臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

Cheng (2005) 曾經由價值的創造（經濟租）與價值的記錄（保守會計）二構面去討論影響剩餘淨利的因素，他的實證結果顯示，就產業層級而言，產業的超額報酬會隨產業的集中程度、產業的進入障礙以及產業的保守會計因子而增加，就公司層級而言，公司的超額報酬則會隨公司的市佔率、公司規模、公司進入障礙以及公司的保守會計因子而增加。為了瞭解前述的主張是否同樣地適用於台灣，本論文參仿其研究程序，探討經濟租與保守會計因子對於我國剩餘淨利的影響。實證結果顯示，除了公司層級之進入障礙因素外，無論產業層級之超額報酬與公司層級之超額報酬，皆未能隨經濟租與保守會計因子而增加。換言之，本研究認為，後續研究者不應過度單純地使用Cheng (2005) 的發現，相反的，未來研究有必要進一步深入探討適用於我國情況的模型。

Investigating the impact of value-creation (economic rents) and value-recording (conservative accounting) on residual income, Chen (2005) demonstrates that industry abnormal earnings increases with industry concentration, industry-level barriers to entry, and industry conservative accounting factors. The firm-level abnormal earnings increases with market share, firm size, firm-level barriers to entry, and firm conservative accounting factors. In order to explore whether the previous propositions on the determinants of residual income can be applied in our country, this study examines how economic rents and conservative accounting affect residual earnings in Taiwan. In summary, using Taiwan data, I cannot find evidence to claim that researchers in Taiwan can use Cheng’s findings directly. Therefore, it is worth for future works to explore what factors affect residual income in Taiwan.

目錄
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究動機與目的 1
第二節 研究問題 4
第三節 研究架構 6
第二章 文獻探討 7
第一節 剩餘淨利評價模型與剩餘淨利 7
第二節 剩餘淨利的影響因子 14
第三節 變數衡量 18
第三章 研究方法 20
第一節 研究假說 20
第二節 樣本選取與資料來源 28
第三節 變數衡量 30
第四節 研究模型 38
第四章 實證結果與分析 45
第一節 樣本敘述性統計量與相關係數 45
第二節 實證結果分析 52
第五章 研究結論與建議 68
第一節 研究結論 68
第二節 研究限制 70
第三節 研究建議 70
附錄 71
參考文獻 73

一、中文部分
劉正田，1997，研究發展支出之效益及其資本化會計資訊對股票評價攸關性之研究，國立政治大學會計系未出版博士論文。
二、英文部分
Bain, J. S. 1956. Relation of profit rate to industry concentration: American manufacturing, 1936-1940. Quarterly Journal of Economics 65 (August): 293-324.
Basu, S. 1997. The conservatism principle and the asymmetric timeliness of earnings. Journal of Accounting and Economics 24: 3-37.
Beaver, W. H. 1989. Financial Reporting: An Accounting Revolution. 2d ed. Prentice_Hall.
Beaver, W. H. 1999. Comments on “An empirical assessment of the residual income valuation model.” Journal of Accounting and Economics 26: 35-42.
Beaver, W., and S. Ryan. 2000. Biases and lags in book value and their effects on the ability of the book-to-market ratio to predict book return on equity. Journal of Accounting Research 38 (Spring): 127-148.
Bernard, V. L. 1995. The Feltham-Ohlson framework: Implications for empiricists. Contemporary Accounting Research 11 (2): 733-748.
Brooks, L. D., and D. A. Buckmaster. 1976. Further evidence of the time series properties of accounting income. The Journal of Finance 31 (December): 1359-1373.
Brozen, Y. 1971a. Bain’s concentration and rates of return revisited. Journal of Law and Economics (October): 351-369.
Brozen, Y. 1971b. The persistence of “high rates of return” in high-stable concentration industries. Journal of Law and Economics (October): 501-512.
Bublitz, B., Ettredge, M. 1989. The information in discretionary outlays: Advertising, research, and development. The Accounting Review 64 (January): 108-124.
Cheng, Q. 2003. Essays on the residual income valuation model. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Wisconsin-Madison.
Cheng, Q. 2005. What determine residual income? The Accounting Review 80: 85-112.

Collins, D. W., and S. P. Kothari. 1989. An analysis of the intertemporal and cross-sectional determinants of earnings response coefficients. Journal of Accounting and Economics (July): 143-182.
Dechow, P. M., A. P. Hutton, and R. G. Sloan. 1999. An empirical assessment of the residual income valuation model. Journal of Accounting and Economics 26: 1-34.
Demsetz, H. 1973. Industry structure, market rivalry, and public policy. Journal of Law and Economics 16: 1-10.
Eaton, B., and R. Lipsey. 1981. Capital, commitment, and entry equilibrium. The Bell Journal of Economics 12 (Autumn): 593-604.
Fairfield, P. M., R. J. Sweeney, and T. L. Yohn. 1996. Accounting classification and the predictive content of earnings. The Accounting Review 71 (3): 337-355.
Fama, E., and H. Babiak. 1968. Dividend policy: An empirical analysis. Journal of the American Statistical Association (December): 1132-1161.
Fama. E. F., and M. Miller. 1972. The Theory of Finance. Kneed, Nap, and Winston.
Fama, E. F., and J. MacBeth. 1973. Risk, return, and equilibrium: Empirical tests. Journal of Political Economy (71): 607-636.
Fama, E. F., and K. R. French. 1992. The cross-section of expected stock returns. The Journal of Finance 47 (June): 427-465.
Fama, E. F., and K. R. French. 1997. Industry costs of equity. Journal of Financial Economics 43: 153-193.
Feltham, G. A., and J. A. Ohlson. 1995. Valuation and clean surplus accounting for operating and financial activities. Contemporary Accounting Research 11 (Spring): 689-732.
Feltham, G. A., and J. A. Ohlson. 1996. Uncertainty resolution and the theory of depreciation measurement. Journal of Accounting Research 34 (Autumn): 209-234.
Francis, J., P. Olsson, and D.R. Oswarld. 2001. Using mechanical earnings and residual income forecasts in equity valuation. Working paper. Duke University.
Frankel, R., and C. M. C. Lee. 1998. Accounting valuation, market expectation, and cross-sectional stock returns. Journal of Accounting and Economics 25: 283-319.
Gjesdal, F. 1999. A steady state growth valuation model: A note on accounting and valuation. Working paper, Norwegian School of Economics, Bergen, Norway.
Greenball, M. 1969. Appraising alternative methods of accounting for accelerated tax depreciation: A relative accuracy approach. Journal of Accounting Research 7: 262-289.
Kothari, S. P. 2001. Capital markets research in accounting. Journal of Accounting and Economics 31: 105-231.
Lev, B., and T. Sougiannis. 1996. The capitalization, amortization, and value-relevance of R&D. Journal of Accounting and Economics 21: 107-138.
Lundholm, L. J. 1995. A tutorial on the Ohlson and Feltham/Ohlson Models: Answers to some frequently asked questions. Contemporary Accounting Research 11 (Spring): 749-761.
Martin, S. 1983. Market, Firm, and Economic Performance. New York: New York University Graduate School of Business, Salomon Brothers Center for the Study of Financial Institutions.
Muller, D. C. (ed.) 1990. The Dynamics of Company Profits: An International Comparison. Cambridge University Press.
Mueller, D. C. 1997. The persistence of profits above the norm. Econometrics 44 (November): 369-380.
Mueller, D. C. 1986. Profits in the Long Run. Cambridge University Press.
Myers, J.M. 1999. Implementing residual income valuation with linear information dynamics. The Accounting Review 74 (January): 1-28.
Ohlson, J. A. 1995. Earnings, book values and dividends in equity valuation. Contemporary Accounting Research 11 (Spring): 661-687.
Penman, S. H., and X. Zhang. 2002. Accounting conservatism and the quality of earnings. The Accounting Review 77 (2): 237-264.
Ravenscraft, D. J. 1983. Structure-profit relationships at the line of business and industry level. Review of Economics and Statistics 645: 22-31.
Sloan, R. G. 1996. Do stock prices fully reflect information in accruals and cash flows about future earnings? The Accounting Review 71 (3): 289-315.
Strickland, A. D., and L. W. Weiss. 1976. Advertising, concentration, and price-cost margins. The Journal of Political Economy 84 (5): 1109-1122.
Stigler, G. J. 1963. Capital and Rates of Return in Manufacturing Industries. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Watts, R. 1973. The information content of dividends. Journal of Business (April): 191-211.