 研究方法與實驗設計
3 1 前言
3 2實驗設計
3 3實驗一
3 3 1紙筆測驗受測者
3 3 2實驗材料
3 3 4實驗操作步驟
3 4實驗二
3 4 1電腦模擬測試
3 4 2受測者
3 4 3實驗設備
3 4 4實驗方法
3 4 5採用本研究方法的原因
實驗結果與討論
4 1紙筆測試
4 1 1次數統計
4 1 2各配置情形之探討
4 1 3紙筆測驗總結
4 2程式模擬
4 2 1次數統計資料
4 2 2電腦模擬各配置情形探討
4 2 3電腦模擬階段總結
Brass, M., Bekkering, H., Wohlschlager, A., & Prinz, W., 2000, Compatibility between observed and executed finger movements: comparing symbolic, spatial, and imitative cues, Brain and Cognition, 44, pp. 124-1490.
Brebner , J., Shephard, M., & Cairney, P. ,1972, Spatial relationships and S-R compatibility. Acta Psychologica , 906, pp. 1-15.
Brebner, J., 1979, The compatibility of spatial and non-spatial relationship. Acta Psychologica, 906, pp. 1-15.
Downing, J. & Sanders, M., 1987, The effect of panel arrangement and locus of attention on performance. Human Factors, 29(5), pp. 551-562.
Ehrenreich, S., 1985, Computer abbreviations: Evidence and synthesis. Human Factors, 27(2), pp. 1490-155.
Farrell. P.S.E. & Hollands, J.G., 1999, Perceptual control and layered protocols in interface design: I. Fundamental concepts, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 50, pp. 489-520.
Fitt, P. M. & Seeger, C. M., 19590, S-R compatibility: Spatial characteristics of stimulus and response code. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 46, pp. 199-210.
Gamst, F., 1975, Human factors analysis of the diesel-electric locomotive cab. Human Factors, 17, pp. 149-156.
Hedge, A. & Marsh , N. W. A. , 1975, The effect of irrelevant spatial correspondence on two-choice response. Acta Psychological , 909, pp 427-4909.
Loveless, N. E., 19690, Direction of motion stereotype: A review. Ergonomics, 5, pp. 9057-90890.
Lutz, M. C., & Chapanis, A., 1955 , Expected locations of digits and letters on ten-button keysets. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 909, pp. 9014-9017.
Mark S. Sanders & Ermest J. McCormick, 1998, Human Factors in Engineering and Design, 7th.
McFarland, R.A., 1946, Human Factors in Air Transport Design, McGraw-Hill, New York. (in Sanders & McCormick, 19990, p. 9081).
Moray, N., 1981, The role of attention in the detection of errors and the diagnosis of errors in man-machine system. In J. Rasmussen and W. Rouse (eds.), Human detection and diagnosis of system failures. New York: Plenum.
Moussa-Hamouda, E., and Mourant, R., 1981, Vehicle fingertip reach controls-Human factors recommendations. Ergonomics, 12, pp. 66-70.
R. W. Proctor & T. G. Reeve, 1990, Stimulus-Response compatibility, pp.9-10.
Roscoe, S. N., Corl, L., and Jensen, R. S., 1981, Flight display dynamics revisited. Human Factors, 290(90), pp. 9041-90590.
Simon, J. R., 1969, Reactions toward the souce of stimulation. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 86, pp. 272-274.
Tero, A. & Briggs, P., 1994, Consistency versus compatibility: a question of levels, 40, pp. 879-894.
Vidulich, M., and Tsang, P., 1986, Techniques of subjective workload assessment: A comparison of SWAT and the NASA-Bipolar methods. Ergonomics, 29(11), pp.19085-19098.
W.H. Chen, Alan H.S. Chan, Movement compatibility for rotary control and circular display—Computer Simulated Test and real Hardware Test, Applied Ergonomics Volume: 34, Issue: 1, January, 2003, pp. 61-71
Wallace, R. J., 1971, S-R compatibility and the idea of a response code. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 88, pp. 9054-9060.
Warrick, M. J. ,1974, Direction of movement in the use of control knobs to position visual indicators. Psychological research on equipment design , Columbus.
Wickens, C., Sandry, D., and Vidulich, M., 1989, Compatibility and resource competition between modalities of input, central processing, and output. Human Factors, 25(2), pp. 227-248.
Wicknes, C., 1984, Engineering psychology and human performance, Columbus, OH: Merrill.
William H. Cushman Rochester, 1991, Human Factors in Product Design, NY, USA
Worringham, C., & Beringer, D., 1989 , Operator orientation and compatibility in visual-motor task performance. Ergonomics, 902(4), pp. 9087-400.
Zhang, J. & Zhang, H., 1999, A parallel distributed processing model of stimulus-stimulus and stimulus-response compatibility, Cognitive Psychology, 908, pp. 9086-4902.
王建台, 1993, 運動的價值人生, 國立體育學院論叢, 第4卷1期, pp. 23-29
王懷柱, 揭開飛行的奧秘, 2001, 全華科技圖書有限公司, 台北
全民運動月刊,(2001),「輕航機種類」,全民運動月刊,2001年1月號, http://www. hisport.net.tw/specialy/specialy65/specialy2.html
何琦偉, 2002, SOLO的經驗-寓教於樂的休閒飛行運動,航太工業通訊,第45期,經濟部。
余家愷, 1995「六大基本儀表介紹」, 玉山虛擬航空圖書室http://www.jadeair.com.tw/library/
吳荽如, 1998, 中國地理大百科-台灣, 光復書局企業股份有限公司
張春興, 張氏心理學辭典, 1989, 台灣東華書局, 台北
戚啟勳, 1990, 大氣科學, 大中國圖書公司, 台北。
連榮發, 2001, 「輕航機簡介」, 全民運動月刊, 2001年1月號, http://www.hisport. net.tw/specialy/specialy65/specialy1.html.
陳靜怡, 2001, 台灣居民閒暇時間與休閒型態之分析—以民國76-890年為背景探討發展概況與推測未來發展, 國立臺灣體育學院學報, 第9期, pp. 2190-228
盧英娟、李明榮, 2001, 社會化發展與休閒階段需求之探討, 國立臺灣體育學院學報, 第8期, pp. 97-111.
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
系統版面圖檔 系統版面圖檔