跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(18.97.14.81) 您好!臺灣時間:2024/12/02 21:07
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

: 
twitterline
研究生:王美蓉
研究生(外文):Mei-jung Wang
論文名稱:網路後設認知閱讀策略訓練對南台灣高中生英語閱讀成效及網路學習認知之研究
論文名稱(外文):STUDIES OF WEB-BASED METACOGNITIVE READING STRATEGY TRAINING IN ENGLISH READING AND PERCEPTIONS OF WEB-BASED LEARNING FOR SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS IN SOUTHERN TAIWAN
指導教授:張玉玲張玉玲引用關係
指導教授(外文):Ye-ling Chang
學位類別:博士
校院名稱:國立高雄師範大學
系所名稱:英語學系
學門:人文學門
學類:外國語文學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2006
畢業學年度:94
語文別:英文
論文頁數:241
中文關鍵詞:後設認知閱讀策略訓練網路學習網路學習社群
外文關鍵詞:Metacognitive reading strategy trainingWeb-based learningOnline learning communities
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:9
  • 點閱點閱:2118
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:899
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:30
網路學習是現代資訊社會一項備受重視的議題,但如何有效地使用後設認知閱讀策略增進閱讀理解更是資訊爆炸時代另一項重要的議題。因此,本研究主要目的是探討南台灣高中生接受網路後設認知閱讀策略訓練之成效和受試者對網路學習的認知。本研究根據選擇、組織、整合、後設認知 (SOIM) 之模式,採用四個後設認知閱讀策略,分別是略讀法、語意圖示法、摘要法和自我評估法。本實驗並開發一個網路後設認知訓練平台,e-閱讀平台,受試者在此一平台上進行閱讀策略訓練以提昇閱讀理解能力。
  三百名高一學生參加此項研究,他們來自於南台灣四所高中,包括高雄市前鎮高中、高雄縣福誠高中、台南市台南女中及台南市家齊女中。受試者被分為二組,一組是實驗組,共有160人;另一組是控制組,共有140人。實驗組回答問卷,測試閱讀理解能力,並參加網路輔助後設認知閱讀策略訓練,而控制組學生僅回答問卷及測試閱讀理解能力,並沒有接受訓練。本實驗為期十週。
  研究工具則包括了閱讀測驗,後設認知閱讀策略問卷,前後測問卷及對e-閱讀平台之教學設計及使用者介面設計之問卷。
  本研究主要之發現如下:
一、網路輔助後設認知閱讀策略訓練成功地提昇實驗組學生對閱讀策略之認知。實驗組在接受訓練之後在閱讀策略之認知上有顯著提昇,而控制組則在實驗前後在閱讀策略之認知上沒有多大不同。
二、網路輔助後設認知閱讀策略訓練有效地提昇實驗組學生的閱讀理解能力。實驗組接受訓練之後,在閱讀測驗上的表現顯著地優於控制組。
三、實驗組學生肯定本網路輔助後設認知閱讀策略訓練之成效。本訓練不只有助於實驗組學生之閱讀過程和成果也影響情意考量。問卷結果顯示,實驗組接受訓練之後,顯著提昇四項後設認知閱讀策略使用頻率,控制組使用四項後設認知閱讀策略頻率則無顯著差異。
四、實驗組學生對於網路學習持有正面的態度,因為網路學習活動可提昇思考能力,提供不同學習模式,增進互動,及提高動機。然而,本研究顯示在此網路閱讀學習活動中,實驗組學生仍然未能完全主動學習。因此教師在建立網路學習社群及維持有效之網路學習活動方面,仍然扮演關鍵角色。
五、實驗組學生對於e-閱讀平台之教學設計及使用者介面設計亦加以肯定。實驗組學生認為操作便利及完善的設計促進他們的使用意願並有助於閱讀策略的學習。

根據上述之發現,本研究也提供下列建議。
一、教師應該將後設認知閱讀策略訓練融入日常之閱讀課程中,以提昇學生的閱讀理解能力。
二、教師可以協助學生提昇電子文件的讀寫能力,以運用現代資訊科技養成自主學習的能力。
三、不論是教師或教育機構均可以積極運用網路學習,以順應現代資訊社會的潮流。
四、英語科的教師應和資訊科的教師互相合作以設計有效之教學平台,進以提昇教學品 質。
Web-based learning has been much emphasized in the age of information. Moreover, how to make effective use of metacognitive reading strategies to enhance reading abilities and process information is a big concern. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the effects of web-based metacognitive reading strategy training and the perceptions by subjects of web-based learning for senior high school students in southern Taiwan. Four reading strategies were selected, based on the selection-organization-integration-metacognition (SOIM) model, to assist students to promote their reading comprehension in a web-based community to train metacognitive reading strategies, including skimming, semantic mapping, summarizing, and self-evaluation. A training platform, an e-reading platform, was developed for this study.
Three hundred students who participated in this study were in the tenth grade in four senior high schools in southern Taiwan – Chien-Chen Senior High School in Kaohsiung City, Fu-Cheng Senior High School in Kaohsiung County, Tainan Girls' Senior High School and Chia-Chi Girls' Senior High School in Tainan. These subjects were divided into two groups – 160 students comprised the experimental group (EG) and 140 students comprised the control group (CG). The EG subjects answered questionnaires, were tested on reading comprehension, and participated in a web-based metacognitive reading strategy training program (WMRSTP), whereas the CG subjects answered the same questionnaires and were tested on reading comprehension but received no such training. The training lasted for ten weeks.
The instruments included tests of reading comprehension, the metacognitive awareness of reading strategy inventory (MARSI), questionnaires before and after training, and the questionnaire on the instructional design and the user-interface design to the e-reading platform.

The main findings of the study are presented as follows:
1. Web-based metacognitive reading strategy training succeeded in increasing EFL students’ metacognitive awareness of reading strategies.
2. Web-based metacognitive reading strategy training was effective in enhancing reading comprehension. The results of the pre-reading and post-reading tests showed that the EG subjects made significant progress than the CG subjects in their reading ability after training.
3. With regard to the training of the four selected metacognitive reading strategies, the EG subjects exhibited positive attitudes towards the four selected metacognitive reading strategies than the CG ones.
4. The EG subjects were appreciative of web-based learning as it was beneficial in promoting thinking, providing alternative instruction, increasing interaction, and enhancing motivation.
5. The EG subjects confirmed the effectiveness of the instructional design and the user-interface design of the e-reading platform. The EG subjects agreed that ease of use and pedagogy-based design increased their desire to use the e-reading platform and also facilitated their learning of the four selected reading strategies.

On the basis of these findings, four pedagogical implications are provided:
1. Teachers should incorporate metacognitive reading strategy training into regular
reading instruction to aid students to become effective readers.
2. Teachers may assist students in developing electronic literacy and taking advantage of modern information technology to become autonomous learners.
3. At all levels of language education, from the teachers to the institutional, active mastery of web-based learning is essential for confronting the imperatives of an information society.
4. English teachers and technology teachers can collaborate with one another to develop adaptive training platforms to facilitate instruction.
TABLE OF CONTENTS

CHAPTER ONE INTRODUCTION 1
Background and Motivation 1
Purposes of Study 7
Research Questions 8
Significance of the Study 8
Limitations of the Study 9
Definition of Terms 10

CHAPTER TWO REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE
15
Metacognition and Reading 15
Reading Comprehension
The Definition of Metacognition
Relevant Studies in Metacognition and Reading 15
20
23
Metacognitive Reading Strategy Training
Metacognitive Strategies
The Significance of Strategy Training 25
25
27
Factors for Training for a Successful Reading Strategy 30
Computer-assisted Language Learning
A Brief History of CALL 33
34
Behaviorist CALL 34
Communicative CALL 35
Integrative CALL 36
Computer-assisted Reading Instruction 39
Online Learning Communities 43
Selected Strategies 47
Skimming 48
Semantic Mapping 50
Summarizing 51
Self-evaluation 52
Summary

CHAPTER THREE METHOD 53

55
Subjects 55
Training Materials 56
Instruments 57
Tests of Reading Comprehension 58
Metacognitive Awareness of Reading Strategy Inventory 60
A Questionnaire on Web-based Training for
Metacognitive Reading Strategies 61
A Questionnaire on Instructional Design and Design of the User-
interface to the E-reading Platform 61
The E-reading Platform 62
System Requirements 63
The Instructional Design 64
The User-interface Design 65
Operating Procedures and Sample Homepages 67
The Teacher’s Interface 67
The Students’ Interface 68
Training Procedures 72
Skimming 72
Semantic Mapping 73
Summarizing 75
Self-evaluation 76
Scoring 76
Data Collection 78
The Pilot Study 78
Collection of Formal Data 80
Data Analysis 81
Quantitative Analysis 81
Qualitative Analysis 83

CHAPTER FOUR RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
85
Results of the Subjects’ Metacognitive Awareness of Reading Strategies 85
General Strategy Use in the MARSI 86
Three Subcategories in the MARSI 88
Discussion of Metacognitive Awareness of Reading Strategies 90
General Strategy Use in the MARSI 90
Three Subcategories in the MARSI 93
Results of Reading Comprehension Tests for the Subjects 97
Discussion of Reading Comprehension by the
Two Groups between Pre- and Post-tests 102
Results of the Subjects’ Responses to Four Selected Metacognitive
Reading Strategies 104
Discussion of the Four Selected Metacognitive Reading Strategies 106
The EG Subjects’ Responses to Skimming 107
The EG Subjects’ Responses to Semantic Mapping 111
The EG Subjects’ Responses to Summarizing 115
The EG Subjects’ Responses to Self-evaluation 118
Results of the EG Subjects’ Perceptions of Web-based Learning 126
Discussion of the EG Subjects’ Perceptions of Web-based Learning 130
Promoting Thinking 130
Providing Alternative Instruction 132
Increasing Interaction 137
Enhancing Motivation 143
The EG Subjects’ Evaluation of the Instructional Design and
the User-interface Design 146
The EG Subjects’ Evaluation of the Instructional Design 146
Discussion of the EG Subjects’ Evaluation of the Instructional Design 148
The EG Subjects’ Evaluation of the User-interface Design 152
Discussions of the EG Subjects’ Evaluation of the User-interface
Design 153

CHAPTER FIVE CONCLUSIONS, IMPLICATIONS, AND SUGGESTIONS 159

Conclusions 159
Implications 163
Suggestions 169

REFERENCES
171

APPENDIXES
201
Appendix A Reading Strategy Training Materials Used in the
E-reading Platform 201
Appendix B Fry’s Readability Formula 206
Appendix C The Pre-training Reading Comprehension Tests 207
Appendix D The Post-training Reading Comprehension Tests 211
Appendix E The Metacognitive Awareness of Reading Strategy
Inventory 215
Appendix F Questionnaire on Web-based Metacognitive Reading Strategy Training 219
Appendix G Questionnaire on the Instructional Design and
the User Interface Design of the E-reading Platform 223
Appendix H A Lesson Plan for Teaching Skimming 227
Appendix I A Lesson Plan for Teaching Semantic Mapping 229
Appendix J A Lesson Plan for Teaching Summarizing 231
Appendix K A Lesson Plan for Teaching Self-evaluation 233
Appendix L A Checklist for Self-evaluation
Appendix M Samples for Scoring 235
237
REFERENCES

ADL. (2002). SCORM documents. Retrieved September 12, 2002, from http://www.adlnet.org
Alderson, J. C. (2000). Assessing reading. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Alessi, S. M., & Trollip, S. R. (2001). Multimedia for learning: Methods and developments. Massachusetts: Allyn & Bacon.
Alexander, P. A., & Jetton, T. L. (2000). Learning from text: A multidimensional and developmental perspective. In M. Kamil, P. Mosenthal, P. D. Pearson, & R. Batt (Eds.), Handbook of reading research. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Allen, S. (2003). An analytic comparison of three models of reading strategy instruction. IRAL, 41, 210-228.
Almalsi, J. F. (2003). Teaching strategic process in reading. New York: The Guilford Press.
Alvermann, D. E., & Moore, D. W. (1991). Secondary school reading. In R. Barr, M.
L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, & P. D. Pearson (Eds.), Handbook of reading
research: Volume II (pp. 951-983). White Plains, NY: Longman.
Andrich, D. (1994). Educational measurement. Unit materials: Module 6. Murdoch
University.
Anderson, N. J. (1999). Exploring second language reading: Issues and strategies.
Canada: Heinle & Heinle.
Anderson, N. J. (2001). Developing metacognitive skills in foreign language learners. Selected papers from the Tenth International Symposium on English Teaching, pp. 1-7.
Anderson, R., & Pearson, P. (1984). A schema-theoretic view of basic processes in reading comprehension. In P. D. Pearson (Ed.), Handbook of reading research. New York: Longman.
Antonacci, P. A. (1991). Students search for meaning in the text through semantic mapping. Social Education, 55(3), 174-175.
Applegate, M. D., Quinn, K. B., & Applegate, A. J. (1994). Using metacognitive
strategies to enhance achievement for at-risk liberal arts students. Journal
of Reading, 38, 32-40.
Armbruster, B. B., Anderson, T. H., & Meyer, J. L. (1991). Improving content-area reading using instructional graphics. Reading Research Quarterly, 17, 281-294.
Bahaa El Din, H. K. (1997). Education and the future. Kayoub, Egypt: Al Ahram Commercial Press.
Baker, F. B. (1978). Computer-managed instruction: Theory and practice. Englewood Cliffs, NY: Educational Technology Publications.
Baker, L., & Brown A. L. (1980). Metacognitive skills and reading. Urbana: University of Illinois Center for the Study of Reading. Technical Report 188.
Baker, L., & Brown, A. L. (1984). Metacognitive skills in reading. In P. D. Person (Ed.), Handbook of reading research. New York: Longman.
Ballantyne, C. (2004). Multiple choice tests. Retrieved January 18, 2004, from http://www.tlc.murdoch.edu.au/eddev/evaluation/mcq/mctests.html
Bandura, A. (1991). Self-efficacy conception of anxiety. In R. Schwarzer & R. A. Wicklund (Eds.), Anxiety and self-focused attention (pp. 89-110). New York: Harwood.
Barchers, S. (1998). Teaching reading: From process to practice. Belmont: Wadsworth Publishing Company.
Barnet, M. A. (1986). Syntactic and lexical/semantic skill in foreign language reading: Importance and interaction. The Modern Language Journal, 70(4), 343-349.
Barnett, M. A. (1988). Reading through context: How real and perceived strategy use affect L2 comprehension. The Modern Language Journal, 72(2), 150-162.
Bartlett, F. C. (1932). Remembering: A study in experimental and social psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Baumann, J. F., & Bergeron, B. S. (1993). Story map instruction using children's
literature: Effects on first graders' comprehension of central narrative elements. Journal of Reading Behavior, 25, 407-437.
Bean, T. W., & Steenwyk, E. L. (1984). The effect of three forms of summarization instruction on sixth graders' summary writing and comprehension. Journal of Reading Behavior, 16, 297-306.
Berger, C. (1996). Educational software design and authoring. Retrieved 10 June, 2002, from http://www.umich.edu/~ed626/define.html
Besser, H., & Donahue, S. (1996). Introduction and overview: Perspectives on
distance independent education. Journal of the American Society for
Information Science, 47(11), 801-804.
Bielaczyc, K., & Collins, A. (1999). Learning communities in classrooms: A
reconceptualization of educational practice. In C. Reigeluth (Ed), Instructional
design theories and models: Volume II (pp. 269-292). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates., Blakey, E., & Spence, S. (1990). Thinking for the future.
Emergency Librarian, 17(5), 11-15.
Block, E. L. (1992). See how they read: comprehension monitoring of L1 and L2 reading. TESOL Quarterly, 26(2), 319-343.
Bolter, J. D. (1998). Hypertext and the question of visual literacy. In D. Reinking, M. McKenna, L. Labbo, & R. Kieffer (Eds.), Handbook of literacy and technology: Transformations in a post-typographic world (pp. 3-13). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Bonk, C. J., & Wisher, R. A. (2000). Applying Collaborative and e-learning Tools to Military Distance Learning: A Research Framework. United States Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences. Retrieved October 3, 2003, from http://www.publicationshare.com/docs/Dist.Learn(Wisher).pdf
Bos, C. S., & Vaughn, S. (1994). Strategies for teaching students with learning and behavior problems. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Brack, C. (1996). Linking the data to develop knowledge: A neglected part of developing web-based university resource. Paper presented at Ausweb 96, Gold Coast, Australia.
Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (Eds.). (1999). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington D.C.: National Academy Press.
Broderick, C. (2001) What is instructional design? Retrieved July 15, 2004, from
http://www.geocities.com/ok_bcurt/whatisID.htm
Brook, C., & Oliver, R. (2003). Online learning communities: Investigating a design framework. Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 19(2), 139-160.
Brown, A. L. (1985). Metacognition: The development of selective attention strategies for learning from texts. In H. Singer & R. B. Ruddell (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (pp. 501-526). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
Brown, H. D. (1987). Principles of language learning and teaching. N. L.: Prentice-Hall.
Brufee, K. A. (1986). Social construction, language, and the authority of knowledge: A bibliographical essay. College English, 48, 773-90.
Burbules, N. (1997). Rhetorics of the Web: Hyperreading and critical literacy. In I. Snyder (Ed.), Page to screen: Taking literacy into the electronic era. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.
Caldwell, J., Huitt, W., & Graeber, A. (1982). Time spent in learning: Implications from research. The Elementary School Journal, 82(5), 471-480.
Canale, M., & Swain, M. (1981). A theoretical framework for communicative competence. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service. No. ED223105)
Castells, M. (2000). End of Millennium (2nd ed.). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Carr, S. (2000). As distance education comes of age, the challenge is keeping the
students. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 46(23), A39-A41.
Carroll, J. (1963). A model of school learning. Teachers College Record, 64, 723-733.
Carrell, P. L., Devine, J., & Eskey, D. E. (Eds.). (1989). Interactive approaches to second language reading. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Carrell, P. L., Pharis, B. G., & Liberto, J. C. (1989). Metacognitive strategy training for ESL reading. TESOL Quarterly, 23, 647-678.
Carrell, P. L. (1989). Metacognitive awareness and second language reading. Modern Language Journal, 73, 121-134.
Chamot, A. U. (1993). Students’ responses to learning strategy instruction in the foreign language classroom. Foreign Language Annals, 26, 308-321.
Chamot, A. U. (1998). Teaching learning strategies to language students. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service. No. ED433719)
Chamot, A. U., & O'Malley, J. M. (1994). The CALLA handbook: Implementing the cognitive-academic language learning approach. Reading: MA: Addison Wesley.
Chamot, A. U., & O’Malley, J. M. (1996). The cognitive academic language learning approach: A model for linguistically diverse classrooms. The Elementary School Journal, 96, 259-273.
Chamot, A. U., Barnhardt, S., & Robbins, J. (1999). The learning strategies handbook. New York: Longman.
Chang, S. J. (1989). Problems and research in junior high school effective teaching: the effective learning strategies in information processing. Journal of National Kaohsiung Teachers College, 28, 24-174.
Chang, Y. L. (1998a). A study of an interactive English reading courseware for senior high school students. Kaohsiung: Fuwen Publishing Company.
Chang, Y. L. (1998b). A homepage-based problem solving project. Proceedings of the Second Multimedia-assisted English Instruction in the Republic China.
Chang, Y. L. (2000). Communicative literacy. The reading package for teaching
reading. English Department, National Kaohsiung Normal University.
Chang, K., Sung, Y., & Chen, I. (2002). The effect of concept mapping to enhance text comprehension and summarization. The Journal of Experimental Education, 71(1), 5-23.
Chang, M. M., & Wu, Y. M. (2003). EFL Learner’s self-efficacy and strategy uses in a web-based learning environment. Proceedings of 2003 International Conference on English teaching and learning in the Republic of China, 117-126, Taichung.
Chang, Y. L., Huang, W. Y., & Chang, C. B. (2002). The effects of asynchronous
learning activities on motivation and their application in language learning. Proceedings of ROCMELIA 2002 and the Second International Conference on Multimedia Language Education, Kaohsiung.
Chapelle, C. (1997). CALL in the year 2000: still in search of research paradigms? Language Learning and Technology, 1(1), 19-43.
Charney, D. (1994). The effect of hypertext on processes of reading and writing. In C. L. Selfe & S. Hilligoss (Eds.). Literacy and computers: The complications of teaching and learning with technology (pp. 238-263). New York: Modern Language Association of America.
Cheng, L.Y. (1991). The study of freshman English reading: The application of metacognitive strategies. Proceedings of the Second Educational Research in Taiwan Province. Taichung: Taiwan Province Government.
Chen, C. F. (2004). Computer-assisted language learning and teaching. Retrieved May 12, 2004, from
http://www2.nkfust.edu.tw/~emchen/CALL/unit7.htm#metacognitive
Chen, H. J. (2002). Cyber Strategy Tutor for Effective On-line Reading. Proceedings of the Seventh Multimedia-assisted English Instruction in the Republic China, Kaohsiung, 113-135.
Chen, H. J. (2003). Developing a technology-enhanced self-access reading environment, Proceedings of 2003 International Conference on English teaching and learning in the Republic of China, Taipei, 103-116.
Chern, C. L. (1993). Chinese students’ word-solving strategies in reading in English. In T. Huckin, M. Haynes, & J. Coady (Eds), Second language reading and vocabulary learning. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Chi. F. M. (1997). Investigating and comparing the reading processes between good and poor senior high school readers. Proceedings of the Fourteenth Conference on English Teaching and Learning in the Republic of China (pp. 19-33). Taipei: National Taiwan Normal University.
Chiu, C. H. (1999). The Effects of Metacognitive Reading Strategy Training on English Reading Comprehension and Attitudes of EFL Students in Senior High School. Unpublished master thesis, National Kaohsiung Normal University.
Classroom Publisher. (2002). Guided practice for reading comprehension. Hong Kong: Classroom Publisher.
Coady, J. (1979). A psycholinguistic models of the ESL reader. In B. Macky, B.
Barkman, & R. Jordan (Eds.), Reading in a second language (pp. 5-12). Rowley: Newburry House.
Cobern, W. W. (1993). Contextual constructivism: The impact of culture on the
learning and teaching of science. In K. Tobin (Ed.), The practice of constructivism in science education. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Cohen, A. D. (1986). Mentalistic measures in reading strategy research: more recent findings. English for Specific Purpose, 5(2), 131-145.
Cohen, A. D. (1988). Research on L2 vocabulary acquisition: putting it in context. Paper presented at the 22nd Annual TESOL Convention, Chicago.
Cohen, A. D. (1990). Language learning. New York: Newbury House.
Cohen, A. D. (1998). Strategies in learning and using a second language. New York: Longman.
Cohen, A. D. (2003a). The learner’s side of foreign language learning: Where do styles, strategies, and tasks meet? IRAL, 41, 279-291.
Cohen, A. D. (2003b). Strategy training for second language learners. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service. No. ED482492)
Cogburn, D. (2003). Globally-distributed collaborative learning and human capacity development in the knowledge economy. In D. Mulenga (Ed.), Globalisation and lifelong education: Critical perspectives. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Corea, S. (2000). Cultivating Technological Innovation for development. The Electronic Journal on Information Systems in Developing Countries.
Cordero-Ponce, W. (2000). Summarization instruction: Effects on foreign language comprehension and summarization. Reading Research and Instruction, 39(4), 329-50.
Costantino, M., & Dabbs, T. (2001). Reading for real. Lynx Publishing.
Craik, F., & Lockhart, R. (1972). Levels of processing: A framework for memory research. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 11, 671-684.
Crook, C. (1994). Computer and the collaborative experience of learning. London, Routledge.
Cutler, R. H. (1996). Distributed presence and community in cyberspace, Interpersonal Communication and Technology: A Journal for the 21st Century, 1 (2).
Curtis, D. D., & Lawson, M. J. (2001). Exploring collaborative online learning. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Network, 5(1), 21-34.
Cyberspeech. (1997). Time, 149, 23.
Davis, B., & Chang, Y. L. (1994). Long distance collaboration with on-line conferencing. TESOL Journal, 4(2), 28-31.
Deshler, D. P., Schumaker, J. B., & Lenz, B. K. (1984). Academic and cognitive interventions for LD adolescents. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 17, 108-117.
Devine, J. (1983). ESL readers internalized models of the reading process. In J. Handscombe, R. Orem, and B. Taylor (Eds.), On TESOL '83: The Question of Control. Selected Papers from the Annual Convention of Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages, Toronto.
Devine, J. (1993). The role of metacognition in second language reading and writing. In J. G. Carson & I. Leki (Eds.), Reading in the composition classroom: Second language perspectives (pp. 105-127). Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle.
Dirkes, M. A. (1985). Metacognition: Students in charge of their thinking. Roeper Review, 8(2), 96-100.
Dodge, L., & Kendall, M. (2004). Learning communities. College Teaching, 52(4), 150-155.
Duck, C. (2004). Learning communities and the language of learning. Adult Learning, 16(2), 24-26.
Duckworth, E. (1996). The having of wonderful ideas" and other essays on teaching and learning. New York: Teachers College Press.
Duffy, G. G., & Hoffman, J. V. (1999). In pursuit of an illusion: The flawed search for a perfect method. The Reading Teacher, 53, 10-16.
Duffy, G. G., Roehler, L. R. Sivan, E., Rackcliffe, G., Book, C., Meloth, M. S., Varus, L. G., Weeselman, R. Putnam, J., and Bassiri, D. (1987). Effects of explaining the reasoning associated with usin greading strategies. Reading Research Quarterly, 22(3), 347-368.
Dyson, M., & Haselgrove, M. (2000). The effects of reading speed and reading patterns on the understanding of text read from screen. Journal of Research in Reading, 23(2), 210-224.
El-Hindi, E., & Leu, J. (1998). Beyond classroom boundaries: Constructivist teaching
with the Internet. The Reading Teacher, 51(8), 694-701.
Eggen, P., & Kauchak, D. (1999). Educational psychology: windows on classroom. USA: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
Ekwall, E. E., & Shanker, J. L. (1993). Locating and correcting reading difficulties. Macmillan Publishing Company.
Eskay, D., & Grabe, W. (1988). Interactive models for second language reading: perspectives on interaction. In P. L. Carrell, J. Devine, & D. E. Eskey (Eds.), (1988). Interactive approaches to second language reading (pp. 239-259). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Eylon, B. S., & Linn, M. C. (1988). Learning and instruction: An examination of four research perspectives in science education. Review of Education Research, 58, 251-301.
Field, M. L. (1984). A psycholinguistic model of the Chinese ESL Reader. Selected papers from the Annual Convention of the Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages, Houston, Texas.
Fisher, C. W. (1980). Teaching behaviors, academic learning time and student achievement: An overview. In C. Denham & A. Liberman (Eds.), Time to learn. Washington, D. C.: Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, National Institute of Education.
Flavell, J. H. (1976). Metacognitive aspects of problem solving. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.), The nature of intelligence (pp. 231-235). Hallsdale, N. J. Lawrence Erlbaum Associaation.
Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of
cognitive-development inquiry. American Psychology, 34(10), 906-911.
Flavell, J. H. (1981). Cognitive monitoring. In W. P. Dickson (Ed.), Children’s oral communication skills (pp. 33-60). San Diego, CA: Academic.
Flavell, J. H. (1985). Cognitive development (2nd Ed.). Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice-Hall.
Forrest, D. L., & Waller, T. G. (1979). Cognitive and metacognitive aspects of reading. Paper presented at the meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, San Francisco.
Fosnot, C. (1996). Constructivism: A psychological theory of learning. In C. Fosnot (Ed.), Constructivism: Theory, perspectives, and practice. New York: Teachers
College Press.
Fox, G. (1998). The Internet: Making it work in the ESL classroom. The Internet TESL Journal, 4(9).
Fry, E. (1991). Ten best ideas for reading teachers. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Gagne, E. D. (1985). The cognitive psychology of school learning. Boston: Little, Brown, and Company.
Garner, R. M. (1987). Metacognition and reading comprehension. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Garner, R. M. (1992). A hard sell of writing across the curriculum. Writing Across the Curriculum Program. Salisbury, MD: Salisbury State University.
Garner, R. M. (1994). Metacognition and executive control. In R. B. Ruddell, M. R. Ruddell, & H. Singer (Eds), Theoretical models and processes of reading. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
Garner, R., & Reis, R. (1981). Monitoring and resolving comprehension obstacles: An investigation of spontaneous text lookbacks among upper-grade good and poor comprehenders. Reading Research Quarterly, 16, 569-582.
Gentry, C. (1994). Introduction to instructional development. Belmont, California: Wadsworth Publishing Co.
Giborowski, J. (1999). Textbooks and the students who can’t read them: A guide to
teaching content. West Rutland, VT: Brookingline Books.
Gilster, P. (1997). Digital literacy. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Goodman, K. (1973). Psycholinguistic universals in the reading process. In F. Smith
(Ed.), Psycholinguistics and reading (pp. 21-27). Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc.
Gottlieb, M. (1995). Nurturing student learning through portfolios. TESOL Journal, 5(1), 12-14.
Gough, P. B. (1972). One second on reading. In J. Kavanagh & I. Mattingly (Eds.),
Language by ear and by eye. MIT press.
Gourgey, A. F. (1999). Teaching reading from a metacognitive perspective: theory and classroom experiences. Journal of College Reading and Learning, 30(1), 85-93.
Grabe, W. (1988). Reassessing the term “Interactive”. In P. L. Carrell, J. Devine,
J. Herrington, & P. Standen (Eds), Interactive approaches to second language reading. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Grabe, W. (1991). Current development in second language reading research.
TESOL Quarterly, 25(3), 375-406.
Graves, D., & Sunstein, B. S. (1992). Portfolio portraits. Portsmouth,
NH: Heinemann.
Greeno, J. and the Middle School Mathematics Through Applications Project Group, Institute for Research on Learning and Stanford University (1998). The situation of knowing, learning, and research. American Psychologist, January, 5-25.
Gunawardena, C. N., Lowe, C. A., & Anderson, T. (1998). Transcript analysis of computer-mediated conferences as a tool for testing constructivist and social-constructivist learning theories. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service. No. ED422854)
Hare, A. P., & Davies, M. F. (1994). Social interaction. In A. P. Hare, H. H. Blumberg, M. F. Davies, & M. V. Kent (Eds.), Small group research: A handbook, pp.169-193. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Hiltz, S. R. (1994). Online communities: A case study of the office of the future. New Jersey: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
Hamman, D. D. (1995). An analysis of the real-time effects of reading strategy training. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, the University of Texas at Austin.
Hanson-Smith, E. (1997). Technology in the classroom: Practice and promise in the
21st century. Retrieved March 6, 2000, from http://www.tesol.org/pubs/catalog/downloadable/hanson-smith-1.html
Hartman, D. (1995). Eight readers reading, the intertextual links of proficient readers reading multiple passages. Reading Research Quarterly, 30, 520-561.
Herrington, J., & Standen, P. (2000). Moving from an instructivist to a
constructivist multimedia learning environment. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 9(3), 195-205.
Hertzog, C., Dixon, R. A., & Hultsch, D. F. (1990). Relationships between metamemory, memory predictions, and memory task performance in adults. Psychology and Aging, 5, 215-227.
Hiltz, S. R. (1994). Online communities: A case study of the office of the future. Norwood, New Jersey: Ablex Publishing Corporation
Hodgson, V., & D. McConell. (1992). On-line education and development. In J. Prior (Ed.), Handbook of training and development. Gower: Worcester.
Hofmeister, A. M. (1990). Individual differences and the form and function of instruction. Journal of Special Education, 24(2), 150-160.
Holms, M. (2002). Web usability & navigation. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Huang, S. (2003). Effects of senior high school students’ reading comprehension through three-level study guides in a web reading club. Unpublished master thesis, National Kaohsiung Normal University.
Huang, W., Wang, C., & Lai, K. (2002). An exploration of asynchronous learning
style. Proceedings of the 6th Global Conference on Computers in Education.
Idol, L. (1987). Group story mapping: A comprehension strategy for both skilled and
unskilled readers. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 20, 196-205.
Jacobson, M. J., & Spiro, R. J. (1995). Hypertext learning environments, cognitive flexibility, and the transfer of complex knowledge: An empirical investigation. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 12 (5), 301-333.
Jacobs, G. M., Ward, C. S., & Gallo, P. B. (1997). The dynamics of digital groups: Cooperative learning in IT-based language instruction. Teaching of English Language and Literature, 13(2), 5-8.
Joe, S. G. (1996). Metacognitive awareness, reading strategies and English teaching in the institutes of technology. Proceedings of Monographic Studies in Linguistics (pp. 6.1-6.20). Taipei: Academia Sinica and National Science Council.
Johnson, P., & Pearson, P. D. (1993). Prior knowledge, connectivity, and the assessment of reading comprehension. Urbana: University of Illinois, Center for the Studying of Reading.
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1985). Cooperative learning: one key to computer assisted learning. The Computing Teacher, 11-15.
Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Holubec, E. J. (1993). Circles of learning. Edina, MI: Interaction Book Company.
Joint Policy Statements of CALICO, EUROCALL, AND IALLT (1999). Scholarly
activities in computer-assisted language learning: Development, pedagogical
innovations, and research. Arising from a Research Seminar at the University
of Essen, Germany. Retrieved June 15, 2000, from: http://www.calico.org/CALL_document.html
Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1987). The psychology of reading and language
comprehension. Massachusetts: Allyn and Bacon, Inc.
Kafai, Y., & Resnick, M. (1996). Constructivism in practice. Mahwah, New Jersey:
Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Kamm, C. (1995). User interfaces for voice applications. In D. Roe
and J. Wilpon (Eds.), Voice Communication between Humans and
Machines, pp. 422–442. National Academy Press.
Karen, S. (2004). The benefits of students learning about critical evaluation rather than being summatively judged. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 3, 369-379.
Kaufman, D., & Brooks, J. G. (1996). Interdisciplinary collaboration in teacher education: A constructive approach. TESOL Quarterly, 30, 231-251.
Kaye, A. R. (1992). Learning together apart. In A. R. Kaye (Ed.), Collaborative learning through computer conferencing (pp. 1-24). London: Springer-Verlag.
Kearsley, G., & Shneiderman, B. (1999). Engagement theory: A framework for technology-based teaching and learning. Retrieved August 1, 2001, from http://home.sprynet.com/~gkearsley/engage.htm
Kintsch, W., & van Dijk, T. A. (1992). Toward a model of text comprehension. Psychological Review, 85, 363-394.
Kitsantas, A., Reister, R. A., & Doster, J. (2004). Developing self-regulated learners: goal setting, self-evaluation, and organizational signals during acquisition of procedural skills. Journal of Experimental Education, 72(4), 269-288.
Kerka, S. (1996). Distance learning, the Internet, and the world wide web.
(ERIC Document Reproduction Service. No. ED395 214)
Koohang, A., & Plessis, J. (2004). Architecting usability properties in the e-learning instructional design process. International Journal on E-Learning, 3(3), 38-44.
Koschmann, T. D., Myers, A. C., Feltovich, P. J., and Barrows, H. S. (1994). Using technology to assist in realizing effective learning and instruction: A principled approach to the use of computers in collaborative learning. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3, 227-264.
Kurfiss, J. G. (1988). Critical thinking: Theory, research, practice, and possibilities.
Washington (D. C.): Association for the Study of Higher Education. (ASHE Higher Education Report no. 2)
Lankes, A. M. D. (1995). Electronic portfolios: A new idea in assessment.
(ERIC Document Reproduction Service. No. EDO-IR-95-9)
Lanni, D. (2001). ICT in language teaching in 6 points. Retrieved January 26, 2004, from http://www.itiscannizzaro.net/Ianni/articles/rationale.htm#2#2
Lee, K. (2000). English teachers’ barriers to the use of computer-assisted language learning. Retrieved December 11, 2002, from http://iteslj.org/Articles/Lee-CALLbarriers.html
Leu, D. J., Jr., & Kinzer, C. K., (2000). The convergence of literacy instruction and
networked technologies for information and communication. Reading Research Quarterly, 35, 108-127.
Leu, D. J., Jr., Mallette, M., & Karchmer, R. (2001). New literacies, new technologies, and new realities: Toward an agenda for the literacy research community. Reading Research and Instruction. Themed Issue on Literacy and Technology, 40, 265-272.
Leu, D. J., Jr. (1996). Sarah's secret: Social aspects of literacy and learning in a digital
information age. The Reading Teacher, 50, 162-165.
Leu, D. J., Jr. (1997). Caity's question: Literacy as diexis on the Internet. The Reading
Teacher, 51, 62-67.
Levy, M. (1997). Computer-assisted language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Liang, T. H. (1997). Guessing or skipping for EFL reading comprehension. English Teaching & Learning, 22(2), 47-61.
Lin-Agler, L., Miao, M., DeWayne, Z., & Karen, M. (2004). Effects of personality on metacognitive self-assessments. College Student Journal, 38, 66-76.
Lian, Y. F. (2002). The Effects of Metacognitive Reading Strategy Training on English Reading for Mildly Disabled learners. Unpublished master thesis, National Kaohsiung Normal University.
Lin, C. B., Young, S. S., Chan, T. W. & Chen, Y. H. (2005). Teacher-oriented adaptive web-based environment for supporting practical teaching models: a case study of “school for all”. Computers & Education, 44(2), 155-172.
Lin, L., & Zabrucky, K. M. (1998). Calibration of comprehension: Research and implications for education and instruction. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 23(4), 345-391.
Lin, C. C. (2001). EFL teachers’ perceptions of network-based language teaching. In H. C. Liou & R. F. Chung (Eds.), Challenges and solutions. Taipei: Crane Publishing.
Lin, C. C. (2003). A study of key influential factors on satisfaction of e-learning. Unpublished master thesis, National Kaohsiung Normal University.
Lin, C. S. (2002). Networked collaborative learning project. APEC 2002.
Liou, H. C. (2001a). Incorporating computers into English classrooms: curriculum
design issues. The Tenth International Symposium on English Teaching.
Liou, H. C. (2001b). Demystifying computer assisted language learning. In H. C. Liou & R. F. Chung (Eds.), Challenges and solutions. Taipei: Crane Publishing.
Liou, W. L. (1996). Intensity devices in BBS postings and in forums of printed
newspapers: A comparative study. Unpublished master thesis, National Taiwan Normal University.
Mayer, E. M. (1996). Learning strategies for making sense out of expository text: The SOI model for guiding three cognitive processes in knowledge construction. Educational Psychology Review, 8(4), 357-371.
MacGregor, J. (2002). Learning community models. Retrieved July 8, 2003, from http://learningcommons.evergreen.edu
Markee, N. (1997). Managing curricular innovation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Masters, L. F., Mori, B. A., & Mori, A. A. (1993). Teaching secondary students with mild learning and behavior problems. Austin, TX: PROED.
Mastropieri, M. A., & Scruggs, T. E. (1997). Best practice in promoting reading
comprehension in students with learning disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 15, 197-213.
May, S. (1993). Collaborative learning: More is not necessarily better. The American Journal of Distance Education, 7(3), 39-50.
McMahon, T. A. (1997). From isolation to interaction? Network-based professional development and teacher professional communication. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, Il.
McIlrath, D., & Huitt, W. (1995). The teaching/learning process: A discussion of models. Valdosta, GA: Valdosta State University.
McKane, P., & Greence, B. (1996). The use of theory-based computer-assisted instruction in correctional centers to enhance the reading skills of reading-disadvantaged adults. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 5, 331-44
McMcGee, A., & Johnson, H. (2003). The effect of inference training on skilled and less skilled comprehenders. Educational Psychology, 23(1), 49-60.
Metzler, R. (1996). Creating web pages: Building links to the classroom. CAELL Journal, 15-19.
Mike, D. (1996). Internet in the schools: A literacy perspective. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 40(1), 1-13.
Mokhtari, K., & Richard, C. (2002). Assessing students’ metacognitive awareness of
reading strategies inventory. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94 (2), 249-259.
Moore, A. B., & Brooks, R. (2000). Learning communities and community
development: Describing the process. International Journal of Adult and Vocational Learning, 1, 1-15.
Mozzon-McPherson, M., & Vismans, R. (2001). (Eds.). Beyond language teaching towards language advising. London: The Center for Information on Language Teaching and Research.
Nattull, C. (1996). Teaching reading skills in a foreign language. Oxford: Heinemann.
Naughton, V. M. (1994). Creative mapping for content reading. Journal of Reading, 37(4), 324-327.
Nelson, S. (1990). Instructional tine as a factor in increasing student achievement. Portland: Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory.
Neufeld, J. K., & Webb, M. R. (1984). 25 Strategies: reading skills for intermediate-advanced students of English as a second language. New York: CBS College Publishers.
Newman, D. R., Johnson, C., Webb, B., & Cochrane, C. (1997). Evaluating the quality of learning in computer supported cooperative learning. Journal of the American Society of Information Science, 48, 484-495.
Oakhill, J., & Patel, S. (1991). Can imagery training help children who have comprehension problems? Journal in Reading Research, 14(2), 106-115.
Oczuks, L. (2003). Reciprocal teaching at work: Strategies for improving reading comprehension. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
Ogata, H. (2001). Research on Ubiquitous CSCL. Retrieved April 10, 2002, from http://www-yano.is.tokushima-u.ac.jp/ogata/clue/
O’Malley, J. M., Chamot, A. U., Stewner-Manzanares, G. Kupper, L. and Russo, R. P. (1995). Learning strategies used by beginning and intermediate ESL students. Language Learning, 35, 21-46.
O’Neil, H. F. (1979). (Ed.). Issues in instructional systems development. New York: Academic Press.
Oxford, R. L. (1990). Language learning strategies: What every teacher should
know. Boston: Heinle & Heinle Publishers.
Oxford, R. L., & Leaver, B. L. (1996). A synthesis of strategy instruction for language learner. In R. L. Oxford (Ed.), Language learning strategies around the world, Cross-cultural perspectives. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaii Press.
Oxford, R. L., Cho, Y., Leung, S., & Kim, H. (2004). Effects of the presence and difficulty of task on strategy use. IRAL, 42, 1-47.
Oxford, R. L., & Ehrman, M. (1995). Adults language learning strategies in an intensive language learning programs in the United States. System 23, 359-386.
Paivio, A. (1991). Dual coding theory: retrospect and current status. Canadian Journal of Psychology 45, 255-87.
Palincsar, A. S. (1986). Reciprocal teaching: Teaching reading as thinking. Oak Brook, IL: North Central Regional Educational Laboratory.
Palinscar, A., & Brown, A. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities. Cognition & Instruction, 1(2), 117-179.
Palincsar, A., Perry, S., & Ellen, N. (1995). Developmental, cognitive, and sociocultural perspectives on assessing and instructing reading. School Psychology Review, 24(3), 331-345.
Palloff, R., & Pratt, K. (1999). Building Learning Communities in Cyberspace. San Francisco: Josey-Bass Publishers.
Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms: Children, computers, and powerful ideas. New York: Basic Books.
Patricia, G. A. (1996). Mapping learning at the secondary level. Social Studies, 87(5), 112-120.
Patricia, G., & Baker, J. (1997). Mapping learning at the secondary level. Clearing House, 70(5), 279-286.
Paris, S. G. (1988). Models and metaphors of learning strategies. In C. E. Weinstein, E. T. Goetz, and P. A. Alexander (Eds.), Learning and study strategies (pp. 229-321). New York: Academic Press.
Paris, S. G., & Lindauer, B. K. (1982). The development of cognitive skills during
childhood. In B. B. Wolman (Ed.), Handbook of developmental psychology. Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice Hall.
Paris, S. G., Wasik, B. A., & Turner, J. C. (1991). The development of strategic reader. In R. Barr, M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, & P. D. Oearson (Eds.), Handbook of
reading research (pp. 609-640).
Paris, S. G., & Winograd, P. (1990). How metacognition can promote academic learning and instruction. In B. F. Jones & L. Idol (Eds.), Dimensions of thinking and cognitive instruction. (pp.15-51). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Pavlov, I. P. (1927). Conditioned reflexes. London: Clarendon press.
Patricia, G. A. (1996). Mapping learning at the secondary school level. Social Studies, 87(5), 217-213.
Pontecorvo, C. (1993). Developing literacy skills through cooperative computer
use: issues for learning and instruction. In T. Duffy, J. Lowyck, & D. Jonassen (Eds.), Designing environments for constructive learning. NATO ASI Series.
Pressley, M. (1990). Cognitive strategy instruction Cambridge. MA: Brookline Books.
Pressley, M., E1-Dinary, P. B., Gaskins, I., Schuder, T., Bergman, J. L., Almasi, J., &
Brown, R. (1992). Beyond direct explanation: Transactional instruction of
reading comprehension strategies. Elementary School Journal, 92: 511-554.
Pressley, M. (2000). What would comprehension instruction be the instruction of? In M. Kamil, P. Mosenthal, P. D. Pearson, & R. Batt (Eds.), Handbook of reading research. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Raphael, T. E. (1982). Question-answering strategies for children. The Reading Teacher, 36, 186-190.
Raphael, T. E., & Pearson, P. D. (1985). Increasing students' awareness of sources of
information for answering questions. American Educational Research Journal, 22, 217-235.
Raphael, T. E., & Pearson, P. D. (1985). Increasing students' awareness of sources of information for answering questions. American Educational Research Journal, 22, 217-235.
Reinking, D. (1988). Computer-mediated text and comprehension differences: The role of reading time, reader preference, and estimation of learning. Reading Research Quarterly, 23(4), 484-98.
Reinking, D. (1998). Synthesizing technological transformations of literacy in a post-typographic world. In D. Reinking, M. McKenna, L. Labbo, & R. Kieffer (Eds.), Handbook of literacy and technology: Transformations in a post-typographic world. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Richard, J., & Anderson, N. (2003). How do you know? A strategy to help emergent readers make inferences. The Reading Teacher, 57(3), 290-295.
Richard, J., & Rodgers, T. (2001). Approaches and methods in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ridley, D.S., Schutz, P.A., Glanz, R.S. & Weinstein, C.E. (1992). Self-regulated learning: the interactive influence of metacognitive awareness and goal-setting. Journal of Experimental Education 60 (4), 293-306.
Rieber, L. P. (1994). Computers, graphics and learning. Madison. WI: WCB Brown & Benchmark.
Rinehart, S. D., Stahl, S. A., & Erickson, L. G. (1986). Some effects of summarization training on reading and studying. Reading Research Quarterly, 21, 422-438.
Rings, S. (1994). The role of computer technology in teaching critical reading. Retrieved October 9, 2000, from http://hakayai.mcli.dist.maricopa.edu/critR/index.html
Robb, T. (2002). Examining self-access. Paper presented at Second National
Conference on the Curriculum, Testing and New Technologies, Sultan Qaboos University, Muscat Oman.
Ronald, G., & Raymand, G. (2002). Progenies in education: The evolution of Internet teaching. Community College Journal of Research & Practice, 26(10), 777-786.
Rovai, A. (2001). Building classroom community at a distance: a case study. Educational Technology Research and Development, 4, 33-48.
Rovai, A. (2002). Development of an instrument to measure classroom community. The Internet and Higher Education, 5, 197-211.
Rubin, D. (1993). A practical approach to teaching reading. MA: Simon
& Schuster.
Rumelhart, D. E. (1980). Schemata: the building blocks of cognition. In R. J. Spiro,
B. C. Bruce & W. F. Brewer (Eds.), Theoretical issues in reading comprehension.
Rumehart, D. (1977). Toward an interactive model of reading. In S. Dornic (Ed.), Attention and performance IV. New York: Academic Press.
Rumehart, D. E., & Ortony, A. (1977). The representation of knowledge in memory.
In R. C. Anderson, R. J. Spiro, & W. E. Montague (Eds.), Schooling and the acquisition of knowledge, (pp 99-135). Hillsdale, N. J. Erlbaum.
Salaberry, R. (1999). CALL in the year 2000: still developing the research agenda. Sameul, S. J., & Kmail, M. L. (1988). Models of reading process. In P. L. Carrell, J.
Devine, & D. E. Eskey (Eds.), Interactive approaches to second language
reading. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Savenye, W. C. (1994). Designing powerful and effective computer-assisted instruction: Introduction for educators. Paper of the English conference on Computer-Assisted Instruction in the Republic of China, Taipei, 98-106.
Scarcella, R., & Oxford, R. (1992). The tapestry of language learning: The individual in the communicative classroom. Boston: Heinle & Heinle.
Schmit, M. C., & Newby, T. J. (1986). Metacognition: Relevance to instruction design. Journal of Instructional Development, 9(4), 29-33.
Self, J., Karakirik, E., Kor, A., Tedesco, P., & Dimitrova, V. (2000). Computer-based strategies for articulate reflection. ICCE/ICCAI, 1.
Senge, P. M. (1992). The fifth discipline. Sydney: Random House
Sergiovanni, T. (1999). The story of community. In J. Retallick, B. Cocklin, & Coombe, K (Eds). Learning communities in Education. London: Routledge.
Shetzer, H., & Warschauer, M. (2000). An electronic literacy approach to network-based language teaching. In M. Warschauer & R. Kern (Eds.), Network-based language teaching: Concepts and practice. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Simpson, T. J. (1995). Message into medium: An extension of the Dual Coding Theory. In Imagery and Visual Literacy: Selected Readings from the Annual Conference of the International Visual Literacy Association, pp. 2-10. Tempe, Arizona.
Sims, R. (1994). Seven levels of interactivity: Implications for the development of multimedia education and training. In M. Ryan (Ed.), APITITE '94. Proceedings of the Asia Pacific Information Technology in Training and Education Conference, pp. 589-594. Brisbane: APITITE 94 Council.
Skehan, P. (1989). Individual differences in second-language learning. London: Edward Arnold.
Skinner, B. F. (1938). The behavior of organisms. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Skinner, B. F. (1969). Contingencies of reinforcement: A theoretical analysis. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Skinner, B. F. (1974). About behaviorism. New York: Knoph.
Smith, F. (1973). (Ed.). Psycholinguistics and reading. Holt, Rinehart and Winston,
Inc.
Smith, F. (1982). Reading without nonsense. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Snider, V. E. (1989). Reading comprehension performance of adolescents with
learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 12, 87-96.
Sorapure, M., Inglesby, P., & Yatchisin, G. (1998). Web literacy: Challenges and
opportunities for research in a new medium. Computers and Composition, 15, 409-424.
Spivey, F. (1992). Computer assisted instruction vs. direct teaching model of teaching reading to incarcerated adults. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service. No. ED353557)
Stanvoich, K. E. (1980). Toward an interactive compensator model of individual
differences in the development of reading fluency. Reading Research Quarterly, 16, 32-71.
Stern, H. H. (1975). What can we learn from the good language learner? Modern Language Review, 31, 304-318.
Stern, H. H. (1992). Issues and options in language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Stewart, O., & Tei, E. (1983). Some implication of metacognition for reading
instruction. Journal of Reading, 27(4), 36-43.
Suarez, T. M. (1991). Enhancing effective instructional time: A review of research. Policy Brief, 1(2), 22-33.
Swan, K. (2001). Virtual interaction: design factors affecting students satisfaction and perceived learning in asynchronous online courses. Distance Education, 22(2), 56-65.
Swanson, P., & De La Paz, S. (1998). Teaching effective comprehension strategies to students with learning and reading disabilities. Intervention in School and Clinic, 33(4), 14-24.
Snyder, I. (1999). Digital literacies: Renegotiating the visual and the verbal in communication. Prospect, 14(3), 13-23.
Taraban, R., Rynearson, K., & Kerr, M. (2000). College students’ academic performance and self-reports of comprehension strategy use. Reading Psychology, 21, 283-308.
Taylor, B. M., & Beach, R. W. (1984), The effects of text structure instruction on middle-grade students' comprehension and production of expository text. Reading Research Quarterly, 19, 134-146.
Teale, W. H., Labbo, L. D., Kinzer, C., & Leu, D. (2002). Exploring literacy on the
Internet. The Reading Teacher, 55(7), 654-661.
Tillman, G. (1995).Will implementing reading computer assisted instruction compared to traditional reading instruction produce more effective comprehension at the elementary school level? (ERIC Document Reproduction Service. No. ED392025)
Tinto, V. (1993). Leaving college: Rethinking the causes and cures of student attrition. (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Twigg, C. A. (1997). Is technology a silver bullet? Educom Review, 28-29.
Vann, R., & Abraham, R. (1990). Strategies of unsuccessful language learners. TESOL Quarterly, 24(2), 177-198.
Vertelney, L., Arent, M., and Lieberman, H. (1990). Two disciplines in search of an interface. In B. Laurel (Ed.), The art of human-computer interface design. Addison-Wesley, pp.45-56.
Villaume, V., and Brabham, E. (2002). Comprehension instruction: Beyond strategies. The Reading Teacher, 55(7), 177-198.
Vygosky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Wallace, C. (1992). Reading. Oxford: OUP.
Ward, L., & Traweek, D. (1993). Application of a metacognitive strategy to
assessment, intervention, and consultation: A think-aloud technique. Journal of School Psychology, 31, 469-485.
Warschauer, M. (1996). Computer-assisted language learning: an introduction. In S. Fotos (Ed.), (pp.3-20). Tokyo: Logos International.
Warschauer, M. (1997). Computer-mediated collaborative learning: Theory and practice. Modern Language Journal, 81, 470-481.
Warschauer, M. (2000). The changing global economy and the future of English
teaching. TESOL Quarterly, 34, 511-535.
Warschauer, M. (2002). A developmental perspective on technology in language education. TESOL Quarterly, 36(3), 453-475.
Warschauer, M., & Whittaker, P. F. (1997). The Internet for English teaching:
Guidelines for teachers. TESOL Reporter 30(1), 27-33.
Warschauer, M., & Kern, S. (2000). (Eds.). Network-based language teaching: Concepts and practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ward, L., & Traweek, D. (1993). Application of a meta-cognitive strategy to
assessment, intervention, and consultation: A think-aloud technique. Journal of School Psychology, 31, 469-485.
Watanabe, Y. (1990). External variables affecting language learning strategies of Japanese EFL learners: Effects of examinations, years spent in college/university, and studying overseas. Unpublished master’s thesis, Lancaster University, U.K.
Wei, C. L. (1997). Collaboration in EFL Classroom: An investigation of DFLL learners’ perception of jigsaw cooperative learning technique in freshman English classes. Proceedings of the 14th Conference on English Teaching and Learning in the Republic of China (pp. 223-238). Taipei: The Crane Publishing Co.
Williams, J. P. (1991). The use of schema in research on the problem solving of learning disabled adolescents. In T. E. Scruggs & B. Y. L. Wong (Eds.), Intervention research in learning disabilities (pp. 302-321). New York: Springer-Verlag.
Willis, J. (1998) Task-based learning? What kind of adventure? Retrieved March 20, 2000, from http://language.hyper.chubu.ac/jp/jalt/pub/tlt/98/jul/willis.html
Women in Business. (2001). Reading for Retention, 53(4), 26-30.
Wong, B. Y. L. (1985). Self-questioning instructional research: a review. Review of
Educational Research, 55(2), 227-268.
Yamamori, K. Isoda, T., Hiromori, T., & Oxford, R. (2003). Using cluster analysis to uncover L2 learner differences in strategy use, will to learn, and achievement over time. IRAL, 41(4), 381-411.
Yang, J. T., Tsai, C. Y., Lin, T., & Liu, J. C. (2003). WISCS2003. 網路教學系統平台與內容標準化學術研討會論文集, 25-30.
Yeh, S. Y., & Lo, J. J. (2003). The influence of metacognitive prompts on computer-based reading strategies training. Proceedings of 2003 International Conference on English Teaching and Learning in the Republic of China, 103-116.

中文文獻
張玉玲 (民88)。 網路套裝軟體在後設認知閱讀策略教學之發展與應用。
NSC 89-2411-H-017-001.
張宸彬 (民91)。非同步學習活動對學習動機之研究。碩士論文。國立高雄師範大學。
楊錦潭、蔡俊彥、和林振欽 (民94)。非同步網路課程系統之研發與實踐。
數位學習理論與實務研討會。新竹。
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top