跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(18.97.14.84) 您好!臺灣時間:2025/01/14 22:05
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

: 
twitterline
研究生:劉麗君
研究生(外文):Li-Chun Liu
論文名稱:華人迷信信念之初探-以台灣地區為例
論文名稱(外文):An exploration on Chinese superstitious belief-the case of Taiwan
指導教授:黃麗霞黃麗霞引用關係
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:輔仁大學
系所名稱:管理學研究所
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:企業管理學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2006
畢業學年度:94
語文別:中文
論文頁數:77
中文關鍵詞:迷信華人迷信因素分析
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:15
  • 點閱點閱:4107
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:704
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:4
本研究的目的在於探討普遍性華人迷信的信念,經由相關的文獻、資料收集到焦點訪談獲得多項的迷信行為與想法後,再以因素分析找出迷信的構面,分別為「討吉利」、「運氣」、「星座」、「水晶」、「與鬼相關」、「婚喪習俗」、「風水」七個因素構面。
部分相關的文獻中也指出迷信與內外控有關,結果發現內外控與「討吉利」、「星座」、「水晶」、「與鬼相關」、「風水」這五個構面呈現正相關,表示對於迷信這五個構面愈在意的人,其人格特質外控的程度愈高。
最後,探討人口統計變數與迷信之間的關係,在性別方面,整體來說,各個構面女性的平均分數都比男性高,只是特別在「運氣」、「水晶」、「婚喪習俗」這三個構面上有顯著差異存在;年齡愈小愈重視「星座」、「與鬼相關」這兩個構面;教育程度為高中/職的較重視討吉利這方面,而教育程度在研究所以上的人較重視風水這個構面;在居住地方面,整體看來居住在中部地區的人較為迷信,北區和南區的樣本可能因為包括都會區所以與迷信之間的關係較中部地區來得不明顯;而所得愈高的人較不重視「星座」、「與鬼相關」這兩個構面,比較重視「婚喪習俗」這個構面。
This purpose of this research is to discuss Chinese superstitious belief. According to the steps of factor analysis, Chinese suppositious belief has been constructed. The Chinese superstitious beliefs are divided into 7 factors. These factors include “asking for auspiciousness,” “good luck,” “constellation,” “crystal,” “related with ghosts,” “wedding and funeral customs,” and “feng shui.”
This research also finds out that locus of control has positive correlation with “asks for auspicious,” “constellation,” “crystal,” “related with ghosts,” “feng shui.” These mean that people who care more about these five constructions, their personality are more externally controlled.
Another goal of this research is to explore the relationships between some vital demographics and superstition. In the gender aspect, females have higher scores in all constructions than males do. Young people attach great importance to “constellation” and “related with ghosts.” People with high school education attach great importance to “asks for auspiciousness,” and people with graduate education attach great importance to “feng shui.” People in the north and south Taiwan are less superstitious because these areas include megalopolis. Besides, people with higher income care more about “wedding and funeral customs.” Some managerial implications and future research directions are also proposed in this research.
目 錄
頁次
第 壹 章 緒論------------------------------------------------------------------- 1
第 一 節 研究動機--------------------------------------------------------- 1
第 二 節 研究目的--------------------------------------------------------- 1

第 貳 章 文獻探討--------------------------------------------------------------- 3
第 一 節 迷信的定義------------------------------------------------------ 3
第 二 節 迷信與其他變數-----------------------------------------------10
第 三 節 典型迷信群體--------------------------------------------------15
第 四 節 迷信的應用-----------------------------------------------------17

第 參 章 研究方法--------------------------------------------------------------19
第 一 節 研究流程--------------------------------------------------------19
第 二 節 焦點訪談--------------------------------------------------------21

第 肆 章 資料分析與結果-----------------------------------------------------23
第 一 節 第一次資料分析-----------------------------------------------23
第 二 節 第二次資料分析-----------------------------------------------29

第 伍 章 結論------------------------------------------------------------------49
第 一 節 研究結論--------------------------------------------------------49
第 二 節 學術貢獻--------------------------------------------------------51
第 三 節 管理意涵--------------------------------------------------------51
第 四 節 研究限制與未來研究建議-----------------------------------53


參考文獻-----------------------------------------------------------------------55
附錄一、68題項-------------------------------------------------------------------------61
附錄二、35題項--------------------------------------------------------------------64
附錄三、第一次問卷--------------------------------------------------------------------66
附錄四、第二次問卷--------------------------------------------------------------------71
附錄五、Rotter內外控分數計算------------------------------------------------------76




表 目 錄
表 2-2-1 Mowen and Carlson(2003)變數關係整理表格-----------------------9
表 4-1-1 人口統計變數樣本特徵(一)-------------------------------------------23
表 4-1-2 居住地卡方檢定表(一)-------------------------------------------------24
表 4-1-3 因素分析KMO與Bartlett檢定(一)----------------------------------24
表 4-1-4 轉軸後的因素矩陣及信度分析---------------------------------------26
表 4-1-5 因素命名整理表---------------------------------------------------------28
表 4-2-1 人口統計變數樣本特徵(二)-------------------------------------------30
表 4-2-2 居住地區卡方檢定表(二)----------------------------------------------30
表 4-2-3 因素分析KMO與Bartlett檢定(二)----------------------------------31
表 4-2-4 樣式矩陣------------------------------------------------------------------32
表 4-2-5 結構矩陣------------------------------------------------------------------34
表 4-2-6 各構面所包含題項------------------------------------------------------36
表 4-2-7 信度分析------------------------------------------------------------------37
表 4-2-8 因素命名及解釋變異量------------------------------------------------38
表 4-2-9 迷信行為與內外控之間的相關與標準誤---------------------------38
表 4-2-10 性別與迷信之間的關係------------------------------------------------39
表 4-2-11 年齡與迷信之間的關係------------------------------------------------40
表 4-2-12 教育程度與迷信之間的關係------------------------------------------41
表 4-2-13 教育程度之事後比較分析表------------------------------------------42
表 4-2-14 居住地與迷信之間的關係---------------------------------------------43
表 4-2-15 居住地事後比較分析表------------------------------------------------44
表 4-2-16 所得與迷信之間的關係------------------------------------------------47
表 5-1-1 人口統計變數與迷信之間的關係------------------------------------50



圖 目 錄
圖 2-1-1 迷信的人格層級模型------------------------------------------------------ 8
圖 3-1-1 研究流程------------------------------------------------------------------20
圖 3-2-1 焦點訪談座位安排------------------------------------------------------21
圖 4-1-1 因素陡坡圖---------------------------------------------------------------25
中文部分
1. PCHOME線上購物(2006),「睡內衣」,http://:shopping.pchome.com.tw/,2006年6月。
2.PCHOME線上購物(2006),「生活開運」,http://:shopping.pchome.com.tw/,2006年6月。
3.吳明隆(2000)。SPSS統計應用實務。台北市:松崗。
4.邱皓政(2005)。量化研究方法(二)—統計原理與分析技術。台北市:雙葉
書廊。
5.賴仕堯(1982)。風水。國立台灣大學建築與城鄉研究所,台北市。
6.陳美燕(1990)。「迷信」與俗民宗教信仰—個言說現象的反省與批判。國立
清華大學社會人類學研究所,新竹市。
7.旅遊指南—香港(2005),「香港迪士尼設計 風水擺第一 群山環抱左青龍、右白虎 大門方位調整12度提升正能量 入口處設水池聚財」,http://www.worldjournal.com/pr/travel/hongkong_news.php?nt_seq_id=1233647,2005年9月12日。
8.中華電信(2006),「emome行動加值服務」,http://www.cht.com.tw/index.php,2006年6月。


英文部分
1.Adorno, T., Frenkel-Brunswick, E., Levinson, D., & Sanford, N. (1950). The Authoritarian Personality, New York: Harper.
2.Albas, D, & Albas, C. (1989). Modern magic: The case of examinations. The Sociology Quarterly, 30, 603-613.
3.Alock, J. E. & Otis L. (1980). Critical thinking and belief in the paranormal. Psychological Reports, 46, 479-482.
4.Becker, E.(1973).The Demial of Death, New York: Free Press.
5.Bleak, J. L., & Frederick, C.M. (1998). Superstition behavior in sport: Levels of effectiveness and determinants of use in three collegiate sport. Journal of Sport Behavior, 21, 1-15.
6.Blum, S. H. & Blum L. H. (1974). Do’s and don’ts: An informal study of some prevalling superstitions. Psychological Reports, 35, 567-571.
7.Emme, E. (1940). Modification and origin of certain beliefs in superstition among 96 college students. Journal of Psychology, 10, 279-291.
8.Epstein, S. (1993). Implications of cognitive experiential self-theory for personality and developmental psychology. In D. C. funder, et al. (Eds.). Studying lives through time: Personality and developmental psychology, 399-438. Washington, D.C.: American Psychological association.
9.Flexner,S. B. (1987). Random house dictionary of the English language (2nd ed.). New York: Random House.
10.Gregory, C.J., & Petrie, B.M. (1975). Superstitions of Canadian intercollegiate athletes: An inter-sport comparison. International Review of Sport Sociology, 10, 59-68.
11.Grimmer, M. R., & White, K. D. (1992). Nonconventional beliefs among Australian science and nonscience students. The Journal of Psychology, 126, 521-8.
12.Groth-Marnat, G & Julie-Ann P. (1998). Personality correlates of paranormal belief: Locus of control and sensation seeking. Social Behavior and Personality, p291-296.
13.Hassan, S. (2000). Releasing the bonds: Empowering people to think for themselves, Somervilie, MA: Freedom of Mind Press.
14.Henslin, J. M. (1967). Craps and magic. American Journal of Sociology, 73, 316-330.
15.Jahoda, G. (1968). The psychology of superstition. London: Allen Lane, The Penguin Press.
16.Johnston, J. C., deGroot, H.P., & Spanos, N.P. (1995). The structure of paranormal belief: A factor-analytic investigation. Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 14, 165-174.
17.Jones, W., Russell D., & Nickel, T.(1977). Belief in the paranormal scale: An objective instrument to measure belief in magical phenomena and causes. JSAS Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 7,100.
18.Killeen, P., R, W, Wildman, and R, W, Wildman II. (1974). Superstitiousness and intelligence. Psychological Reports, 34, 1158.
19.Lawrence, T. R. (1995). How many factors of parnormal belief are there? A critique of the Paranormal Belief Scale. Journal of Parapsrchology, 58, 3-25.
20.Maller, J., & Lundeen, G. (1933). Superstition and emotional maladjustment. Journal Educational Research, 27, 592-617.
21.Malinowski, B. (1954). Magic, science, and religion, New York:Doubleday, 139-140.
22.Matute, H. (1994). Learned helplessness and superstitious befavior as opposite effects of uncontrollable reinfoucement in humans. Learning and Motivation, 25, 216-232.
23.Melissa, T. & Chris B. (2003). Characteristics associated with superstitious behavior in track and field athletes: Are there NCAA divisional level differences?. Journal of Sport Behavior, 26(1),. 168-187
24.Milgram, S. (1974). Obedience to authority. New York: Harper & Row.
25.Mowen, John C. & Brad C.(2003).Exploring the antecedents and consumer behavior consequences of the trait of superstition. Psychology & Marketing, 20(12), 1045–1065.
26.Ninness, C. H. A., & Ninness, S. K. (1998). Superstitious math performance: interactions between rules and scheduled contingencies. The Psychological Record, 48, 45–62.
27.Nunnally, J. C.(1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Book Company.
28.Orenstein, A. (2002). Religion and paranormal belief. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 41, 301-311.
29.Otis, L. & Alcock, J. E. (1982). Factor affecting extraordinary belief. The Journal of Social Psychology, 118, 77-85.
30.Oxford English Dictionary (1989), http://dictionary.oed.com/cgi/entry/00242809.
31.Paulhus, D. (1983). Sphere-specific neasures of perceived control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44(6), 1253-1265.
32.Rank, O. (1968). Art and artist: Creative urge and personality development, New York: Agathon Press.
33.Rotter, J. B. (1966).Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological Monographs, 80, NO.1 (Whole No. 609).
34.Rudski, J. (2001). Competition, superstition and the illusion of control. Current Psychology, 20 (1), 68–84.
35.Rudski, J. (2003). What does a superstitious person believe? Impressions of participants. The Journal of General Psychology, 431-445.
36.Rudski, J. (2004). The illusion of control, superstitious belief, and optimism. Current Psychology: Developmental, Learning, Personality, Social, 22(4), 306-315.
37.Saucier, G. (1994). Mini-markers: A brief version of Goldberg’s unipolar big five markers. Journal of Personality Assessment, 63, 506–516.
38.Sebald, H. (1984). New-age romanticism: The quest for an alternative
lifestyle as a force of social change. Humboldt Journal of Social Relations, 11, 106–127.
39.Sjöberg, L & Wåhlberg A. af. (2002). Risk perception and new age beliefs. Risk Analysis, 22(4). 751-764.
40.Shermer, M. (2003). Why smart people believe weird things. Skeptic Volume, 10, p62-74.
41.Simmons, L. C. & Robert M. S. (2003). Cultural superstitions and the price endings used in Chinese advertising. Journal of International Marketing, 11(2), 101-111.
42.Skinner, B. F. (1948). Superstition in the pigeon. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 38, 168–172.
43.Tobacyk, J. & Gary M. (1983). Belief in paranormal phenomena: Assessment instrument development and implications for personality functioning. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44(5), 1029-1037.
44.Tobacyk, J. J. & Ed Nagot & Mark M. (1988). Paranormal beliefs and locus of control: A multidimensional examination. Journal of Personality Assessments, 52(2), 241-246.
45.Tobacyk, J. J. (1995).What is the correct dimensionality of Paranormal Beliefs? A reply to Lawrence’s critique of the paranormal belief scale. The Journal of Parapsychology, 59, 27-46.
46.Tobacyk, J.(1995). Final thoughts on issues in the measurement of paranormal beliefs. The Journal of Parapsychology, 159, 141-145.
47.Tsang E.(2004). Superstition and decision-making: Contradiction or complement? Academy of Management Executive, 18, 92-104.
48.Wagner, G. A., & Morris, E. K. (1987). “Superstitious” behavior in children. The Psychological Record, 37, 471-488.
49.Warren, C.W. (1934). Dictionary of psychology. Boston: Houghton Miffiln.
50.Wulff, D. M. (2000).Mystical experience, in varieties of anomalous experience: Examining the scientific evidence, (E. Cardena, S. J. Lynn, and S. Krippner, Eds.), Washington, D.C.: American Psychological association, 408.
51.Vyse, S. A. (1997). Believing in magic: The psychology of superstition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.45
52.Zuckerman, M. (1971). Dimensions of sentation seeking. Journal of Conruling and Climical Psychology, 36, 45-52.
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top