(3.235.108.188) 您好!臺灣時間:2021/02/28 00:33
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果

詳目顯示:::

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:黃燕萍
論文名稱:科技人員住宅社區評價模式之研究
論文名稱(外文):Study on Evaluation Model for Community of High-tech Employees
指導教授:解鴻年解鴻年引用關係
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:中華大學
系所名稱:建築與都市計劃學系(所)
學門:建築及都市規劃學門
學類:都市規劃學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2006
畢業學年度:94
語文別:中文
論文頁數:90
中文關鍵詞:永續住宅社區評價模式科技人員層級分析法
外文關鍵詞:Sustainable CommunityAnalytic HierarchyTechnology Employee
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:3
  • 點閱點閱:108
  • 評分評分:系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:0
校所名稱:中華大學建築與都市計畫研究所碩士班 論文名稱:科技人員住宅社區評價模式之研究 畢業時間:2006年(九十四年度第二學期碩士學位論文摘要) 研究生姓名:黃燕萍 指導教授:解鴻年 論文摘要: 永續發展(Sustainable Development)不僅是當代全球共通的議題,亦是人類 生活追求之典範,其目的在於確保人類自然福祉、兼顧社經與環境發展,以有效 提升集居生活品質;在台灣,若欲探討集居環境與其之對應,住宅社區於實際發 展中著實扮演著基礎建構之重要角色。台灣社區由農業轉變至現代化社會,並在 二十一世紀進入高科技和跨國商業為中心的全球社區,永續社區(Sustainable Community)之建立是地區、社會,甚至於國家之重要基礎與未來的理想。而, 都市社區居民的互動、歸屬感等生活文化亦隨著人口組成因素、高密度化已轉變 為重視私密與安全性及人際關係上的疏離現象,同時包含有面臨社會、文化及環 境生態等新發展的挑戰,而朝向多元與複雜。為落實「全球思考、地方行動」之 概念,本研究以新竹地區具代表性之科技人員住宅社區為對象,藉由探究其社會 文化、生活環境、經營管理等面向,建立住宅社區永續發展之評價模式,以作為 整體目標邁進之有效導引。是以,本研究參考國內外相關領域研究成果與文獻, 歸納整理住宅社區於發展上所應考量之關鍵方向(如人文社會、自然環境、生活 品質、空間使用...等),以科技人員重視程度問卷調查篩選重要影響準則因子, 進而透過層級分析法(Analytic Hierarchy Process;AHP)之操作,計算影響準則 因子之權重與重要性排序,以建立整體評價模式。實證部份則選定新竹地區三個 具高同質性之科技人員住宅社區個案進行評價。此研究結果將提供科技人員住宅 社區落實永續發展一具客觀之量化分析工具及規劃者未來規劃設計上對於影響 準則因子優先順序之具體參考及重要基礎導引。
Abstract School: Chung Hua University Department: Graduate School of Architecture and Urban Planning Title: Study on Evaluation Model for Community of High-tech Employees Time: June 2006 Researcher: Yen-Ping Huang Adviser: Hung-Nien Hsieh Sustainable development is not only a global issue, but also a paragon which human being pursuits. It is aiming to promote quality of life and ensure human welfare whilst concern socio-economic and environmental development. If to discuss sustainable development and its corresponding settlement environment, residential communities would play an important role of fundamental framework. Taiwan has transformed from agriculture to modern society, and entered hi-tech international business community in 21st century. Sustainable development is an ideal to build up the foundation and future of a region, a society, or even a country. However in urban communities, interaction between residents, feel of belonging and other livelihood cultures have become dispersed because of high-density living and demographical structure. In addition, the challenges of social, cultural and environmental development has also become more diversified and complex. In order to achieve the idea of “think globally, act locally”, this study uses residential communities of high-tech workers as the case study, and tried to establish a sustainability evaluation method by investigating their socio-culture, living environment, operation and management. Therefore, this study reviewed relevant research literatures and achievements, sorted key directions for developing residential community (eg. Socio-culture, nature environment, living quality, space usage, etc.), choosing important factors by evaluation questionnaires for high-tech workers. Finally the study used analytic hierarchy process (AHP) to calculate and sort out the significance of affecting factors, in order to establish overall evaluation model. Case studies adopted three high-tech worker communities for individual evaluation. The result of this study will promote the sustainability of such communities by providing planners an objective quantification analytical tool with concerning on various affecting factors.
第一章 緒論.....................................................................................................1 第一節 研究動機與目的............................................................................................1 一、研究動機........................................................................................................1 二、研究目的........................................................................................................2 第二節 研究方法與範圍............................................................................................3 一、研究方法........................................................................................................3 二、研究範圍........................................................................................................4 第三節 研究流程........................................................................................................5 第二章 相關文獻與理論回顧.........................................................................6 第一節 永續發展概念與意義....................................................................................6 第二節 永續發展概念應用於住宅社區....................................................................9 一、住宅社區發展之論述與概念........................................................................9 二、住宅社區環境品質永續評量指標..............................................................10 三、永續住宅社區的定義與發展面向..............................................................13 第三節 科技人員與住宅社區相關研究..................................................................28 第四節 研究方法......................................................................................................30 一、問卷調查......................................................................................................30 二、層級分析法(Analytic Hierarchy Process;AHP)..................................32 第三章 科技人員住宅社區評價之準則因子初擬......................................37 第一節 科技人員住宅社區評價之相關影響準則因子..........................................37 第二節 評價準則因子篩選......................................................................................41 一、問卷調查......................................................................................................41 二、問卷統計及結果分析-重視程度..............................................................42 三、問卷統計及結果分析-滿意程度..............................................................44 第三節 小結..............................................................................................................46 第四章 科技人員住宅社區評價...................................................................47 第一節 評價模式之準則因子權重計算..................................................................48 一、問卷調查......................................................................................................48 二、結果分析......................................................................................................50 第二節 個案評價......................................................................................................56 一、住宅社區個案之評價..................................................................................63 二、結果分析......................................................................................................67 第五章 結論與建議.......................................................................................68 第一節 研究結論......................................................................................................68 第二節 後續研究建議..............................................................................................72 參考文獻......................................................................................................................73 附錄一 第一階段問卷調查......................................................................................79 附錄二 第二階段問卷調查......................................................................................80
1. Barton(1998), Sustainable Communities. 2. Beatley, Timothy (1998), The Vision of Sustainable Communities. In:Burby, R. J. (ed.), Cooperating with Nature, Washington, D.C.:Joseph Henry Press Chris Maser C.,1997, Sustainable Community Development,St. Lucie Press,U.S.A.,頁XV. 3. Graham A. Tobin(1999), “Sustainability and community resilience: the holy grail of hazards planning? ” , Environmental Hazards 1. pp. 13-25. 4. Ishikawa, A., Amagasa, T., Tamizawa, G., Totsuta, R.and Mieno, H.(1993), “ The Max-Min Delphi Method and Fuzzy Method Via Fuzzy Integration ”, Fuzzy Set and Systems55, pp.241-253. 5. Jeffrey C.Bridger,A.E.Luloff(1999), “Toward an interactional approach to sustainable community development”, Journal of Rural Studies 15, pp. 377-387. 6. John A. Meech. etc.(2006), “Transformation of a derelict mine site into a sustainable community: the Britannia project”, Journal of Cleaner Production 14, pp. 349-365. 7. Office of the Deputy Prime Minister(ODPM),(2003), Sustainable Communities : building for the future. 8. Office of the Deputy Prime Minister(ODPM),(2004), Skill for Sustainable Communities. 9. Office of the Deputy Prime Minister(ODPM),(2005), Creating sustainable communities. 10. Roseland, Mark. Eds.(1998), Toward Sustainable Communities:Resources for citizens and their government, Canada:New Society Publishers. 11. Roseland Mark(2000), “ Sustainable community development: integrating environmental, economic, and social objectives ”, Progress in Planning 54, pp.73–132. 12. Saaty, T.L.(1980), The Analytic Hierarchy Process, McGraw-Hill, New York. 13. Saaty, T.L.(1986), “ Dependence and independence: From linear hierarchies to nonlinear networks ” , European Journal of Operational Research, 26(1), pp.229-237. 14. Sustainable Seattle(1993), Indicators of Sustainable Community: A Report to Citizens on Long -Trends in Our Community. U.S.A.: Sustainable. 15. Sustainable Seattle(1998), Indicators of Sustainable Community . 16. S.Hatfield Dodds(2000), “Pathway and paradigms for sustaining human communities-some thoughts for community designers”, in. R. Lawrence(ed.), Sustaining Human Settlement:A Challenge for the new millennium, Urban International Press, Newcastle-upon-Tyne Uk, pp.28-54. 17. Sir John Egan(2004), The Egan Review: Skills for Sustainable Communities, UK:RIBA Enterprise Ltd. (李永展於2005 年翻譯,書名為「建構永續社區的 技能」,五南出版社). 18. Sustainable Communities Resource Package: Table of Contents Ontario Round Table on Environment and Economy. http://sdss.geog.ntu.tw. 19. John A. Meech, etc.(2006), “Transformation of a derelict mine site into a sustainable community:the Britannia project”, Journal of Cleaner Production, pp.349-365. 20. Woodrow W. Clark(2006), “Partnerships in creating agile sustainable development communities”. Journal of Cleaner Production. pp.1-9. 21. Young, M. D.(1992), “ Sustainable Investment and Resource Use, ” Great Britain: The Parthenon Publishing Group.
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
1. 李釗、江少鋒、郭文田(1997),「垃圾焚化灰渣作為混凝土細骨材之可行性研究」,中國環境工程學刊,第七卷,第三期,第289-296頁。
2. 李釗、江少鋒、郭文田(1997),「垃圾焚化灰渣作為混凝土細骨材之可行性研究」,中國環境工程學刊,第七卷,第三期,第289-296頁。
3. 李建中、李釗、鄭清江、何啟華(1996),「垃圾焚化灰燼之大地工程特性」,中國土木水利工程學刊,第八卷,第三期,第397-404頁。
4. 李建中、李釗、鄭清江、何啟華(1996),「垃圾焚化灰燼之大地工程特性」,中國土木水利工程學刊,第八卷,第三期,第397-404頁。
5. 張蕙蘭(2003),「國外焚化底渣再利用介紹」,永續產業發展雙月刊,第十二期,第55-64頁。
6. 張蕙蘭(2003),「國外焚化底渣再利用介紹」,永續產業發展雙月刊,第十二期,第55-64頁。
7. 王一雄(1997).農藥與生態環境。生命科學簡訊,11(10):15­18。
8. 王一雄(1997).農藥與生態環境。生命科學簡訊,11(10):15­18。
9. 林浩潭(2000).農藥對環境之影響。農業世界,202:19­22。
10. 林浩潭(2000).農藥對環境之影響。農業世界,202:19­22。
11. 洪亮吉、李國欽(1991).農藥在環境中的命運。中華民國雜草學會會刊,12(2): 115­128。
12. 洪亮吉、李國欽(1991).農藥在環境中的命運。中華民國雜草學會會刊,12(2): 115­128。
13. 詹見平、吳世霖(1992).台灣生物地理區南北過渡區的魚類生態。中國水產月刊第478期,p5­59。
14. 詹見平、吳世霖(1992).台灣生物地理區南北過渡區的魚類生態。中國水產月刊第478期,p5­59。
15. 楊薇靜(1999).農藥對野生生物有害嗎。科學教育月刊,220:P27­32。
 
系統版面圖檔 系統版面圖檔