跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(18.97.14.91) 您好!臺灣時間:2025/01/16 21:02
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

: 
twitterline
研究生:呂學明
研究生(外文):Hsueh-Ming Lu
論文名稱:應用回收期數法探討品質經濟性研究
論文名稱(外文):A study on economics of quality utilizing payback period
指導教授:邱裕方邱裕方引用關係
指導教授(外文):Yu Fang David Chiu
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:中原大學
系所名稱:工業工程研究所
學門:工程學門
學類:工業工程學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2006
畢業學年度:94
語文別:中文
論文頁數:117
中文關鍵詞:品質投資品質發展品質成本品質經濟性經濟轉折點(EIP)
外文關鍵詞:quality investmenteconomics of qualitycost of qualityeconomic
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:178
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:1
隨著全球化的來臨,企業所面臨的是高度競爭與顧客導向的市場環境,而擁有良好品質一直是企業競爭的關鍵所在。社會大眾對於品質的期待會隨著時間而有所變化,尤其在產品生命週期相當短暫的環境,若能在最短的時間內,以最少的成本有效提昇產品的品質滿足消費者的需求,將更有利於企業在市場上佔有一席之地。近幾年品質發展強調消費者滿意,為符合消費者多元與善變的心理,品質改善的投資必須是持續的。在企業重視投資利益的前提下,為滿足消費者高品質的需求,品質的投資必須更強調經濟效益。
Juran(1951)建構品質成本模型,主要觀點在於預防成本與失敗成本間的替換(trade-off),以總品質成本最低點,建構品質最佳水準。由於過去總品質成本最低點,所能表達的品質經濟效益似乎是略顯不足,近年來,Beruvides 和Chiu進一步以資本預算(capital budgeting)的概念,提出品質經濟概念模型”經濟轉折點(Economic Inflection Point, EIP)”, 找尋品質投資的最佳經濟效益時間點。本研究以經濟轉折點模型為基礎概念,利用不同的評估方式,重新詮釋經濟轉折點模型,期望提供決策者更多的資訊。
In this modern age of economic globalization, businesses throughout the world are faced with unprecedented competition in the consumer-driven market. The key to success against such fierce competition is the maintenance of the highest possible quality. The mass’s expectation to the quality will change through the time. Thus, if a
business can drastically improve the quality of its product in the shortest time while spending the cost as little as possible, this would offer a distinct competitive advantage for this business in the marketplace. In recent years, to maintain this advantage, it is necessary for businesses to continually improve the quality of its product or service in order to meet the ever-changing and demanding expectations of the consumers. Under the premise of the investment benefits, the business must emphasize the economic effect of the quality investment to appease the consumers’ high quality need.
Juran(1951)had described the model of quality cost, of which the main concept is that there is a trade-off of the prevention cost and the failure cost. In essence, the best quality level should be attained while taking into the account the two costs in order to maintain the lowest level of total quality cost. However, it recently became evident that the lowest point of the total quality cost does not translate well into the economic benefit. Thus, Beruvides and Chiu have tried to use the concept of capital
budgeting to advance Economic Inflection Point of the quality economics model, in order to find the best economic effect timing in quality investment. This research is based on the basic concept of the Economic Inflection Point model, and use different evaluation ways to re-examine the Economic Inflection Point model, we also expect that this research can provide information to the senior management in decision
making.
目錄
摘要..........................................................................i
ABSTRACT.....................................................................ii
誌謝....................................................................... iii
目錄.........................................................................iv
圖目錄........................................................................v
表目錄......................................................................vii
第一章 序論...................................................................1
1.1 研究背景與動機............................................................1
1.2 研究問題..................................................................3
1.3 研究目的..................................................................3
1.4 論文架構..................................................................4
1.4 研究貢獻..................................................................7
第二章 文獻探討...............................................................8
2.1 品質定義..................................................................8
2.2 品質發展.................................................................15
2.3 品質系統與成本...........................................................26
2.4 品質經濟效益.............................................................42
2.5 總結.....................................................................50
第三章 研究方法..............................................................51
3.1 研究設計.................................................................51
3.2 研究假設與限制...........................................................52
3.3 模型建構.................................................................55
3.4 案例說明.................................................................57
3.5 統計假設(statistical hypothesis).........................................59
3.6 資料產生與蒐集...........................................................61
第四章 模型驗證..............................................................66
4.1 模擬結果.................................................................66
4.2 資料分析.................................................................75
4.3 敏感度分析...............................................................83
4.4 總結.....................................................................96
第五章 結論..................................................................98
5.1 研究結論.................................................................98
5.2 結果評核.................................................................99
5.3 未來發展................................................................100
參考文獻....................................................................101
作者簡介....................................................................110

圖目錄
圖 1-1 研究流程與論文架構.....................................................6
圖 2-1 Mitra 的三項品質觀點..................................................10
圖 2-2 品質在生產分配系統的角色..............................................13
圖 2-3 狩野紀昭的品質內部構造................................................14
圖 2-4 品質建立七大階段......................................................23
圖 2-5 六標準差與QC Story 問題解決程序.......................................24
圖 2-6 品質涵蓋的部門........................................................27
圖 2-7 ISO 9000:2000 持續改善品質管理系統...................................30
圖 2-8 品質系統架構運作模式..................................................31
圖 2-9 Juran 品質模型........................................................33
圖 2-10 品質成本歸類決策圖...................................................35
圖 2-11 Lundvall 的品質成本模型..............................................36
圖 2-12 品質系統成本趨勢.....................................................38
圖 2-13 Juran 品質成本修正模型...............................................39
圖 2-14 長時間觀測下品質水準的發展...........................................40
圖 2-15 六標準差成本模式.....................................................40
圖 2-16 BS 6143 標準之品質成本...............................................41
圖 2-17 品質改善效益.........................................................43
圖 2-18 Juran 品質設計的經濟模型.............................................47
圖 2-19 二階損失函數與傳統損失函數比較.......................................48
圖 2-20 品質經濟最適點.......................................................48
圖 2-21 品質經濟性模型.......................................................49
圖 3-1 品質投資與利潤模型假設................................................53
圖 3-2 品質投資方案的投資型態................................................61
圖 3-3 案例A 品質成本型態....................................................63
圖 3-4 案例B 品質成本型態....................................................63
圖 3-5 案例A 模擬的資料分配..................................................64
圖 3-6 案例B 模擬的資料分配..................................................65
圖 4-1 案例A - JP 模擬結果直方圖.............................................67
圖 4-2 案例A - IRR EIP 模擬結果直方圖........................................68
圖 4-3 案例A - PB EIP 模擬結果直方圖.........................................69
圖 4-4 案例A - JP、IRR EIP 與PB EIP 重疊圖...................................70
圖 4-5 案例A- IRR EIP 、PB EIP 與JP 趨勢圖...................................70
圖 4-6 案例B - JP 模擬結果直方圖.............................................71
圖 4-7 案例B - IRR EIP 模擬結果直方圖........................................72
圖 4-8 案例B - PB EIP 模擬結果直方圖.........................................73
圖 4-9 案例B - JP、IRR EIP 與PB EIP 重疊圖...................................74
圖 4-10 案例B - IRR EIP 、PB EIP 與JP 的趨勢圖...............................74
圖 4-11 案例A - PB EIP 與JP 成對差異直方圖...................................76
圖 4-12 案例A - PB EIP 與IRR EIP 成對差異直方圖..............................78
圖 4-13 案例B - PB EIP 與JP 成對差異直方圖...................................80
圖 4-14 案例B - PB EIP 與IRR EIP 成對差異直方圖..............................81
圖 4-15 案例A— PB EIP 與回收期數、失敗成本曲線斜率曲面圖....................87
圖 4-16 案例A— PB EIP 與回收期數、失敗成本曲線斜率等高線圖..................87
圖 4-17 案例A— PB EIP 與投資成本、失敗成本曲線斜率曲面圖....................88
圖 4-18 案例A— PB EIP 與回收期數、失敗成本曲線斜率等高線圖..................88
圖 4-19 案例A— PB EIP 與回收期數、投資成本曲線斜率曲面圖....................89
圖 4-20 案例A— PB EIP 與回收期數、投資成本曲線斜率等高線圖..................89
圖 4-21 案例B— PB EIP 與回收期數、失敗成本曲線斜率曲面圖....................93
圖 4-22 案例B— PB EIP 與回收期數、失敗成本曲線斜率等高線圖..................93
圖 4-23 案例B— PB EIP 與投資成本、失敗成本曲線斜率曲面圖....................94
圖 4-24 案例B— PB EIP 與回收期數、失敗成本曲線斜率等高線圖..................94
圖 4-25 案例B— PB EIP 與回收期數、投資成本曲線斜率曲面圖....................95
圖 4-26 案例B— PB EIP 與回收期數、投資成本曲線斜率等高線圖..................95

表目錄
表 2-1 生產者與消費者的品質觀點..............................................11
表 2-2 Garvin 品質定義分類彙整...............................................12
表 2-3 品質的定義............................................................15
表 2-4 品質的發展與紀事......................................................16
表 2-5 品質時代的演進........................................................18
表 2-6 品質年代與內涵........................................................21
表 2-7 持續改善與傳統企業之比較..............................................22
表 2-8 TQM 與6σ 比較.........................................................24
表 2-9 品質成本的定義與分類..................................................34
表 2-10 影響品質成本的正負因子...............................................35
表 2-11 英國百大企業資本預算評估方式.........................................45
表 2-12 各國資本投資評估方法的使用頻率.......................................46
表 3-1 IRR EIP 、PB EIP 模型的差異...........................................56
表 3-2 案例說明品質成本資料..................................................58
表 3-3 案例說明之結餘與回收期數..............................................58
表 3-4 JP、IRR EIP 與PB EIP 定義.............................................60
表 3-5 案例A 各期投資成本與失敗成本資料......................................62
表 3-6 案例 B 各期投資成本與失敗成本資料.....................................63
表 3-7 模擬結果示意表........................................................65
表 4-1 案例A - JP 模擬結果統計特徵量.........................................67
表 4-2 案例A - IRR EIP 模擬結果統計特徵量....................................68
表 4-3 案例A - PB EIP 模擬結果統計特徵量.....................................69
表 4-4 案例A- IRR EIP 、PB EIP 與JP 90%信賴區間..............................70
表 4-5 案例B - JP 模擬結果統計特徵量.........................................71
表 4-6 案例B - IRR EIP 模擬結果統計特徵量....................................72
表 4-7 案例B - PB EIP 模擬結果統計特徵量.....................................73
表 4-8 案例B - IRR EIP 、PB EIP 與JP 的90%信賴區間...........................75
表 4-9 各參考點模擬結果比較表................................................75
表 4-10 案例A - PB EIP 與JP 成對t 檢定結果報表...............................77
表 4-11 案例A - PB EIP 與IRR EIP 成對t 檢定結果報表..........................78
表 4-12 案例B - PB EIP 與JP 成對t 檢定結果報表...............................80
表 4-13 案例B - PB EIP 與IRR EIP 成對t 檢定結果報表..........................82
表 4-14 假設檢定彙整表.......................................................83
表 4-15 敏感度分析的參數與水準...............................................84
表 4-16 案例A 敏感度分析之投資成本資料.......................................85
表 4-17 案例A 敏感度分析之失敗成本資料.......................................85
表 4-18 案例A— PB EIP 在各參數水準的結果....................................86
表 4-19 案例B 敏感度分析之投資成本資料.......................................90
表 4-20 案例B 敏感度分析之失敗成本資料.......................................91
表 4-21 案例B— PB EIP 在各參數水準的結果....................................92
表 4-22 敏感度分析彙整表.....................................................96
一、中文參考
中國生產力中心 譯,田口玄一 著(1999),「品質評價的SN 比」,台北:中國生產力中心出版。
林公孚(2003),「朱蘭談六標準差」,品質月刊,第39 卷4 期,第76-77 頁。
林公孚(2006),「品質新年代、新思維」,品質月刊,第42 卷1 期,第13-17頁。
林建基(2003),「從品質成本談Six Sigma」,品質月刊,第39 卷8 期,第70-72 頁。
亞士力國際認證 譯、Lane, B. 著(1996),「ISO 9000 實務與認證指引」,台北:三民書局。
周良全、邱裕方(2005),「品質成本案例分析—印刷電路板產業之個案研究」,中國工業工程學會九十四年度年會暨學術研討,CIIE-009。
周佳樺(2000),「品質、生產力與獲利能力關聯性之研究─以高科技產業為例」,國立台灣大學會計研究所碩士論文。
狩野紀昭、陳麗妃(2003),「六標準差獨到之處與TQM 的比較」,品質月刊,第39 卷11 期,第67-75 頁。
高福成(2003),「TQM 與Six sigma 世紀之爭」,品質月刊,第39 卷12 期,第56-58頁。
夏荷立 譯、勞勃•史雷特 著(2003),「29 個關鍵領導智慧」,台灣:美商麥格羅•西爾。
張紹勳(2000),「研究方法」,台中市:滄海。
張瑞當、曾玉琪、沈天河(1998),「資本預算之規劃與決策研究:以振昌公司汽電共生設備投資案之評估決策為例」, 中華管理評論, 1(2) ,http://cmr.ba.ouhk.edu.hk/cmr/oldweb/n2/981011.html。
黃永東(2006),「六標準差管理應用至ISO 9000:2000 之探討」,品質月刊,第102
42 卷2 期,第21-24 頁。
傅和彥、黃士滔 (2001),「品質管理」,台北:前程企業管理有限公司。
楊錦洲(2002),「特別報導:品質發展更上層樓,從摩扥羅拉6σ 到奇異6σ」,縱效雜誌,第156 期,第20-26 頁。
楊錦洲(2003),「GE-6σ 可強化TQM 之功能」,品質月刊,第39 卷4 期,第71-75 頁。
楊錦瑤(2002),「Six Sigma 實戰觀念植入篇」,品質月刊,第38 卷7 期,第46-48頁。
詹昭雄(2002),「從TQM 轉換至6σ 之要點」,品質月刊,第38 卷2 期,第86-88頁。
經濟部中小企業處委託管理科學學會編撰(1989),「中小企業品質管理手冊」,初版,台北:經濟部中小企業處。
廖仁傑(2003),「由ISO 9000 到AS 9100-談航太業品質系統」,品質月刊,第39 卷7 期,第64-67 頁。
蔡耀宗(2006),「品質經營的新思維」,品質月刊,第42 卷2 期,第50-52 頁。
蔡耀宗(2006),「品質的進化-邁向永續成長的路」,品質月刊,第42 卷3 期,第75-78 頁。
鄭春生(1999),品質管理,2 版,台北:育友圖書。
鄭榮郎(2003),「從伊索寓言學習品質系統」,品質月刊,第39 卷4 期第56-58頁。
鄭榮郎(2003),「六標準差最近流行的趨勢-重新思考 回歸原點」,品質月刊,第39 卷9 期,第61-63 頁。
劉漢容(1995),「品質管制」,二版,台南:勝凱企業管理顧問股份有限公司。
潘浙楠、李文瑞 (2003),「品質管理」,台北:華泰文化事業股份有限公司。
適仲(2003),「品質系統的偏見」,品質月刊,第39 卷4 期,第67-70 頁。
樂為良 譯、潘迪等 著(2002),「六標準差團隊實戰指南」,台北:麥格羅希爾。
賴宏典(2000),「中小企業品質系統導入模式、步驟之研究(以認證觀點探討之) 」,私立朝陽科技大學工業工程與管理碩士論文。
盧興猷(2003),「優質管理系統ISO 9000:2000」,香港:三聯書店。
謝安田(1979),「企業研究方法」,台北:水牛出版社。
戴久永 (2000),「品質管理」,二版,台北:三民書局。
鍾朝嵩 譯、石川馨 著(1988),「日本式品質管制」,桃園:先鋒企業管理發展公司。
鐘朝嵩(1995),「品質管理」,桃園:和昌出版社。
鍾漢清(1996),「品質成本管理」,初版,台北:中華民國品質學會。

二、西文參考文獻
Abbott, L. (1955). Quality and competition. New York: Columbia University Press.
American Society for Quality Control (1971). Quality costs-What an How(2ed). Milwaukee:ASQC.
Angel, L. C. & Chandra, M. J. (2001). Performance implications of investment in continuous quality improvement. International Journal of Operations &
Production Management, 21(1/2), 108-126.
Anonymous (2004). Can quality be free? Quality, 42, 52-53.
Anthes, G. H. (2003) Payback period. Computerworld, 37(7), 28-29.
Atkinson, H., Hamburg, J. & Ittner, C. (1994). Linking quality to profits:
Quality-based cost management. Milwaukee: Quality Press.
Babbie, E. R. (2004). The basics of social research(3ed.). Hartford: Wadsworth.
Bauer, A., Reiner, G. & Schamschule, R. (2000). Organizational and quality systems development: an analysis via a dynamic simulation model. Total Quality
Management, 11(4-6), 410-416.
Beheiry, M. F. (1991). New thoughts on an old concept: The cost of quality. CMA, 65(5), 24-25.
Bennyan, J. C. (1992). Examine costs of system quality via perfect process analysis. Industrial Management, 34(3), 13-16.
Bisgaard, S. & Freiesleben, J. (2004). Six sigma and the bottom line. Quality Progress, 37(9), 57-62.
Boardman, C. M., Reinhart, W. J. & Celec, S. (1982). The role of the payback period in the theory and application of duration to capital budgeting. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 9(4), 511-522.
Bottorff, D. L. (1997). COQ systems: The right stuff. Quality Progress, 30(3), 33-35.
British Standard BS6143 Part 2 (1990). Prevention appraisal and failure mode.
London: BSI.
Broh, R. A. (1982). Managing quality for higher profit. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Campanella, J. ( 1999). Principle of quality costs – Principles, Implementation, and Use. 53th ASQC annual quality congress, 507-508.
Carr, L. & Tyson, T. (1992). Planning quality cost expenditures. Management
Accounting, 74(4), 52-56.
Chaneski, W. S. (2003). Continuous improvement in practice. Modern Machine Show, 76(3), 50~51.
Chen, J. M. & Tsou, J. C. (2003). An optimal design for process quality improvement: modeling and application. Production Planning & Control, 14(7), 603-612.
Chiu, Y. D. (2002). A study on the economics of quality in a technology management environment. Dissertation in Industrial Engineering, Texas Tech University.
Chowdhury, S.(2001). The power of Six Sigma. Chicago: Dearborn Trade.
Crosby, P. B. (1979). Quality is free. New York: McGrew-Hill.
Dale, B. G. & Plunkett, J. J. (1999). Quality Costing(3ed.). New York: Chapman & Hall.
Dalgleish, S. (2003). My ideal quality system. Quality, 42(7), 14.
Desatnick, R. L.(2001). Does QS 9000 really protect the customer? The Journal for Quality & Participation, 24(1), 46~48.
Deming, W. E. (1982). Quality, Productivity, and Competitive Position. MIT Center for Advanced Engineering, Cambridge, Massachusetts: Cambridge.
Devany, A. S. & Saving, T. R. (1983). The economics of quality. Journal of Political Economy, 91(6), 979-1000.
Donaldson, D. P. (2003). Six sigma: A false god? Quality Progress, 36(1), 6.
Duffin, M. (1993). The cost of indifference. The TQM Magazine, 5, 7-9.
Edwards, C. D. (1968). The meaning of quality. Quality Progress, 1(10), 36-37.
Elimam, A. A. & Dodin, B. M. (2001). Incentives and yield management in
improvement productivity of manufacturing facilities. IIE Transactions, 33(6),
449-462.
Evans, J. R. & Lindsay, W. M. (2002). The management and control of quality(5ed). Cincinnati, Ohio: South-Western.
Feigenbaum, A.V. (1983). Total Quality Control(3ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Folaron, J. & Morgan, J. P. (2003). The evolution of Six Sigma. ASQ Six Sigma
Forum Magazine, 2(4), 38-44.
Freiesleben, J. (2004). On the limited value of cost of quality models. Total Quality Management, 15(7), 959-969.
Freiesleben, J. (2004). Quality problems and their real costs. Quality Progress, 37(12), 49-55.
Gabor, A. (1992). How W. Edwards Deming brought the quality revolution to
America-The stories of Ford, Xerox, and GM. New York: Penguin Books.
Garvin, D. A. (1984). What does “Product Quality” really mean? Sloan Management Review, 26(1), 25-43.
Garvin, D. A. (1988). Management quality. New York: Macmillan.
Gilmore, H. L. (1974). Product conformance cost. Quality Progress, 7(6), 16-19.
Gordon, D. K. (2002). Quality management system vs. quality improvement. Quality Progress, 35(11), 86-88.
Halis, M. & Oztas, A. (2002). Quality cost analysis in ISO-9000-certified Turkish companies. Managerial Auditing Journal, 17(1/2), 101-104.
Hammer, M. & Goding, J. (2001). Putting six sigma in perspective. Quality, 40(10), 58-62.
Hartman, A. & Legrand, C. (2003). Peak: Performance. Optimize, 2(9), 24-32.
Horngren, C. T., Foster, G. & Datar, S. M.(2000). Cost accounting. New Jersey:
Prentice-Hall.
Hurburgh, C. R. & Lawrence, J. D. (2003). The need for QMS. Resource, 10(9), 29.
Isaksson, R. & Garvare, R. (2003). Measuring sustainable development using process models. Managerial Auditing Journal, 18(8), 649-656.
Juran J. M. (1951). Quality control handbook. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Juran, J. & Gryna, F. (1980). Quality planning and analysis. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Juran, J. M. (1992). Juran on quality design. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Kim, M.W. & Liao, W.M. (1994). Estimating hidden quality costs with quality loss function. Accounting horizons, 8(1), 8-19.
Krishnamoorthi, K. S. (1989). Predict quality cost changes using regression. Quality Progress, 22(12), 52-55.
Krishnan, S. K., Agus, A. & Husain, N. (2000). Cost of quality: the hidden cost. Total Quality Management, 11(4/5&6), 844-848.
Kubiak, T. M. (2005). Feigenbaum in quality: past, present, future. Quality Progress, 38(11), 57-62.
Kume, H. (1985). Business management and quality cost: The Japanese view. Quality Progress, 18(5), 13-18.
Lesser, W. H. (1954). Cost of quality. Industrial Quality Ccontrol, 11-14.
Love, C. E., Guo, R. & Irwin, K. (1995). Acceptable Quality level versus zero-defects: Some empirical evidence. Computer Ops Res., 22(4),403-417.
Love, P. E. D. & Irani, Z. (2003). A project management quality cost information system for the construction Industry. Information & Management, 40, 649-641.
Mcadam, R. & Mckeown, M. (1999). An analysis of the impact of ISO 9000 and total quality management on small businesses in Northern Ireland. Total Quality
Management, 10(2), 229-241.
Miller, J. R. & Morris, J. S. (2000). Is quality free or profitable?. Quality Progress, 33(1), 50-53.
Mitra, A. (1993). Fundamentals of quality control and improvement. New York:
Macmillan.
Montgomery, D. C. (2001). Introduction to statistical quality control(4ed.). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Morino, D. N. (1990). Economics of quality: choosing among prevention alternative.
International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 7(3), 13-26.
Munro, R. A. (2000). Linking six sigma with QS-9000. Quality Progress, 33(5),
47-53.
Pall, G. A. (1987). Quality Process Management. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
Pande, P. S., Neuman , R. P. & Cavanagh, R. R.( 2000), The Six Sigma way: How GE, Motorola, and other top companies are honing their performance. New York:
McGraw-Hill.
Pfeifer, T., Ressiger, W. & Canales, C. (2004). Integrating six sigma with quality management systems. The TQM Magazine, 16(4), 241-249.
Pike, R. H.(1988). The capital budgeting revolution. Management Accounting, 66(9),28-30.
Pirsig, R. M. (1974). Zen and the art of motorcycle maintenance. New York: Bantam Books.
Porter, M.E. (1985). Technology and competitive advantage. Journal of Business
strategy, 5, 60-78.
Pursglove, A. B. & Dale, B. G. (1995). Developing quality costing system: Key
features and outcomes. Omega, 23(5), 567-575.
Samuel, K. M. H.(1994). Is the ISO 9000 series for total quality management?
International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 11(9), 74-89.
Sandoval-Chavez, D. A. & Beruvides, M. G.. (1997). A state-of-the-art-matrix of the costs related to quality. Proceeding of the Sixth International conference on Management of Technology, 1253-1260.
Schneiderman, A. M. (1986). Optimal quality costs and zero defects: Are they
contradictory concepts? Quality Progress, 19 (12), 28-31.
Sjoblom, L. M. (1998). Financial information and quality management: Is there a role for accountants? Accounting Horizons, 12(4), 363-373.
Slater, R.(1999). The GE way fieldbook. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Sower, V. E., Quarles, R. & Cooper, S. (2002). Cost of quality distributeon and
quality system maturity: An exploratory study. 56th ASQC annual quality congress, 343-354.
Sullivan, L. P. (1986). The seven stages in company wide quality control. Quality Progress, 19(5), 77-83.
Summers, D. C. S. (2003). Quality(3ed.). New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
Superville, C. R. & Gupta, S. (2001). Issues in modeling, monitoring and managing quality costs. The TQM Magazine, 13(6), 419-423.
Superville, C. S., Jones, S. F. & Boyd, J. L. (2003). Quality costing: Modeling
suggestions for managers. International Journal of Management, 20(3), 346-352.
Taguchi, G., Elsayed, E. & Hsiang, T. (1989). Quality Engineering in Production system. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Thurston, D. L., Alvarado, J., Mangun, D. & Hoffman, W. F. (2000). Cost, quality, and environmental tradeoffs for printed circuit board assembly. The Engineering Economist, 45(3), 206-231.
Tkaczyk, S. & Jagla, J. (2001). The economic aspects of the implementation of a
quality system process in Polish enterprises. Journal of Materials Technology,
109(1-2), 196-205.
Weiler, C. (2004). What do CEOs think about quality? Quality Progress, 37(5),
52-56.
Yang, M. B. (2004). A new quality cost model and the optimum quality level.
Pan-Pacific Management Review, 7(2),161-181.
Zairi, M. (2002). Six Sigma: Another irritation or a blessed addition for better management? The TQM Magazine, 14(5), 273-274.
Zhng, Z. (2000). Developing a model for quality management methods and evaluating their effects on business performance. Total quality management, 11(1), 129~137.

三、網路參考資料
ASQ:http://www.asq.org
ISO:http://www.iso.org/iso/en/ISOOnline.frontpage.
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
1. 須文蔚,民國八十五年,〈報導文學在臺灣,1949-1994〉,《新聞學研究》。第五十一期。
2. 黃永東(2006),「六標準差管理應用至ISO 9000:2000 之探討」,品質月刊,第102
3. 狩野紀昭、陳麗妃(2003),「六標準差獨到之處與TQM 的比較」,品質月刊,第39 卷11 期,第67-75 頁。
4. 熊秉元,民國九十二年七月,〈正義和效率──法學和經濟學的對話〉,法令月刊,第五十四卷,第七期。
5. 楊錦瑤(2002),「Six Sigma 實戰觀念植入篇」,品質月刊,第38 卷7 期,第46-48頁。
6. 楊錦洲(2003),「GE-6σ 可強化TQM 之功能」,品質月刊,第39 卷4 期,第71-75 頁。
7. 熊秉元,民國九十二年六月,〈豈只是明察秋毫而已──法學裡的因果關係〉,法令月刊,第五十四卷,第六期。
8. 黃維幸,民國九十四年七月,〈刀揮戈登結:人權與憲改〉,法令月刊,第五十六卷,第七期。
9. 翁岳生,民國九十一年二月六日,〈司法正義新作為(下)〉,司法周刊,第一O六九期,第二版。
10. 吳景芳,民國九十三年七月,〈台灣的刑事審前程序之改造〉,法令月刊,第五十五卷,第七期。
11. 林永謀,民國七十八年三月,〈審級制度與刑事之上訴〉,法令月刊,第四十卷第三期。
12. 林錦芳,民國八十九年五月三日,〈從清理遲延案件之經驗,談提昇第一審審判品質之道〉,司法周刊,第九七八期,第二版。
13. 詹昭雄(2002),「從TQM 轉換至6σ 之要點」,品質月刊,第38 卷2 期,第86-88頁。
14. 廖仁傑(2003),「由ISO 9000 到AS 9100-談航太業品質系統」,品質月刊,第39 卷7 期,第64-67 頁。
15. 蔡耀宗(2006),「品質經營的新思維」,品質月刊,第42 卷2 期,第50-52 頁。