一、 中文部分:按作者姓名筆畫順序遞增排序
1. 中央健康保險局:全民健康保險醫療費用支付標準相對值表研訂計畫-專科內服務項目相對值研訂手冊,2001。
2. 行政院衛生署,二代健保規劃叢書----全民健保改革綜論,2004a;12-16;46-47。
3. 行政院衛生署,行政院二代健保規劃小組總結報告書----邁向權責相符的全民健康保險制度,2004b;14-43;118-146。
4. 李玉春、鄧宗業:建構權責相符的醫療服務支付制度,全民健保醫療資源配置與合理使用,行政院衛生署,2004;114-154。
5. 李玉春:醫療成本變異大 標準成本爭議多--應用成本分析於全民健保醫療費用支付標準之探討 會計研究月刊,1995;118:107-113。6. 李玉春、許玫玲:全民健康保險支付標準協商模式之建立,衛生報導,1995;5: 22-27。7. 李玉春、林蕙卿:全民健康保險支付標準協商模式之檢討與改革之芻議,醫院,1996;29:1-9。8. 李玉春:全民健保西醫總額支付制度之推動政策 ---基層與醫院預算之分立或統合,台灣醫界,2001;l44(7):43-47。
9. 宋文娟、藍忠孚、陳琇玲等 台灣醫師人力政策當前重要課題之專家意見分析,中華衛誌,1999;18(5):334-340。
10. 沈富雄:新世紀新政府談全民健保之改革,台灣醫界,2000;43(9):35-38。
11. 林夢陸:訂定醫師費計算基準—淺釋醫療資源相對價值表(RBRVS),醫院,1994;27: 37-42。12. 吳重慶、葉淑娟:全民健保現況與回顧,台灣醫界,2001a;44(5):55-57。
13. 吳重慶、葉淑娟:總額預算的多元化支付制度,台灣醫界,2001b; 44(6):55-57。
14. 吳佳容:全民健保支付標準修訂過程之觀察--以八十六年五月十五日公告之外科調整案為例,醫院,1997;30:65-70。15. 吳凱勳:「醫療費用支付標準的訂定」座談會,全民健康保險,1996;4:11-17。
16. 洪政武:健保扭曲醫療生態,醫生尊嚴今非昔比,國策專刊 2001;17:19-21。17. 洪碧蘭:支付標準現況與問題探討,醫院,1997;30(6):22-27。18. 洪碧蘭、楊志良:健保支付與醫界生態關係之初探,醫院,1998;31:41-60。19. 陳星助 林素雲:全民健保實施論病例計酬支付制度後疾病嚴重度變化情形探討--以臺灣東部某區域醫院外科住院常見疾病為例,醫院,2000;33(1): 32-40。
20. 陳琇玲、黃文駿、溫信財等:牙科處置藥品及材料成本相對值之初探,臺灣公共衛生雜誌,2002;21(2):133-139。
21. 陳琇玲、溫信財、楊志良等:試以相對價值表(RVS)訂定醫師費計算基準--以牙科79個處置為例,中華公共衛生雜誌,2000;19(6):411-422。
22. 張鴻仁:全民健康保險醫療費用支付制度之研究,行政院經濟建設委員會研究報告,1990;6-29;44-49;57-64。
23. 張顯洋 林照陽:以作業基礎成本制構建醫院醫療成本資訊系統之實證研究 醫院1996;29(6):5-29。24. 張金堅、陳炯年、朱樹勳:全民健保後外科醫師人力之調查與分析 醫學教育1998;2:45-53。25. 張錦文、黃淑雅:台灣醫療制度的四大問題與解決之道 醫院 1998;31(2):1-4。
26. 張北葉、洪志洋:「全民健康保險醫療費用支付標準手術項目科內相對值建立模式及影響因素研究---以外科各次專科為例」,中央健保局委託研究報告(計畫編號:DOH91-NH-1040),2004。
27. 張北葉、洪志洋:「全民健康保險醫療費用手術項目支付標準之訂定模式---以外科各次專科為例」,中央健保局委託研究報告(計畫編號:DOH93-NH-1002),2005。
28. 葉金川:全民健康保險傳奇,董氏基金會出版,2002:163-187。
29. 楊志良、陳琇玲、溫信財等:牙科處置資源耗用相對價值表之研探,臺灣公共衛生雜誌,2001;20(6):475-484。
30. 楊志良、陳琇玲、徐慧娟等:探討三種支付標準相對值方法﹍美國RBRVS、健保局模式、台大台中模式之比較 台灣醫界 2002;45(9):50-55。
31. 黃元惠、王貴英、洪志洋等:全民健保實施後外科專科醫師人力下降的可能因素探討,台灣醫界2004a;47:40-44。
32. 黃元惠、王貴英、洪志洋等:淺論健保支付制度、支付基準、支付標準與支付制度改革,台灣醫界,2004b;47(7):49-51。
33. 黃元惠、張北葉、洪志洋等:以模糊多準則決策法建立一般外科手術支付標準,台灣醫學,2005a; 9(3):323-331。
34. 黃元惠、張北葉、洪志洋等:全民健保支付標準相對值考量因素之研究----以小兒科為例,醫院雜誌,2005b;38(1):55-63。
35. 黃元惠、張北葉、洪志洋等:全民健保外科手術項目新支付標準之分析,台灣醫界,2005c;48(7)。
36. 黃元惠、洪志洋、趙文鴻,「科技管理與臨床工程」,2003;46(9):52-53。
37. 劉見祥:全民健保支付制度之趨勢,醫院,1999;32:15-20。38. 劉順仁、楊志良、鄭旭然:公立教學醫院實施責任中心制度之初步成效及成本控制相關因素之個案研究,管理評論,1997;16(1):85-114。39. 鄧昇謨:醫療院所成本動因之個案研究--文獻探討,和春學報,1998;5:167-182。40. 鄧振源、曾國雄:層級分析法(AHP)的內涵特性與運用(上)(下),中國統計學報,1987;27(6、7)。41. 賴淑美、楊銘欽、李玉春等:醫療資源配置改革與規劃策略,全民健保醫療資源配置與合理使用,行政院衛生署,2004;5-62。
42. 錢橙山:全民健保對台灣醫療生態的衝擊,台灣醫界,2001;44(4):47。
43. 盧瑞芬、謝啟瑞:支付制度的經濟誘因探討,醫療經濟學,學富文化事業有限公司,2000: 297-323。
44. 蘇瑞勇:淺論全民健保之「總額支付制度」,高雄醫師會誌,2000(10):45-50。45. 蕭子誼:探究全民健保之自助、互助性社會福利功能,主計月報,1993;76:3-10。二、英文部分:按作者名字第一個字母順序遞增排序
1. Becker E. R.: Physician services in an academic neurology department: Using the resource-based relative-value scale to examine physician activities. Journal of Health Care Finance, 2001;27(4):79-92.
2. Bellman, R. E., and Zadeh, L. A.: Decision-making in a fuzzy environment. Management Science, 1970, 17(4), 141-146.
3. Belton, V., and Gear, A.E.: On a shortcoming of Saaty’s method of analytic hierarchies. Omega, 1983;11(3):227-230.
4. Berman, P. A.: Health sector reform: making health development sustainable. In Berman PA ed. Health Sector in Developing Countries. Boston, MA: Harvard University Press, 1995.
5. Buckley, J. J.: Ranking aalternatives using guzzy numbers. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 1985;15(1), 21-31.
6. Chapple, A., and Rogers, A.: Explicit guidelines for qualitative research: a step in the right direction, a defence of the soft option, or a form of sociological imperialism? Family Practice, 1998;15(6):556–561.
7. Cheng, S.H., and Chiang, T.L.: Disparity of medical care utilization among different health insurance schemes in Taiwan. Social Science & Medicine, 1998; 47(5): 613-620.
8. Cherouny, P., and Nadolski, C.: Underreimbursement of Obstetric and Gynecologic invasive services by the resource-based relative value scale. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1996; 87 (3):328-331
9. Chiang, T.L.: Taiwan’s 1995 health care reform. Health policy, 1997; 39(3): 225-239.
10. Ellis, R.P., and McGuire, T.G.: Supply-side and demand-side cost sharing in health care. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 1993;7(4): 135-151.
11. Folland, S., Goodman A.C., and Stano, M.: Government regulation-principal regulatory mechanisms. In: The economics of health and health care, New Jersey, Prentice-Hall, Inc, Upper Saddle River, 2001: 445-469, 489.
12. Forgone, D.A., and D’Annunzio, C.M.: The use of DRGs in health care payment systems around the world. Journal of Health Care Finance, 1999;26(2):66-78.
13. Giacomini, M.K., and Cook, D.J.: Users' guides to the medical literature, XXIII: qualitative research in health care––A, are the results of the study valid? Journal of American Medical Association, 2000;284:357–362.
14. Grimaldi, P.L.: Medicare fees for physician services are resource-based. Journal of Health Care Finance, 2002; 28(3):88-104.
15. Gupta, U. G., and Clarke, R. E: Theory and applications of the Delphi technique: a bibliography (1975-1994). Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 1996;53(2): 185-211.
16. Harris-Shapiro, J.: RBRVS revisited. Journal of Health Care Finance, 1998; 25(2): 49-54.
17. Harris-Shapiro, J.: RBRVS--1999 update. Journal of Health Care Finance, 1999;26(2): 48-52.
18. Hoddinott, P. and Pill, R.: A review of recently published qualitative research in general practice: more methodological questions than answers? Family Practice, 1997;14: 313–319.
19. Hsiao, W.C., Braun, P., Dunn. D., et al: Resource -based relative values, an overview. Journal of Americal Medical Association, 1988a; 260(16): 2347-2352.
20. Hsiao, W.C., Braun, P, Dunn. D, et al: Special report: results and policy implications of the resource-based value study. New England Journal of Medicine, 1988b; 319:881-888.
21. Huber M., and Orosz, E.: Health expenditure trends in OECD countries, 1990-2001, Health Care Financing Review, 2003;25(1):1-22.
22. Jones, R.: Why do qualitative research? Brithish Medical Journal, 1995;311(6996):2.
23. Louiselle, P. R.: Easing the transition to an RBRVS-based physician compensation system. Healthcare Financial Management, 1998; 52(11): 67-69.
24. Lubarsky, D.A., and Reves, J.G.: Using medicare multiples results in disproportionate reimbursement for anesthesiologists compared to other physicians. Journal of Clinical Anesthesia, 2000;12(3): 238-241.
25. Malterud, Q.K.: Qualitative research: standards, challenges, and guidelines. The Lancet, 2001;358(9280):483-488.
26. Marc, J., Kesteloot, K., De Graeve, D., et al: A typology for provider payment systems in health care. Health Policy, 2002;60(3): 255–273.
27. McCormack, L.A., and Burge, R.T.: Diffusion of Medicare's RBRVS and related physician payment. Health Care Financing Review, 1994;16(2):159-173.
28. OECD health data 2005, http://www.oecd.org/health/healthdata
29. Phelps, C.E.: Universal insurance issues and international comparisons of health care systems. Health Economics, 2nd edi. Addison-Wesley. 1997.
30. Pope, C., and Mays, N.: Qualitative research: reaching the parts other methods cannot reach: an introduction to qualitative methods in health and health care services research. British Medical Journal, 1995;311(6996):42-45.
31. Powell, R., and Single, H.: Methodology matters—V, focus group. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 1996;8(5):499-504.
32. Rode, D.: RBRVS rule update expands procedural and documentation requirements. Healthcare Financial Management, 1998; 52(1): 80-82.
33. Rotarius, T.: An RBRVS approach to financial analysis in health care organizations. The Health Care Manager, 2001;19(3):17-23.
34. Schackleford J. L.: Measuring productivity using RBRVS cost accounting. Healthcare Financial Management, Westchester 1999; 53(1): 67-69.
35. Saaty, T. L.: A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 1977;15(2), 234-281.
36. Saaty, T. L.: The analytic hierarchy process. New York, McGraw-Hill, 1980.
37. Saaty, T. L., and Vargas, L. G.: The logic of priorities. Kluwer-Nijhoff: Boston, Massachusetts, 1980.
38. Tang, M. T., and Tzeng, G. H.: A hierarchy fuzzy MCDM method for studying electronic marketing strategies in the information service industry. Journal of International Information Management, 1999;8(1), 1-22.
39. Thorpe, K.E.: Does all-payer rate setting work? The case of the New York prospective hospital reimbursement methodology. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 1987;12(3): 391–408.
40. Tzeng, G. H., Shian, T. A., and Lin, C. Y.: Application of multicriteria decision making to the evaluation of new energy-system development in Taiwan. Energy (An International Journal), 1992;17(10):983-992.
41. Tzeng, G. H., and Tsaur, S. H.: Application of multicriteria decision making to old vehicle elimination in Taiwan. Energy and Environment, 1993;40(3):265-283.
42. Tzeng, G. H., and .Teng, J. Y.: Multicriteria evaluation for strategies of improving and controlling air-quality in the super city: A case of Taipei city. Journal of Environmental Management, 1994;40(3):213-229.
43. Zadeh, L. A.: Information and Control. Fuzzy Sets, 1965;8(3):338-353.
44. Zadeh, L. A.: The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning, parts 1, 2, and 3. Information Science, 1975;8(2):199-249, 8(3):301-357; 9(1):43-80.
45. Zhau, R., and Goving, R.: Algebraic characteristics of extended fuzzy numbers. Information Science, 1991;54(1):103-130.
46. Zahedi, F.: Analytic hierarchy process: a survey of the method its application. Interfaces, 1986;16(4):96-108.