(3.236.222.124) 您好!臺灣時間:2021/05/10 15:43
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果

詳目顯示:::

: 
twitterline
研究生:黃麗香
研究生(外文):Huang, Li-Hsiang
論文名稱:論金‧史丹利‧羅賓遜《黃金海岸》及《太平洋邊緣》中之歷史、烏托邦與後現代
論文名稱(外文):History, Utopia and Postmodernism in Kim Stanley Robinson’s The Gold Coast and Pacific Edge.
指導教授:林建光林建光引用關係
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立中興大學
系所名稱:外國語文學系
學門:人文學門
學類:外國語文學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2005
畢業學年度:94
語文別:英文
論文頁數:67
中文關鍵詞:科幻小說認知疏離新奇後現代歷史模擬烏托邦收集者他者.
外文關鍵詞:Science Fictioncognitionestrangementnovumpostmodernismhistorysimulacrumutopiacollectorotherness.
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:185
  • 評分評分:系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔
  • 下載下載:23
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:0
科幻小說可以被視為是一種批判的文類. 對於此文類能發揮它批判力量的可能性可以在科幻小說的定義中清楚的看見. 也就是說科幻小說必須是一種認知疏離的文類. 認知、疏離和新奇使得科幻小說可以對現在提出批判. 此論文的目的是要討論後現代與烏托邦的議題. 後現代被視為是晚期資本主義的一種文化優勢. 在後現代社會中, 歷史是被遺棄的, 進而造成一種缺乏深度的現象. 然而, 藉由一種收集、撿拾廢棄物的行為, 後現代缺乏深度的現象是可以被消除的. 烏托邦是屬於科幻小說的一種次文類. 也是一種對社會的批判. 烏托邦的成功取決於對他者的渴望.
Science fiction can be said as a kind of critical genre. The potential for the genre to exert its critical power is clearly observed by its definition. Namely, science fiction should be a literary genre of cognitive estrangement. Both cognition and estrangement together with another element, novum, make it possible for SF to make a critique on empirical present. The main purpose of the thesis is to discuss such issues as postmodernism and utopia. Postmodernism is considered as a cultural dominant of late capitalism. History in the postmodern society is rejected. This further contributes to a lack of depth. However, this postmodern depthlessness is negated through the act of collection, an act of gathering waste. Utopia, a subgenre of SF, is also treated as a social critique. The success of utopia depends on the desire for otherness.
Contents

Chinese Abstract ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- i
English Abstract ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- ii
Introduction ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1
Chapter One: The Poetics of Science Fiction ------------------------------------------- 8
Chapter Two: Postmodernism and Its Discontents: The Representation of History in The Gold Coast -------------------------------------------------------- 24
Chapter Three: Pacific Edge as the Utopian Embodiment of Intersubjective Desire-------------------------------------------------------------------- 45
Bibliography --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 64
Works Cited
Althusser, Louis. Lenin and Philosophy and Other Essays. Trans. Ben Brewster.
NY: Monthly Review, 1971.
---. For Marx. Trans. Ben Brewster. London: Verso, 1979.
Baudrillard, Jean. Jean Baudrillard: Selected Writings. Ed. Mark Poster.
California: Stanford UP, 1988.
Benjamin, Jessica. The Bonds of Love: Psychoanalysis, Feminism, and the Problem
of Domination. NY: Pantheon, 1988.
Bloch, Ernst. The Principle of Hope. Trans. Neville Plaice, Stephen Plaice, and
Paul Knight. 3 Vols. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT P, 1986.
---. Natural Law and Human Dignity. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT P, 1987.
Broderick, Damien. Reading by Starlight: Postmodern Science Fiction. London:
Routledge, 1995.
Buck-Morss, Susan. The Dialectics of Seeing: Walter Benjamin and the Arcades
Project. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT P, 1989.
Elliott, Robert C. The Shape of Utopia: Studies in a Literary Genre. Chicago: U of
Chicago P, 1970.
Foote, Bud. “A Conversation with Kim Stanley Robinson.” Science-Fiction
Studies 21.1 (Mar 1994): 51-66.
Franko, Carol. “Working the ‘ In-Between’: Kim Stanley Robinson’s Utopian
Fiction.” Science-Fiction Studies 21.2 (July 1994): 191-211.
Freedman, Carl. Critical Theory and Science Fiction. Hanover, NH: UP of New England, 2000.
Glotfelty, Cheryll, and Harold Fromm, eds. The Ecocriticism Reader: Landmarks in
Literary Ecology. Athens: U of Georgia P, 1996.
Hardt, Michael and Kathi Weeks. Introduction. The Jameson Reader. By Fredric
Jameson. Eds. Michael Hardt and Kathi Weeks. Oxford: Blackwell, 2000.
James, Edward. “Before the Novum: The Prehistory of Science Fiction Criticism.”
Learning from Other Worlds: Estrangement, Cognition, and the Politics of Science Fiction and Utopia. Ed. Patrick Parrinder. Durham: Duke UP, 2001. 19-35.
Jameson, Fredric. Marxism and Form: Twentieth-Century Dialectical Theories of
Literature. Princeton, NJ: Princeton UP, 1971.
---. The Political Unconscious: Narrative as a Socially Symbolic Act. Ithaca, NY:
Cornell UP, 1991.
---. “Progress Versus Utopia; or, Can We Imagine the Future?” Science-Fiction
Studies 27 (July 1982): 147-59.
---. Postmodernism, or, The Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism. Durham: Duke UP,
1991.
Jennings, Michael William. Dialectical Images: Walter Benjamin’s Theory of
Literary Criticism. Ithaca: Cornell UP, 1987.
Kellner, Douglas. Jean Baudrillard: From Marxism to Postmodernism and Beyond.
Cambridge: Polity, 1989.
Kumar, Krishan. Utopia and Anti-Utopia in Modern Times. Oxford: Blackwell,
1991.
Lane, Richard J. Jean Baudrillard. London and NY: Routledge, 2000.
Levitas, Ruth. The Concept of Utopia. NY: Philip Allan, 1990.
Lukَacs, Georg. History and Class Consciousness. Trans. Rodney Livingstone.
Cambridge, Mass.: MIT P, 1971.
Mannheim, Karl. Ideology and Utopia: An Introduction to the Sociology of
Knowledge. Ed. Bryan S. Turner. London: Routledge, 1991.
Merril, Judith. History and Definition of Science Fiction. 14 Jan. 2005
<http://alcor.concordia.ca/~talfred/sf-def.htm>.
Moylan, Tom. Demand the Impossible: Science Fiction and the Utopian
Imagination. NY and London: Methuen, 1986.
---. “ ‘Dare to Struggle, Dare to Win’: On Science Fiction, Totality and Agency in
the 1990s.” Science Fiction, Critical Frontiers. Eds. Karen Sayer and John
Moore. London: Macmillan, 2000. 48-65.
Parrinder, Patrick. Science Fiction: Its Criticism and Teaching. London: Methuen,
1980.
Robinson, Kim Stanley. The Gold Coast. NY: Tom Dougherty Associates, 1988.
---. Pacific Edge. NY: Tom Dougherty Associates, 1988.
---. History and Definition of Science Fiction. 14 Jan. 2005
<http://alcor.concordia.ca/~talfred/sf-def.htm>.
Scholes, Robert and Eric Rabkin. Science Fiction: History, Science, Vision.
NY: Oxford UP, 1977.
Shklovsky, Victor. “Art as Technique.” Russian Formalist Criticism: Four Essays.
Trans. and Introduced by Lee T. Lemon and Marion J. Reis. Lincoln: U of Nebraska P, 1965. 3-24.
Slotkin, Alan R. “The Ecological Newspeak of Kim Stanley Robinson.” American
Speech 72.4 (Winter 1997): 440-43.
Stratton, Susan. “The Messiah and the Greens: The Shape of Environmental Action
in Dune and Pacific Edge.” Extrapolation 42.4 (Winter 2001): 303-16.
Suvin, Darko. Metamorphoses of Science Fiction. London: Yale UP, 1979.
---. Positions and Presuppositions in Science Fiction. London: Macmillan, 1988.
Williams, Raymond. Problems in Materialism and Culture. London: Verso, 1980.
Wohlfarth, Irving. “Et Cetera? The Historian as Chiffonnier.” New German
Critigque 39 (Fall 1986): 142-68.
Wolmark, Jenny. Aliens and Others: Science Fiction, Feminism and Postmodernism. NY: Harvester Wheatsheaf, 1993.
Zipes, Jack. Breaking the Magic Spell: Radical Theories of Folk and Fairy Tales.
Rev. and expanded ed. Lexington: UP of Kentucky, 2002.
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
1. 黃舒芃,<我國行政權民主正當性基礎的檢視-以德國公法釋義學對於行政權民主正當性概念的詮釋為借鏡>,憲政時代,25卷2期,1999年10月,頁61至95。
2. 黃榮村,<從國際化觀點展望台灣二十一世紀的教育>,【國家政策季刊】,第2卷第3期,2003年9月。
3. 黃俊傑,<當前大學教育的困境及其對應策略>,收於【大學理念與校長遴選】,中華民國通識教育學會出版,1999年3月再版,頁214以下。
4. 董保城,<從「學者共合國」到「學術企業體」之兩難-論新版大學法草案>,月旦法學雜誌,93年3月。
5. 程明修,<制度的終結?-國立大學行政法人化之選擇>,【法學講座】,第25期,2004年1月。
6. 陳愛娥,<行政法人化與行政效能—「行政法人」作為政府組織改造的另一種選擇?>,月旦法學教室第12期,頁64。
7. 陳淳文,<論法國法上之公法人>,【月旦法學雜誌】,第84期,2002年5月,頁32以下。
8. 許宗力,<國家機關的法人化-行政組織再造的另一選擇途徑>,【月旦法學雜誌】,第57期,2000年2月,頁26以下。
9. 許宗力,<基本權程序保障功能的最新發展-評司法院釋字第四八八號解釋>,月旦法學雜誌第54期,1999年11月,頁153以下。
10. 翁興利,<我國政府改造的發展策略-分權理論的觀點>,【中國行政評論】,第12卷第1期,民國91年12月,頁77以下。
11. 林明鏘,<評「行政法人法」草案-以九十二年二月草案為中心(上)(下)>,人事行政,92年3月、6月。
12. 周志宏,<教育事務民營化之法律問題—以國民中小學公辦民營為中心>,月旦法學雜誌第102期,2003年11月,頁41。
13. 李建良,<論公法人在行政組織建制上的地位與功能-以德國公法人概念與法制為借鏡>,【月旦法學雜誌】,第84期,2002年5月,頁43以下。
14. 詹盛如,<英國高等教育財政改革與論爭>,教育研究月刊,第121期,2004年5月,頁140以下。
15. 蔡秀卿,<日本獨立行政法人制度>,【月旦法學雜誌】,第84期,2002年5月,頁60以下
 
系統版面圖檔 系統版面圖檔