臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

本研究主要是從現階段台日國會交流，探討台灣的國會外交。由於台灣外交受到中國全方位無理的打壓，國際社會的處境十分艱難。因此在許多無邦交國家，傳統外交工作及駐外單位與外國行政機關的接洽聯繫經常受到限制，然而經由國會交流管道，卻往往可以達到一定的成效。另外就邦交國而言，由於國會代表民意，國會議員間的互訪、交流、聯繫也更能加強雙邊互動。選定日本為研究個案的原因，主要是日本為內閣制國家，國會外交的影響較為直接，且近期台日交流有重大發展，如美日安保諮商「二加二會談」首度納入台海問題、日本支持台灣成為WHA觀察員、台灣觀光客赴日免簽證等；另外，台日雙方國會議員往來密切，且有運作成熟之跨黨派國會聯誼組織，進行有系統的交流，如台日交流聯誼會、日華議員懇談會等。
本研究係採用深度訪談法，選擇的訪談對象為參與外交事務的國會議員、立法院行政人員、外交部官員、日本國會議員，以及國際關係學者。經由訪談分析，所獲致的研究成果有：一、了解台灣目前國會外交現況、困境以及未來可能的發展策略。二、評估國會外交的功能，並探討其運作方式對台灣外交與其他方面之影響。三、借重台日國會交流經驗，提供政府國會外交政策建議，藉以協助台灣突破目前所面臨的外交困境。

It is mainly to explore the implications of congressional diplomacy of Taiwan in this study, by reviewing the exchanges of the Congress between Taiwan and Japan at current stage. Undoubtedly, China is doing its best to keep Taiwan out of the diplomatic arena at all levels in the world, so as to worsen the situation of national identity of Taiwan in the international community. Under such circumstances, the restrictions are constantly imposed upon the routine works and contacts for the Taiwan Representative Offices abroad with government authorities or agencies in the undiplomatic countries.
As for the congress represents the general public will in the democratic countries, it is surely helpful for the interactions of bilateral relations among congressmen of Taiwan and other countries through visits, exchanges and contacts. Furthermore, it is achieved in the goal of the promotion on the substantial relations with other countries. Japan is a cabinet-oriented country, its members of the Cabinet come from the Congress. It therefore produces direct influence on diplomacy of congress. Besides, there are some enormous breakthroughs on the exchanges between Taiwan and Japan at current stage, such as: the Taiwan issue has been put on the agenda of ”2 plus 2” US-Japan security consultation meeting for the first time, Japan supports Taiwan as an observer in the WHA, free visa entry treatment for Taiwanese tourists, and so on. Based on this, it is primary to take the exchanges of the Congresses between Taiwan and Japan as the subject of this study. Moreover, there are maturely operating and multiparty members’ amity groups conducted in both country’s congress, which are keeping close contacts, such as Taiwan-Japan Exchanges Amity Group, Sino-Japanese Diet Members Conference. It is going to be reviewed on this part in the study.
The method of in-depth interview will be exercising in the research. The selected interviewees are ranging from those legislators who are actively participating in foreign affairs, senior administrators of the Legislative Yuan, officials of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Japanese Congressmen and heavy-weighted scholars who are familiar with international relations. Through the analysis of interviews, it will be expected to produce some outcomes in this study, such as following:
1. To realize the situation, hardship and future possible development strategy of the congressional diplomacy of Taiwan at current stage.
2. To evaluate the achievement of the congressional diplomacy of Taiwan, and to explore what influence its operation will be on Taiwan’s diplomacy and other aspects.
3. To advise the Government about the feasible policy of the congressional diplomacy and assist in breaking through hardship of Taiwan’s diplomacy right at the moment by borrowing the experiences of the exchanges of the Congress between Taiwan and Japan.

第一章 緒論
第一節 研究動機與目的
第二節 預期研究成果與研究架構

第二章 理論與文獻回顧
第一節 國會外交的意義
第二節 國會與外交政策
第三節 台灣的外交政策

第三章 台日國會交流現況分析
第一節 台灣國會外交現況
第二節 台日國會交流現況

第四章 研究方法與研究設計
第一節 研究性質
第二節 研究方法
第三節 研究設計

第五章 研究發現
第一節 訪談結果分析
第二節 研究結果探討

第六章 結論與政策建議
第一節 結論
第二節 政策建議

參考文獻

附錄

一、中文
王高成（1997），「安全兩難下的兩岸外交競爭」，《問題與研究》，第36卷第2期，頁23-35。
外交部（2004），「安排或協助第五屆立法委員組團出國考察情形」，外交部新聞稿。
立法院秘書室（2004），「推展國會外交，接軌國際社會」，立法院秘書室公共關係事務處新聞稿。
宋學文，黃子哲（2002），「從東帝汶獨立運動探討美國的干預主義」，問題與研究，第41卷第3期，頁83-108。
林碧炤（1996），「務實外交的理論與實際」，《理論與政策》，第10卷第2期，頁84-95。
洪丁福（1996），《國際政治的理論與實際》，台北：時英出版社。
高英茂（2004），「我國國會外交」，立法院外交委員會專題報告。
高朗（1994），《中華民國外交關係之演變（1972－1992）》，台北：五南出版社。
高朗（1996），「論我國經貿外交」，《理論與政策》，第11卷1期，頁22-31。
蔡政文（1995），「務實外交的理念、實踐及評估」，《政治科學論叢》，第6期，頁279-306。
鄧榮進（1990），《雷根時代美國參議院政黨政治對外交政策的影響》，淡江大學美國研究所碩士論文。
駱士強（1989），《美國行政立法分權制度與美國外交政策制訂之研究》，淡江大學美國研究所碩士論文。
羅致政、吳志中（2000），《台灣國會外交專題研究》，立法院委託國策院研究計畫。

二、英文
Babbie, E., Practicing Social Research: Guided Activities to Accompany the Practice of Social Research (New York: Wadsworth Publisher, 1991).
Caporaso, J., The Elusive State: International and Comparative Perspective (London: Sage Publication, 1989), p. 9.
Deudney, D. and Matthew, R., Contested Grounds: Security and Conflict in the New Environmental Politics (New York: SUNY Publisher, 1998).
Grieco, J. M., “Anarchy and the Limits of Cooperation: A Realist Critique of the Newest Liberal Institutionalism,” International Organization 42 (1988), pp. 485-507.
Haas, P., “Introduction: Epistemic Communities and International Policy Coordination,” International Organization, Vol. 46 (Winter 1992), pp. 1-36.
Huntington, S., The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order (New York: Simon and Schuster, 1996).
Jessica, M., ”Redefining Security,” Foreign Affairs Vol. 68 No. 2 (Spring 1989), pp. 162-177.
Keohane, R. O. and Martin, L., “The Promise of Institutionalist Theory,” International Security 20 (1995), pp. 39-51.
Keohane, R. O. and Nye, J. S., Power and Interdependence (New York: Harper Collins, 1989); Robert O. Keohane, International Institutions and State Power: Essays on International Relations Theory (Boulder: Westview Press, 1989).
Keohane, R. O., “Realism, Neoliberalism, and the Study of World Politics,” in Robert O. Keohane, ed., Neorealism Its Critics (New York: Columbia University Press, 1986), pp. 1-26.
Keohane, R. O., After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy (New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1984).
Keohane, R. O., ed. Neorealism Its Critics (New York: Columbia University Press, 1986).
Krasner, S. D. ed., International Regimes (Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1983); Susan Strange, “Cave! Hic Dragones: A Critique of Regime Analysis,” in Stephen Krasner, ed., International Regimes (Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1983), pp. 337-354.
Krasner, S. D. ed., International Regimes (Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1983).
Litfin, K. T., “Constructing Environmental Interdependence,” Global Governance Vol. 5 No. 3 (1999), pp. 359-377.
Mearsheimer J., “Back to the Future: Instability in Europe After the Cold War,” International Security, Vol. 15 (1990), pp. 5-56.
Misher, E. G., “Research interviewing - context and narrative” (Cambridge: Harvard University Press,1986).
Patton, M. Q., Qualitative evaluation and research methods (Newbury Park, CA: SAGE, 1990).
Rosenau, J. N., Turbulence in World Politics: A Theory of Change and Continuity (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1990).
Rosenau, J N., Among The Domestic-Frontier: Exploring Governance in a Turbulence World (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997).
Rousenau, J. and Czempiel E. O, eds., Governance Without Government. Order and Change in World Politics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992).
Rubin, H. J., and Riene S. R., “Qualitative Interviewing: The Art of Hearing Data” (Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1995).
Ruggie, J. G., “Continuity and Transformation in World Polity: Toward a Neorealist Synthesis,” World Politics, Vol. 35 (January 1983), pp. 261-285.
Ruggie, J. G., “Multilateralism: The Anotomy of an Institution,” International Organization 46 (Summer 1992), pp. 561-598.
Ruggie, J. G., Constructing the World Polity: Essays on International Institutionalization (Lodon/New York: Routledge, 1998).
Scholte, J. A., “The Globalization of World Politics,” in Steve Smith and John Baylis, ed., The Globalization of World Politics (New York: Oxford University Press, 1997), p. 20.
Snyder, J., “New Thinking About the New International System,” in Jack Snyder and Robert Jervis, eds., Coping with Complexity in the International System (Boulder, CO.: Westview Press, 1993), pp. 1-25.
Strange, S., The Retreat of the State: The Diffusion of Power in the World Economy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996), pp.73-81.
Waltz, K. N., “The Emerging Structure of International Politics,” International Security 18 (Fall 1993), pp. 44-79.
Waltz, K. N., Theory of International Politics (Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley.1979), pp.89-98.
Wendt, A. and R. Duvall, “Institutions and International Order,” in Ernst-Otto Czempiel and James N. Rosenau, eds., Global Changes and Theoretic Challenges: Approaches to World Politics for the 1990s (Lexington, Mass.: Lexington Books), pp. 51-73.
Wendt, A., “Anarchy is What States Make of It: The Social Construction of Power Politics,” International Organization, Vol. 46 (Spring 1992), pp. 391-426.
Wendt, A., “Constructing International Politics,” International Security, Vol. 20 (Summer 1995), pp. 71-81.

三、日文
中□嶺雄（2001），《中□、台□、香港》，東京：PHP 研究所。
中□嶺雄、古森義久（2000），《中□ゾ脅威ろ-幻想ソ日中友好》，東京：PHP 研究所。
日本外務省（2003），《外交青書平成15年版》。東京：外務省。
日本防衛廳（2002），《防衛白書2002》，東京：日本防衛廳。