臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

清楚而具調整彈性的設計鏈應用模式是推動設計鏈協同設計的重要基礎。SCC(supply chain council)之 DCOR SIG嘗試提出DCOR(design chain operations reference)模式協助企業建構設計鏈modeling framework。然而，DCOR 1.0版目前僅規劃出process framework與初步之I/O定義，缺乏具體的參考應用模式及產業的實際應用案例。因此，本研究整合DC、CPD/CPC的概念及DCOR的參考模式為基礎，提出CDCOR(collaborative design chain operations reference)模式，以作為Product Life Cycle中協同設計鏈系統建制參考的基礎。該模式在專案管理(project management, PM)的基礎下，共包括五個核心程序：整合產品企劃(PP)、概念設計(CD)、細部設計(DD)、設計驗證(DR)、設計修正(DA)。與四大階段：協同設計鏈營運模式、協同設計鏈協同型態、協同設計鏈流程模式及協同設計鏈作業模式。同時提供產業CDCOR模式評估方法，本研究將該模式應用於中。綜言之，本研究的貢獻在於DCOR模式的延伸，具體的規劃協同設計鏈的參考架構，並實際implement於台灣機車產業的NPD以作為 case study，此案例亦可成為中心廠、客戶與協力廠於協同設計鏈課題的最佳實務典範。

A well-defined and flexible design chain reference model is an important basis for promoting collaborative design chain. The DCC SIG, under the Supply-Chain Council (SCC), proposed the DCOR (design chain operations reference) attempting to assist enterprises building a design chain modeling framework. So far, DCOR version 1.0 only maps out the preliminary definitions such as major design procedures and lacks of an example of best practice in industry. Moreover, few researches have attempted this issue. This study integrates the concepts of design chain (DC), collaborative product design (CPD)/collaborative product commerce (CPC) to propose CDCORM (collaborative design chain operations reference model) on the basis of DCOR as reference for developing collaborative design chain system in the product life cycle. The CDCORM includes four hierarchical levels: collaborative design chain business model, collaborative design chain cooperative model, collaborative design chain process model, and collaborative design chain operational model. Under the basis of project management (PM), the CDCORM comprises five core procedures: Product Plan (PP), Concept Design (CD), Detail Design (DD), Design Review (DR), and Design Amend (DA). This study also provides an assessment applying an example of motorcycle industry for CDCORM. Summary, the contribution of this study is to extend the DCOR model to propose a whole collaborative design chain reference model and implement it in the new product development of the motorcycle industry as case study. This case study serves an example of best practice for industry.

中文摘要 1
ABSTRACT 2
誌謝 3
目錄 4
表目錄 7
圖目錄 8
圖目錄 8
一、緒論 10
1.1 研究背景 10
1.2 研究動機 11
1.3 研究目的 12
1.4 研究範圍 13
1.5 研究架構 13
二、文獻探討 15
2.1新產品開發流程 15
2.2 協同工程 17
2.3 設計鏈與協同設計 20
2.3.1 協同設計的沿革和相關觀念 20
2.3.2 協同產品商務(Collaborative Product Commerce ,CPC) 20
2.3.3協同產品設計(collaborative Product Design , CPD) 21
2.4 主要的研發模式 22
2.4.1 設計鏈上下游關係 22
2.4.2 供應商整合範圍 24
2.4.3 OEM (Original Equipment Manufacturing） 25
2.4.4 ODM（Own/Original Design Manufacturing） 26
2.4.5 OBM（Own Brand Manufactures） 26
2.4.6 CDM 27
2.5 設計鏈作業參考模式(DCOR) 28
2.5.1 CDCOR架構 30
2.5.2 協同設計鏈營運模式 32
2.5.3 協同設計鏈協同模式 33
2.5.4 協同設計鏈流程模式 35
2.5.5 協同設計鏈作業模式 36
三、研究架構與研究方法 38
3.1 研究方法 38
3.2 個案選擇 38
3.3 資料蒐集 39
3.4 研究設計 40
四、產業現況分析及個案描述 42
4.1機車產業現況 42
4.2機車產品分析 47
4.3設計鏈架構分析 50
4.3.1低價車種 52
4.3.2熱門車種 53
4.3.3高價值車種 55
4.4 協同設計鏈角色分析 56
4.5協同設計鏈管理機制 68
4.6 產品/設計流程/設計鏈綜合分析 70
五、CDCOR模式的評估－機車產業的應用 73
5.1 車輛產業協同設計流程模式分析 73
5.1.1商品企劃 77
5.1.2概念設計 79
5.1.3細部設計 83
5.1.4設計驗證 87
5.1.5專案管理 88
5.3 協同設計鏈協同模式 90
5.4 協同設計鏈流程模式 91
5.5 協同設計鏈作業模式 92
5.6 車輛產業協同設計流程模式類別比較分析 97
5.6.1 第零層：設計鏈成員之間的合作模式比較分析 97
5.6.2 第一層：協同設計鏈營運模式比較分析 103
5.6.3 第二層：協同設計鏈協同模式比較分析 105
5.6.4 第三層：協同設計鏈流程模式比較分析 107
5.6.5 第四層：協同設計鏈作業模式比較分析 110
5.7 小結 117
六、結論與建議 118
6.1 研究結論 118
6.2 研究限制 122
6.3 後續研究方向 124
參考文獻 125
中文部分 125
英文部分 125
網站部分 128

中文部分
1.白光華，創新協同產品研發-PDM 應用實務，2003，中國生產力中心，台北。
2.陳銘崑，2004，”OEM接單型態下電子化協同設計參考模式之研究, Journal of the Chinese Institute of Industrial Engineers”， Vol. 21, No. 4, pp. 395-408
3.經濟部「資訊業電子化AB計畫」結案報告,2002
4.吳琮璠，1997，”資訊管理個案研究方法”，資訊管理學報第四卷第一期

英文部分
1.Aberdeen Group ,Collaborative Product Commerce ,http://www.aberdeen.com.
2.Asanuma, B./T. Kikutani ,1992, "Risk Absorption in Japanese Subcontracting: A Microeconometric Study of the Automobile Industry", The Journal of the Japanese and International Economies 6, pp. 1-29.
3.Asanuma, Banri,1998, "Manufacturer-Supplier Relationships in Japan and the Concept of RelationSpecific Skill," The Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, 1989, 3, 1-30.
4.Bensaou, M.,1999,: Portfolios of Buyer-Supplier Relationships. Sloan Management Review Summer, 35-44
5.Bidault, F., C. Despres , C. Butler ,1998,. Leveraged Innovation Unlocking the Innovation Potential of Strategic Supply. Macmillan, London.
6.Bill Hakanson,2000,Design-Chain Council Established as a Special Interest Group within the Supply-Chain Council - Focus on Design Chain Issues and the Design-Chain Operations Reference-Model,http://www.supply-chain.org/
7.Charles H. Fine and Daniel E. Whitney, MIT Working Paper, "Is the Make-Buy Decision Process a Core Competence ?",April 1996.
8.Clark, K.B. ,1989, Project Scope and project performance: the effects of parts strategy and supplier involvement on product development, Management Science, 35, 10, 1247-1263.
9.Cooper, R. G. ,1994,Perspective: Third Generation New Product Process, Journal of Production Management (11), 1994, 3-14
10.Datamonitor, 2005,"Global Motorcycle Manufacturers" , http://www.researchandmarkets.com
11.Davidow W. , Malone M. 1992, The Virtual Corporation, Harper Collins.
12.Deloitte Research Group ,2001, http://www.deloitte.com/
13.DeSanctis Gerardine, Monge Peter,1999,"Introduction to the Special Issue:Communication Processes for Virtual Organizations", Organization Science Vol.10,No.6, pp 693-703, November-December, 1999
14.Dyer, J.H. ,1997," Effective interfirm collaboration: How firms minimize transaction costs and maximize transaction value", Strategic Management J. 18(7) 535-556.
15.Dyer, JH, 1996,"Specialized Supplier Networks as a Source of Competitive Advantage", Strategic Management Journal, 17: 55-83.
16.Ferguson, Ch. H. and Ch. R. Morris, 1994, Computer Wars: the Fall of IBM and the Future of Global Technology, New York: Times Books.
17.Huang, C. J., Trappery, A., Yao, Y. H. ,2003, "Collaborative design , collaborative product commerce, configuration management, workflow management", Journal of the Chinese Institute of Industrial Engineers, Vol. 20,No. 4
18.Jinwoo Kim,1999, "Hierarchical Structure of Intranet Functions and Their Relative Importance: Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process for Virtual Organizations", Decision Support Systems, Volume: 23, Issue: 1, pp.59-74
19.Lee, D.L. and Chen, Y.M.,1996, "Integrated Product and Process Data Management", Integrated Computer-Aided Engineering, 13, 1-4 .
20.Leonard-Barton, D.,1992," Core capabilities and core rigidities: A paradox in managing new product development. "Strategic Management Journal 13: 111-125
21.Monczka, R.M., Trent, R.J., Callahan, T.J., 1994. "Supply base strategies to maximize supplier performance." International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics 23 (4), 42-54.
22.O'Grady, P. and Chuang, W. C.,2001, "Research issues in e-commerce and product development" , Cybernetics and Systems, Vol. 32, No. 7, pp.775-786.
23.Paul Schonseleben, Dr. (Prof), 2000,"With agility and adequate partnership strategies towards effective logistics networks",Computers in Industry, Volume: 42, Issue: 1, pp.33-42, June
24.Prasad,Biren,1996,"Concurrent Engineering Fundamentals-Integrated Product and Process Organization", Prentice Hall,New Jersey.
25.Simchi-Levi, David., Kaminsky, Philip., and Simchi-Levi, Edith.,2000, "esigning and Managing the Supply Chain -Concepts, Strategies, and Case Studies", McGraw-Hill Higher Education, New York.
26.Strader, Troy J.; Lin, Fu-Ren; Shaw,Michael J.,1998, "Information infrastructure for electronic virtual organization management",Decision Supprt Systems, Volume: 23, Issue: 1,May, 1998, pp. 75-94
27.Supply-Chain Council ,2004 Supply-chain operations reference model ,version 6.0. Supply-Chain Council, Pittsburgh, PA
28.Supply-Chain Council ,2004, Design-Chain Special Interest Group ,Design-Chain Operations Reference-model (DCOR) 1.0 .
29.Twigg, D. ,1995 ,'Design Chain Management: Inter-organisational Co-ordination of Product Development in the UK Automotive Industry", Doctoral Thesis, University of Warwick
30.Wang, L., Shen, W., Xie, H., Neelamkavil, J., Pardasani, A. ,2002,"Collaborative conceptual design-state of the art and future trends" , Computer-Aided Design, Vol. 34, Iss. 13, pp. 981-996.
31.Yin, R. K.,1994, "Case Study Research, Design and Methods (2nd ed.)", Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA, Merriam, S. B.,1988,"Case study research in education". Thousand Oaks, CA: Jossey-Bass.
32.Stake, R. E. ,2000, "Case studies" In N. K. Denzin, & Y. S. Lincoln, (Eds.). Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

網站部分
1.Supply-Chain Council , http:// www.supply-chain.org/