中文部份:
1. 毛連塭 (1988) ,「創造力研究的理論」,國小特殊教育,第8期,pp.1-7。2. 何欣育 (2004) ,早期供應商介入對新產品開發績效之研究,私立東吳大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
3. 吳彥輝 (1999) ,運用模糊層級分析法與管理才能評鑑模式之研究,國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。4. 吳萬益、林清河 (2002) ,行銷研究,初版,台北:華泰。
5. 林俊宏 (2002) ,消費者特性、新產品屬性及環境變數對創新購買意願之影響,國立成奶j學企業管理研究所碩士論文。6. 徐村和 (1998) ,「模糊德菲層級分析法」,模糊系統學刊,第4卷,第1期,pp.59-72。7. 徐村和、楊宗欣 (1999) ,「媒體選擇影響因素之研究-習慣領域及灰色理論」,東吳經濟商學學報,第24期,pp.115-138。8. 張有恆、徐村和 (1993) ,「模糊度量AHP法-交通運輸計畫評估新模式」,中華民國第一屆模糊理論與應用研討會論文集,pp.365-371。
9. 張保隆、鄭文英 (1990) ,「決策屬性具相關性之分析層級統計模式」,交大管理學報,第1卷,第10期,pp.159-171。10. 陳名揚譯;刀根薰著 (1993) ,競賽式決策制定法-AHP入門,初版,台北:建宏。
11. 陳昭儀 (1990) ,我國傑出發明家之人格特質、創造歷程及生涯發展之研究,國立台灣師範大學特殊教育研究所碩士論文。12. 陳昭儀 (1990) ,二十位傑出發明家的生涯路,初版,台北:心理。
13. 陳昭儀、陳琦、張素華譯;Piirto, J.著 (1995) ,瞭解創意人,初版,台北:心理。
14. 陳麗昭 (2000) ,台灣個人發明人專利商品化歷程之研究,國立雲林科技大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。15. 黃建榮 (2002),台灣獨立發明人之社會資本與商品化模式、創新滿意度之研究,國立雲林科技大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。16. 經濟部 (2005) ,智慧財產局年報,台北:經濟部。
17. 簡倍祥 (2005) ,電子市集創新發展過程影響因子之研究-Fuzzy AHP之應用,國立中正大學企業管理研究所博士論文。18. 羅力仁 (2002) ,連鎖便利商店店址選擇評估模式之研究-運用模糊AHP法,國立中正大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。英文部份:
1. Bailin, S. (1988), Achieving Extraordinary Ends: Anessay on Creativity, Boston: Kluwer Academic.
2. Belton, V. & A. E. Gear (1983), “On a Shortcoming of Saaty’s Method of Analytic Hierarchies,” Omega, Vol.11, No.3, pp.227-230.
3. Belton, V. & A. E. Gear (1985), “The Legitimacy of Rank Reversal-A Comment,” Omega, Vol.13, No.3, pp.227-230.
4. Bloom, B. S. (1985), Developing Talent in Young People, New York: Ballantine books.
5. Buckley, J. J. (1985), “Fuzzy Hierarchical Analysis,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, Vol. 17, pp.233-247.
6. Cooke, D. C. (1968), Inventions: That Made History, Toronto: Longmans.
7. Dahlin, K., Taylor, M., & Fichman, M. (2004), “Today’s Edisons or Weekend Hobbyists: Technical Merit and Success of Inventions by Independent Inventors,” Research Policy, Vol.33, pp.1167-1183.
8. Henderson, S. J. (2004), “Product Inventors and Creativity: The Finer Dimensions of Enjoyment,” Creativity Research Journal, Vol.16, No.2&3, pp.293-312.
9. Herzberg, F. (1987), “Innovation: Where is the Relish,” The Journal of Creative Behavior, Vol.21, No.3, pp.179-192.
10. Gilman, J. J. (1995), “Risk Was His Friend: Edison’s Legacy to Innovation Leaders,” Research Technology Management, July-August, pp.8-9.
11. Jardin, L., (1999), Ingenious Pursuits: Building the Scientific Revolution, New York: Talese.
12. Kotler, P. (2004), Marketing Management, 11th ed., N.J.: Prentice-Hall.
13. Laarhoven, P. J. M. & W. Pedrycz (1983), “A Fuzzy Extension of Saaty’s Priority Theory,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, Vol.11, No.3, pp.229-241.
14. Mon, D. L., C. H. Cheng & J. C. Lin (1994), “Evaluating Weapon System Using Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process Based on Entropy Weight,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, Vol. 62, pp.127-134.
15. Mackinnon, D. (1978), In Search of Human Effectiveness: Identifying and Developing Creativity, New York: Bearly Limited.
16. McMullan, (1975), “Creative Individuals: Paradoxical Personages,” The Journal of Creative Behavior, Vol. 10, No.4, pp.265-275.
17. Millet, I. & Harker, P. T. (1990), “Globally Effective Questioning In the Analytic Hierarchy Process,” European Journal of Operational Research, Vol.48, pp.88-97.
18. Parker, R. S., Udell, G. G., & Blades, L. (1996), “The New Independent Inventor: Implications for Corporate Policy,” Review of Business, Spring, Vol.17, No.3, pp.7-11.
19. Poole, M. (1980), Creativity Across the Curriculum, London: George Allen and Unwin.
20. Robertson, A. (1984), “Characteristics of the Successful Inventor: Some Notes on the Nature of Creativity and the Creative Mind,” Technovation, No.2, pp.141-145.
21. Rogers, E. M. (1983), Diffusion of Innovation, 3rd ed., New York: Free Press.
22. Roman, H. T. (2005), “Tips for Inventors,” Tech Directions, Vol.25, No.1,pp.13-14.
23. Saaty, T. L. (1980), The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation, New York: McGraw-Hill.
24. Udell, G. G. (1990), “It’s Still Caveat, Inventor,” J PROD INNOV MANAG, Vol.7, pp.230-243.
25. Woods, D. R. (1989), “Creativity,” JCST, Feb. , pp.259-261.