跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(18.97.14.87) 您好!臺灣時間:2025/01/17 18:17
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:廖文菁
研究生(外文):Wen-Ching Liao
論文名稱:供應鏈成員在購回合約模式下最適訂購量之研究-以單期二階層存貨模式為例
論文名稱(外文):The Research of Optimal Ordering Policy for Buyback Contract Model among Supply Chain Partners- A Case Study for One Period of Two Echelon Inventory
指導教授:劉基全劉基全引用關係廖述賢廖述賢引用關係
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國防管理學院
系所名稱:資源管理研究所
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:其他商業及管理學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2006
畢業學年度:94
語文別:中文
論文頁數:89
中文關鍵詞:供應鏈契約購回合約隨機模型
外文關鍵詞:supply chain contractbuyback contractstochastic model
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:2
  • 點閱點閱:300
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:0
由於供應鏈的整合與協調是良好供應鏈管理的基礎,供應鏈體系中的各廠商發展出一些供應鏈契約機制,以促進彼此之間的合作,有助於供應鏈各廠商之間進行協調與整合,以提升整體供應鏈的獲利。
購回合約是藉由交易雙方約定的購回價格賣方購回買方未售出之產品來使交易的雙方能夠分擔風險,為常用的供應鏈契約機制中之ㄧ,有鑒於運用購回合約觀念於供應鏈契約在研究與實務上的價值,本研究乃嘗試建立一個單一製造商與單一零售商之供應鏈最適購回合約之隨機模型,以深入探討在廠商期望利潤極大化的目標下,供應鏈實施購回合約之最適訂購量及獲利。本研究並以產品需求為均等分配及常態分配為例,推導出最適解的方法,並藉由實驗設計進行數値模擬與敏感度分析。
本研究分析結果發現:在均等分配之下,產品批發價格、產品購回價格與產品需求分配數值之變動為影響製造商生產量決策的顯著因子;產品銷售價格與產品批發價格數值之變動為影響零售商訂購量的決策顯著因子。而在常態分配之下,產品批發價格、產品購回價格與產品成本數值之變動是影響製造商生產量決策的顯著因子;產品銷售價格數值之變動為影響零售商訂購量決策之顯著因子。
As the integration and coordination among the supply chain partners form the base for good supply chain management. The supply chain partners develop supply chain contracts to help the cooperation with each other lower the risks and increase the profits for both manufacturer and retailer of the supply chain.
Buyback contract, one of the popular supply chain contracts, uses pre-agreed buyback price to buyback unsold products of the retailers. Due to the academic and practical value, this study formulates a stochastic model for buyback contract to maximize the expected profit of manufacturer and retailer. Also, special distributions such as uniform distribution and normal distribution are used as the demand distribution to deduce an optimal solution. Finally, by design of experiment, this study performs numerical simulation and sensitivity analysis to find out the significant factors influencing the expected profit.
The study results show that in the case of demand distribution is uniform distribution, the product wholesales price, buyback price and distribution parameter are the significant factors to influence manufacturer’s decision and the product price, the product wholesales price are the significant factors influence retailer’s decision. In the case of demand distribution is normal distribution, the product wholesales price, buyback price and the product cost are the significant factors to influence manufacturers’ decision and the product price is the significant factors influence retailers’ decision.
第一章 緒論 .................................... 1
1.1 研究背景與動機 ............................ 1
1.2 研究問題與目的.............................. 5
1.3 研究方法流程 .............................. 6
1.4 論文架構 .................................. 8
第二章 文獻探討................................... 9
2.1 供應鏈契約之定義與功能........................ 9
2.2 供應鏈契約結構之分類........................ .13
2.3 單期存貨決策下報童問題之相關文獻................16
2.3.1 傳統報童單期單次存貨決策之相關文獻............16
2.3.2 報童問題單期多次存貨決策之相關文獻............18
2.4 購回合約相關文獻回顧......................... 21
2.5 小结........................................26
第三章 購回合約之模型建立與求解.....................28       
3.1 模型情境說明..................................28
3.2 模型基本假設 .................................30
3.3 參數與決策變數定義.............................31
3.4 購回合約一般模式數學模型之建立與求解.............33
3.4.1 購回合約一般模式數學模型之建構...............33
3.4.2 購回合約一般模式數學模型之求解...............35
3.5 購回合約均等分配數學模型之建立與求解.............38
3.5.1 購回合約均等分配下數學模型之建構..............38
3.5.2 購回合約均等分配下數學模型之求解..............40
3.6 購回合約在常態分配下數學模型之建立與求解..........42
3.6.1 購回合約常態分配下數學模型之建構..............42
3.6.2 購回合約常態分配下數學模型之求解..............45
第四章 數值模擬分析.................................48
4.1 均等分配下廠商利潤模式之求解範例 .................48
4.1.1 均等分配下製造商利潤模式之求解範例...........49
4.1.2 均等分配下零售商利潤模式之求解範例...........50
4.2.常態分配下廠商利潤模式之求解範例.................51
4.2.1常態分配下製造商利潤模式之求解範例............51
4.2.2常態分配下零售商利潤模式之求解範例............52
4.3 敏感度分析 .................................. 54
4.3.1 均等分配下製造商購回合約模組之決策模式........54
4.3.2 均等分配下零售商購回合約模組之決策模式........58
4.3.3 常態分配下製造商購回合約模組之決策模式........61
4.3.4 常態分配下零售商購回合約模組之決策模式........64
4.4 小結 .........................................67
第五章 結論與建議..................................68
5.1 研究結論..................................... 68
5.1 研究貢獻..................................... 69
5.3 研究限制與後續研究建議..........................69
參考文獻 .........................................71
附錄 .........................................75
中文部份
[1]Simchi-Levi,Kaminsky & Simchi-Levi (2004),供應鏈管理創新解決方案,陳
琇玲、林宣萱譯,台北:美商麥格羅‧希爾國際股份有限公司 。
[2]Heizer & Render (2005),生產作業管理,陳振益譯,台北:台灣培生教育出版。
[3]Chopra & Meindl (2004),供應鏈管理,陳銘崑譯,台北:台灣培生教育出版。
[4]Rasmusen (2003),賽局理論與訊息經濟,楊家彥、張建一、吳麗真譯,台北:五南圖
書股份有限公司
[5]Simchi-Levi, Kaminsky & Simchi-Levi (2003),供應鏈之設計與管理,蘇雄義
譯,台北:美商麥格羅‧希爾國際股份有限公司。
[6]王家隆(2000),零售商之退價與定價模式,國立中央大學工業管理研究所碩士論文。
[7]黃允成(2001),報童模式在機率性需求與數量折扣下最適訂購量與訂購策略之研究,
工業工程學刊,第十八捲,第六期,43-52頁
[8]趙美惠(1999),供應鏈模型中之協商政策與退貨政策之分析,國立台灣科技大學資訊
管理研究所碩士論文。
[9]洪維恩(2000),Maple在微積分之應用-基礎篇,五南圖書出版公司。
[10]洪維恩(2001),數學魔法書Maple,五南圖書出版公司。
[11]謝志峰(2004),季節性商品單期兩次訂購動態規劃模型之分析與研究,國立大學商學
研究所碩士論文。
[12]蘇雄義(2004),物流與運籌管理:觀念、機能與整合,台北:華泰文化出版。

英文部分

[1]Azoury,Katy S.& Bruce L. Miller (1984), “ A Comparison of the
Optimal Orderin Levels of Bayesian and Non-Bayesian Inventory
Models’’, Management Science. Vol.30,no.8, pp.993-1003.

[2]Abraham,B.& J Ledolter (1983), “ Statistical Methods for
Forecasting’’, John Wiley&Sons. Inc.

[3]Cachon,G.P. (2003), “Supply chain coordination with
contracts’’,in :S Graves, T. de Kok (eds.), The Handbook of
Operations Research and Management Science : Supply Chain
Management, Kluwer, Amsterdam,The Netherlands.

[4]Choi,T-M.,D.Li,&H.Yan (2003) “Optimal two-stage ordering policy
with Bayesian information updating’’ The Journal of the
Operational Research Society, Vol.54,pp.846-859

[5]Chopra,S.&P.Meindl (2004), Supply Chain Management : Strategy,
Planning and Operation, pp364-371, Prentice-Hall,Inc., Englewood
Cliffs, N.J. 07632,U.S.A.

[6]Donohue, K.L. (2000), “Efficient supply contracts for fashion
goods with forecast updating and two production modes’’,
Management science.,Vol.46. No.11,pp.1397-1411


[7]Eppen,G&Ananth.V.Iyer(1997),“Improved fashion buying with
Bayesian updates.’’Operations Resarch,Vol.45 no.6 pp.805-860.

[8]Emmons, H. & S.M. Gilbert (1998), “The role of returns policies
in pricing and inventory decisions”,, Management Science., Vol.
44, No.2, pp.276-283.
[9]Lau,H.S.&A.H.L.Lau(1988),The newsboy problem with price-dependent
demand distribution” , IIE Transactions, Vol.20, No. 2, pp.168-
175

[10]Lau, H.S. & A.H.L. Lau (1999), “Manufacturer’s pricing strategy
and return policy for a single-period commodity’’, European
Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 116, pp.291-304

[11]Lin, Chinho & Yihsu Lin (2005), “The production size and
inventory policy for a manufacturer in a two-echelon inventory
model”, Computers & Operations Research (32), pp.1181-1196.

[12]Marvel, H.P. & J. Peck (1995), “Demand uncertainty and returns
policies”, International Economic Review, Vol. 36, No. 3, pp.691-
714.

[13]Mantrala, M.K. & K. Raman(1999), “ Demand uncertainty and
supplier’s returns policies for a mulit-store style-good
retailer’’, European Journal of Operarional Research , Vol.
115, pp.270-284.

[14]Mostard, Julien & Teunter Ruud(2006), “The newsboy problem with
resalable returns: A single period model and case study”,
European Journal of Operational Research, pp.81-96.

[15]Kandel, E. (1996), “ The right to return”, Journal of Law and
Economics, April, pp.329-356

[16]Padmanabhan, V. & I.P.L. Png (1995), “Returns policies: make
money by Making good”, Sloan Management Review, Vol.37, No.1,pp.
65-72.

[17]Padmanabhan, V. & I.P.L. Png (1997), “ Manufacturer’s returns
policies and retail competition”, Management Science , Vol.6,
No.1, pp.81-94.

[18]Pasternack, B.A. (1985), “Optimal pricing and return policies
for perishable commodities”,Management Science :, Vol.4, No.2,
pp. 166-176.

[19]Rarhowsky,D.A(1990),“Handbook of nonlinear regression
models”,Marcel Dekker,Inc.

[20]Stock,J.,T.Speh & H.Shear (2002),“Many happy product
returns”,Harvard Business Review, Vol.80, Issue 7,July, pp.16-17

[21]Simchi-Levi,Kaminsky & Simchi-Levi (2004), Manageing Supply
Chain pp.364-371, Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs,
N.J.07632, USA

[22]Taylor, T.A. (2001), “ Channel coordination under price
protection, midlife returns, and end-of-life returns in dynamic
markets’’ Management Science’’, Vol .47 No.9, pp.1220-1234

[23]Taylor, T.A. (2002), “ Supply chain coordination under channel
rebates with sales effort effects’’, Management Science, Vol.
48, No. 8, pp. 992-1007

[24]Tsay, A., S. Nahmias & N. Agrawal (1998),“Modeling Supply Chain
Contracts: A Review, Quantitative Models for Supply Chain
Management, Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp.299-336.

[25]Wang, Hao (2004), “ Do return policies intensify retail
competition?”, Marketing Science.Vol. 23 No.3, pp.611-613.

[26]Zhang, Song, Wu (2005), “ Supply Chain Coordination of Loss-
Averse Newsvendor with Contract”,Tsinghua Science and
Technology .Vol. 10(2), pp.133-140.
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top