中文部分
王文科(2002)。教育研究法。台北市：五南。
王保進(2003)。主要國家高等教育評鑑實務暨我國資訊學門評鑑制度之規劃。台北市：高等教育。
王素芸(1993)。適性評量的理論與實施。教育研究雙月刊，30，9-69。
何英奇(1992)。教學評量的基本原則。國立臺灣師範大學學術研究委員會 (主編)，教學評量研究。台北市：五南。
吳清山、黃美芳、徐緯平(2002)。教育績效責任研究。台北市：高等教育。
李隆盛、賴春金(2004)。技職教育評鑑的展望。教育資料集刊，29，327-340。
林聰明、王國隆(1990)。專科學校評鑑作業改進調查研究。台北市：教育部。
柳玉清、王淑敏、邱美秀、陳李綢 (譯) (2000)。T. Kubiszyn, & G. Borich 著。教育測驗與評量(Educational testing and measurement: Classroom application and practice)。台北市：五南。
郭昭佑(2000)。學校本位評鑑。台北市：五南。
張文華、郭重吉(1995)。科教革新中評量理念的重建。教育研究雙月刊，45，23-30。陳正昌(1993)。正確的教學評量觀念-專訪臺中師院簡院長茂發。教育研究雙月刊，30，4-7。
游家政(1996)。得懷術及其在課程研究上的應用。花蓮師院學報，6，1-24。黃政傑(2002)。課程評鑑。台北市：師大書苑。
黃曙東 (譯) (2005)。D. L. Stufflebeam 著。CIPP 評鑑模式。載於蘇錦麗 (審訂)，評鑑模式：教育及人力服務的評鑑觀點 (Evaluation models: Viewpoints on educational and human services evaluation) (頁333-383)。台北市：高等教育。
黃曙東、蘇錦麗(2005)。後設評鑑研究：以2001年大學校院實施自我評鑑計畫成果報告書為例。教育研究集刊，51(2)，31-65。曾淑惠(1996)。我國專科學校後設評鑑之研究。國立台灣師範大學工業教育研究所博士論文。未出版。楊瑩(2006，6月)。歐盟高等教育評鑑機制之形成與建置。載於財團法人高等教育評鑑中心基金會舉辦之「2006年邁向卓越高等教育評鑑」國際學術研討會論文集(頁81-117)，台北市。
趙志揚(1998)。技職教育教學品質系統之建構與驗證---以高職數控機械課程為例。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告(成果報告編號：NSC87-2516-S018-002)。
蘇錦麗(1997)。高等教育評鑑：理論與實際。台北市：五南。
蘇錦麗、黃曙東(2006，6月)。世界重要國家評鑑專業標準與指導原則之發展對我國教育評鑑的啟示。載於財團法人高等教育評鑑中心基金會舉辦之「2006年邁向卓越高等教育評鑑」國際學術研討會論文集(單行本，頁1-27)，台北市。
英文部分
Alfred, R., Ewell, P., Hudgins, J., & McClenney, K. (1999). Core indicators of effectiveness for community college (2nd ed.). Washington, D.C.: Community College Press.
Airasian, P. W., & Abrams, L. M. (2003). Classroom student evaluation. In T. Kellaghan, D. L. Stufflebeam & L. A. Wingate. International handbook of educational evaluation, 533-548. The Netherlands: Kluwer.
American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, and National Council on Measurement in Education (AERA) (1999). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. New York: Longman.
Association of American Colleges and Universities (AACU) (2004). Assessment. Retrieved Dec. 1, 2004, from http://www.aacu.org/issues/assessment/index.cfm.
Astin, A. (1993). What Matters in College? Four Critical Years Revisited. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Australian Universities Quality Agency (AUQA) (2002). Audit manual. Retrieved April 2, 2004, from http://www.auqa.edu.au/qualityaudit/auditmanuals/auditmanual_v1 /auqa_auditmanualv1c.pdf.
Banta, T. W. (1985). Use of outcomes information at the University of Tennessee, Knoxville. In P. T. Ewell (eds.). Assessing educational outcomes. New Directions for Institutional Research, 47. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Banta, T. W., & Moffett, M. S. (1987). Performance funding in Tennessee: Stimulus for program improvement. In D. F. Halpen. Student outcomes assessment: What institutions stand to gain. New Directions for Higher Education, 59. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Barr, R. B., & Tagg, J. (1995). From teaching to learning: A new paradigm for undergraduate education. Change, 27, 12-15.
Borden, V. M. H., & Bottrill, K. V. (1994). Performance indicators: History, definitions, and methods. In V. M. H. Borden, & T. W. Banta (eds.). Using performance indicators to guide strategic decision making. New Directions for Institutional Research, 82. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Brown, J. S., & Burton, R. R. (1978). Diagnostic models for procedural bugs in basic mathematical skills. Cognitive Science, 2, 155-192.
Brown, G., Bull, J., & Pendlebury, M. (1997). Assessing Student Learning in Higher Education. London: Routledge.
Candy, P. C., & Maconachie, D. (n.d.). Quality assurance in Australian higher education: A recent history and commentary. Retrieved June 25, 2004, from http://www.avcc.edu.au/policies_activities/quality_assurance/policy/quality_assurance_in_austra.doc.
Carlson, J. S., & Wiedl, K. H. (1979).Toward a differential testing approach: Testing the limits employing the Raven Matrices. Intelligence, 3, 323-344.
Clarke, M., & Masaus, G. (2003). New and old in student evaluation. In T. Kellaghan, D. L. Stufflebeam & L. A. Wingate. International handbook of educational evaluation (pp. 485-487). The Netherlands: Kluwer.
Council for Higher Education Accreditation (CHEA) (2003). Statement of mutual responsibilities for student learning outcomes: Accreditation, institutions, and programs. Washington DC: CHEA.
Council for Higher Education Accreditation (CHEA) (2004). Accreditation and the provision of additional information to the public about institution and program performance. Washington: CHEA.
Council for Higher Education Accreditation (CHEA) (2005). CHEA recognition --Recognition of accrediting organizations: Policy and procedures. Retrieved April 29, 2005, from http://www.chea.org/recognition/recognition.asp.
Council of Regional Accrediting Commissions (2003). Regional accreditation and student learning :A guide for institutions and evaluators. Philadelphia: Middle States Commission on Higher Education.
Curvale, B. (2003). France-Higher education. In Educational evaluation around world: An international anthology (pp. 93-102, 159-162). Demark: The Danish Evaluation Institute.
Department of Education, Science and Training (DEST) (2004). Learning and Teaching Performance Fund: Issue paper. Retrieved Nov. 28, 2005, from http://www.dest.gov.au/NR/rdonlyres/8F857836-F4AE-4D74-952E-3906FF5807B4/894/ltp_issues_paper.pdf.
Department of Education, Science and Training (DEST) (2005). Learning and Teaching Performance Fund 2006: Administrative information for providers. Retrieved Nov. 28, 2005, from http://www.dest.gov.au/NR/rdonlyres/018DB581-375F-4BDF-ABD8-1F5E608A4382/7637/FINALAIP2August2005.pdf.
Department of Education and Skills (DfES) (2003). The future of higher education. Retrieved Nov. 29, 2005, from http://www.dfes.gov.uk/hegateway/strategy/hestrategy/pdfs/DfES-HigherEducation.pdf.
Diamond, R. M. (1998). Designing and assessing courses and curricula: A practical guide. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Dittrich, K. (2003). Ambition of the Netherlands Accreditation Organisation. Retrieved August 5, 2004, from http://www.nvao.net/content.php?a=s&t=per&id=95.
Eaton, J. S. (1991). The unfinished agenda: Higher education and the 1980s. New York: American Council on Education and the Macmillan Publishing Co.
Eaton, J. S. (2003a). An overview of U.S. accreditation. Retrieved April 17, 2005, from http://www.chea.org/pdf/overview_US_accred_8-03.pdf.
Eaton, J. S. (2003b). Accreditation and recognition in the United States. Retrieved April 25, 2005, from http://www.chea.org/international/OECD_JEPaper_0803.pdf.
Eaton, J. S. (2003c). Is accreditation accountable? The continuing conversation between accreditation and the federal government. Washington DC: CHEA monograph series 1.
Eckstein, M. A., & Noah, H. J. (1993). Secondary school examinations. International perspectives on policies and practice. New Haven, CN: Yale University Press.
Erwin, T. D. (1991). Assessing student learning and development: A guide to the principles, goals, and methods of determining college outcomes. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Ewell, P. T. (1983). Information on student outcomes: How to get it and how to use it. Boulder, Colo.: National Center for Higher Education Management Systems.
Ewell, P. T., & Ries, P. (2000). Measuring up 2000: The state-by-state report for higher education . National Center for Public Policy and Higher Education: National Center Report #00-5. Retrieved Nov. 26, 2005, from http://measuringup.highereducation.org/2000/assessA.htm.
Ewell, P. T. (2001). Accreditation and student learning outcomes: A proposed point of departure. Washington DC: CHEA Occasional Paper.
Filipp L. (2004). 2004 Student learning outcomes assessment reports. Retrieved Sep. 26, 2005, from
http://www.umbc.edu/selfstudy/Documents/2004%20SLOAR%20-%20Report.pdf#search='2004%20student%20learning%20outcomes.
Frye, R. (1999). Assessment, accountability, and student learning outcomes. Dialogue, 2. Retrieved Sep. 11, 2005, from http://www.ac.wwu.edu/%7Edialogue/issue2.pdf.
Frye, R. (2004). Assessment & outcomes. Retrieved Nov. 11, 2004, from http://pandora.cii.wwu.edu/cii/resources/outcomes/default.asp.
Gagne, R. M., Briggs, L. J., & Wager, W. W. (1992). Principle of instructional design (4th ed). Orlando, FL: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College Publishers.
Gipps, C. & Stobart, G. (2003). Alternative assessment. In T. Kellaghan, D. L. Stufflebeam, & L. A. Wingate. International handbook of educational evaluation (pp. 549-575). The Netherlands: Kluwer.
Glazer, S. M., & Ogle, D. (1994). Helping our students see their learning. Teaching, 25(2), 100-102.
Guerrero, F., & Swan, K. (1988). Computer pilot program, 1986-87. New York: New York City Board of Education. (ERIC ED 301-155).
Hackman, M. Z., & Johnson, C. E. (2000). Leadership: A communication perspective. Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press.
Higher Education Funding Council (HEFC) (2003). Information on quality and standards in higher education: Final guidance. Retrieved Dec. 26, 2005, from http://www.hefce.ac.uk/pubs/hefce/2003/03_51/.
Huang, S. T., & Su, J. L. (2005, May). Establishment of an integrated evaluation system for Taiwan's universities: Integrating internal evaluation and external meta-evaluation. Paper presented at the Redesigning Pedagogy: Research, Policy, Practice; Singapore.
Huba, M. E., & Freed J. E. (2000). Learner-centered assessment on college campuses-shifting the focus from teaching to leaning. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
Jennings, J. M. (2003). New Zealand-Higher education. In Educational evaluation around world: An international anthology (pp. 127-136, 171-173). Demark: The Danish Evaluation Institute.
Jones, L. V. (2003). National assessment in the United States: The evolution of a nation’s report card. In T. Kellaghan, D. L. Stufflebeam & L. A. Wingate. International handbook of educational evaluation (pp. 883-904). The Netherlands: Kluwer.
Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation (Joint Committee) (2000). The need for student evaluation standards. Retrieved Oct. 26, 2005, from http://www.wmich.edu/evalctr/jc/.
Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation (Joint Committee) (2003). The student evaluation standards. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
Joint Committee on Testing Practice (JCTP) (2004). Code of fair testing practices in education. Washington, DC: Joint Committee on Testing Practice.
Joint Quality Initiative (JQI) (2004). Shared ‘Dublin’ descriptors for short cycle, first cycle, second cycle and third cycle awards. Retrieved Oct. 16, 2004, from http://www.jointquality.org/content/descriptors/CompletesetDublinDescriptors.doc.
Keeves, J. P. (1994). National examinations: Design, procedures and reporting. Paris: International Institute for Educational Planning.
Kellaghan, T. & Madaus, G. F. (2003). External (public) examinations. In T. Kellaghan, D. L. Stufflebeam & L. A. Wingate. International handbook of educational evaluation (pp. 577-600). The Netherlands: Kluwer.
Kemp, D. A. (1999). Quality Assured: A new Australian quality assurance framework for university education. Retrieved Sep. 16, 2004, from http://www.dest.gov.au/archive/ministers/kemp/dec99/ks101299.htm.
Knight, J., & De Wit, H. (eds.) (1999). Quality and internationalization in higher education. Paris: OECD-IMHE.
Kristoffersen, D. (2003). Denmark. In Educational evaluation around world: An international anthology (pp. 25-34, 139-140). Demark: The Danish Evaluation Institute.
L’Ecuyer, J. (2003). Canada-Higher education. In Educational evaluation around world: An international anthology (pp. 85-92, 155-158). Demark: The Danish Evaluation Institute.
Leegwater, W., & Vercruysse, N. (2003). Working on the European dimension of quality. In D. F. Westerheijden & M. Leegwater (Eds.), Working on the European dimension of quality : Report of the conference on quality assurance in higher education as part of the Bologna process, Amsterdam, 12-13 March 2002 (pp.9-11). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Ministry of Education, Culture and Science.
Lubinescu, E. S., Ratcliff, J. L., & Gaffney, M. A. (2001). Two continuums collide: Accreditation and assessment. New Directions for Higher Education, 113. 5-21.
Madaus, G. F., & O’Dwyer, L. M. (1999). A short history of performance assessment. Phi Delta Kappa, 80, 688-695.
Mannat, R.P. (1992). The changing paradigm of outcomes and assessment. International Journal of Educational Reform 1.
Marchese, T. J. (1997). "The new conversations about learning." In Assessing Impact: Evidence and Action. Washington DC: American Association for Higher Education.
Miller, M. A., & Ewell, P. T. (2005). Measuring up on college-level learning. National Center for Public Policy and Higher Education: National Center Report #05-8. Retrieved Nov. 28, 2005, from http://www.highereducation.org/reports/mu_learning/Learning.pdf.
Mislevy, R., Wilson, M., Ercikan, K. & Chudowsky, N. (2003). Psychometric principles in student assessment. In T. Kellaghan, D. L. Stufflebeam & L. A. Wingate. International handbook of educational evaluation, 489-531. The Netherlands: Kluwer.
National Postsecondary Education Cooperative Working Group (NPEC) (2005). NPEC sourcebook on assessment: Definitions and assessment methods for communication, leadership, information literacy, quantitative, reasoning, and quantitative skills. Retrieved Sep. 28, 2005, from http://www.uccs.edu/~irpage/IRPAGE/Assessment_Index/NPECsourcebook.pdf#search='npec%20sourcebook%20on%20assessment'.
New England Association of School and Colleges －Commission on Institutions of Higher Education (2000). Summary of survey of enhancing institutional effectiveness through student outcomes assessment at the undergraduate level. Retrieved Nov. 15, 2004, from http://www.neasc.org/cihe/results.htm.
New Zealand Universities Academic Unit (NEUAAU) (2002). Academic Audit Manual. Retrieved July 25, 2004, from http://www.aau.ac.nz/nzuaau/publications/reports/AuditManual2003-2006.pdf.
Oakland, T. (1995). Test use with children and youth internationally: Current status and future directions. In T. Oakland, & R. K. Hambleton. International perspectives on academic assessment. Boston: Kluwer.
Pack, D. H. (1998). WINGS: The Winona State University electronic portfolio project. Aboout Campus, 24. 26.
Palomba, C. A., & Banta, T. W. (1999). Assessment essentials: Planning, implementing, and improving in higher education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Ross, J. E., & El-Khaws, E. (1987). Thinking about assessment: Perspectives for presidents and chief academic officers. Washington, D. C.: American Council on Education and American Association for Higher Education.
Sadri, G. (2002). Identifying core business school competencies. Retrieved Sep. 28, 2005, from http://www.exchangesjournal.org/research/1044_Business_1.html.
Satty, T. L. (1980). The analytic hierarchy process. NY: McGraw-Hill.
Seybert, J. A. (1994). Assessing student learning. Assessment Update. Copenhagen, Demark: Author.
The Danish Evaluation Institute (EVA) (2003). Quality procedures in European higher education: An ENQA survey. Helsinki, Finland: European Network for Quality Assurance in Higher Education.
The Oxford English Dictionary (1989) (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
The Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education (QAA) (2003a). The quality assurance agency for higher education 2003. Gloucester, UK: Author.
The Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education (QAA) (2003b). Learning from subject review1993-2001. Retrieved Sep. 23, 2005, from http://www.qaa.ac.uk/reviews/subjectReview/learningfromSubjectReview/learningFromSubjectReview.pdf.
The Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education (QAA) (2005). Quality assurance in higher education: A guide fro international readers. Retrieved Nov. 29, 2005,from http://www.qaa.ac.uk/international/studentGuide/English_readers.pdf.
Tyler, R. W. (1934). Constructing achievement tests. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Bureau of Educational Research.
Tyler, R. W. (1942). Eight-year study. In E. R. Smith & R. Tyler (Eds.), Appraising and recording student progress. New York: Harper.
University of Hertfordshire (2004). Guidelines on learning outcomes. Retrieved Sep. 23, 2004, from http://www.herts.ac.uk/tli/guidelines/guidelines_contents_main.html.
U. S. Department of Education (USDE) (2004). Accreditation and quality assurance. Retrieved August 4, 2004, from http://www.edu.gov/about/offices/list/ous/international/usnei/us/edlite-accreditation.html.
U. S. Department of Education (USDE) (2005a). National Advisory Committee on Institutional Quality and Integrity: Mission. Retrieved Sep. 28, 2005, from http://www.ed.gov/about/bdscomm/list/naciqi.html.
U. S. Department of Education (USDE) (2005b). Accreditation in the United States: The recognition process. Retrieved Sep. 28, 2005, from http://www.ed.gov/admins/finaid/accred/accreditation_pg14.html#RecognitionProcess.
U. S. Department of Education (USDE) (2005c). Accreditation in the United States: The criteria for recognition. Retrieved Sep. 29, 2005, from
http://www.ed.gov/admins/finaid/accred/accreditation_pg13.html#RecognitionCriteria_.
Vroeijenstijn, A. I. (2003). The Netherlands-Higher education. In Educational evaluation around world: An international anthology (pp. 119-126, 167-170). Demark: The Danish Evaluation Institute.
Wang, Z. M. (1993). Psychology in China: A review. Annual Review of Psychology, 44, 87-116.
Waterhouse, S. (2005). The power of E-learning: The essential guide for teaching in the digital age. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Westerheijden, D. F. (2003). Movements towards a European dimension in quality assurance and accreditation. In D. F. Westerheijden & M. Leegwater (Eds.), Working on the European dimension of quality : Report of the conference on quality assurance in higher education as part of the Bologna process, Amsterdam, 12-13 March 2002 (pp.16-41). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Ministry of Education, Culture and Science.
Wiggins, G. (1991). A brief argument for “authentic” assessment. Snow mass, Co. (A reversion of an ERIC Digest).