跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(44.220.181.180) 您好!臺灣時間:2024/09/10 05:50
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:邱薇瑄
研究生(外文):CHIU WEI HSUAN
論文名稱:影響企業員工知識庫採用意願之研究
論文名稱(外文):Factors Influencing the Acceptance of the Knowledge Repositories
指導教授:閔庭祥閔庭祥引用關係傅振瑞傅振瑞引用關係
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立高雄應用科技大學
系所名稱:商務經營研究所
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:一般商業學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2006
畢業學年度:94
語文別:中文
論文頁數:87
中文關鍵詞:知識管理系統知識庫網路效應計畫行為理論科技接受模式關鍵多數知識品質
外文關鍵詞:Knowledge Management SystemKnowledge RepositoryNetwork EffectsTPBTAMCritical Massknowledge quality
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:414
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:3
隨著知識管理的風潮,導入知識管理系統的企業越來越多,企業內知識管理
系統的主要核心是知識庫,對許多企業來說,知識庫是不可或缺的設備,但目前
很多公司內的知識庫,因為員工的使用心態而沒有達成導入知識庫應有的成效。
本研究欲藉由計劃行為理論與科技接受模式的觀點,探討員工採用知識庫的
意願,並從網路外部性與知識品質的角度,瞭解這些因素對於員工採用知識庫意
願的影響。
本研究以問卷調查進行實證研究,以e-mail 的方式寄發邀請函至104人力銀
行與天下雜誌排名之前1000大製造業與500大服務業的資訊部門,以回覆邀請函
並願意配合參與研究的企業為調查對象,共有 28家企業回函並願意參予研究,發
放問卷為320份,回收268份,有效問卷193份。研究結果顯示:
1.「關鍵多數」、「知覺有用」、「知覺易用」,會影響員工貢獻知識的意願。
2.「知覺有用」、「知覺易用」,會影響員工收集知識的意願。
3.「知覺易用」、「知識品質」,透過「知覺有用」會影響員工貢獻與收集知識。
Owing to the knowledge management being in vogue, there are many industries trying to adopt the knowledge management system. To most of the companies, knowledge repositories are essential components in most organizational settings for effective implementation of knowledge management. Unfortunately, at present day, many knowledge repositories in organizations are not yet successfully implemented.

Based on the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) and Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), this study inquires employee acceptance of the knowledge repositories and try to inspect the factors affecting the willingness of employees on knowledge repository through the view of network externality and knowledge quality. The main purpose of this study is to explore the effect of acceptance to the employees’ knowledge repositories.

This study is subject to empirical verification with the use of a questionnaire survey. An email attention to the managers of MIS departments of the top 1000 manufactures and top 500 service companies in Taiwan were sent through a list of 104 Job Bank and Common Wealth Magazine. With the approvals of top management of twenty-eight MIS departments, 320 questionnaires were sent out to these companies and 268 replies were received. In total, there are 193 valid questionnaires. Important findings are listed as follows:
1."Critical Mass", “Perceived Usefulness"and "Perceived Ease of Use" affect the acceptance of employee to contribute for knowledge.
2.“Perceived Usefulness", "Perceived Ease of Use" affect the acceptance of employee to collect knowledge.
3."Perceived Ease of Use" "knowledge quality" can affect acceptance of employee to contribute and collect knowledge through “Perceived Usefulness".
摘要 I
Abstract II
致謝 III
目錄 IV
表目錄 VII
圖目錄 VIII
一、緒論 1
1.1 研究背景與動機 1
1.2 研究目的 3
1.3 研究範圍 3
1.4 研究內容與流程 4
二、文獻探討 6
2.1 知識 6
2.1.1知識的定義 6
2.1.2知識的分類 6
2.1.3知識品質 7
2.2 知識管理 9
2.2.1知識管理的目的 9
2.2.2知識管理的定義 10
2.2.3組織與知識管理 10
2.2.4知識管理系統 12
2.3 知識庫 14
2.3.1知識庫定義 14
2.3.2知識庫的概念 15
2.3.3知識庫的特性 16
2.4科技接受行為 19
2.4.1慎思行為理論(TRA) 19
2.4.2計劃行為理論(TPB) 20
2.4.3科技接受模型(TAM) 23
2.4.4解構計畫行為理論(Decomposed TPB) 25
2.4.5國內外科技接受行為相關研究 27
2.5網路外部性理論(Network Externalities) 29
2.5.1網路外部性的定義 29
2.5.2網路外部性之類型與來源 30
2.5.3網路外部性與關鍵多數理論(Critical Mass) 31
三、研究模型與方法 33
3.1 研究模型 33
3.2 研究假說 35
3.3 變數定義與操作化 43
3.4 問卷前測(Pretest)與測試(Pilot Test) 48
3.5 資料收集 48
3.6 資料處理與分析 49
四、資料分析 51
4.1敘述性統計分析 51
4.1.1基本資料 51
4.1.2對知識庫的使用情況 52
4.2 效度 53
4.2.1內容效度與表面效度 53
4.2.2 建構效度 53
4.3 信度 57
4.4 假說檢定 58
4.4.1影響行為意願 60
4.4.2影響知覺有用 62
4.4.3路徑圖 65
4.5 研究分析 67
五、結論與建議 69
5.1 研究結論 69
5.1.1知識貢獻意願 69
5.1.2知識收集意願 70
5.2 研究意涵與貢獻 71
5.2.1學術貢獻 71
5.2.2管理實務意涵 71
5.3 研究限制 73
5.4 未來研究方向 74

六、參考文獻 75
附件1 學術問卷邀請函 83
附錄2 正式問卷 84
中文部分
1.王育民,2004,知識管理系統成功模式建構與驗證之研究,國立中山大學資訊管理學系博士論文。
2.王保進,2002,視窗版SPSS與行為科學研究,台北:心理出版社。
3.王學亮、陳郁青,1999,知識管理系統分析模式之探討-以信用卡風險管理之個案經驗知識庫為例,中華民國科技管理論文集。
4.吳佳純,2004,不同策略型態對於知識管理系統特徵與績效之關聯性探討-以高科技產業為例,立德管理學院科技管理研究所碩士論文。
5.吳明隆,2000,「SPSS統計應用實務」,松崗書局。
6.吳明隆,2006,「SPSS統計應用學習實務問卷分析與統計應用」,第三版,知城數位科技股份有限公司。
7.李敏正,2003,延伸計劃行為理論以預測WWW持續使用之研究,高雄第一科技大學資訊管理研究所碩士論文。
8.卓秋季,1998,工模式與創新能力之研究-知識管理觀點,政治大學科技管理研究所碩士論文。
9.林淳一,1999,建立知識管理資料庫以提昇企業競爭力之研究,大業大學事業經營研究所碩士論文。
10.邱皓政, 2005,「量化研究與統計分析:spss中文視窗版資料分析範例解析」,第二版,五南圖書出版股份有限公司。
11.炬見工作室,2005,知識管理-企業核心競爭力和永續發展的關鍵報告,博碩文化股份有限公司。
12.高啟文,2003,以網路經濟學及複雜理論探討行動商務成長模式之研究,實踐大學企業管理所碩士論文。
13.張紹勳,2000,研究方法,滄海書局。
14.陳立邦,2004,運用知識庫模式輔助GPS測量指派作業之研究逢甲大學土地管理學系碩士論文
15.陳泳成,2003,以修正科技接受模式探討影響「使用者自建系統接受」之因素,國立中山大學資訊管理研究所碩士論文。
16.陳淑華,2003,知識管理資訊系統服務品質之研究-以某資訊科技為例,銘傳大學資訊管理系碩士論文。
17.陳順宇,2005,「多變量分析」,第四版,華泰書局。
18.黃智強,2000,影響採用網路購物因素之研究-以網路書店為例,中央大學資訊管鋰學系碩士論文。
19.溫素真,2004,消費者使用簡訊折價卷之行為意圖,高雄第一科技大學行銷與流通系碩士論文。
20.詹定邦,2002,知識管理在顧問業發展加盟連鎖之應用探討,大葉大學事業經營研究所碩士論文。
21.劉文欽、馬芳資、張孟元,1999,知識管理之理論與實務討,第十屆國際資訊管理學術研討會論文集,25-32
22.蔡采芳,1999,顧問業知識管理系統架構之研究,大業大學資訊管理研究所碩士論文。
23.盧希鵬,2005,網路行銷電子化企業經營策略,雙葉書廊有限公司。
24.謝政益,2003,網路電話接受度之研究,台灣科技大學資訊管理所碩士論文。
25.謝政勳,2004,應用分解式計劃行為理論探討消費者採用第三代行動通訊服務意願之研究,樹德科技大學資訊管理所碩士論文。
26.iThome電腦報,http://www.ithome.com.tw/


英文部分

1.Adams, D. A., Nelson, R. R., & Todd, P. A. (1992). “Perceived usefulness, ease of use and usage of information technology: a replication.” MIS Quarterly, 16, 227-247.
2.Ajzen, Icek, & Thomas J.Madden (1985).“Predction of Goal-Directed Behavior.Attitudes,Intentions,and Perceived Behavioral Control.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 22, 453-474.
3.Bandura, A. (1977). “Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. ”Psychological Review, 84, 191-215.
4.Bansler, J. P. & Havn, E. C. (2003). “Building community knowledge systems: an empirical study of IT-support for sharing best practices among managers.” Knowledge and Process Management, 10, 156.
5.Bansler, J. P. & Havn, E.(2004).“Exploring the role of network effects in IT implementation:The case of Knowledge repositories.”Information Technology and People,17,268-283.
6.Bart van den Hooff & Jan A.de Ridder (2004).“Knowledge sharing in context:the influence of organizational commitment,communication climate and CMC use on knowledge sharing.”Journal of Knowledge Management, 8,6, 117.
7.Barth, S. (2000).“KM Horror Stories.” Knowledge Management, 3, 36-40.
8.Bhattancherjee, A. (2000).“ Acceptance of E-Commerce Services: The Case of Electronic Brokerages. ”IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics- PartA: Systems and Humans, 30, 411-420.
9.Chau, Y. K. & Hu, J. H. (2001).“ Information technology acceptance by individual professionals: a model comparison approach. ”Decision Sciences, 32, 699-718.
10.Constant, D., Kiesler, S.,& Sproull, L.(1994).“What's mine is ours,or is it? A study of attitudes about information sharing.”Information System Research,5,400-421.
11.Davenport, T. H. & L.Prusak (1998). “Working Knowledge.” Boston:Harvard Business School Press.
12.Davis, F. D. (1986). “A Technology Acceptance Model for Empirically Testing New End-User Information Systems:Technology and Results.” Doctoral dissertation,Sloan School of Management.Massachusetts Institute of Technolohy.
13.Davis, F. D. (1989). “Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology.” MIS Quarterly, 13, 319.
14.DeLone, W. H. & McLean, E. R. (1992).“ Information Systems Success:The Quest for the Dependent Variable.” Information Systems Research, 3,1, 60-95.
15.DeLone, W. H. & McLean, E. R. (2003).“The DeLone and McLean Model of Information System Success:A Ten-Year Update.”Journal of Management Information Systems,19, 9-30.
16.Dixon, N. M. (2000).“Common Knowledge.”, Boston, MA.: Harvard Business School Press.
17.Fishbein, M. & Ajzen, I. (1975). “Belief, attitude intention and behavior: an introduction to theory and research.”, MA: Addision-Wesley.
18.Gay, L.R.(1992).“Educational Research Competencies for Analysis and Application ”.New York:Macmillan.
19.Gold, A. H., Malhotra, A., & Segars, A. H. (2001). “Knowledge management: An organizational capabilities perspective. ”Journal of Management Information Systems, 18, 185.
20.Harris, D.B. (1998).“Creating a Knowledge Centric Information Technology Environment.”, Sep.15,http://www.htcs.com/ckc.html.
21.Housel, T. & Bell, A. H. (2001). “Measuring and Managing Knowledge.” Macmillan/McGraw-Hill,New York.
22.Hu, P. J., Chau, P. Y. K. , Sheng, O.R.L, & Tam, K.Y.(1999).“Examining the Technology Acceptance Model Using Physician Acceptance of Telemedicine Technology.”Journal of Management Information Systems,16,91-112.
23.Huber, G. P. (2001). “Transfer of knowledge in knowledge management systems: Unexplored issues and suggested studies.” European Journal of Information Systems, 10, 72.
24.Kaiser, H.F.(1974).“An index of factorial simplicity .”Psychometrika,39,31-36.
25.Katz, M. L. & C. Shapiro (1985).“Network Externalities, Competition and Compatibility.”American Economic Review, 75,424-440.
26.Kristen, B. D., Gibb, D., Charlotte, H., & Stephen, H. (2004).“ Toward a Model of Effective Knowledge Management and Directions for Future Research: Culture, Leadership, and CKOs.” Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 10, 26.
27.Leitch, A., Robert, K., & Davis, R. (1992).” Accounting Information System.” Prentice-Hall.
28.Lin, C.C & Lu, H.(2000). “Towards an understanding of the behavioural intention to use a web site. ”International Journal of Information Management, 20, 197-208.
29.Lou, H., Luo, W., & Strong, D. (2000). “Perceived critical mass effect on groupware acceptance. ”European Journal of Information Systems, 9, 91.
30.Lu, H. P. & Gustafson, D. H. (1994).“ An empirical study of perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use on computerized support system use over time.”International Journal of Information management, 14, 317-329.
31.Marchand, D. (1990). “Managing Information Quality.” In Book Information Quality:Definitions and Dimensions.,Edited by Wormel,I.,Taylor G,Los A., 7-17.
32.Markus, M. L. & Connolly, T. (1990). “Why CSCW applications fail: problems in the adoption of interdependent work tools.” In Los Angeles,California..
33.Markus, M. L. (2001).“ Toward a theory of knowledge reuse: Types of knowledge reuse situations and factors in reuse success. ”Journal of Management Information Systems, 18, 57.
34.Mathieson, K. (1991).“ Predicting user intentions: comparing the technology acceptance model with the theory of planned behavior.” Information Systems Research, 2, 173-191.
35.Mckinney, V., Yoon, K., & Zahedi, F. M. (2002). “The measurement of web-customer satisfaction:an expectation and disconfirmation approach.” Information System Research, 13, 296-315.
36.Gong, M., Xu, Y. & Yu, Y. (2004). “An Enhanced Technology Acceptance Model for Web-Based Learning. ”Journal of Information Systems Education, 15, 365.
37.Mockler R.J. (1992). “Developing Knowledge-based Systems Using an Expert System Shell. ”New York,Macmillan Publishing Company.
38.Moon, J. W. & Kim, Y. G. (2001).“ Extending the TAM for a world-wide-web context. ”Information and Management, 38, 217-230.
39.Nonaka, I. & H.Takeuchi (1995). “The Knowledge Creating Company:How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation.” Oxford University Press.
40.Oliver, P.E., Marwell,G.. & Teixeira, R.(1985).“A theory of the critical mass:interdependence,group heterogeneity,and the production of collective action.”American Journal of Sociology,91,522-556.
41.Oren, S.S. , S.A.Smith & R.B.Wilson(1982)“Competitive nonlinear tariffs.”Journal of Economic Theory,129,49-71.
42.Pae, J. H. & Hyun, J. S. (2002). “The impact of technology advancement strategies on consumer's patronage decisions.” Information and Management, 40, 191-204.
43.Paul, L. & John, I. (2003). “Why do people use information technology? a critical review of the technology acceptance model.” Information and Management, 40, 191-204.
44.Polanyi, M. (1966). “The tacit dimension.” Doubleday Anchor, Garden City, NY.
45.Rai, A., Lang, S. S., & Welker, R. B.(2002). “Assessing the Validity of IS Success Models:An Empirical Test and Theoretical Analysis,“Information Systems Research,13,50-69.
46.Rogers, E. M. & Allbritton, M. M.(1995).“Interactive Communication Technologies in Business Organization.”Journal of Business Communication,32,175-195.
47.Rohlfs, J.(1974).“A theory of interdepdndent demand for a communication service.”The Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science,5,16-37.
48.Ruggles, R. (1998).“ The state of the notion: Knowledge management in practice. ”California Management Review, 40, 80.
49.Sarvary, M. (1999).“ Knowledge management and competition in the consulting industry. ”California Management Review, 41, 95-107.
50.Sedden, P. B. (1997).“A Respecification and Extension of the DeLone and McLean Model of IS Success.”Information System Research,8,240-253.
51.Seddon, P. B. & Kiew, M. Y. (1994).“ A Partial Test and Development of the DeLone and McLean Model of IS Success. ”The Internaltional Conference on Information System,Vancouver,Canada, 99-110.
52.Spek, R. & Spijkervet, A.(1997)“Knowledge Management:dealing intelligently with knowledge.”
53.Susan, S. & Demetrius, P. (2005).“ Questionnaire Development to Predict Mammorgraphy Intertion Among Women in Southern Louisiana.” Journal of Nursing Measurement, 13, 23.
54.Taylor, S. & Todd, P. A. (1995). “Decomposition and crossover effects in the theory of planned behavior :A study of consumer adoption intention.” International Journal of Research in Marketing, 12, 137-155.
55.Taylor, S. & Todd, P. A. (1995).“ Understanding information technology usage: a test of competing models.” Information Systems Research, 6, 144-176.
56.Teo, Thompson S.H., Vivien K.G. Lim and Raye Y.C. Lai(1999),“Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation in Internet Usage,”The International Journal of Management Science,27,25-37.
57.Tiwana, A. (2002).“ The Knowledge Management Toolkit:Orchestrating IT,Strategy,and Knowledge Platform.” Prentice Hall,New Jersey.
58.Triandis, H. C. (1977). “Interpersonal Behavior.”, CA: Brooks/Cole.
59.Venkatesh, V. (2000).“ Determinants of perceived ease of use: Integrating control, intrinsic motivation, and emotion into the technology acceptance model.” Information Systems Research, 11, 342-365.
60.Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., & David, G. B. (2003).“ User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. ”MIS Quarterly, 27, 425-478.
61.Shih, Y.Y. & Fang, K. (2004). “The use of a decomposed theory of planned behavior to study Internet banking in Taiwan.” Ineternet Research, 14, 213.
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
1. 紀國鐘. (2001). 電子化政府推動現況與未來發展. 研考雙月刊, 25(1), 15-20.
2. 李小芬. (2001). 學校行銷. 社教雙月刊, 101, 55-56.
3. 吳珮君. (2006). 新學校的行銷策略分析――以政大附中首次招生為例. 學校行政雙月刊, 41, 165-175.
4. 吳奕軍. (1998). 從傳統行銷出發看網路行銷. 突破雜誌, 15, 98-101.
5. 吳清山. (2004). 學校行銷管理的理念與策略. 北縣教育, 47, 23-34.
6. 吳國基. (2005). 學校行銷策略在學校行政上的應用與實務. 學校行政雙月刊, 37, 96-108.
7. 吳明隆、許詩旺. (2004). 國民小學教育人員對行銷策略認知及其運作之研究. 學校行政雙月刊, 32, 64-78.
8. 何福田. (2005). 學校行銷的意義與重要性. 研習資訊雙月刊, 22(1), 1-9.
9. 江偉平. (1997). 推動電子化政府強化競爭力. 通訊雜誌, 42, 48-56.
10. 羅清水(民87)。回流教育與教師專業成長。師友月刊,376,12-15。
11. 謝振裕(民88)。從成人教育理念看教師專業成長。國教之友,51,3,52-56。
12. 蔡敏玲(民90)。教育質性研究報告的書寫:我在紀實與虛構之間的認真與想像。國立臺北師範學院學報,14,233+235-257+259。
13. 蔡培村(民87)。終身學習與教師生涯發展。臺灣教育,565,14-26。
14. 黃淑馨(民88)。啟動教師學習之輪。教師天地,98,63-70。
15. 張添洲(民85)。教師生涯發展—成功的喜悅。技術及職業教育雙月刊,31,21-23。