跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(44.200.122.214) 您好!臺灣時間:2024/10/13 00:01
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

: 
twitterline
研究生:柯明中
研究生(外文):Ming-Chung Ko
論文名稱:住院病人留置尿管盛行率及導尿管相關尿路感染之菌種與抗藥性分析
論文名稱(外文):Prevalence of indwelling urinary catheter among hospitalized patientsand analysis of uropathogens and pattern of antimicrobial resistance associated with the use of urinary catheter
指導教授:李中一李中一引用關係
指導教授(外文):Chung-Yi Li
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:輔仁大學
系所名稱:公共衛生學系碩士班
學門:醫藥衛生學門
學類:公共衛生學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2006
畢業學年度:94
語文別:中文
論文頁數:77
中文關鍵詞:留置尿管尿路感染菌種抗藥性
外文關鍵詞:urinary catheteruropathogenantimicrobialresistance
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:2
  • 點閱點閱:687
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:146
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:2
住院病人留置尿管盛行率及導尿管相關尿路感染之菌種與抗藥性分析

背景與目的:
留置尿管常用來處理尿貯留與尿失禁,然而有其相關風險與併發症;本研究將探討留置尿管在台灣住院病人間使用的盛行率,及導尿管相關尿路感染的細菌菌種與抗藥性情況,藉此提供病人照顧與治療的參考。
材料與方法:
利用2003年「全民健康保險學術研究資料庫」之「住院醫療費用清單明細系統抽樣檔」及其相對應之住院醫令資料,以及「醫事機構基本資料檔」的資料,本研究估計留置尿管在全體住院病人、不同醫療科別、不同地區、不同醫院層級、年齡層與性別間的盛行率。至於導尿管相關尿路感染的菌種與抗藥性分析,則是擷取某區域醫院2004年所有的尿液培養結果,以比較留置尿管是否會在細菌菌種分佈與抗藥性程度上造成明顯差異。
結果:
2003年住院病人執行留置尿管之總體盛行率為14.1%,在不同醫療科別:內科、外科、骨科及婦產科的盛行率分別是11.1% 、13.4% 、18.2%及35.5%。內科病人留置尿管的盛行率在醫學中心、區域醫院與地區醫院分別是11.2%、10.4%和11.9%;依地域來看,台灣北區、中區、南區及東區分別是10.3%、11.2%、12.2%及8.5%;從性別及年齡的分層來看,50-59、60-69、70-79及80-89歲男性,盛行率分別是7.5%、11.6%、15.8%及21.1%,而女性在相對年齡層則分別為7.0%、10.4%、18.2%及24.0%。
在菌種分析部分,無留置尿管者以大腸桿菌(Escherichia coli)最常見,其次為非大腸桿菌的腸內桿菌屬(non-E. coli Enterobacteriaceae)、綠膿桿菌(Pseudomonas spp.)和腸球菌(Enterococci spp.),各佔36.8%、19.2%、8.6%和7.3%;有留置尿管者也是大腸桿菌最常見,但比例較低為23.4%,其次為非大腸桿菌的腸內桿菌屬佔20.5%,綠膿桿菌雖也是第三位,但比例較高為16.4%,而一些抗藥性強的罕見革蘭氏陰性桿菌(Rare Gram negative bacilli)比例上升排第四位,佔5.8%。
在細菌抗藥性分析部分,大腸桿菌對於常用的磺胺類藥物(sulfamethoxazole + trimethoprim,SXT)有很高的抗藥性(32.3%-73.5%),相對於無留置尿管,有留置尿管者更具抗藥風險。大腸桿菌對於其他常用抗生素,以cefazoline(CZ)、amoxicillin+clavulanic acid(AMC)、ciprofloxacin(CIP)及gentamicin(GM)的抗藥比例較高,而amikacin(AN)、ceftazidime(CAZ)及imipenem(IPM)的抗藥比例較低;除了IPM外,幾乎都可發現留置尿管顯著增加抗藥性。
非大腸桿菌的腸內桿菌屬對於SXT也有很高的抗藥性,相對於無留置尿管者,有留置尿管者也有較高的抗藥性,此外,非大腸桿菌的腸內桿菌屬對於CZ與AMC的抗藥比例也很高,對IMP的抗藥性最低,留置尿管也會增加抗藥風險。
綠膿桿菌對AMC抗藥比例很高, AN、CAZ及IPM則有較低的抗藥性;至於留置尿管對於抗藥性的影響並不明顯。
其他罕見革蘭氏陰性桿菌對抗生素的抗藥比例都很高,只有對IPM有較低的抗藥性;留置尿管對於抗藥性的影響並不明顯。
在共同抗藥性的探討部分,包括大腸桿菌在內的腸內桿菌屬若對SXT抗藥時,也容易對CZ、AMC、CIP及GM產生共同抗藥性,這種情形在有留置尿管者更為明顯。
結論
2003年台灣住院病人留置尿管之盛行率為14.1%,其中內科系執行盛行率為11.1%。留置尿管增加綠膿桿菌與其他罕見革蘭氏陰性桿菌等抗藥性強的菌種引起尿路感染的比例,也會增加一般細菌與腸內桿菌屬之抗藥性,造成治療上的困難;使用留置尿管前應審慎考量其必要性。

關鍵詞:留置尿管、尿路感染、菌種、抗藥性
Prevalence of indwelling urinary catheter among hospitalized patients
and analysis of uropathogens and pattern of antimicrobial resistance associated with the use of urinary catheter

Purpose:
Indwelling urinary catheter has been frequently used to manage urinary retention or incontinence despite it might cause certain complications. In this study, we evaluated the prevalence of indwelling urine catheter among hospitalized patients in Taiwan. We also analyzed uropathogens and pattern of antimicrobial resistance associated with urinary catheter utilization. Information from this analysis can be used as reference in future care and treatment of patients.
Materials and Methods:
Using the files of inpatient expenditures by admissions, details of inpatient orders and registry for contracted medical facilities from the National Health Insurance Research Database, we estimated the overall and stratum specific prevalence of indwelling urinary catheter among hospitalized patients according to admitted department, geographic area and accreditation level of hospitals, age and gender of patients in 2003. The distribution of uropathogens and pattern of antimicrobial resistance were analyzed with the reports of all urine cultures from the laboratory of a regional hospital in 2004. Comparison was made to examine whether the use of urinary catheter may be associated with different uropathogens and pattern of antimicrobial resistance.
Results:
The overall prevalence of indwelling urinary catheter among all hospitalized patients was 14.1% in 2003. The prevalence among patients admitted to the department of internal medicine, surgery, orthopedic and gynecology and obstetric was estimated at 11.1%, 13.4%, 18.2% and 35.5% respectively. The prevalence among patients admitted to the department of internal medicine was 11.2% in medical centers, 10.4% in regional hospitals, and 11.9% in local hospitals. Geographic variation showed that the prevalence in northern, middle, southern and eastern part of Taiwan was 10.3%, 11.2%, 12.2% and 8.5% respectively. According to age and gender, the prevalence for male patients aged 50-59, 60-69, 70-79 and 80-89 years was estimated at 7.5%、11.6%、15.8% and 21.1%, respectively. The corresponding figures for female were 7.0%, 10.4%, 18.2% and 24.0%.
Analysis of uropathogens showed that Escherichia coli (36.8%) was the most common pathogen causing urinary tract infections of patients without indwelling urinary catheter, followed by non-E. coli Enterobacteriaceae (19.2%), Pseudomonas spp. (8.6%), and Enterococcus spp. (7.3%). Of the patients with indwelling urinary catheter, Escherichia coli (23.4%) was still the most common uropathogen, followed by non-E. coli Enterobacteriaceae (20.5%), Pseudomonas spp. (16.4%), and rare Gram negative bacilli (5.8%).
The resistance rates of Escherichia coli against sulfamethoxazole + trimethoprim (SXT) were high, ranging from 32.3% to 73.5%. Indwelling urinary catheter further increased the risk of resistance. With regarding to the resistance of Escherichia coli to other commonly prescribed antimicrobials, the resistance rates were higher against cefazoline(CZ), amoxicillin+clavulanic acid (AMC), ciprofloxacin (CIP) and gentamicin (GM); but relatively low against amikacin (AN), ceftazidime (CAZ) and imipenem (IPM). Indwelling urinary catheter may also increase the risk of resistance against nearly all antibiotics except IPM.
The resistance rate for non-E.coli Enterobacteriaceae against SXT was also high, especially among the patients with indwelling urinary catheter. Additionally, the resistance rates were also high against CZ and AMC, but low against IMP. Again, indwelling urinary catheter was also observed to increase risk of resistance. Pseudomonas spp. was observed to be highly resistant against AMC and was less likely to be resistant against AN, CAZ and IPM. However, indwelling urinary catheter did not seem to be able to increase the risk of resistance of Pseudomonas spp. The resistance rates were generally high for rare Gram negative bacilli against all tested antimicrobials except IPM. Moreover, indwelling urinary catheter did not increase much of the risk of resistance of Pseudomonas spp. and rare Gram negative bacilli.
With regard to concurrent resistance, it showed that concurrent resistance of SXT with CZ, AMC, CIP and GM, respectively was all significant for the Enterobacteriaceae including Escherichia coli. Concurrent resistance was particularly evident among patients with indwelling urinary catheter.
Conclusions:
In 2003, the prevalence of indwelling urinary catheter among all hospitalized patients and patients admitted to the department of internal medicine in Taiwan was 14.1% and 11.1% respectively. Indwelling urinary catheter not only increased the urinary tract infections caused by intrinsically more resistant pathogens such as Pseudomonas spp. and rare Gram negative bacilli, but also increased the risk of antimicrobial resistance of Enterobacteriaceae. This may lead to difficulty in treating patients. We recommended caution be exercised before using indwelling urinary catheter.

Keywords: urinary catheter, uropathogen, antimicrobial, resistance
論文摘要……………………………………………………………………1
第一章:研究背景與目的…………………………………………………7
第二章 文獻回顧…………………………………………………………..9
第一節 留置尿管的使用現況及相關問題………………………………….......…...9
第二節 尿路感染之菌種及其抗藥性……………………………………………….11
一、尿液感染的細菌及其抗藥性………………………………………………...11
二、細菌對抗生素的共同抗藥性………………………………………………...14
第三節 置尿管相關尿路感染之細菌抗藥性……………………………………….15
第三章 材料與方法…………………………………………………….....17
第一節:留置導尿盛行率分析………………………………………………………17
一、 研究設計與資料來源……………………………………………………......17
二、變項定義……………………………………………………………………….18
三、資料串聯方式…………………………………………………………………19
第二節 導尿管相關尿路感染之細菌菌種與抗藥性分析………………………......19
一、研究設計與資料來源…………………………………………………………19
二、檢體來源區分、年齡層與性別分組…………………………………………20
三、尿液培養操作、菌種判讀與細菌抗藥性檢驗………………………………20
四、統計分析及方法…………………………………………………………..….20
第四章 結果…………………………………………………………….....23
第一節 留置尿管盛行率…………………………………………………………….23
第二節 尿液細菌培養的菌種……………………………………………….….…...23
第三節 細菌抗藥性的分析………………………………………………….….…...25
第四節 護理之家住民尿液培養之細菌種類與抗藥性分析結果…………….…..27
第五章 討論……………………………………………………………....29
第一節 住院病人留置尿管之盛行率……………………………………………....29
第二節 留置尿管與未留置尿管病人尿路感染之菌種…………………………....30
第三節 留置尿管與未留置尿管病人尿路感染菌種之抗藥性…………………….33
第四節 護理之家住民尿液培養之細菌種類與抗藥性分析結果………………….38
第五節 本研究之優點與限制……………………………………………………….39
一、本研究之優點…………………………………………………………….......39
二、本研究之限制………………………………………………………………...40
第六節 臨床與公共衛生之應用與未來研究方向………………………………….41

參考文獻…………………………………………………………………...44

表 2-1、尿路感染之菌種及其抗藥性之相關文獻報告……………………………...55
表 4-1、2003年住院病人使用留置尿管之醫療科別分佈…………………………...57
表 4-2、不同評鑑等級醫院內科病人留置尿管之盛行率…………………………...58
表 4-3、不同區域內科病人留置尿管之盛行率……………………………………...59
表 4-4、內科系住院病人之年齡別與性別留置導尿管盛行率……………………...60
表 4-5、依留置尿管與否分析尿液培養的結果……………………………………...61
表 4-6、尿液培養細菌所屬病人基本資料…………………………………………...62
表 4-7、依留置尿管與否分析細菌種類之分佈……………………………………...63
表 4-8、男性病人留置尿管產生E. coli 對各種抗生素產生抗藥性之年齡別勝算比(OR)……………………………………………………………………………64
表 4-9、女性病人留置尿管產生E. coli 對各種抗生素產生抗藥性之年齡別勝算比(OR) …………………………………………………………………………...65
表 4-10、男性病人留置尿管產生non-E.coli Enterobacteriaceae對各種抗生素產生抗藥性之年齡別勝算比(OR)……………………………………………………66
表 4-11、女性病人留置尿管產生non-E.coli Enterobacteriaceae對各種抗生素產生抗藥性之年齡別勝算比(OR)……………………………………………………67
表 4-12、男性病人留置尿管產生Pseudomonas spp對各種抗生素產生抗藥性之年齡別勝算比(OR)…………………………………………………………………68
表 4-13、女性病人留置尿管產生Pseudomonas spp對各種抗生素產生抗藥性之年齡別勝算比(OR)…………………………………………………………………69
表 4-14、男性病人留置尿管產生Rare Gram negative bacilli對各種抗生素產生抗藥性之年齡別勝算比(OR)………………………………………………………70
表 4-15、女性病人留置尿管產生Rare Gram negative bacilli對各種抗生素產生抗藥性之年齡別勝算比(OR)………………………………………………………71
表 4-16、留置尿管產生Enterococci spp對各種抗生素產生抗藥性之年齡別勝算比(OR)……………………………………………………………………………72
表 4-17、留置尿管產生對磺胺藥物具抗藥性的Enterobacteriaceae且同時對他種抗生素產生抗藥性之勝算比………………………………………………………73
表4-18、護理之家住民依留置尿管與否分析細菌種類之分佈……………………..74
表4-19、護理之家住民尿液培養細菌對各抗生素產生抗藥之比例……………..…75
圖3-1、以「住院醫療費用清單明細系統抽樣檔」及其相對應之住院醫令資料,以及「醫事機構基本資料檔」分析留置尿管盛行率之流程圖………………76
附表1:醫院所屬地區………………………………………………………………...77
六、參考文獻
Barnett BJ, Stephens DS. Urinary tract infection: an overview. Am J Med Soc 1997;314:245-249.

Bauer AW, Kirby WM, Sherris JC, Turck M. Antibiotics susceptibility testing by a standardized single disc method. Am J Clin Pathol 1966;45:493-496.

Beunders AJ. Development of antibacterial resistance: the Dutch experience. J Antimicrob Chemother 1994;33(Suppl.A):17-22.

Bonadio M, Meini M, Spitaleri P, Gigli C. Current microbiological and clinical aspects of urinary tract infections. Eur Urol 2001;40:439–444.

Bryan CS, Reynolds KL. Hospital-acquired bacteremic urinary tract infection: epidemiology and outcome. J Urol 1984;132:494-498.

Chiang TL. Taiwan’s1995 health care reform. 1997;39:225-239.

Coates KW, Harris RL, Cundiff GW, Bump RC. Uroflowmetry in women with urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse. Br J Urol 1997;80:217-221.

Cox AJ, Hukins DW, Sutton TM. Infection of catheterised patients: bacterial colonisation of encrusted Foley catheters shown by scanning electron microscopy. Urol Res 1989;17:349-350.

Dyer IE, Sankary TM, Dawson JA. Antibiotic resistance in bacterial urinary tract infections, 1991 to 1997. West J Med 1998;169:265-268.

Ena J, Amador C, Martinez C, Ortiz de la Tabla V. Risk factors for aquisition of urinary tract infections caused by ciprofloxacin resistant Escherichia coli. J Urol 1995;153:117-120.

Ena J, Lopez-Perezagua MM, Martinez-Peinado C, Cia-Barrio MA, Ruiz-Lopez I. Emergence of ciprofloxacin resistance in Escherichia coli isolates after widespread use of fluoroquinolones. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 1998;30:103-107.

Finkelstein R, Rabino G, Kassis I, Mahamid E. Device-associated, device day infection rates in an Israeli adult general intensive care unit. J Hosp Infect 2000;44:200-205.

Fitzgerald MP, Kulkarni N, Fenner D. Postoperative resolution of urinary retention in patients with advanced pelvic organ prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000;183:1361-1363.

Gales AC, Jones RN, Gordon KA , Sader HS, Wilke WW, Beach ML, Pfaller MA, Doern GV. Activity and spectrum of 22 antimicrobial agents tested against urinary tract infection pathogens in hospitalized patients in Latin America: report from the second year of the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program (1998). J Antimicrob Chemother 2000;45:295-303.

Gammack JK. Use and management of chronic urinary catheters in long term care: much controversy, little consensus. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2002;3:162-168.

Garau M, Xercavins M, Rodriguez-Carballeira M, Gomez-Vera JR, Coll I, Vidal D, Llovet T, Ruiz-Bremon A. Emergence and dissemination of quinolone-resistant Escherichia coli in the community. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1999;43:2736-2741.

Garibaldi RA, Burke JP, Dickman ML, Smith CB. Factors predisposing to bacteriuria during indwelling urethral catheterization. N Engl J Med. 1974;291:215-219.

Givens CD, Wenzel RP. Catheter-associated urinary tract infections in surgical patients: a controlled study on the excess morbidity and costs. J Urol 1980;124:646-648.

Godfrey H, Evens A. Catheterization and urinary tract infections: microbiology. Br J Nursing 2000;9:682-690.

Goetz AM, Kedzuf S, Wagener M, Muder RR. Feedback to nursing staff as an intervention to reducecatheter-associated urinary tract infections. Am J Infect Control 1999;27:402-404.

Green MS, Rubinstein E, Amit P. Estimating the effects of nosocomial infections on the length of hospitalization. J Infect Dis 1982;145:667-672.

Gupta K, Sahm DF, Mayfield D, Stamm WE. Antimicrobial resistance among uropathogens that cause community-acquired urinary tract infections in women: a nationwide analysis. Clin Infect Dis 2001;33:89-94.

Gupta K, Scholes D, Stamm W. Increasing prevalence of antimicrobial resistance among uropathogens causing acute uncomplicated cystitis in women. JAMA 1999;281:736-738.

Haley RW, Culver DH, White JW, Morgan WM, Emori TG. The nationwide nosocomial infection rate: a new need for vital statistics. Am J Epidemiol 1985;121:159-167.

Haley RW, Hooton TM, Culver DH, Stanley RC, Emori TG, Hardison CD, Quade D, Shachtman RH, Schaberg DR, Shah BV, Schatz GD. Nosocomial infections in U.S. hospitals, 1975-1976: estimated frequency by selected characteristics of patients. Am J Med 1981;70:947-959.

Harding GK, Nicolle LE, Ronald AR, Preiksaitis JK, Foward KR, Low DE, Cheang M. How long should catheter –acquired urinary tract infection in women be treated? A randomised controlled study. Ann Intern Med 1991;114:713–719.

Hastie KJ, Dickinson AJ, Ahmad R, Moisey CU. Acute retention of urine: Is trial without catheter justified? J R Coll Surg Edinb 1990;35:225-227.
Jacoby GA, Archer GL. New mechanisms of bacterial resistance to antimicrobial agents. New Eng J Med 1991; 324:601-612.

Infectious Diseases society of the Republic of China. Guidelines for antimicrobial therapy of urinary tract infections in Taiwan. J Microbial Immunol Infect 2000;33:271-272.

Jacoby GA, Archer GL. New mechanisms of bacterial resistance to antimicrobial agents. New Eng J Med 1991;324:601-612.

Jain P, Parada JP, David A, Smith LG. Overuse of the indwelling urinary tract catheter in hospitalized medical patients. Arch Intern Med 1995;155:1425-1429.

Kaufman JM, Fam B, Jacobs SC, Gabilondo F, Yalla S, Kane JP, Rossier AB. Bladder cancer and squamous metaplasia in spinal cord injury patients. J Urol 1977;118:967-971.

Krieger JN, Kaiser DL, Wenzel RP. Urinary tract etiology of blood stream infections in hospitalized patients. J Infect Dis 1983;148:57-62.

Kunin CM, Douthitt S, Dancing J, Anderson J, Moeschberger M. The association between the use of urinary catheters and morbidity and mortality among elderly patients in nursing homes. Am J Epidemiol 1992;135:291-295.

Kunin CM, Steele C. Culture of the surfaces of urinary catheters to sample urethral flora and study the effect of antimicrobial therapy. J Clin Microbiol 21:902,1985.

Kunin CM. Can we build a better urinary catheter? N Engl J Med 1988;319:365-366.

Lauderdale TL, McDonald LC, Shiau YR, Chen PC, Wang HY, Lai JF, Ho M. The status of antimicrobial resistance among gram-negative pathogens: the Taiwan surveillance of antimicrobial resistance (TSAR) program, 2000. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 2004;48:211-219.

Liedl B. Catheter-associated urinary tract infections. Curr Opin Urol 2001;11:75-79.

Lu JF, Hsiao WC. Dose universal health insurance make health care unaffordable? Lessons from Taiwan. Health aff(Millwood) 2003;22:77-88.

Maki DG, Tambyah PA. Engineering out the risk of infection with urinary catheters. Emerg Infect Dis 2001;7:1–13.

Mazzulli T. Antimicrobial resistance trends in common urinary pathogens. Can J Urol 2001;8 suppl 1:2-5.

National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. 2003. Approved standard M2-A8. Performance standards for antimicrobial disk susceptibility tests, 8th ed. NCCLS, Wayne, Pa.

Nickel JC, Gristina AG, Costerton JW. Electron microscopic study of an infected Foley catheter. Can J Surg 1985;28:50-53.

Nickel JC, Ruseska I, Wright JB, Costerton JW. Tobramycin resistance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa cells growing as a biofilm on urinary catheter material. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1985;27:619-623.

Nicolle LE, Strausbaugh LJ, Garibaldi RA. Infections and antibiotic resistance in nursing homes. Clin Microbiol Rev 1996;9:1-17.

Nicolle LE. Resistant pathogens in urinary tract infections. J Am Geriatr Soc 2002;50:230-235.

Nicolle LE. The chronic indwelling catheter and urinary infection in long-term care facility residents. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2001;22:316-321.

Ouslander JG, Greengold B, Chen S. Complications of chronic indwelling catheters among male nursing home patients: A prospective study. J Urol 1987;138:1191-1195.

Patel HR, Arya M. The urinary catheter: 'a-voiding catastrophe'. Hosp Med 2000;62:148–149.

Platt R, Polk BF, Murdock B, Rosner B. Mortality associated with nosocomial urinary-tract infection. N Engl J Med 1982;307:637-642.

Ribeiro BJ, Smith SR. Evaluation of urinary catheterization and urinary incontinence in a general nursing home population. J Am Geriatr Soc 1985;33:479-482.

National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. 2003. Approved standard M2-A8. Performance standards for antimicrobial disk susceptibility tests, 8th ed. NCCLS, Wayne, Pa.

Sahm D. Surveillance of antimicrobial resistance patterns and data for urinary tract pathogens in the USA. Clin Drug Invest 2001;21 suppl 1:1-5.

Sahm DF, Thornsberry C, Maryfield DC, Jones ME, Karlowsky JA. Multidrug-resistant urinary tract isolates of Escherichia coli: prevalence and patient demographics in the United States in 2000. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2001;45:1402-1406.

Saint S, Lipsky BA, Goold SD. Indwelling urinary catheters: a one-point restraint? Ann Intern Med 2002;137(2):125–127.

Saint S, Lipsky BA. Preventing catheter related bacteriuria. Should we? Can we? How? Arch Intern Med 1999;159:800-808.

Schaeffer AJ. Urinary tract infections: antimicrobial resistance. Curr opin Urol 2000;10:23-24.

Sobel JD, Kaye D. Urinary tract infections. In: Mandell GL, Bennett JE, Dolin R; eds. Mandell, Douglas and Bennett's principles and practice of infectious diseases. 4th ed. New York: Churchill Livingstone;1995:662-690.

Sotto A, De Boever CM, Fabbro-Peray P, Gouby A, Sirot D, Jourdan J. Risk factors for antibiotic-resistant Escherichia coli isolated from hospitalized patients with urinary tract infections: a prospective study. J Clin Microbiol 2001;39:438-444.

Spicer WJ. Enterobacteriaceae. In: Clinical bacteriology, Mycology and parasitology: an illustrated color text. 1st ed. Spicer WJ. London: Churchill Livingstone;2000. pp40-43.

Spicer WJ. Pseudomonas and rare gram-negative rods. In: Clinical bacteriology, Mycology and parasitology: an illustrated color text. 1st ed. Spicer WJ. London: Churchill Livingstone;2000. pp46-47.


Tambyah PA, Halvorson KT, Maki DG. A prospective study of pathogenesis of catheter associated urinary tract infections. Mayo Clin Proc 1999;74:131-136.

Vromen M, van der Ven AJ, Knols A, Stobberingh EE. Antimicrobial resistance patterns in urinary isolates from nursing home residents. Fifteen years of data reviewed. J Antimicrob Chemother 1999;44:113-116.

Warren JW, Damron D, Tenney JH, Hoopes JM, Deforge B, Muncie HL Jr. Fever, bacteremia and death as complications of bacteriuria in women with long term urethral catheters. J Infect Dis 1987;155:1151-1158.

Warren JW, Steinberg L, Hebel JR, Tenney JH. The prevalence of urethral catheterization in Maryland nursing homes. Arch Intern Med 1989;149:1535-1540.

Warren JW. Catheter-associated urinary tract infections. Infect Dis Clin North Am 1997;11:609–622.

Wazait HD, Patel HR, Veer V, Kelsey M, Van Der Muelen JH, Miller RA, Emberton M. Catheter-associated urinary tract infections: prevalence of uropathogens and pattern of antimicrobial resistance in a UK hospital. BJU Int 2003;91:806-809.

Weinstein MP, Towns ML, Quartey SM, Mirrett S, Reimer LG, Parmigian G, Reller LB. The clinical significance of positive blood cultures in the 1990s: a prospective comprehensive evaluation of the microbiology, epidemiology, and outcome of bacteremia and fungemia in adults. Clin Infect Dis 1997;24:584-602.

Wingard E, Shlaes JH, Mortimer EA, Shlaes DM. Colonization and cross-colonization of nursing home patients with trimethoprim-resistant gram-negative bacilli. Clin Infect Dis 1993;16:75-81.

Winstanley TG, Limb DI, Eggington R, Hancock F. A 10 year survey of antimicrobial susceptibility of urinary tract isolates in the UK: the Microbe Base project. J Antimicrob Chemother 1997;40:591-594.

Wong ES. Guideline for prevention of catheter-associated urinary tract infections. Am J Infect Control 1983;11:28-36.

Woolf B. On estimating the relation between blood group and disease. Ann Hum Genet 1955;19:251-523.

Zimakoff JD, Pondoppidan B, Larsen SO, Poulsen KB, Stickler DJ. The management of urinary catheters: compliance of practice in Danish hospitals, nursing homes and home care to national guidelines. Scand J Urol Nephrol 1995;29:299-309.
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
1. 彭曉瑩(2002)。教育行銷之理論與實務。人文及社會學科教學通訊,13(3),108-119。
2. 陳嘉彌(1997)。教師參與在職進修動機取向與其接受創新程度間之關係研究。教育研究資訊,5,45-62。
3. 張茂源(2004)。淺析國民小學的學校自我行銷。研習資訊,21(6),85-89。
4. 徐木蘭(1984)。組織溝通的個案研究---以化學工業研究所為例。國立政治大學學報,49,201-229。
5. 邱天助(1996)。社會教育的行銷理念。社教雙月刊,71,9-16。
6. 林新發(1998)。學習型組織與學習型學校。國民教育,39(2),11-18。
7. 林水順、莊英慎(2000)。技職學院行銷作為與特性認知分析-以國立勤益技術學院會為例。中華管理學報1(1),33-53。
8. 李小芬(2001)。學校行銷。社教雙月刊,101,55-56。
9. 黃富順(2000)。成人的經驗教育。於中華民國成人教育學會主編:成人學習革命。台北:師大書苑。
10. 湯堯(2001)。論述高等教育經營之策略-以SWOT為例。國立高雄師範大學教育學系教育學刊,17,147-161。
11. 黃義良(2002)。淺析學校行銷策略適用於中小學的具體做法。教育資料與研究,45,112-119。
12. 劉德勝(1999)。義工與博物館行銷。博物館學季刊,7,53-63。
13. 鄭勵君(1998)。學校形象之行銷管理與策略分析。高市文教,6,55-59。
14. 8. 吳萬益、劉清和,1992。大型教學醫院門診服務品質之探討,國立成功大學學報,第32期:129-149。
15. 9. 吳萬益、鄭永忠、江正信,2000。大型教學醫院組織文化、內部激勵與控制制度對經營績效之影響研究,輔仁管理評論,第7卷第1期:103-130。