跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(44.220.184.63) 您好!臺灣時間:2024/10/04 06:29
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

: 
twitterline
研究生:張麗媛
研究生(外文):Sonia Chang
論文名稱:員工安全氣氛知覺與安全行為之相關研究-以北台灣某醫學中心急診部門為例
論文名稱(外文):The Association of Safety Climate Perception and Safety Behavior - A Study on Emergency Department of A Hospital in Northern Taiwan
指導教授:許光宏許光宏引用關係
指導教授(外文):Pro. Hsu Kuang-Hung
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:長庚大學
系所名稱:企業管理研究所
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:企業管理學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2006
畢業學年度:94
語文別:英文
論文頁數:85
中文關鍵詞:安全氣氛安全氣氛知覺安全行為醫院
外文關鍵詞:Safety ClimateSafety Climate PerceptionSafety BehaviorHospital
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:2
  • 點閱點閱:359
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:105
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:1
摘要

眾多的研究者,早已證明在工業界安全行為與安全氣氛有非常顯著的關係;不安全的舉動或行為是引起工作場所中的事故與傷害的主要因素,而改善安全行為可減少與工作相關的事故與傷害的次數;安全行為經常關係著執行的品質,因此改善生產率可能是安全行為的附加利益;安全氣氛激發與認可安全行為的重點在於員工的態度和行為,安全氣氛是一個過程並非計劃,它的發展耗時且需要整個團體努力導入許多特色;而本研究企圖證明此理論亦適用於台灣醫界。
我們收集台灣北區擁有8600名員工、3900個床位、全年度門診病患約三百二十萬人次、急診病患約二十四萬人次、住院病患約一百二十六萬人次的某醫學中心急診部之醫生、護士及行政人員共199名參加本研究的問卷調查,回收有效問卷共有162份。
研究重要發現如下:
- 正面的安全氣氛可導致員工更有效的安全行為 (Coefficient of Stepwise Regression = 0.51)。
- 醫院可經由加強正面安全氣氛而降低事故與傷害
- 管理承諾(Factor Loading = 0.61)、全員參與(Factor Loading = 0.62)、安全訓練(Factor Loading = 0.54)為安全氣氛的主要因素。
- 人口統計學的可變因素如職業(p = 0.0002)、性別(p = 0.0003)和教育程度(p=0.0005)與正面的安全氣氛和安全行為有極大的關聯。
最後,建議台灣醫院透過教育訓練可增加員工的安全知識,並加強正面的安全氣氛,有效的影響個人的安全行為,進而降低在醫院中傳染疾病的散播率。
ABSTRACT

Many researchers have shown that Safety Behavior has significant relationship with Safety Climate in industries. For instance, Garavan & O’Brien argued that “Unsafe acts or behaviors are a major causal factor in workplace accidents/injuries. Improved Safety Behavior reduces the frequency of work related accidents and injuries.”; Vredenburgh considered that “Safety Behavior is often tied to quality of performance, and therefore, an added benefit of Safety Behavior maybe an improvement in productivity.”; Barr claimed that “Safety Climate motivates and recognizes Safe Behavior by focusing on the attitudes and behaviors of the employees. It is a process—not a program; it takes time to develop and requires a collective effort to implement its many features.” In this study, we attempt to prove the theory is suitable for Taiwan hospitals as well.
The study has collected the physicians, nurses and staff of a Memorial Hospital located in northern Taiwan, to participate in this investigation and received 162 valid questionnaires as basic data. The hospital employs 8600 people, has 3900 beds, with 3.2M/year outpatients, 240K/year emergency cases and 260K/year inpatients,
Significant findings are as follows:
- A positive Safety Climate can lead to more effective Safety Behavior among staff (Coefficient of Stepwise Regression = 0.51).
- Hospitals can reduce risk of infectious disease outbreak through emphasizing positive Safety Climate, which will lead to Safety Behavior among all staff.
- Management commitment (Factor Loading = 0.61), all employees’ involvement (Factor Loading = 0.62) and safety training (Factor Loading = 0.54) are major factors leading to a positive Safety Climate.
- There are some demographic variables such as profession (p = 0.0002), gender (p = 0.0003) and education level (p = 0.0005) positively associated with Safety Climate and Safety Behavior.
Finally, we suggested some measures to lessen the risk of infectious diseases spreading in Taiwan’s hospitals. Among these suggestions are training that will enhance staff’s safety knowledge and awareness, and other actions for creating a positive Safety Climate and promoting individual Safety Behavior in Taiwan hospitals.
TABLE OF CONTENTS

CHAPTER I Introduction…………………………………………...1
1.1 Motivation for the Research………………………………1
1.2 Objectives of the Research…………………………………2
CHAPTER II Literature Review……………………………………4
2.1 Safety Climate…………………………………...……………4
2.2 Safety Behavior……………………………………………….11
2.3 The Relationship Between Safety Climate and Safety
Behavior………………………………………………………...14
CHAPTER III Materials and Methods…………………………..19
3.1 Research Agenda……………………………………………...19
3.2 Study Subjects……………………………………….....….20
3.3 Questionnaire...................................21
3.4 Research Limitation.............................23
3.5 Statistical Analysis..……………..…………………...24
CHAPTER IV Results...................................29
4.1 Descriptive Statistics………………………………………29
4.2 Factor Analysis………………………………………………..31
4.3 Uni-variable Analysis…………………………………..……31
4.4 Multiple-Variable Analysis…………………………………35
CHAPTER V Discussion…………...........................38
CHAPTER VI Conclusions………………………................49
REFERENCES……………………………………………………….....….52
APPENDIX..............................................61
Appendix I: Original Questionnaire....................61
Appendix II: The Results of Factor Analysis...........65
Appendix III: Filtered Questionnaire..................70
REFERENCES

Alison G. Vredenburgh. 2002. Organizational safety: Which management practices are most effective in reducing employee injury rates? Journal of Safety Research 33 (2002) 259-276.

Barling, J; Zacharatos, A. 1999. ‘High performance safety system: Management practices for achieving optimal safety performance’, paper presented at the 25th annual meeting of the Academy of Management, Toronto.

Barr, J. 1998. Cultivating culture. Occupational Health and Safety, 67(1), 32.

Barrick, MR; Stewart, GL; Piotrowski, M. 2002. ‘Personality and job performance: Test of the mediating effects of motivation among sales representatives’, Journal of Applied Psychology, vol.87, pp. 43-51.

Borman, WC; Penner, LA; Allen, TD; Motowidlo, SJ. 2001. ‘Personality predictors of citizenship performance’, International Journal of Selection & Assessment. Vol.9, pp. 52-69.

Broberg, E. 1984. “Use of Gensus Data Combined with Occupational Accident Data”, Employment Gazette, Vol.16, pp.147-153.

Brown, RL; Holmes, H. 1986. “The Use of Factor-Analysis Procedure for Assessing the Validity of and Employee Safety Climate Model”, Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol.18, pp.289-307.

Campbell, JP; Gasser, MB; Oswald, FL. 1996. ‘The substantive nature of performance variability’, in Individual Differences and Behavior in Organizations, ed. K.R. Murphy, Jossey-Bass, San Fancisco.

Cody Ronald P; Smith Jeffrey K. 1997. Applied Statistics and the SAS Programming Language, 4th ed. US. Prentice-Hall, Inc. pp 115 – 137.

Cohen, A. 1977. Factors in successful occupational safety programs. Journal of Safety Research 9, 168-178.

Cohen, HH; Cleveland, RJ. 1983. Safety program practices in record-holding plants. Professional Safety, 3, 26–33.

Cox, S.J. & Cheyne A.J.T. 2000. “Assessing safety culture in offshore environments”, Safety Science, vol.34, pp.1-3.

Dawson, S. 1991. “ Managing Safety Offshore: Offshore Operations Post Piper Alpha”. London: Marine Management (Holdings) Ltd., 6-8 February (Paper 13).

DeGreen, KB. 1972. “Systems Theory, Macroergonomics and the Design of Adaptive Organizations”, in K.B. Degreen (ed.) Human Factors in Organization Design and Management, New York: North-Holland.

Denison, D. 1996. “What is the Difference Between Organizational Culture and Organizational Climate? A Native’s Point of View on a Decade of Paradigm Wars”, Academy of Management Review, Vol.21, No. 5, pp.5-8.

DeJoy, D.M. 1985. Attributional processes and hazard control management in industry. Journal of Safety Research, 16:61-71.

Easton, Valerie J; McColl John H. 2005. Statistics Glossary V1.1 Available from:http://www.stats.gla.ac.uk/steps/glossary/paired_data.html

Edmondson, A.C. 1996. Learning from mistakes is easier said than done: Group and organizational influences on the detection and correction of human error. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 32:5-28.

Embrey, D.E. 1992. “Incorporating Management and Organizational Factors into Probabilistic Safety Assessment”, Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Vol.38, PP. 199-208.

Flin, R.; Mearns, K.; O’Connor, P.; Bryden, R.. 2000. Measuring safety climate: identifying the common features. Safety Science, 34:177-192.

Garavan, Thomas N; O'Brien, Fergal. 2001. An investigation into the relationship between Safety Climate and Safety Behaviors in Irish Organizations. Irish Journal of Management, 22, 1; ABI/INFORM Global, pg.141.

Glendon, AI; Stanton, NA. 2000. Safety Science, 34 (2000) 193±214

Gonzalez-Roma, V.; Peiro, J.; Lloret, S.; Zornoza, A. 1999. The validity of collective climates. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology 72, 25-40.

Gu, Cheng-Feng; Hsu, Shang-Hwa. 2003. The Study for Safety Culture in Petrochemical Industry. Department of Industrial and Management National Chiao Tung University.

Guo, Jian-Zhi; Cao, Chang-Cheng. 2004. Locus of control, Supervisory support and unsafe behavior: The case of Construction industry in Taiwan, 中華心理學刊, vol.4.

Hale, AR.. 2000. ‘Culture’s confusions’. Safety Science, vol.34, pp.1-3.

Hofmann, DA; Morgeson, FP. 1999. ‘Safety-related behavior as a social exchange: The role of perceived organizational support and leader-member exchange’, Journal of Applied Psychology, vol.84, no.2, pp.286-96.

Hofmann, DA; Stetzer, A. 1996. “A Cross-Level Investigation of Factors Investigating Unsafe Behaviors and Accidents”, Personnel Psychology, Vol.49, No.2, pp.307-340.

International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), Vienna. 1991. Safety Culture, a report by the International Nuclear Safety Advisory Group, Safety Series No. 75-INSAG-4. pp.4-5.

Institution of Electrical Engineers (IEE), Health and Safety Policy Advisory Group. 2005. Health and Safety Briefing 07 - Safety Culture. Available from URL: http:www.iee.org/Policy/Areas/Health/ hsb07.cfm.

Lampert, U. 1974. “Age and the Predisposition to Accidents”, Archives Des Maladaise Professionelles, Vol.62, pp.173-180.

Lutness, J. 1987. Measuring up: assessing safety with climate surveys. Occupational Health and Safety 56(2), 20-26.

Mitchell, T.R. & Wood, R.E. 1980. Supervisors’ responses to subordinate poor performance: A test of an attributional model. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 25: 123-138.

Moran, E; Volkwein, J. 1992. “The Culture Approach to the Formation of
Organizational Climate”, Human Relations, Vol.45, No.1, pp.19-47.

Neal, A.; Griffin, M.A; Hart, P.M. 2000. The impact of organizational climate on Safety Climate and individual behavior. Safety Science 34, 99-109.

Neal, Andrew; Griffin, Mark A. 2002. Safety Climate and Safety Behavior. Australian Journal of Management; 27, ABI/INFORM Global pg. 67.

Oborne, DJ. 1995. Human Factors in Design and Development: Ergonomics at Work, New York:Wiley.

Ostrom, C; Wilhelmsen, OC & Kaplan, B. 1993. Assessing Safety Culture. Nuclear Safety, 65, 163–172.

Pidgeon, NF. 1991. Safety Culture and risk management in organizations. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 22(1), 129– 140.

Pidgeon, N.F. 1995. “Risk Construction and Safety Culture in Managing High-Risk Technologies”, Paper prepared for International Workshop on Institutional Vulnerabilities and Resilience in Public Administration, Crisis research Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands.

Ray, PS; Frey, A. 1999. “Validation of the Safety Behavior Index”, Professional Safety, Vol.44, No.7, pp.25-30.

Reason, JT. 1979. “Actions Not as Planned: The Price of Automisation”, in Underwood, G. (ed.), Aspects of Consciousness: Psychological Issues, London: Academic Press.

Rousseau, DM. 1988. “Issues of Level in Organizational Research: Multilevel and Cross-Level Perspectives”, in Cummings, L.L. and Staw, B.M. (eds), Researching Organizational Behavior, Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

Reichers, A.E.; Schneider, B. 1990. “Climate and culture: An evolution of constructs”, in Organizational climate and culture, ed. B. Schneider, San Francisco, Jossey-Bass, pp. 40-84.

Rousseau, DM. 1988. “The Construction of Climate in Organizational Research”, in Cooper, C. and Robertson, I.L. (eds), International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Chichester: Wiley.

Schneider, B. 1990. The climate for service: An application of the climate construct. In B. Schneider (Ed.), Organizational climate and culture: 383-412. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Schroder, HM. 1970. Safety performance measurement. Journal, Journal of Safety Research 2, 188-195.

Siehl, C; Martin, J. 1990. Organizational culture: a key to financial performance? In B. Schneider (Ed.), Organizational climate and culture. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, pp. 241– 281.

Simonds, RH; Shafai-Sahrai, Y. 1977. Factors apparently affecting injury frequency in eleven matched pairs of companies. Journal of Safety Research 9, 120-127.

Singleton, WT. 1982. The Body at Work: Biololgical Ergonomics, London: Cambridge University Press.

Smith, MJ; Cohen, HH; Cohen, A; Cleveland, RJ. 1978. Characteristics of successful safety programs. Journal of Safety Research 10, 5-15.

Turner, BA. 1991. The development of a Safety Culture. Chemistry and Industry, 4, 241–243.

UCLA Academic Technology Services. Available from: http://www.ats.ucla.edu/STAT/SPSS/faq/alpha.html

Vredenburgh, Alison G. 2002. Organizational safety: Which management practices are most effective in reducing employee injury rates? Journal of Safety Research, 33 (2002) 259– 276.

Wilpert, B. 1994. Industrial/organizational psychology and ergonomics toward more comprehensive work sciences. Proceedings of the 12th triennial Congress of the International Ergonomics Association, vol.1, pp.37-40.

Winsermius, W. 1965. “Some Ergonomic Aspects of Safety”, Ergonomics, Vol.8, pp.151-162.

Zohar, D. 1980. Safety Climate in industrial organizations: theoretical and applied implications. Journal of Applied Psychology, 65, 96–102.

Zohar, D. 2000. ‘A group-level model of Safety Climate: Testing the effect of group climate on microaccidents in manufacturing jobs’, Journal of Applied Psychology, vol.85, no.4, pp.587-96.
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top