跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(18.97.14.84) 您好!臺灣時間:2024/12/14 17:56
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:蔡政道
研究生(外文):Jeng-Dau Tsai
論文名稱:臨床腸病毒71腦炎診斷工具之比較
論文名稱(外文):Clinical Comparisions of Tools in Diagnosing Enteroviral 71 Encephalitis
指導教授:郭煌宗郭煌宗引用關係
指導教授(外文):HUANG-TSUNG KUO
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:中國醫藥大學
系所名稱:醫學研究所碩士班
學門:醫藥衛生學門
學類:醫學學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2006
畢業學年度:94
語文別:中文
論文頁數:53
中文關鍵詞:腸病毒 71 型菱腦炎肌躍型抽搐肺水腫神經學影像病毒培養反轉錄聚合酵素鏈鎖反應:陽性率敏感度
外文關鍵詞:enterovirus 71rhombenceohalitismyoclonic jerkpulmonary edemaneurological imagesvirus culturereverse transcription- polymerase chain reactionpositive ratesensitivity
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:946
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:0
腸病毒腦膜腦炎是最常見的無菌性腦膜腦炎,其預後通常良好且死亡率低;但是腸病毒71型引起之手口足病或疱疹性咽峽炎而併發之腦炎自87年在台灣爆發後,因其侵犯中樞神經易造成神經性肺水腫而有高死亡率。診斷腸病毒71型腦炎主要依照個案的臨床症狀、脊髓液及影像特徵作初步診斷。而確定診斷之工具包括了病毒培養、血清學及逆轉錄聚合酵素鏈鎖反應。這篇主要的目的是檢視以泛腸病毒及腸病毒71型之引子以逆轉錄聚合酵素鏈鎖反應(RT-PCR)在應用在不同檢體中之陽性率性比較。這裡亦回顧了腸病毒71型腦炎之臨床表現及其在神經核磁共振影像之發現。
本研究以90年1月至94年12月因感染腸病毒而引起中樞神經症狀,而進入中國醫藥大學附設醫院兒童加護病房接受治療之兒童為對象,而收集其檢體做分析。每一位均收集四組成對檢體,包括喉頭/肛門拭體、脊髓液及血液,一套以RT-PCR偵測腸病毒基因之陽性與否;另一套則以傳統病毒培養而偵測之。
共有66位符合診斷定義病童,其檢體執行RT-PCR及傳統病毒培養;結果可發現RT-PCR在不同檢體中之陽性率在喉頭(74.2%)及肛門拭體(68.2%)遠高於脊髓液(34.9%)及血液(27.7%);而在病毒培養亦可發現其陽性率在喉頭(30.3%)及肛門拭體(16.7%)高於脊髓液(1.5%)及血液(3.0%)。而在各不同檢體中,也可以發現RT-PCR之陽性率均明顯高於病毒培養。而以四組檢體做RT-PCR則可鑑別出92%的病童為腸病毒感染,其中65%可以次分型確定為腸病毒71型。
我們結論RT-PCR之陽性率明顯優於病毒培養,其在臨床上是可做為良好鑑別性之診斷工具。
Enteroviral meningoencephalitis is the most prevalent meningoencephalitis, which usually subsequent a well prognosis and low mortility;but enterovirus 71 infections manifested as hand-foot-mouth disease or herpangina with encephalitis that subsequent neurological pulmonary edema and substantial mortality in Taiwan since its breakout in 1998. Tentative diagnosis of enterovirus 71 meningoencephalitis depends on individual clinical symptoms, cerebral spinal fluid (CSF) and neurological images. Final confirmation of virus infection includes virus culture, reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and serology. The aim of this study was to speculate the application of RT-PCR with universal pan-enteroviral and enteroviral 71(EV71) type- specific primers for direct detections of enterovirus in clinical specimens. Here also review the clinical manifestation and findings of neurological MR imagings in enterovirtus 71 encephalitis.
This project enrolled patients diagnosed of erterovirus central nerve system infection, who admitted to the pediatric intensive care unite of China Medical University Hospital between 2000,Jan to 2005,Dec.Four paired of specimens, including throat/recta swabs, cerebral spinal fluid and blood were collected when admitted; one set were sent for RT-PCR and another were for virus culture.
There were total sixty-six patients who met the diagnostic criteria, with specimens conducted both RT-PCR and virus culture. The results showed the positive rate of RT-PCR were higher in throat swabs (74.2%), rectum swabs (68.2%) than in CSF (34.9%) and blood (27.7%). The same results also showed in virus culture, which consisted of throat swabs (30.3%), rectum swabs (16.7%), CSF (1.5%) and blood (3.0%).Also the positive rate in RT-PCR were demonstrated superior to virus culture in each paired of specimens. Identification of enterovirus infection with RT-PCR was as high as 92% with four specimens, in which 65% were subtyped as enterovirus 71.
We concluded the sensitivity of RT-PCR is superior to viral culture, which works with a well identification in clinical diagnosis of pan-EV and EV71 infection.
中文摘要 ---------------------------------------------------- 1.
英文摘要 -----------------------------------------------------3.
致謝 -------------------------------------------------------- 5.
關鍵字--------------------------------------------------------6.
目錄 ---------------------------------------------------------7.
圖目錄 ------------------------------------------------------10.
表目錄 ------------------------------------------------------12.
第一章 前言
第一節 研究緣起 -----------------------------------------13.
第二節 研究目的-----------------------------------------14.

第二章 文獻探討
第一節 1998腸病毒71型在台灣的爆發---------------------- 16.
第二節 腸病毒71型病理特徵-------------------------------17.
第三節 腸病毒71型病理機轉-------------------------------17.
第四節 腸病毒 71 型腦炎的分期--------------------------- 18.
第五節 腸病毒 71 型腦炎臨床表現--------------------------19.
第五節 聚合酵素鏈鎖反應----------------------------------20.

第三章 研究架構與研究設計
第一節 研究時間及對象------------------------------------21.
第二節 腦幹腦炎之定義----------------------------------- 21.
第三節 檢體採得----------------------------------------- 21.
第四節 核磁共振----------------------------------------- 22.

第四章 研究材料及研究方法
第一節 病毒培養
4-1-1病毒培養之單層細胞株---------------------------23.
4-1-2病毒培養之單層細胞株---------------------------23.
第二節 反轉錄聚合酵素鏈鎖反應
4-2-1反轉錄聚合酵素鏈鎖反應之檢體處置---------------24.
4-2-2反轉錄聚合酵素鏈鎖反應之原理-------------------24.
4-2-3反轉錄聚合酵素鏈鎖反應之步驟-------------------25.
4-2-4反轉錄聚合酵素鏈鎖反應之引子------------------ 25.
4-2-5 3% agarose gel電泳-------------------------- 26.
4-2-6資料收集及統計方法------------------------------26
4-2-7人體試驗委員會----------------------------------26
第五章 研究結果
第一節 腸病毒71型腦炎臨床特徵
5-1-1基本資料---------------------------------------27
5-1-2 腸病毒71型腦炎臨床徵狀------------------------27
第二節 病毒培養及逆轉錄聚合酵素鏈鎖反應之比較
5-2-1 病毒培養及逆轉錄聚合酵素鏈鎖反應之敏感性--------28.
5-2-2 以病毒培養及逆轉錄聚合酵素鏈鎖反應比較診斷
pan-EV及EV71病毒腸病毒71型之敏感性---------- 28.
5-2-3 以病毒培養及逆轉錄聚合酵素鏈鎖反應比較其時效性- 28.
第三節 影像特徵--------------------------------------------29
第六章 討論
第一節 腸病毒中樞神經系統感染症狀----------------------- 30.
第二節 病毒培養及逆轉錄聚合酵素鏈鎖反應之敏感性比較------32.
第三節 神經學影像--------------------------------------- 33.
第七章 結論------------------------------------------------ 34.
參考文獻----------------------------------------------------- 45
作者簡歷及著作------------------------------------------------51
1.Huang CC, Liu CC, Chang YC, Chen CY, Wang ST, Yeh TF. Neurologic complications in children with enterovirus 71 infection. N Engl J Med 1999; 341:936-42.
2.Chang LY, King CC, Hsu KH, Ning HC, Tsao KC, Li CC, Huang YC, Shih SR, Chiou ST, Chen PY, Chang HJ, Lin TY. Risk factors of enterovirus 71 infection and associated hand, foot, and mouth disease/herpangina in children during an epidemic in Taiwan. Pediatrics 2002; 109:88.
3.Shah VA, Chong CY, Chan KP, Ng W, Ling AE. Clinical characteristics of an outbreak of hand, foot and mouth disease in Singapore. Ann Acad Med Singapore 2003; 32:381-7.
4.趙文崇。腸病毒71型腦脊髓炎神經行為。台灣神經學學會雜誌,2003年13卷增刊第一期;192-7。
5.Lu HK, Lin TY, Hsia SH, Chiu CH, Huang YC, Tsao KC, Chang LY. Prognostic implications of myoclonic jerk in children with enterovirus infection. J Microbiol Immunol Infect 2004 ;37:82-7.
6.Chen CY, Chang YC, Huang CC, Lui CC, Lee KW, Huang SC. Acute flaccid paralysis in infants and young children with enterovirus 71 infection: MR imaging findings and clinical correlates.AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2001 ;22:200-5.
7.Shen WC, Tsai C, Chiu H, Chow K. MRI of Enterovirus 71 myelitis with monoplegia. Neuroradiology 2000 ;42:124-7.
8.Shen WC, Chiu HH, Chow KC, Tsai CH. MR imaging findings of enteroviral encephaloymelitis: an outbreak in Taiwan.AJNR 999 ;20:1889-95.
9.陳震宇。小兒神經放射診斷學。台灣神經學學會雜誌,2003年13卷增刊第一期;322-7。
10.McMinn P, Stratov I, Nagarajan L, Davis S. Neurological manifestations of enterovirus 71 infection in children during an outbreak of hand, foot, and mouth disease in Western Australia.Clin Infect Dis 2001 ;32:236-42 .
11.Chang LY, Lin TY, Hsu KH, Huang YC, Lin KL, Hsueh C, Shih SR, Ning HC, Hwang MS, Wang HS, Lee CY. Clinical features and risk factors of pulmonary oedema after enterovirus-71-related hand, foot, and mouth disease. Lancet 1999;354:1682-6.
12.Kao SJ, Yang FL, Hsu YH, Chen HI. Mechanism of fulminant pulmonary edema caused by enterovirus 71. Clin Infect Dis. 2004 15;38:1784-8. Kao SJ, Yang FL, Hsu YH, Chen HI. Mechanism of fulminant pulmonary edema caused by enterovirus 71.Clin Infect Dis 2004 ;38:1784-8.
13.Fu YC, Chi CS, Chiu YT, Hsu SL, Hwang B, Jan SL, Chen PY, Huang FL, Chang Y. Cardiac complications of enterovirus rhombencephalitis. Arch Dis Child 2004 ;89:368-73.
14.Lin TY, Twu SJ, Ho MS, Chang LY, Lee CY. Enterovirus 71 outbreaks, Taiwan: occurrence and recognition.Emerg Infect Dis 2003 ;9:291-3.
15.Chang LY, Hsia SH, Wu CT, Huang YC, Lin KL, Fang TY, Lin TY. Outcome of enterovirus 71 infections with or without stage-based management: 1998 to 2002. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2004 ;23:327-32.
16.Lin TY, Chang LY, Hsia SH, Huang YC, Chiu CH, Hsueh C, Shih SR, Liu CC, Wu MH. The 1998 enterovirus 71 outbreak in Taiwan: pathogenesis and management.Clin Infect Dis 2002 ;34:S52-7.
17.Nishikii Y, Nakatomi A, Doi T, Oka S, Moriuchi H. Favorable outcome in a case of perinatal enterovirus 71 infection. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2002; 21:886-7.
18.Chang LY, Tsao KC, Hsia SH, Shih SR, Huang CG, Chan WK, Hsu KH, Fang TY, Huang YC, Lin TY. Transmission and clinical features of enterovirus 71 infections in household contacts in Taiwan.
JAMA 2004 ; 291:222-7.
19.Hsia SH, Wu CT, Chang JJ, Lin TY, Chung HT, Lin KL, Hwang MS, Chou ML, Chang LY. Predictors of unfavorable outcomes in enterovirus 71-related cardiopulmonary failure in children. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2005; 24:331-4.
20.Liu CC, Tseng HW, Wang SM, Wang JR, Su IJ. An outbreak of enterovirus 71 infection in Taiwan, 1998: epidemiologic and clinical manifestations. J Clin Virol 2000; 17:23-30.
21.Li CC, Yang MY, Chen RF, Lin TY, Tsao KC, Ning HC, Liu HC, Lin SF, Yeh WT, Chu YT, Yang KD. Clinical manifestations and laboratory assessment in an enterovirus 71 outbreak in southern Taiwan. Scand J Infect Dis 2002; 34:104-9.
22.Templeton NS. The polymerase chain reaction- History, Methods and Applications. Diagnostic Molecular Pathology 1992;1: 58-72.
23.Ramers C, Billman G, Hartin M, Ho S, Sawyer MH. Impact of a diagnostic cerebrospinal fluid enterovirus polymerase chain reaction test on patient management. JAMA 2000 ;283:2680-5.
24.Vuorinen T, Vainionpaa R, Hyypia T.Five years'' experience of reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction in daily diagnosis of enterovirus and rhinovirus infections. Clin Infect Dis 2003 ;37:452-5.
25.Rotbart HA, Ahmed A, Hickey S, Dagan R, McCracken GH Jr, Whitley RJ, Modlin JF, Cascino M, O''Connell JF, Menegus MA, Blum D. Diagnosis of enterovirus infection by polymerase chain reaction of multiple specimen types. Pediatr Infect Dis J 1997 ;16:409-11.
26.Singh S, Chow VT, Phoon MC, Chan KP, Poh CL.Direct detection of enterovirus 71 (EV71) in clinical specimens from a hand, foot, and mouth disease outbreak in Singapore by reverse transcription-PCR with universal enterovirus and EV71-specific primers.J Clin Microbiol 2002 ;40:2823-7.
27.Tan EL, Chow VT, Kumarasinghe G, Lin RT, Mackay IM, Sloots TP, Poh CL.Specific detection of enterovirus 71 directly from clinical specimens using real-time RT-PCR hybridization probe assay.Mol Cell Probes 2006 ;20:135-40.
28.Wang JR, Tuan YC, Tsai HP, Yan JJ, Liu CC, Su IJ. Change of major genotype of enterovirus 71 in outbreaks of hand-foot-and-mouth disease in Taiwan between 1998 and 2000. J Clin Microbiol 2002 ;40:10-5.
29.Yan JJ, Su IJ, Chen PF, Liu CC, Yu CK, Wang JR. Complete genome analysis of enterovirus 71 isolated from an outbreak in Taiwan and rapid identification of enterovirus 71 and coxsackievirus A16 by RT-PCR. J Med Virol 2001 ;65:331-9.
30.Pozzetto B, Gaudin OG, Aouni M, Ros A. Comparative evaluation of immunoglobulin M neutralizing antibody response in acute-phase sera and virus isolation for the routine diagnosis of enterovirus infection.J Clin Microbiol 1989 ;27:705-8.
31.Gilgen M, Germann D, Luthy J, Hubner P. Three-step isolation method for sensitive detection of enterovirus, rotavirus, hepatitis A virus, and small round structured viruses in water samples.Int J Food Microbiol 1997 22;37:189-99.
32.Robinson CC, Willis M, Meagher A, Gieseker KE, Rotbart H, Glode MP. Impact of rapid polymerase chain reaction results on management of pediatric patients with enteroviral meningitis.Pediatr Infect Dis J 2002 ;21:283-6.
33.Furione M, Zavattoni M, Gatti M, Percivalle E, Fioroni N, Gerna G. Rapid detection of enteroviral RNA in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) from patients with aseptic meningitis by reverse transcription-nested polymerase chain reaction.New Microbiol 1998 ;21:343-51.
34.Rotbart HA. Diagnosis of enteroviral meningitis with the polymerase chain reaction.J Pediatr 1990 ;117:85-9.
35.Glimaker M, Johansson B, Olcen P, Ehrnst A, Forsgren M. Detection of enteroviral RNA by polymerase chain reaction in cerebrospinal fluid from patients with aseptic meningitis.Scand J Infect Dis 1993;25:547-57.
36.Schlesinger Y, Sawyer MH, Storch GA. Enteroviral meningitis in infancy: potential role for polymerase chain reaction in patient management.Pediatrics 1994 ;94:157-62.
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
1. [14]翁正強、江銘鴻、陳誠直、林佳宏. “剪力釘對包覆型SRC梁力學行為之影響”, 中國土木水利工程學刊, Vol. 13, Iss. 1, pp. 181-192, 2001.
2. [12]許協隆、李建輝. “腹版開孔之鋼骨鋼筋混凝土梁反覆載重試驗研究”, 中國土木水利工程學刊, Vol. 14, Iss. 4, pp. 581-590, 2002.
3. [32]林聰悟、王承順、秦志中. “鋼骨鋼筋混凝土撓曲強度設計之探討”, 結構工程, Vol. 12, Iss. 1, pp. 13, 1997.
4. [31]陳生金、陳昭榮、朱俊星. “半預鑄鋼骨鋼筋混凝土梁柱接頭研究”, 結構工程, Vol. 17, Iss. 1, pp. 3, 2002.
5. [29]陳正誠、張大鵬、方至楷. “鋼骨鋼筋混凝土短梁之剪力實驗行為”, 中國土木水利工程學刊, Vol. 12 卷 3 期 頁 511, Iss., 2000.
6. [25]翁正強、廖慧明、張荻薇、陳誠直、顏聖益. “鋼骨鋼筋混凝土建築之梁柱構造細則研究”, 土木工程技術, Vol. 2, Iss. 4, pp. 1, 1998.
7. [10]陳正誠、陳建中. “包覆型鋼骨鋼筋混凝土梁之撓曲行特性”, 中國土木水利工程學刊, Vol. 13, Iss. 2, pp. 263-275, 2001.
8. [9]翁正強、江銘鴻、顏聖益. “包覆型SRC梁剪力握裹破壞試驗與力學行為研究”, 中國土木水利工程學刊, Vol. 13, Iss. 3, pp. 555-565, 2001.
9. [24]翁正強、顏聖益、陳誠直、黃明慧. “包覆型鋼骨鋼筋混凝土梁之極限彎矩強度研究”, 中國土木水利工程學刊, Vol. 12, Iss. 3, pp. 521-531, 2000.