臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

有鑑於員工旅遊活動在企業內實行甚久，但在國內外文獻中鮮少深入探討其對企業的影響。為了解員工旅遊活動在企業內部的角色及其影響，本研究以184位高科技產業中的員工為有效樣本，並以組織認同觀點試圖了解企業員工旅遊活動對社會資本間之影響，及社會資本對於知識分享意願之影響。透過個別變數文獻探討，將存在於個別變數間之關係連結起來。

本研究採層級迴歸分析，在人口統計變項及角色內行為控制下，結果顯示 (1) 企業員工旅遊活動，有助於組織成員建立社會資本；(2) 企業員工旅遊活動，有助於提升組織成員間知識分享意願；(3) 社會資本與知識分享意願間顯著呈現正向關係；(4) 社會資本對企業員工旅遊與知識分享意願間之關係具中介作用；(5) 組織認同對企業員工旅遊與社會資本間之關係具干擾作用；(6) 組織認同對社會資本與知識分享意願間之關係具干擾作用。最後並根據上述研究結果加以提出研究結論與建議。

Having acknowledged that corporate employee packaged tour has carried out in business for a long time, but less literature talk about corporate employee packaged tour. In order to understand the role and the influence of corporate employee packaged tour in business, this study empirically tested the influence of corporate employee packaged tour to social capital by organizational identification.

The results of this study indicated (1) corporate employee packaged tour was in general positively related with social capital, (2) corporate employee packaged tour was in general positively related with one's willingness of knowledge sharing, (3) social capital was in general positively related with one's willingness of knowledge sharing, (4) social capital was in general medium with corporate employee packaged tour and the willingness of knowledge sharing, (5) organizational identification in some degree intervened the relationships between corporate employee packaged tour and social capital, (6) organizational identification in some degree intervened the relationships between social capital and the willingness of knowledge sharing. Conclusions, recommendations, as well as limitations were also discussed based on the research results.

第壹章 緒論 ....................................1

第一節 研究背景與動機 ..........................1
第二節 研究目的 ................................4
第三節 研究流程 ................................5

第貳章 文獻探討與假設建立 ......................6

第一節 企業旅遊 ................................6
第二節 社會資本 ...............................11
第三節 組織認同 ...............................17
第四節 知識分享 ...............................19
第五節 研究假設 ...............................22

第參章 研究方法 ...............................29

第一節 研究架構 ...............................29
第二節 變數操作性定義及衡量 ...................30
第三節 樣本選擇與資料蒐集 .....................37

第肆章 研究結果 ...............................39

第一節 樣本結構分析與說明 .............................................................................................39
第二節 信度分析、及相關係數分析 ............................................43
第三節 同源變異檢測 ............................................46
第四節 各變數間關係之迴歸分析結果 ............................................47

第伍章 結論與建議 ............................................54

第一節 研究結論 ............................................54
第二節 建議 ...................................59

參考文獻 ......................................61
附錄一 ........................................68

李總縯，〈組織氣候、組織認同、組織效能之關聯性研究－以非營利組織國際獅子會台灣地區分會為實證對象〉，中原大學企業管理研究所碩士論文，2002。

巫玫慧，〈公司團體套裝旅遊之探討：從員工旅遊動機之觀點〉，臺北：私立中國文化大學觀光事業研究所碩士論文，2003。

徐瑋伶、鄭伯壎，〈組織認同：理論與本質之初步探索分析〉，中山管理評論，10卷，1期，45-64，2002。
言午士軍，管理學，台北：東華書局，1988。

黃閔穗，〈公司團體套裝旅遊之實證研究〉，臺北：私立中國文化大學觀光事業研究所碩士論文，2002。

Alavi, M. and Leidner, D. E. (2001), Knowledge Management and Knowledge Management Systems: Conceptual Foundations and Research Issues, MIS Quarterly, Vol.25(1), pp. 107-136.

Baron, K. M. and Kenny, D. A., 1986. The Moderator-Mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychology Research: Conceptual, Strategic, and Statistical Considerations, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol.51(6) , pp. 1173-1182.

Baumeister, R. F., and Leary, M. R. (1995), The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation,
Psychological Bulletin, Vol.61, pp.224-226.

Baumeister, R. F., and Tice, D. M. (1985), Self-esteem and response s to success and failure: Subsequent performance and intrinsic motivation, Journal of Personality, Vol.53, pp.450-467.

Becerra-fernandez, I. and Sabherwal, R. (2001), Organizational Knowledge Management: A Contingency Perspective, Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol.18(1), pp. 23-55.

Brown, J. D., Collins, R. L., and Schmidt, G. W. (1988), Self-esteem and direct versus indirect forms of self-enhancement, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol.55, pp.445-453.

Brown, J. S. and Duquid, P. (2000), Knowledge and Organization: A Social-practice Perspective, Organization Science, Vol.12(2), pp. 198-213.

Buckman, R. H. (1998), Knowledge sharing at Buckman Labs, Journal of Business Stategy, Vol.19, pp. 11-15.

Burkhardt, M. E., and Brass, D. J. (1990), Changing patterns or patterns of Change: The effects of a change in technology on social network structure and power, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol.35, pp. 105-127.

Cheney, G. (1983), On the various and changing meaning of organizational membership: A Field study of organizational identification, Communication Monographs, Vol.50, pp.342-362.

Child, J. (2001), Trust－The Fundamental Bond in Global Collaboration, Organizational Dynamics, Vol.29(4), pp.274-288.

Cohen, M. D., and Levinthal, D. A. (1990), Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol.35, pp. 128-152.

Coleman, D. (1999), Groupware: Collaboration and knowledge sharing. In Liebowitz, J. (Eds.), Knowledge Management Handbook. New York: CRC Press.

Davenport, T. H., and Prusak, L. (1998). Working knowledge: how organizations manage what they know. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press. (胡瑋珊譯，民88，知識管理：企業組織如何有效運用知識，台北：中國生產力中心。)

Dixon, N. M. (2000), Common knowledge: How companies thrive by sharing what they know, Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

Drucker, P. F. (1993), Post- Capitalist Society, New York: Harper Business.

Dutton, J. E., Dukerich, J. M., & Harquail, C. V. (1994), Organizational images and member identification, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol.39, pp. 239-263.

Fraser, V., Marcella, R., and Middleton, I. (2000), Employee perceptions of knowledge sharing: Emplyoee threat or synergy for the greater good? Competitive Intelligence Review, Vol.11(2), pp. 39-52.

Gold, A. H., Malhotra, A, and Segars, A. (2001), Knowledge Management: An Organizational Capabilities Perspective, Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol.18(1), pp. 185-214.

Grant, R. M. (1996), Prosperin in Dynamically-competitive Environments: Organizational Capability as Knowledge Intergration, Organization Science, Vol.7(4), pp.375-387.

Greenard, S. (1998), Storing shaping and sharing collective wisdom, Workforce, pp. 82-88.

Hansen, M. T. (1998b), Combining network centrality and related knowledge: Explaining effective knowledge sharing in multiunit firms. Working paper, Harvard Business, Boston.

Hansen, M. T. (1999), The Search-Transfer Problem: The Role of Weak Ties in Sharing Knowledge Across Organization Subunits, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol.44, pp.82-111.

Hansen, Marie Louise Mors, and Bjørn Løvås (2005), Knowledge sharing in organizations: multiple networks, multiple phases, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 48, No. 5, pp. 776–793.

Hanson, M. T. (2002), Knowledge Networks: Explaining Effective Knowledge Sharing in Multiunit companies, Organization Science, Vol.13(3), pp.232-248.

Henry, R. A. (1995), Improving group judgement accuracy: Information sharing and determining the best member, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, vol.62, pp.190-197.

Ibarra, H. and Andrews, S. (1993), Power, social influence and sensemaking: Effects of network centrality and proximity on employee perceptions. Administrative Science Quarterly, vol.38, pp. 277-303.

Kalling, T. (2003), Organization-internal Transfer of Knowledge and the Role of a Qualitative Case Study, Knowledge and Process Management, Vol.10(2), pp. 115-126.

Knippenberg, D. and Schie, E. CM. (2000), Foci and correlates of organizational identification, Journal of Organizational Psychology, Vol.73, pp. 137-147.

Kogut, B. and Zander U. (1992), Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology, Organization Science, Vol.3(3), pp.383-397.

Kogut, B. and Zander U. (1996), What Firms Do? Coodination, Identity and Learning, Organization Science, Vol.7(5), pp. 502-518.

Lam, A. (2000), Tacit Knowledge, Organization Learning and Social Institution: An Integrated Framework, Organization Science, Vol.21(3), pp. 487-513.

Lee, H. and Choi, B. (2003), Knowledge Management Enablers, Process, and Organizational Performance: An Integrative View and Empirical Examination, Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol.20(1), pp. 179-228.

Lee, S. M. (1971), An empirical analysis of organizational identification, Academy of Management Journal, Vol.14, pp. 213-226.

Leenders, R. Th. A. J., & Gabbay, S. M. (1999b), CSC: An agenda for the future. In R. Th. A. J. Leenders & S. M. Gabbay (Eds.), Corporate social capital and liability, pp. 483-494, Boston: Kluwer.

Leenders, R. Th. A. J., and Gabbay, S. M. (1999a), Corporate social capital and liability, Boston: Kluwer.

Lesser, E. L.(2000), Leveraging Social Capital in Organizations, in Lesser, E. L. (Eds.), Knowledge and Social Capital: Foundations and Applications, pp.1-16.

Lin, N, (1982), Social Resources and Instrumental Action, in paper V. Marsden ＆ Nan Lin, eds., Social Structure and Network Analysis, Beverly Hill: Sage Publications.

Lin, N, (2001), Social Capital: A Theory of Social Structure and Action, Cambridge University Press.

Long, J. S. (1983), Covariance structural models—An introduction to LISREL. Beverly Hills and London, Sage Publications.

Mael, F. A., & Ashforth, B. E. (1992), Alumni and their alma mater: A partial test of the reformulated model of organizational identification, Journal of Organizational Behavior, Vol.13, pp. 103-123.

March, R. (2000), The Japanese travel life cycle, Journal of Travel ＆Tourism Marketing, Vol.9(1/2), pp. 194-195.

Matson, E., Patiath, P. and Shaver, T. (2003), Avoiding Competence Substitution Through Knowledge Sharing, Academy of Management Review, Vol.25(2), pp.294-311.

McEvily, B., Perrone, V. and Zaheer, A. (2003), Trust as an Organizing Principle, Organization Science, Vol.14(1), pp.91-103.

Mowday, R. T., Porter, L. W. and Steers, R. M. (1982), Employee-organizational linkages: The psychology of commitment, absenteeism, and turnover. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

Nahapiet, J., and Ghoshal, S. (1998), Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organization advantage, Academy of Management Review, Vol.23, pp. 242-266.

Nonaka, I., Toyama, R. and Konno, N. (2000), SECI, Ba, and Leadership: A Unified Model of Dynamic Knowledge Creation, Long Range Planning, Vol.33, pp.5-34.

Nooetboom, B. (2000), Learing by Interaction: Absorptive Capability, Cognitive Distance and Governance, Journal of Management and Governance, Vol.4(1), pp.69-92.

Okhuysen, G. A., and Eisenhardt, K. M. (2002), Integrating knowledge in groups: How formal interventions enable flexibility, Organization Science, Vol.13, pp.370-386.

Osterloh M. and Frey B. S. (2000), Motivation, knowledge transfer, and organization forms, Organization Science, Vol.11(5), pp.538-550.

Pratt, M. B. (1998), To be or not to be: Central questions in organizational identification, In D. A. Whetten and P.C. Godfrey(Eds.), Identity in organizations, pp. 172-178, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Schulz, M. (2001), The uncertain relevance of newness: organization leaning and knowledge flow, Academy of Management Journal, Vol.44(4), pp.661-681.

Smith, K., Smith, K., Olian, J., Sims, H., O’Bannon, D., & Scully, J. (1994), Top management team demography and process: the role of social integration and communication, Administrative Science Quarterly, vol. 39, pp. 412-438.

Szulanski, G. (1996), Exploring Internal Stickiness: Imprediments To The Transfer of Best Practice Within The Firm, Strategic Management Journal, Vol.17(winter special issue), pp.27-43.

Tang, L, I. (2000), Knowledge sharing network study, Unpublished master dissertation, Department of Business Administration, National Chengchi University.(in Chinese)

Teece, D. (1998), Research Directions for Knowledge Management, California Management, Vol.40(3), pp.289-292.

Tsai, W. (2000), Social capital, strategic relatedness and the formation of interaorganal linkages, Strategic Management Journal, Vol.21, pp.925-939.

Tsai, W. and Ghoshal, S. (1998), Social capital and value creation: The role of intra-firm networks, Academy of Management Journal, vol. 41, pp. 464-476.

Uhlbien, M., Graen, G. B., and Scandura, T. A. (2000), Implications of Leader-Member Exchange (LMX) for strategic human resource management systems: Relationships as social capital for competitive advantage. Research in Personnel and Human Resource Management, vol. 18, pp. 137-185.

Uzzi B. (1996), The sources and conseque nces of embededness for the economic performance of organizations: The network effect, American Sociological Review, Vol.61, pp. 674-698.

Von Hippel, E. (1994), Sticky information and the locus of problem solving: Implications for innovation, Management Science, Vol.40, pp.429-430.

von Krogh, G. (1998), Care in Knowledge Creation, California Management Review, Vol.40(3), pp.133-153.

Wang, K. C., Huang, M. S., & Chen, W. Y. (2002), What makes a good in-company group package tour: An exploratory investigation, In K. Chon, & A. Ogle (Eds.), First Asia Pacific Forum for Graduate Students Research in Tourism Conference Proceeding, pp. 117-124.

Yli-renko H., Autio, E. and Sapienza H.J. (2001), Social capital, knowledge acquisition, and knowledge exploitation in young technology-based firms, Strategic Management Journal , Vol. 22, pp. 587-613.