跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(44.200.77.92) 您好!臺灣時間:2024/02/25 04:37
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:王俊傑
研究生(外文):Jiun-Jie Wang
論文名稱:研發與行銷部門間整合與知識管理能力對新產品發展績效影響之研究
指導教授:林明杰林明杰引用關係
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立中央大學
系所名稱:企業管理學系
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:企業管理學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2006
畢業學年度:94
語文別:中文
論文頁數:95
中文關鍵詞:部門整合知識管理新產品發展績效
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:10
  • 點閱點閱:150
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:6
論文提要及內容:
在現今高速變動的產業環境中,新產品開發的成功與否與公司的業績達成及利潤目標有直接的關係,且比率正逐年升高。因此不斷持續地推出新產品,並能滿足顧客之需求,已成為評估企業成長與成功的重要指標。但是影響新產品成功的因素不勝凡舉,其中以部門間的整合成功與否,對新產品發展績效的影響是最為重大且直接。又隨著知識機經濟時代來臨,一家公司知識管理能力的好壞也漸漸地影響了新產品發展績效的成敗,所以本研究為探討研發與行銷間整合與知識管理能力對新產品發展績效影響。
本研究將跨部門整合區分為跨部門互動與合作兩個構面,首先透過文獻探討釐清互動與合作的意義,並以研發與行銷部門為研究對象,採用實證研究的方式了解互動與合作對於新產品發展績效之影響。進而再搭配不同的知識管理能力,探討不同的整合程度運用不同的知識管理能力是否對新產品發展績效會有影響。本研究主要以t檢定、單因子、雙因子變異數分析驗證各變數之間的關係。
研究結果發現:
一、跨部門間的合作和互動確實會對新產品發展績效有影響。新產品發展績效從高到低依序為『高整合』、『合作型』、『互動型』、最差為『低整合』的廠商
二、『高整合』和『合作型』的廠商比『互動型』和『低整合』的廠商擁有較高的知識管理能力。
三、『互動型』的廠商,若是注重知識應用和保護能力,新產品發展績效的表現會比注重知識取得和轉換能力的廠商來的好。『合作型』的廠商則不明顯。
Abstract
In fast-moving industrial environment, there is a direct relationship between the success of new product development performance and the revenue goal of companies. However, this relationship is increasing. According to Takeachi & Nonaka (1986), new product development has a very high contribution to corporate revenue. Therefore, the success of new product development or not has played a very critical influence on corporate which want to succeed.
Reviewing former papers regarding new product development, there are lots of researches which discuss several crucial factors that influence the success of new product development. The first one is the integration of R&D and marketing, and the second one is knowledge management. Therefore, my paper is to research the integration of R&D and marketing fits knowledge management ability that influence on new product development performance.
My research separates interdepartmental integration into interdepartmental interaction and interdepartmental collaboration. Knowledge management ability separated into four abilities which are gaining, translating, applying, and protecting ability. Moreover, I use questionnaire and statistic method to test my research. My research result as follow:
1. My research find out that the rank of new product performance are 「high integration」, 「collaboration」,「interaction」,and 「low integration」. Therefore, data analysis shows that my hypothesis one 「when interdepartmental interaction and collaboration of R&D and marketing departments are both high, new product development performance is better than the other three situations」gets supportive.
2. Companies of「high integration」have better performance on knowledge management four abilities than the companies of「interaction」and「low integration」.
3. Companies of「interaction」focus on the abilities of applying and protecting, NPD performance would be better than the companies of「interaction」 focus on the abilities of gaining and translating. However, .companies of「collaboration」do not show the same result.
目 錄
第一章 緒論.........................................................................................1
第一節 研究動機..........................................................................................1
第二節 研究目的..........................................................................................4
第三節 研究程序..........................................................................................5
第二章 文獻探討.............................................................................6
第一節 跨部門整合......................................................................................6
第二節 新產品發展的績效........................................................................10
第三節 研發與行銷之跨部門整合與新產品發展績效............................16
第四節 知識管理……................................................................................17
第三章 研究設計...........................................................................27
第一節 研究架構…....................................................................................27
第二節 研究變數之操作性定義與衡量....................................................28
第三節 研究假設........................................................................................32
第四節 研究對象與問卷回收....................................................................35
第五節 資料分析........................................................................................36
第六節 信度與效度....................................................................................40
第四章 研究結果分析..................................................................42
第一節 樣本資料分析................................................................................42
第二節 研發與行銷間之整合與新產品發展績效的關係........................44
第三節 研發與行銷間之整合與知識管理能力的關係............................50
第四節 研發與行銷間之整合配合知識管理能力對新產品發展績效的關係..52
第五節 本章小節.........................................................................................58
第五章 結論與建議.....................................................................59
第一節 研究結論........................................................................................59
第二節 研究貢獻與實務建議....................................................................63
第三節 研究限制與未來研究建議............................................................65
參考文獻...................................................................................................66
附表...............................................................................................................73
附錄二:個案訪談...........................................................................78
附錄三:論文問卷...........................................................................90
參考文獻

一、 中文部分
1. Bill Gates (1999),樂為良譯,數位神經系統,台北:商周編輯顧問股份有限公司。
2. Nonaka & Takeuchi (1995),楊子江、王美音譯,創新求勝:智價企業論,台北:遠流出版社。
3. 許士軍 (1982),管理學,台北:東華書局。
4. 賴士葆 (1990),『研究發展╱行銷互動與新產品發展績效相關之研究』,台北:中華民國管理科學學會。
5. 賴士葆 (1990),研究發展/行銷/製造三部門互動與新產品開發績效相關之研究,台北:華泰書局。
6. 司徒達賢 (1995),策略管理,台北:遠流出版社。
7. 劉美慧 (1999),『不同創新類型下新產品發展階段跨部門互動之探討』,國立中央大學企業管理研究所未出版碩士論文。
8. 李政雄 (1999),『新產品開發策略與市場資訊處理能力對新產品開發績效影響之研究』,國立中央大學企業管理研究所未出版碩士論文。
9. 勤業管理顧問公司 (2000),劉京偉譯,知識管理的第一本書,台北:商周編輯顧問股份有限公司。
10. 伍家德 (2000),「產品創新類型、部門參與程度與新產品開發績效關係之研究」,政治大學企業管理研究所未出版之博士論文。
11. 林公孚 (2001),『知識與知識管理』,品質月刊,第37 卷,第6期,pp.56-61
12. 柯裕隆 (2003),『技術策略與知識管理能力對新產品開發績效影響之研究』,國立中央大學企業管理研究所未出版碩士論文。
13. 吳佩鳳 (2003),『研發與行銷之跨部門互動及合作與新產品發展績效之研究』,國立中央大學企業管理研究所未出版碩士論文。
14. 李勝謙 (2003),『開發新產品之過程中研發/行銷部門整合與組織績效關係之研究-以國內SPS相關產業為例』,國立中山大學管理學院高階經營碩士學程碩士 在職專班未出版碩士論文。
15. 陳順宇 (2004),多變量分析,台北:華泰書局,第三版
16. 陳姵羽 (2004),『環境驅動力、企業環境承諾、部門整合與競爭優勢之探討-台灣製造業之實證』,國立東華大學企業管理研究所未出版碩士論文。
17. 廖彥迪 (2005),『技術創新類型與知識管理能力對新產品開發績效影響之研究』,國立中央大學企業管理研究所未出版碩士論文。
18. 蔡筱梅 (2005),『知識整合機制對團隊學習績效的影響』,國立中央大學企業管理研究所未出版碩士論文。

二、 英文部分
1. Alavi, M. (1997), “KPMG Peat Marwick U.S: One Giant Brain”, Harvard Business School (Case) pp.397-108.
2. Anderson J. C. and. Gerbing D. W. (1988) Structural Equation Modeling in Pratice: A Review and Recommended Two Step Approach, Psychological Bulletin, 103: pp.411-423.
3. Andrew, H. G..; Arvind, M.; Albert H. S. (2001),"Knowledge Management:An Organizational Capabilities Perspective", Journal of Management Information System, 18(1), pp.185-214.
4. Appley, D.G. and Winder, A.E. (1977), “An Evolving definition of collaboration and some implications for the world of work.” Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 13(3): pp.279-291.
5. Barczak, G. (1995), “New Product Strategy, Structure, Process, and Performance in the Telecommunications Industry”, Journal of Product Innovation Management, 12(2), pp. 224-234.
6. Berry M.A. and Rondinelli .D.A. (1998) Proactive Corporate Environmental Management: A New Industrial Revolution, Academy of Management Executive, 12(2), pp.38-50.
7. Carlsson, M. (1991), “Aspects of the Integration of Technical Functions for Efficient Product Development.” R&D Management, 21(1): pp.55-66.
8. Chuang, S.H.(2004), “A resource-based perspective on knowledge management capability and competitive advantage: an empirical investigation”, Expert Systems with Applications, 27(3), pp.459-466.
9. Clark, K.B. and Fujimoto, T. (1989), “Overlapping Problem Solving in Product Development.” Managing International Manufacturing, Elsevier Science Publisher, North-Holland, pp.127-152.
10. Clark, K.B. and Fujimoto, T. (1991), “Product Development Performance: Strategy, Organization, and Management in the World Auto Industry. Boston.” Harvard Business School Press.
11. Cooper, R. G.; Kleinschmidt, E. J. (1996), " Winning Business in Product Development: The Critical Success Factors", Research Technology Management, 10 (4), pp.18 - 29.
12. Davenport, T. H.; Klahr, P. (1998), “Managing customer support knowledge.” , Califonia Management Review, 40(3), pp.195-208.
13. Drucker, P. (1993), "Post-Capitalist Society", N.Y.: Butterworth Heineman.
14. Gold,A.H. , Malhotra,A. and Segars, A.H.(2001),”Knowledge Management : An Organizational Capabilities Perspective.” , Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol.18(1),Summer, pp.185-214.
15. Griffin, A. and Hauser, J.R. (1992), “Patterns of Communication Among Marketing, Engineering, and Manufacturing—A Comparison between Two Product Teams.” Management Science, 38(3): pp.360-373.
16. Griffin, A. and Page, A.L. (1993), “An Interim Report on Measuring Product Development Success and Failure.” Journal of Product Innovation Management, 10(4): pp.291-308.
17. Griffin, A. and Hauser, J.R. (1996), “Integrating R&D and Marketing: A Review and Analysis of the Literature.” Journal of Product Innovation Management, 13: pp.191-215.
18. Gupta, A. K. and Wilemon, D. (1985), “The R&D Marketing Interface in high-technology firms.” Journal of Product Innovation Management, 2: pp.12-24.
19. Gupta, A. K. and Wilemon, D. (1985), “R&D and Marketing Dialogue in High-Tech Firms.” Industrial Marketing Management, 14: pp289-300.
20. Gupta, A. K. and Wilemon, D. (1986), “A Model for Studying R&D-Marketing Interface in the Product Innovation Process.” Journal of Marketing, 50(2): pp. 7-17.
21. Gupta, A. K. and Wilemon, D. (1990), “Accelerating the Development of Technology-Based New Products.” California Management Review, 32(2): pp.24-44.
22. Hayes R.H. and Wheelwright S.C. (1984), “Restoring Our Competitive Edge: Competing Through Manufacturing.” New York: John Wiley and Sons.
23. Hauptman, O.(1990), “The Different Roles of Communication in Software Development and Hardware R&D: Phenomenologic Paradox or Atheoretical Empiricism? ”, Journal of Engineering & Technology Management, July, pp.49-71.
24. Hanley, S. and .Dawson, C. (2000), “A Framework for Delivering Value with Knowledge Management: The AMS Knowledge Centers.” Information Strategy; 16, pp.27-36.
25. Kenneth B. Kahn (1996), “Interdepartmental Integration: A Definition with Implications for Product Development Performance.” Journal of Product Innovation Management, 13: pp.137-151.
26. Kenneth B. Kahn (2001), “Market Orientation, Interdepartmental Integration, and Product Development Performance.” Journal of Product Innovation Management, 18(1) pp.314-323.
27. Lawrence, P.P. and Lorsch, J.W. (1967), “Differentiation and Integration in Complex Organizations.” Administrative Science Quaterly, 12(1): pp.1-47.
28. Lawrence, P.P. and Lorsch, J.W. (1986), “Organization and Environment:Managing Differentiation and Integration. Boston.” MA: Harvard Business School Press.
29. Liebowitz, J. (1999), Knowledge Management: Handbook, Florida: CRC Press.
30. Marshall, L. (1997), “Facilitating Knowledge Management and Knowledge Sharing: New Opportunities for information professionals.” Journal of Product Innovation Management, 14(5), pp.337-355.
31. Matsuno, K.; Mentzer, J.T. (2000), “The Effects of Strategy Type on the Market Orientation-Performance Relationship”, Journal of Marketing, 64(4), pp.1-16.
32. Miller, M. et.al.(1999),” Measuring and Reporting Intellectual Capital from Adiverse Canadian Industry Perspective: Experiences, Issues and Prospects.” Organization for Economic Co-operation and development, OECD symposium, Amsterdam.
33. Millson, M.R. and Wilemon, D. (2002), “The Impact of Organizational Integration and Product Development Proficiency on Market Success.” Industrial Marketing Management, 31: pp.1-23.
34. Moenaert, R.K., Souder, W.E., Meyer, A.D. and Deschoolmeester, D. (1994), “R&D-Marketing Integration Mechanisms, Communication Flows, and Innovation Success. ” Journal of Product Innovation Management, 11: pp.31-45
35. Moenaert, R.K., (1995), “R&D/Marketing Communication During the FuzzyFront-End. ” IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 42(3): pp.243-258.
36. Morey, D.(2001),“High-speed Knowledge Management: Integrating Operations Theory and Knowledge Management for Rapid Results.” Journal of Knowledge Management, 5(4), pp.322-328.
37. Nonaka, I.; Takeuchi, H. (1995), “The Knowledge Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation”, Oxford University Press.
38. O’Dell, C.; Grayson, C.(1998), “ If Only We Knew What We Know: Identification and Transfer of Internal Best Practices.”, California Management Review, Vol.40(3) , pp.154-174.
39. Olson, E.M., Walker Jr., O.C., Ruekert, R.W. and Bonner, J.M. (2001), “Patterns of Cooperation During New Product Development Among Marketing, Operations and R&D: Implications for Project Performance.” Journal of Product Innovation Management, 18: pp.258-271.
40. Ottum, B.D. and Moore, W.L. (1997), “The Role of Marketing Information in New Product Success/Failure.” Journal of Product Innovation Management, 14: pp.258-273.
41. Robert, S. and David, P. (2004), " Strategy Maps :Converting Intangible Assets Into Tangible Outcomes ", Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
42. Ruekert, R.W. and Walker, O.C. (1987), “Marketing’s Interaction with Other Functional Units: A Conceptual Framework and Empirical Evidence.” Journal of Marketing, 51(1): pp.1-19.
43. Song, X.M. and Parry, M.E. (1992), “The R&D-Marketing Interface in Japanese High-Technology Firms.” Journal of Product Innovation Management, 9(2): pp.91-112.
44. Song, X.M. and Parry, M.E. (1993), “Determinants of R&D-Marketing Integration in High-Tech Japanese Firms.” Journal of Product Innovation Management, 10: pp.4-22.
45. Song, X.M. and Parry, M.E. (1997), “The Determinants of Japanese New Product Success.” Journal of Marketing Research, 34(1): pp.64-76
46. Song, X.M., Thieme, R.J. and Xie, J. (1998), “The Impact of Cross-functional Joint Involvement Across Product Development Stages:An Exploratory Study.” Journal of Product Innovation Management, 15: pp.289-303.
47. Song, X.M., Montoya-Weiss, M.M., and Schmidt, J.B. (1997), “Antecedents and Consequences of Cross-functional Cooperation:A Comparison of R&D, Manufacturing, and Marketing Perspectives.” Journal of Product Innovation Management, 14: pp.35-47.
48. Soudr, W.E. and Chakrabarti, A.K. (1978), “The R&D Interface: Results from an Empirical Study of Innovation Projects.” IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 25(4): pp.88-93.
49. Souder, W.E., (1987), “Managing New Product Innovations.” Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
50. Souder, W.E., (1988), “Managing Relations Between R&D and Marketing in New Product Development Projects.” Journal of Product Innovation Management, 5: pp.6-19.
51. Souder, W.E. and Moenaert, R.K. (1992), “Integrating Marketing and R&D Project Personnel Within Innovation Projects:An Information Uncertainty Model.” Journal of Management Studies, 29(4): pp.485-510.
52. Souder, W.E., Sherman, J.D. and Davies-Cooper, R. (1998) “Environmental Uncertainty, Organizational Integration, and New Product Development Effectiveness: A Test of Contingency Theory.” Journal of Product Innovation Management, 15(6): pp.520-533.
53. St. John, C.H. and Rue, L.W. (1991), “Research Notes And Communications Co-ordinating, Mechanisms, Consensus Between Marketing and Manufacturing Groups, And Marketplace Performance.” Strategic Management Journal, 12: pp.549-555.

54. Tsai,C.H., Chen, W.C., and Liu, P.L.(2004), “An empirical study on the correlation between knowledge management capability and competitiveness in Taiwan’s industries”, Technovation, 24(12), pp.971-977.
55. Van de Ven, A.H. and Ferry, D.L. (1980), “Measuring and Assessing Organizations.” New York: John Wiley & Sons.
56. Woodward, J. (1965), “Industrial Organization: Theory and Practice.” London: Oxford University Press.
57. Zack, M. (1999), ”Developing a Knowledge Strategy.” California Management Review, Vol. 41(3), Spring, pp.125-143.
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
無相關期刊