臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

基於現有良好的國防科技能力，在不與民爭利的前提之下，以多國企業方式投資軍民通用產品，為維持國防能量之一有效方法。基此，本研究旨在探討企業主體欲在國際多個區域進行投資，並且成為一個知名的多國企業（multinational enterprise, MNE）。為達成上述基礎目標，假設該MNE決定以獨資之市場進入策略投資多個國際區域，為確保競爭優勢，期望在投資之規劃時間幅度內，各計畫投資區域，皆能達成其目標(稅後)盈餘。假設，該MNE決定採用分散化同步推進策略（decentralized synchronized advancement strategy, DSAS），對多個區域進行投資，此策略係指將資本預算分散投入各個計畫投資區域，並同步進行投資。在採用DSAS之市場推進策略下，本研究建構一最佳化資源配置模型，藉以獲得各計畫投資區域之最佳資本投入分配及其商品訂價政策。最後，引用可分離凸規劃技術發展求解程序，並輔以範例說明。

Aiming to effectively keep national defense energy and develop capacity without sacrificing civilian interests, on the basis of current good techniques of in our army, invest dual-use products by the form of multinational enterprise (MNE) is one of effective methods. Under this premise, this study considers an enterprise who wants to expand its business to multiple locations in global and to be a well-known MNE. Suppose the MNE utilizes wholly owned market entry strategy to achieve the purpose. In order to cumulate potential expanding advantages, the enterprise hopes that each subsidiary gleans a target return within a specific time horizon. Assume that the enterprise utilizes “decentralized synchronized advancement strategy (DSAS)” which refers to expanding business by decentralizing the available capital budget into each planning investment location and invest them concurrently. Based on utilizing DSAS and assuming the capital budget is scarce, this paper proposes an optimization model to find the optimal capital investment allocation and commodity pricing policy. In addition, a list of theoretical results within the proposed models is demonstrated. Finally, a solution procedure based on the theoretical results and separable convex programming approach is developed. Also, a numerical example is given.

中文摘要………………………………………………………….. I
英文摘要………………………………………………………….. II
誌謝……………………………………………………………….. III
目錄……………………………………………………………….. VI
表目錄…………………………………………………………….. VII
圖目錄…………………………………………………………….. VIII
第一章 緒論……………………………………………………… 1
1.1研究背景……………………………………………………. 1
1.2研究動機與目的……………………………………………. 1
第二章 文獻回顧………………………………………………… 4
第三章 問題描述………………………………………………… 9
第四章 資本配置與產品訂價模型……………………………… 12
4.1研究假設……………………………………………………. 12
4.2符號定義與說明……………………………………………. 13
4.3 模型參數函數……………………………………………… 14
4.4模型建構……………………………………………………. 16
第五章 演算法與數值範例……………………………………… 39
5.1 演算法……………………………………………………… 39
5.2 數值範例…………………………………………………… 41
第六章 結論與建議……………………………………………… 59
6.1 結論………………………………………………………… 59
6.2 未來研究方向……………………………………………… 61
參考文獻………………………………………………………….. 63

【1】 Culem, C. G. (1992), “The Locational Determinants of Direct Investment Among Industrialised Countries,” European Economic Review, Vol. 32, No. 4, pp.885-904.
【2】 Devereux, M. and R. Griffith (1998), “Taxes and The Location Production: Evidence from A Panel of US Multinationals,” Journal of Public Economics, Vol. 68, No. 3, pp.335-367.
【3】 Sashi, C. M. and L. W. Sterm (1995), “Product Differentiation and Market Performance in Producer Goods Industries,” Journal of Business Research, Vol. 32, No. 2, pp.115-127.
【4】 Wheeler, D. and A. Mody (1992), “International Investment Locations: The Case of U.S. Firm,” Journal of International Economics, 33(1), 57-76.
【5】 Arthur, B. (1986), Industry Location Patterns and The Importance of History, Stanford University, Center for Economic Policy Research, p.84.
【6】 Dunning, J. H. (1980), “Toward An Eclectic Theory of International Production: Some Empirical Tests,” Journal of International Business Studies, Vol. 11, No. 1, pp.9-31.
【7】 Dunning, J. H. (1988), Explaining International Production, London: Allen & Unwin.
【8】 Dewhurst, J. H. L.(2000), “Foreign Direct Investment and Development-agency Intervention: A Theoretical Model,” Urban Studies, Vol. 37, No. 3, pp.497-511.
【9】 Kogut, B. and H. Singh (1988), “The Effect of National Culture on the Choice of Entry Mode,” Journal of International Business Studies, Fall, pp.411-432.
【10】 C. W. L. Hill, H. Peter and W. C. Kim (1990), “An eclectic theory of the choice of international entry mode,” Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 11, No. 2, pp.117-128.
【11】 R. Mudambi, S. M. Mudambi (2002), “Diversification and market entry choices in the context of foreign direct investment,” International Business Review, Vol. 11, No. 1, pp.35-55.
【12】 Bardhan, P. K. (1982), “Important, Domestic, and Transnational Vertical Integration: A Theoretical Note,” Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 90, No. 4, pp.1020-1034.
【13】 Tang, M. J. and C. J. Yu (1990), “Foreign Market Entry: Production-Related Strategies,” Management Science, Vol. 36, No. 4, pp.476-489.
【14】 J. T. Teng, M. S. Chern and K. H. Kim (2001), “Entry strategies for multinational enterprises and host countries,” European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 133, No. 1, pp.62-68.
【15】 Feng, Y., B. Xiao(2006), “Integration of pricing and capacity allocation for perishable products,” European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 168, pp.17-34.
【16】 Chang, C. C., 2003, “The Centralized Sequential Investment Problem with Regional Characteristics Effect by Using Genetic Algorithms,” Journal of Operations Research Society of Japan, Vol. 46, No. 4, pp. 467-486.
【17】 Chang, C. C., 2003, “An Estimation Method of Parameters Based on Weibull Distribution Centralized Sequential Investment Problem,” Journal of Chinese Institute of Industrial Engineers, Vol. 21, No. 5, pp. 504-515.
【18】 Chang, C. C. and Chu, Y. F., 2003, “A TQM Case of Centralized Sequential Decision-making Problem,” The Asian Journal of Quality, Vol. 4, No. 1, pp. 131-147.
【19】 Bazaraa, M., H., Sherall, and C. Shetty (1993), Nonlinear Programming, Theory and Algorithms, 2nd ed., Wiley, New York.
【20】 Rardin, D. (1998), Optimization in Operations Research, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
【21】 Saaty, T. L. (1980), The Analytic Hierarchy Process, McGraw-Hill, New York.
【22】 Saaty, T. L. (1982), Decision Making For Leaders, Wadsworth, Belmont, California.
【23】 Saaty, T. L. and K. P. Kearns (1985), Analytical Planning, Pegramon, New York.
【24】 Edwards, W. (1977), “How to Use Multiattribute Utility Measurement for Social Decision Making,” IEEE Transaction on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, SMC Vol. 7, No. 5, pp. 326-340.
【25】 Edwards, W. and F. H. Barron (1994), “SMARTS and SMARTER: Improved Simple Methods for Multiattribute Utility Measurement,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Process, Vol. 60, pp. 306-325.