跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(18.97.14.88) 您好!臺灣時間:2024/12/04 13:28
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:林建宏
研究生(外文):Chien-Hung Lin
論文名稱:探討負面口碑傳播與消費者轉換意願之關係
論文名稱(外文):Research on the Relevance between Negative Word-of-Mouth and Consumer Switching Intention
指導教授:榮泰生榮泰生引用關係
指導教授(外文):Tai-Sheng Jung
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:輔仁大學
系所名稱:管理學研究所
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:企業管理學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2006
畢業學年度:94
語文別:中文
論文頁數:77
中文關鍵詞:負面口碑傳播品牌態度顧客滿意度個人涉入程度
外文關鍵詞:negative word-of-mouthBrand attitudeconsumer satisfactionpersonal involvement
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:3
  • 點閱點閱:627
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:4
論文題目:探討負面口碑傳播與消費者轉換意願之關係
校(院)系所組別:輔仁大學管理學研究所碩士班
研究生:林建宏 指導教授:榮泰生 博士 論文頁數:77
論文摘要內容:
在現今競爭激烈的環境下,消費者的轉換行為對業者而言是具有相當影響力的。對於新進入的廠商來說,必須使既有廠商的顧客產生轉換意願,進而產生轉換行為才能在市場上占有一席之地,而對於現有的廠商而言,則必須防範消費者的轉換行為,因此瞭解引起消費者轉換意願之因素是相當重要的。影響消費者轉換意願之因素甚多,而本研究則著重於負面訊息影響的部份。負面口碑傳播意指當消費者有不滿意的購物經驗或者是對某項產品服務有著不好的使用感覺時,甚至於不再使用的經驗發生時,而將這種不好的經驗告訴親朋好友,並建議他人不要使用此產品的過程。
本研究探討負面訊息強度、傳播者專業與關係強度對於消費者轉換意願的影響,並加入品牌態度、顧客滿意度與個人涉入程度作為干擾變數加以討論,探討三個干擾變數是否會對負面口碑所造成的負面效果產生干擾效果。
研究結果發現負面訊息強度與關係強度皆會使消費者產生轉換意願行為;傳播者專業程度越高,對消費者轉換意願並沒有顯著影響。在干擾變數方面,個人涉入程度會對負面口碑所產生的負面效果進行干擾;而品牌態度與顧客滿意度則會對消費者轉換意願產生負向的影響。

關鍵詞:負面口碑傳播、品牌態度、顧客滿意度、個人涉入程度
Title of Thesis: Research on the relevance between negative word-of-mouth and consumer switching intention
Name of Institute: Graduate Institute of Management Fu Jen Catholic University
Name of Student: Chien-Hung Lin Advisor: Dr. Tai-Sheng Jung
Total Page: 77
Abstract:
In today’s market where competition is increasingly fierce, the consumer switching behavior has become highly significant to businesses. For market newcomers, the task at hand is to initiate a switching intention among the consumers of the incumbent businesses and to further switch consumer behavior to gain a share of the market. As for the incumbent, preventing consumer switching behavior is certainly a top priority. Therefore, identifying the factors that could possibly lead to consumer switching intention is of utmost importance. It is evident that there are various elements that may cause switching intention. This study, however, focuses on the so-called “negative word-of-mouth.” Negative word-of-mouth refers to consumers’ complaints over their dissatisfaction with certain negative shopping experiences, products or services. Negative word-of-mouth comes into play when consumers share their experience of dissatisfaction with their friends and relatives, telling them not to purchase certain products and services.
This study discusses the intensity of negative messages and the professionalism and intensity of relationship of the “message sender” on consumer switching intention. Brand attitude, consumer satisfaction and personal involvement are included to serve as moderating variables. The aim is to see whether or not these three variables moderate the negative effect created by negative word-of-mouth.
The result of the study shows that both the intensity of negative messages and the intensity of relationship result in consumer switching intention and behavior. The level of professionalism of the message sender, however, does not play a significant role. In terms of variables, personal involvement moderates the negative effect of negative word-of-mouth while brand attitude and customer satisfaction have a negative influence on consumer switching intention.

Keywords:negative word-of-mouth、Brand attitude、consumer satisfaction、personal involvement
目 錄

第壹章 緒論 1
第一節 研究動機 1
第二節 研究目的 3
第三節 研究流程 4
第四節 研究範圍 5
第貳章 文獻探討 7
第一節 自變數 7
第二節 干擾變數 12
第三節 依變數 15
第叁章 研究方法 17
第一節 研究架構 17
第二節 研究假設 18
第三節 變數衡量與問卷設計 21
第四節 研究設計 26
第肆章 資料分析與驗證 29
第一節 前測階段 29
第二節 樣本結構與信效度分析 33
第三節 研究假設檢定 35
第四節 模型修飾 49
第伍章 結論與建議 53
第一節 研究結論 53
第二節 管理意涵與實務建議 57
第三節 研究限制 59
第四節 後續研究方向 60
參考文獻 61
附錄一 網路問卷 69
附錄二 問卷 74











表 目 錄
表 2-5-1 轉換行為分類表 11
表 3-3-1 問卷題項定義參考學者表 20
表 3-3-2 問卷題項設計彙總表 21
表 4-1-1 量表前測信度分析表 25
表 4-1-2 量表前測效度分析表 27
表 4-2-1 性別分佈狀況表 29
表 4-2-2 所在地位置分佈狀況表 30
表 4-2-3 潛在變項信效度表 30
表 4-3-1 LISREL分析的八種矩陣概念列表 33
表 4-3-2 各種契合度指標的比較 35
表 4-3-3 外衍變項CFA檢定結果 36
表 4-3-4 內衍變項CFA檢定結果 36
表 4-3-5 整體模型檢定結果 37
表 4-3-6 LISREL整體假設驗證結果 38
表 4-3-7 PA-LV路徑分析各項結果分解說明part1 43
表 4-3-8 PA-LV路徑分析各項結果分解說明part2 45
表 4-4-1 各項變數間MI變化量的統整表part1 47
表 4-4-2 各項變數間MI變化量的統整表part2 48
表 4-4-3 模型修飾前後契合度的改變一覽表 49
表 5-1-1 假設驗證結果彙總表 51



















圖 目 錄
圖 1-3-1 研究流程圖 4
圖 3-1-1 研究架構圖 15
圖 4-3-1 完整LISREL模型矩陣的概念圖 34
圖 4-3-2 PA-LV路徑分析的標準化終解路徑圖 39
圖 4-3-3 莖葉圖 41
圖 4-3-4 標準化殘差散佈圖 42
圖 4-4-1 LISREL建議修飾的路徑圖 46
參考文獻
中文部份
1.林欽榮(2002)。商業心理學。台北:揚智文化。
2.林衢良(2004)。大學生撞球參與者撞球場球館滿意度、涉入程度與忠誠度之關係研究。國立體育學院體育研究所碩士論文,台北。
3.邱皓政(2003)。結構方程模式-LISREL的理論、技術與應用。台北:雙葉書廊。
4.邱建智(2003)。負面口碑訊息對消費者購買決策影響之探討。國立台灣科技大學企業管理研究所碩士論文,台北。
5.洪毓穗(2000)。負面報導資訊下,消費者認同、所有權狀態與企業回應策略對品牌態度之影響。國立台灣大學商學研究所碩士論文,台北。
6.徐達光(2003)。消費者心理學-消費者行為的科學研究。台北:東華書局。
7.陳逸帆(2004)。理性、感性廣告訴求下轉換意願影響因素之探討-以ISP產業為例。天主教輔仁大學管理學研究所碩士論文,台北。
8.黃芳銘(2004)。社會科學統計方法學-結構方程模式。台北:五南圖書。
9.榮泰生(2003)。企業研究方法。台北:五南圖書。
10.榮泰生(2006)。SPSS與研究方法。台北:五南圖書。
11.編輯部(1998)。「行銷新趨勢:口碑傳播」。世界經理文摘,139期。
12.羅怡君(2002)。資訊時代下的口耳相傳論意見領袖之質變。國立台灣科技大學企業管理研究所碩士論文,台北。



英文部份
1.Anderson, E. W. (1998). Customer satisfaction and word-of-mouth. Journal of Service Research, 1, 5-17.
2.Bansal, H. S., & Voyer, P. A. (2000). Word-of-mouth process within a services purchase decision context. Journal of Service Research, 3(2), 166-177.
3.Bass, F. M., & Talarzyk, W. W. (1972). An attitude mdel for the study of brand preference. Journal of Marketing Research, 9(2), 93-96.
4.Bentler, P. M., & Wu, E. J. C. (1993). EQS/Windows user’s guide. Los Angeles: BMDP Statistical Software.
5.Blackwell, R. D., Miniard, P. W., & Engel, J. F. (2006). Consumer behavior (10th ed.), Harcourt College Publishers: Fort Worth
6.Blodgett, J. G., Granbois, D. H., & Walters, R. G. (1993). The effects of perceived justice on complaints’ negative word-of-mouth behavior and repatronage intention. Journal of Retailing, 69, 339-428.
7.Bollen, K. A. (2002). Structural equations with latent variables. New York: Wiley.
8.Bolton, R. N. (1998). A dynamic model of the duration of the customers’ relationship with a continuous service provider: The role of satisfaction. Marketing Science, 17(1), 45-65.
9.Bristor, J. M. (1990). Enhanced explanations of word-of-mouth communications: The power of relationships. Research in Consumer Behavior, 4, 51-83.
10.Brown, J. J., & Reingen, P. H. (1987). Social ties and word-of-mouth referral behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 14, 350-362.
11.Cardozo, R. N. (1965) An experimental study of customer effort, expection, & satisfaction. Journal of Marketing Research, 2, 244-249.
12.Cliff, N. (1983). Some cautions concerning the application of causal modeling methods. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 18, 115-126.
13.Day, D. S. (1978). Are cnsumers satisfied, In Aaker, D. A., & Day, G. S. (Eds.). Consumerism: Search for the Consumer Interest (3rd ed.), New York: Free Press, 406-417.
14.Dholakia, R. R., & Sternthal, B. (1977). Highly credible source: Persuasive facilitator or persuasive liabilities. Journal of Consumer Research, 3, 223-232.
15.Duhan, D. F., Johnson, S. D., Wilcox, J. B., & Harrel, G. D. (1997). Influences on consumer use of word-of-mouth recommandation sources. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 25(4), 283-295.
16.Fishbein, M. & Ajzen, I., Engewood Cliffs (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior, NJ Prentice-Hall.
17.Fiske, S. T. (1980). Attention and weight in person perception: The impact of negative and extreme behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38(6), 889-906.
18.Fornell, M. D., Johnson, E. W., Anderson, J. C., & Barbara, E. B. (1996). The American customer satisfaction index: Nature, purpose, and findings. Journal of Marketing, 60, 7-18.
19.Frenzen, J. L., & Davis, H. L. (1990). Purchasing behavior in embedded markets. Journal of Consumer Research, 17, 1-12.
20.Frenzen & Nakamoto. (1993). Structure, cooperation, and the flow of market information. Journal of Consumer Research, 24, 343-373.
21.Ganesh, J., Arnold, M. J., & Reynolds, K. E. (2000). Understanding the customer base of service providers: An examination of the differences between switchers and stayers. Journal of Marketing, 64, 65-87.
22.Gilly, M. C., John, L. G., Mary, F. W., & Laura, J. Y. (1998). A dyadic study of interpersonal information search. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 26, 83-100.
23.Goldsmith, R. E., Laffery, B. A., & Newell, S. J. (2000). The impact of corporate credibility and celebrity credibility on consumer reaction to advertisement and brands. Journal of Advertising. 29(3), 43-54.
24.Hahha, N., & Wozniak, R. (2001). Customer behavior(1st ed.), New York: Prentice-Hall.
25.Herr, Paul, Kardes, F., & Kim, J. (1991). Effect of word-of-mouth and product-attribute information on persuasive: An accessibility-diagnostic perspective. Journal of Consumer Research, 17, 454-462.
26.Jöreskog, K. G.., & Sorbom, D. (1989). LISREL 7: A guide to the program and applications. Chicago: SPSS Inc.
27.Keaveney, S. M. (2001). Customer switching behavior in online service: An exploratory of the role of selected attitudinal, behavioral, and demographic factors. Academy of Marketing Science, 374.
28.Kim, M., Park, M., & Jeong, D. (2004). The effect of customer satisfaction and switching behavior on customer loyalty in Korean mobile telecommunication services. Telecomunication Policy 28. 145-159.
29.Klein, J. G. (1996). Negativity in impressions of presidential candidates revisited: The 1992 election. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 289-296.
30.Kotler, L. (2000). Marketing management (10th ed.), Prentice-Hall, New Jersey, 36-37.
31.Krugman, H. E. (1965). The impact of television advertising: Learning without involvement. Public Opinion Quarterly, 29, 349-356.
32.Laurent, G., & Kapferer, J. (1985). Measuring consumer involvement profiles. Journal of Marketing Research, 2, 41-53.
33.Lazarsfeld, P. F. (1948). The people’s choice. New York: Columbia University Press.
34.Leonard-Barton, D. (1985). Experts as negative option leaders in the diffusion of a technological innovation. Journal of Consumer Research, 11, 914-927.
35.Lutz, R. J. (1975). Changing brand attitudes through modification of cognitive structure. Journal of Consumer Research, 1, 49-59.
36.Mackenzie, S. B., Richard. J. L., & Belch, G. E. (1986). The role of attitude toward the ad as a mediator of advertising effectiveness: A test of competing explanations. Journal of Marketing Research, 23, 130-143.
37.Maheswaran, Durairaj, & Joan, Meyers-Levy (1990). The influence of message framing and issue involvement. Journal of Marketing Research, 27, 361-367.
38.Miserski, R. W. (1982). An attribution explanation of the disproportionate influence of unfavorable information. Journal of Consumer Research, 9, 301-310.
39.Mitchell, A. A., & Peter, A.. D. (1996). The assessment of alternative measures of consumer expertise. Journal of Consumer Research, 23, 219-239.
40.Money, R. B., Gilly, M. C., & Graharm, J. L. (1998). Explorations if national culture and word-of-mouth referral behavior in the purchase of industry services in the United States and Japan. Journal of Marketing Research, 62, 76-87.
41.Peter, J. P., & Olson, J. C. (1990). Customer behavior and marketing strategy (2nd ed.), Homewood IL: Richard D. Irwin Inc.
42.Petty, R.E., & Cacioppo, J.T. (1983). Field dependence and attitude change: Source credibility can alter persuasion by affecting message-relevant thinking. Journal of Personality, 51 (4), 653-666.
43.Reichheld, F. F., & Sasser, W. E. (1990). Zero defections: Quality comes to services. Harvard Business Review, (September-October), 105-111.
44.Reichheld, F. F. (1996). The loyalty effect: The hidden force behind growth, profit and lasting value. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
45.Richard, N. G., & Bearden, W. O. (1992). A comparative analysis of two models of behavioral intention. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 18(1), 51-65.
46.Richins, M. L. (1983). Negative word-of-mouth by dissatisfied consumers: A pilot study. Journal of Marketing, 47, 68-78.
47.Richins, M. L. (1984). Word-of-mouth communication as negative information, In A.T.C. Kinnear(ED.). Advances in Consumer Research, 11, Ann Arbor, MI: Association for Consumer Research, 32-36.
48.Rudestam, K. E., & Newton, R. R. (1992). Surviving your dissertation. A comprehensive guide to content and process, Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
49.Schiffman, L. G., & Leslie, L. K. (1997). Consumer behavior (6th ed.), Upper Saddle river, NJ: Prentice Hall.
50.Skowronski, J. J., & Donal, E. C. (1989). Negativity and extremity in impression formation: A review of explanations. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 131-142.
51.Tanaka, J. S. (1989). A general coefficient of determination for covariance structure models under arbitrary GLS estimation. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 42, 233-239
52.Weiner, J. L., & Mowen, J. C. (1986). Source cedibility: On the independent effects of trust and expertise. Advances in Consumer Research, 13. 306-310.
53.Whyte, W. H. (1954). The web of word-of-mouth. Fortune, (November), 140-143.
54.Wright, P. (1974). The harassed decision maker: Time pressures, distractions, and the use of evidence. Journal of Applied Psychology, 59, 555-561.
55.Zahorik, A. J. (1985). A nonhierarchical brand switching model for
Inferring market structure: Development and empirical test.
Unpublished Ph.D dissertation, Cornell University.
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
1. 11.編輯部(1998)。「行銷新趨勢:口碑傳播」。世界經理文摘,139期。
2. 王振德(1988)。我國資源教室方案實施現況及其成效評鑑。特殊教育研究學刊,4,1-20。
3. 成虹飛(1999)。報告書寫的困擾與可能性─寫給愛好質化研究的朋友。新竹師院學報,12,27-41。
4. 吳武典(1997)。Gardner與Sternberg智能建構模式的整合及人事智能之探討。資優教育季刊,65,1-7。
5. 洪蘭(2002)。多元智慧。文教新潮,7,6-8。
6. 范瓊方(1988)。幼兒繪畫的教育功能。美育,77,37-44。
7. 范瓊方(1999)。兒童繪畫與自我調整的關係。美育,103,9-13。
8. 郭禎祥(1999a)。廿十一世紀藝術教育的展望。美育,106,1-9。
9. 郭禎祥(1999b)。描繪新世紀藝術教育藍圖。美育,110,1-9。
10. 陳杰琦(1998)。鑑別、培養與發展兒童的多元智力能力。文教新潮,3(5),6-17。
11. 陳瓊花(1998)。試比較安海姆與高瓏對於兒童繪畫發展理念之異同。美育,87,49-56。
12. 陳瓊花(1999)。兒童與青少年描述藝術作品時的觀念傾向。美育,106,39-55。
13. 陳瓊花(1999)。我國青年藝術觀念探討之一:繪畫表現上「像」與「不像」問題的看法。美育,103,29-38。
14. 陳玫岑、劉源昌(2001)。多元智能展示方法之探討。博物館學季刊,15,93-105。
15. 張蓓莉(1990)。特殊班或資源班與普通班之溝通與交流。特殊教育季刊,35,1-8。