跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(18.97.14.90) 您好!臺灣時間:2024/12/03 15:26
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

: 
twitterline
研究生:許雯琳
研究生(外文):Wen-lin Hsu
論文名稱:任務導向雙語週報閱讀計畫對高中生英語讀寫能力之效益研究
論文名稱(外文):EFFECTS OF A TASK-BASED BILINGUAL WEEKLY READING PROGRAM ON ENGLISH LITERACY DEVELOPMENT OF SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS
指導教授:張玉玲張玉玲引用關係
指導教授(外文):Ye-ling Chang
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立高雄師範大學
系所名稱:英語學系
學門:人文學門
學類:外國語文學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2006
畢業學年度:95
語文別:英文
論文頁數:137
中文關鍵詞:任務導向雙語週報英語讀寫能力學習單合作學習高中生
外文關鍵詞:task-basedBiligual WeeklyEnglish literacyworksheetcooperative learningsenior high school students
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:6
  • 點閱點閱:982
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:257
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:10
論文摘要:
本研究旨在探討運用雙語週報作為閱讀素材、實施任務導向學習,對高中生英文讀寫能力之效益。特別探討學生對閱讀雙語週報、參與任務導向學習活動的回應,及任務導向學習是否對學生讀寫能力具有效果;同時也分析學生對於合作學習的反應。
本研究以高雄市新興高中六十九位二年級學生為研究對象。在十二週中學生必須閱讀六期雙語週報。該六十九位學生被分為兩組:任務導向組的三十二位學生在進行雙語週報閱讀的同時,參與任務導向學習活動編寫一份英文報;非任務導向組則在傳統教室中由教師引導閱讀雙語週報。
據此,兩組共六十九位學生的閱讀暨作文前測與後測成績被收集、統計並量化分析。本研究另有一份問卷收集這六十九位學生對閱讀雙語週報及英文閱讀的看法,以及三十二位任務導向組的學生對編寫報紙、任務導向學習活動、學習單及合作學習的回應。此外,本研究者將學生對本研究的中文意見及建議翻譯成英文並予以質化分析。
本研究主要發現如下:
一、 任務導向組及非任務導向組在參與本活動前,認為讀懂英文文章不容易。參與活動後,兩組皆認為閱讀雙語週報增強他們的英文閱讀能力。
二、 閱讀雙語週報對兩組學生英文閱讀能力有益;但相較之下,任務導向組效果更佳。
三、 進行任務導向學習方案後,任務導向組的寫作能力顯著勝過非任務導向組。
四、 多數的學生對於編寫英文報紙持正面且積極的態度。他們大多表示,編寫英文報紙提升學習興趣、並加強英文能力。
五、 多數的學生對於任務導向學習活動抱持肯定的態度。他們認為運用所學以完成任務強化了他們的英文讀寫能力。
六、 多數的學生表示為了完成學習單,他們會更認真閱讀雙語週報,但有些學生不認為完成學習單能夠提升其英文能力。
七、 多數的學生肯定合作學習的效果。他們喜歡與組員互動及討論,並能從中習得人際互動與溝通的技巧。
根據以上研究結果,本研究者建議英文教師使用雙語週報作為閱讀素材,運用任務導向學習給予學生做中學的機會,並能利用合作學習營造合作互惠而非競爭式的學習氣氛,以增進英文學習效益。
ABSTRACT

The purpose of this present study is to investigate whether the application of a task-based Bilingual Weekly reading program worked on senior high school students' English literacy development. Specially, the student responses to Bilingual Weekly, task-based learning (TBL), and whether TBL had positive effects on the students' reading comprehension and writing ability were explored.
The subjects of this study were sixty-nine eleventh graders from Kaohsiung Municipal Hsin Hsing Senior High School. During the twelve-week span, the subjects were divided into two groups: the task-based group (TBL Group) and the non-task-based group (Non-TBL Group). TBL Group, consisting of 32 subjects, had to compose one issue of English newspaper while reading Bilingual Weekly. On the other hand, the researcher instructed Non-TBL Group, comprised of 37 subjects, to read Bilingual Weekly.
In data collection, the differences in the subjects' reading comprehension and writing ability between the pretests and post-tests were analyzed and compared quantitatively, and so were the results of the questionnaire. In addition, the subjects' comments and responses to this study were translated from Chinese into English and then discussed qualitatively. Based on the data analyses, the findings of the study are summarized as follows:
1. The students of both groups used to think it difficult to understand English articles. After taking part in this reading program, however, the students believed that their English reading comprehension had been improved.
2. The Bilingual Weekly reading program did benefit English reading comprehension, for the subjects of TBL Group fared better than that of Non-TBL Group.
3. After the program, TBL Group exhibited more significant improvement on English writing ability than Non-TBL Group.


4. Most of the TBL students showed positive responses to composing English newspaper. They expressed that composing English newspapers aroused their learning motivation and enhanced their English competence.
5. Most of the TBL students thought highly of TBL. They felt that putting what they had learned into practice to accomplish the assigned task strengthened their English reading comprehension and writing ability.
6. Most of the TBL students expressed that they had read Bilingual Weekly attentively to complete the worksheets. Yet, they did not think that worksheet-completion helped to better their English competence.
7. Most of the TBL students profited from cooperative learning. They enjoyed discussing and interacting with their groupmates; at the same time, they learned the skills of social interaction and communication.
Based on the study findings, it is advisable that English teachers usher in Bilingual Weekly as reading materials, utilize TBL to provide students with the opportunity to learn by doing. Furthermore, cooperative learning can come to English teachers' aid to construct a reciprocal rather than a competitive learning atmosphere, hence fostering positive learning.
TABLE OF CONTENTS

CHAPTER ONE INTRODUCTION Page
Background and Motivation 1
Purposes of the Study 6
Research Questions 7
Significance of the Study 8
Limitations of the Study 8
Definitions 9
CHAPTER TWO LITERATURE REVIEW
Authentic Reading and Reading Materials 12
Reading for Real Purposes 12
Authentic Reading Materials 13
Teaching English Reading with Authentic Materials 14
Authentic Writing and Writing Activities 16
Writing for Real Purposes 17
Principles for Authentic Writing Instruction 18
Teaching English Writing with Authentic Activities 21
Combining Reading and Writing Together 23
Task-based Language Learning 24
Definitions of Tasks 24
Task-based Learning 26
Types of Tasks in Task-based Language Learning 27
Frameworks of Task-based Language Learning 30
Cooperative Learning in Task-based Learning 34
CHAPTER THREE METHODOLOGY
Subjects 36
Instruments 37
The Teaching Material 38
Guidance for Structural Features of Newspaper 39
Worksheets 39
A Peer Evaluation Sheet 40
English Reading Comprehension Tests 40
English Writing Proficiency Tests 41
A Post-study Questionnaire on Student Responses to Bilingual Weekly and Task-based Learning 42
Procedures 43
Data Analysis 46
Quantitative Analysis 46
Qualitative Analysis 46
CHAPTER FOUR RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS
Effects of the Combination of TBL and Bilingual Newspaper Reading 47
Comparison of Students' English Reading Comprehension 48
Comparison of Students' English Writing Ability 49
Comparison of Student Responses to Reading English Articles and Bilingual Weekly 50
TBL Student Responses to Task-based Learning 53
TBL Student Responses to Composing Newspapers 54
TBL Student Responses to the TBL Activities 59
TBL Student Responses to the Worksheets 63
TBL Student Responses to Cooperative Learning 64
CHAPTER FIVE CONCLUSIONS, IMPLICATIONS AND SUGGESTIONS
Conclusions 69
Implications 72
Suggestions 74
REFERENCES 77
Appendix
Appendix A: An English Reading Comprehension Pretest 90
Appendix B: An English Reading Comprehension Post-test 97
Appendix C: An English Writing Proficiency Pretest 102
Appendix D: An English Writing Proficiency Post-test 103
Appendix E: A Writing Rating Scale 104
Appendix F: Worksheets
Appendix F-1: Worksheet (Bilingual Weekly, No. 341) 105
Appendix F-2: Worksheet (Bilingual Weekly, No. 343) 106
Appendix F-3: Worksheet (Bilingual Weekly, No. 345) 107
Appendix F-4: Worksheet (Bilingual Weekly, No. 347) 108
Appendix F-5: Worksheet (Bilingual Weekly, No. 349) 109
Appendix F-6: Worksheet (Bilingual Weekly, No. 351) 110
Appendix G: Adopted Bilingual Weekly and News Headline Guidance
Appendix G-1: Issues of Bilingual Weekly Adopted in the Study 111
Appendix G-2: Guidance for Structural Features of News Story Headline 114
Appendix H: A Peer Evaluation Sheet
Appendix H-1: A Peer Evaluation Sheet (Chinese) 116
Appendix H-2: A Peer Evaluation Sheet (English) 117
Appendix I: A Post-study Questionnaire
Appendix I-1: A Post-study Questionnaire on Student Responses to Bilingual Weekly and Task-based Learning (Chinese) 118
Appendix I-2: A Post-study Questionnaire on Student Responses to Bilingual Weekly and Task-based Learning (English) 122
Appendix J: The Newspaper the TBL Group Students Composed 127
Appendix K: Post-study QSRBWTBL Reliability Analysis (Alpha)
Appendix K-2: Post-study QSRBWTBL Items 1-12 Reliability Analysis (Alpha) 135
Appendix K-2: Post-study QSRBWTBL Items 13-45 Reliability Analysis (Alpha) 136
REFERENCES

Aiex, N. K. (1998). Collaborating on a newspaper in the elementary classroom. ERIC Digest. ERIC Clearinghouse on Reading English and Communication Bloomington IN (ERIC ED414 580).
Aiex, N. K. (2000). Newspapers as a teaching resource for adult learners. ERIC Digest. ERIC Clearinghouse on Reading English and Communication Bloomington IN(ERIC ED440 428).
Alvermann. D. E., Dillon, D. R., & O'Brien, D. G. (1987). Using discussion to promote reading comprehension. Newark, DE: IRA.
Anderson, J. (1993). Journal writing: The promise and the reality. Journal of Reading, 36(4),304-309.
Ansary, H. & Babaii, E. (2002). Universal characteristics of EFL/ESL textbooks: A step towards systematic textbook evaluation. The Internet TESL Journal, 8(2). Retrieved December 15, 2004 from http://iteslj.org/Articles/Ansary-Textbooks.
Antepara, R. (2003). Using news stories in the ESL classroom. The Internet TESL Journal,9(12). Retrieved September 29, 2004 from
http://iteslj.org/techniques/Antepara-5Ws.html.
Antonacci, P. & Hedley, C. (1994). Natural approaches to reading and writing. Norwood,NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
Atkinson, D. (2003). L2 writing in the post-process era: Introduction. Second Language Writing, 1(12), 3-16.
Au, K. H. (2000). Literacy instruction for young children of diverse backgrounds. In D. S.Strickland, & L. M. Morrow, (Eds.), Beginning reading and writing (pp. 35-45). New York: Teachers College Press.
Bamford, J. & Day, R.R. (1997) Extensive reading: What is it? Why bother? The Language Teacher, 21(5), 6-12.
Bartram, P. (1999). Writing a press release: How to get the right kind of publicity and news coverage. Oxford, UK: How To Books, Ltd.
Bermejo, J. I. (2000). Teaching EFL/ESL students how to read Time and Newsweek. The Internet TESL Journal, 6(7). Retrieved July 30, 2004 from
http://iteslj.org/Techniques/Bermejo-TimeNewsweek.html.
Brew, A. (2003). Writing activities: A primer for outdoor educators. ERIC Digest. ERIC Clearinghouse on Rural Education and Small Schools Charleston WV. (ERIC ED475 390).
Brookes, G. (1988). Exploring the world through reading & writing. Language Arts, 65(3),245-253.
Brown, H. D. (2001). Teaching by principle. (2nd ed.). New York: Addison Wesley Longman,Inc.
Brown, J. D. (1990). Understanding research in second language learning: A teacher's guide to statistics and research design. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Brown, R. (1991). Group work, task difference, and second language acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 11, 1-12.
Byrne, D. (1967). Progressive picture compositions pupil's book. Harlow: Longman House.
Cabral, M. (2004). Developing task-based writing with adolescent EFL Students. The InternetTESL Journal, 10(2). Retrieved December 15, 2004 from http://iteslj.org/Techniques/Cabal-Task-basedWriting.html.
Candlin, C. (1987). Towards task-based language leaning. In C. Candlin, & D. Murphy(Eds.), Language learning tasks (pp.132-156). Englewood Cliff, N.J.: Prentice Hall.
Carson, J.G. (1993). Reading for writing: Cognitive perspectives. In J.G. Carson & I. Leki(Eds.), Reading in the composition classroom: Second language perspectives. Boston,MA: Heinle & Heinle Publishers.
Chambers, G. N. (1999). Motivating language learners. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Chandler, C. E. (1990). Using newspapers in the ESL literacy classroom. ERIC Digest. ERIC Clearinghouse on Languages and Linguistics Washington DC (ERIC ED321 619).
Chavez, M. (1988). Learner's perspectives on authenticity. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 36(4), 277-301.
Chen, Chien-ying (2005). An exploratory study of how EFL junior high school students develop L2 literacy through task-based reading-to-writing instruction. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Cheng Kung University.
Cheung, C. (2001). The use of popular culture as a stimulus to motivate secondary students'English learning in Hong Kong. ELT Journal, 55(1), 55-61.
Christensen, B. (1990). Teenage novels of adventure as a source of authentic material. Foreign Language Annals, 23, 531-537.
Cramer, R. L. (1978). Children's writing and language growth. Ohio, US: Charles E. Merrill Publishing Company.
Crandall, J. (1995). The why, what, and how of ESL reading instruction: Some guidelines for writers of ESL reading textbooks. In P. Byrd (Ed.), Material writer's guide (pp. 79-94).Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle Publishers.
Crookes, G. & Chaudron, C. (2001). Guidelines for language classroom instruction. In M. Celce-Marcia (Ed.), Teaching English as a second or foreign language(pp. 29-54). Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle Publishers.
Crookes, G. & Gass, S. (1993). (Eds.). Tasks and language learning: Integrating theory and practice. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
Daly, B. (2004). Facilitating discussions of newspaper articles in the ESL/EFL classroom.The Internet TESL Journal, 10(7). Retrieved
August 15, 2004 from http://iteslj.org/Lessons/Daly-Newspaper.html.
Day, R. R. & Bamford, J. (2000). Reaching reluctant readers. English Teaching Forum, 38(3), 12-20.
Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. New York: Macmillan Publishers Ltd.
Dunkel, P. A. (1995). Authentic second/foreign language listening texts: Issues of definition,
operationalization, and application. In P. Byrd (Ed.), Material writer's guide (pp.95-106). Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle Publishers.
Dutcher, P. (1990). Authentic reading assessment. ERIC Digest. ERIC Clearinghouse on Reading English and Communication Bloomington IN (ERIC ED328 607).
Dycus, D. (1996). Making jigsaw activities using newspaper articles. The Internet TESL Journal, 2(2). Retrieved September 1, 2004 from
http://iteslj.org/Techniques/Dycus-Jigsaw.html.
Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based language learning. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Emig, J. (1971). The composing process of twelfth graders. Urbana, IL: NCTE.
Engestroem, Y. (1999). Activity theory and individual and social transformation. In Y. Engestroem, R. Miettinen, & R. Punamaeki (Eds.), Perspectives on activity theory (pp.19-38). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Estaire, S. & Zanon, J. (1994). Planning classwork-A task based approach. Oxford, UK: Macmillan Publishers.
Gardner, R. C. & Lambert, W. E. (1972). Attitudes and motivation in second language learning. Rowley, MA: Newberry House.
Gass, S. M. & Selinker, L. (1994). Second language acquisition: An introductory course. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum & Associates.
Gebhard, J. C. (1987). Successful comprehension: What teachers can do before students read. English Teaching Forum, 25, 21-23.
Gokhale, A. A. (1995). Collaborative learning enhances critical thinking. Journal of Technology Education, 7(1), 98-105.
Grabe, W. (1991). Current developments in second language reading research. TESOL Quarterly, 25(3): 375-406.
Grundy, P. (1993). Newspapers. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Guariento, W. & Morley, J. (2001). Text and task authenticity in the EFL classroom. ELT Journal, 55(4), 347-353.
Hammond, W. F. (2002). The creative journal: A power tool for learning. Green Teacher, 69, 34-38.
Hamp-Lyons, L. & Heasley, B. (1992). Study writing: A course in written English for academic and professional purposes. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Heaton, J. B. (1988). Writing English language tests. Hong Kong: Longman.
Herron, C. & Seay, I. (1991). The effect of authentic oral texts on student listening comprehension in the foreign language classroom. Foreign Language Annals, 24, 487-495.
Hussin, S., Maarof, N. & D'Cruz, J. V. (2001). Sustaining an Interest in learning English and increasing the motivation to learn English: An enrichment program. The Internet TESL Journal, 7(5). Retrieved February, 6, 2005 from
http://iteslj.org/Techniques/Hussin-Motivation/.
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1986). Action research: Cooperative learning in the science classroom. Science and Children, 24, 31-32.
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1999). Learning together and alone: Cooperative,competitive and individualistic learning (5th ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon, Inc.
Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Holubec, E. J. (1993). Circles of learning (4th ed.). Edina,MI: Interaction Book Company.
Jolly, D. (1984). Writing tasks: An authentic task approach to individual writing need. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Katz, L.G. (1997). A developmental approach to assessment of young children. ERIC Digest. ERIC Clearinghouse on Languages and Linguistics Washington DC (ERIC ED407 172).
Kelly, C., Kelly, L, Offner, M. & Vorland, B. (2002). Effective ways to use authentic materials with ESL/EFL students. The Internet TESL Journal, 8(11). Retrieved September 30, 2004 from http://iteslj.org/Techniques/Kelly-Authentic.html
Kilickaya, F. (2004). Authentic materials and cultural content in ESL classrooms. The Internet TESL Journal, 10(7). Retrieved December 15, 2004 from
http://iteslj.org/Techniques/Kilickaya-AutenticMaterial.html.
Krajka, J. (2000). Using the Internet in ESL writing instruction. The Internet TESL Journal,6(11). Retrieved December 15, 2004 from
http://iteslj.org/Techniques/Krajka-WritingUsingNet.html.
Krashen, S. D. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Oxford, UK: Pergamon Press.
Krashen, S. D. (1984). Writing research, theory, and application. New York: Pergamon Press.
Larsen-Freeman, D. (1986). Techniques and principles in language teaching. New York: Oxford University Press.
Leaver, B. L. & Willis, J. R. (Eds.) (2005). Task-based instruction in foreign language education: Practices & programs. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
Levin, M. (1997). Kids in print: Publishing a school newspaper. Parsippany, NJ: Good Apple, Inc.
Lightbown, P. M. & Spada, N. (1999). How languages are learned. New York: Oxford University Press.
Lindemann, E. (2001) The rhetoric for writing teachers. New York: Oxford University Press.
Littlewood, W. (1995). Foreign and second language learning. Cambridge: CUP.
Long, M. (1985). A role for instruction in second language acquisition. In K. Hyltenstam & M. Pienemann (Eds.), Modelling and assessing second language acquisition (pp. 88-102). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
Long, M. (1989). Input, interaction and second language acquisition. In H. Winitz(Ed.), Annals of the New York academy of sciences conference on native and foreign language acquisition (pp. 159-278). New York: New York Academy of Sciences.
Long, M. & Crookes, G. (1992). Three approaches to task-based syllabus design. TESOL Quarterly, 26(1), 27-56.
Loschky, L. & Bley-Vroman, R. (1993). Grammar and task-based methodology. In G.Crookes & S. Gass (Eds.), Tasks and language learning: Integrating theory and practice (pp. 123-163). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
Lu, Kuan-ying (2003). Effect of e-mail exchanges on EFL senior high school students'writing. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Tsing Hua University.
Maria, K. (1990). Reading comprehension instruction, issues & strategies. Parkton, MD: New York Press.
Massi, M. P. (2001). Interactive writing in the EFL class: A repertoire of tasks. The Internet TESL Journal, 7(6). Retrieved December 18, 2004 from
http://iteslj.org/Techniques/Massi-WritingTasks.html.
Moffet, J., & Wagner, B. J. (1983). Student-centered language arts and reading, K-13:A handbook for teachers (3rd ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.
Nagel, P.S. (1999). E-mail in the virtual ESL/EFL classroom. The Internet TESL Journal, 5(7), Retrieved February 5, 2005, from http://iteslj.org/Articles/Nagel-Email.html.
Nunan, D. (1989) Designing tasks for the communicative classroom. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Nunan, D. (2001). Task-based language teaching with go for It. Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle Publishers.
Nunan, D. (2004). Task-based language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Nunan, D. (2005). Important tasks of English education: Asia-wide and beyond [Electronic version]. Asian EFL Journal, 7(3).
Oxford, R. (1990). Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know.Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
Oxford, R. (2001). Integrated skills in the ESL/EFL classroom. ERIC Digest. ERIC Clearinghouse on Languages and Linguistics Washington DC (ERIC ED456 670).
Oxford, R. & Shearin, J. (1994). Language learning motivation: Expanding the theoretical framework. Modern Language Journal, 78, 12-28.
Peyton, J. K. (Ed.). (1990). Students and teachers writing together. Alexandria, VA: TESOL.
Piaget, J. (1963). The origins of intelligence in children. New York: W.W. Norton & Company, Inc.
Pica, T., Holliday, L., Lewis, N., & Morgenthaler, L. (1989). Comprehensible output as an outcome of linguistic demands on the learner. Studies in Second Language Acquisition,11(1), 63–90.
Pica, T., Kanagy, R. & Falodun, J. (1993). Choosing and using communication tasks for second language instruction. In G. Crookes. & S. Gass (Eds.), Tasks and language learning: Integrating theory and practice (pp. 9-34). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
Press-Enterprise. (n.d.). Retrieved July 25, 2004, from
http://www.press-enterprise.com/nie/more_about.html.
Purves, A. & Purves, W. (1986). On the nature and formation of interpretive and rhetorical communities. In T. N. Postlethwaite (Ed.), International education research: Papers in honor of Torstern Husen (pp. 45-64). Oxford: Pergamon Press.
Rasinski, T. & Padak, N. (1996). Holistic reading strategies: Teaching children who find reading difficult. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
Rass, R. A. (2001). Integrating reading and writing for effective language teaching.
English Teaching Forum, 39 (1), 30-36.
Rau, W. & Heyl, B. S. (1990). Humanizing the college classroom: Collaborative learning and social organization among students. Teaching Sociology, 18, 141-155
Reid, J. M. (1993). Teaching ESL Writing. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall Regents.
Reid, S. D. (1992). The prentice hall guide for college writing: Teacher's manual. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall Regents.
Renandya, W. A, Jacobs, G. M. & Yu, V. W. (1998). Review of Extensive Reading In The Second Language Classroom by Day, R. R.& Bamford, J. RELC Journal, 29(2), 187-191.
Richards, J., Platt, J. & Weber, H. (1986). Longman dictionary of applied linguistics.London: Longman Group Ltd.
Richards, J. C. & Rodgers, T. S. (2001). Approaches and methods in language teachings(2nd ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Robinson, P. S., Ting, C. C. & Urwin, J. J. (1996). Investigating second language task complexity. RELC Journal, 26, 62-79.
Rogers, C. & Medley, F., Jr. (1988). Language with a purpose: Using authentic materials in the foreign language classroom. Foreign Language Annals, 21, 467-478.
Sanderson, P. (1999). Using newspapers in the classroom. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Schenk, M. J. (1988). Read, write, revise: A guide to academic writing. New York: St. Martin's Press.
Schraw, G., & Dennison, R.S. (1994). The effect of reader purpose on interest and recall.
Journal of Reading Behavior, 26, 1-17.
Shrum, J. L. & Glisan, E. W. (2000). Teacher's handbook (2nd ed.). Boston: Heinle & Heinle.
Skehan, P. (1994). Second language acquisition strategies, interlanguage development and task-based learning. In M. Bygate, A, Tonkyn, & E. Williams (Eds.), Grammar and the language teacher (pp. 175-199). NJ: Prentice Hall.
Skehan, P. (1996). Second language acquisition research and task-based instruction. In J. Willis & D. Willis (Eds.), Challenge and change in language teaching (pp. 17-30). Oxford, UK: Heinemann Group.
Skehan, P. (1998). A cognitive approach to language learning.Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Skehan, P. (2003). Task-based instruction. Language Teaching,36,1-14.
Slavin, R. E. (1995). Cooperative learning (2nd ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon , Inc.
Smith, K. A. (2000). Going deeper: Formal small-group learning in large classes. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 81, 25-46.
Spelleri, M. (2002). From lessons to life: Authentic materials bridge the gap. Retrieved August 22, 2004 from
http://www.eslmag.com/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=18.
Starr, L. (2001). Ten great activities: Teaching with the newspaper. Educationworld.com. Retrieved August 17, 2004, from
http://www.educationworld.com/a_lesson/lesson139.shtml.
Stauffer, R. G. (1965). A language experience approach. In J.A. Kerfoot (Ed.), First grade reading programs, perspectives in reading No. 5. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
Stevick, E. W. (1978). Control, initiative, and the whole learner. In R. L. Light & A. H. Osman (Eds.), Collected papers in teaching English as a second language and bilingual education (pp. 34-45). New York: NYS ESOL EBA.
Stone, L. (1991). Task-based activities: making the language laboratory interactive. ERIC Digest. ERIC Clearinghouse on Languages and Linguistics Washington DC (ERIC ED343 407).
Susser, B. & Robb, T. N. (1990). EFL extensive reading instruction: research and procedure. JALT Journal, 12(2), 57-63.
Swaffar, J. K. (1985). Reading authentic texts in a foreign language: A cognitive model. The Modern Language Journal, 69(1), 15-34.
Taiwo, R. (2004). Helping ESL learners to minimize collocational errors. The Internet
TESL Journal, 10 (8). Retrieved September 20, 2004 from
http://iteslj.org/Techniques/Taiwo-Collocation.html.
Taylor, D. & Dorsey-Gaines, C. (1988). Growing up literate: Learning from inner city families. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann Group.
Teale, W. H. & Yokota, J. (2000). Beginning reading and writing: Perspectives in instruction. In D. S. Strickland, & L. M. Morrow (Eds.), Beginning reading and writing (pp. 3-21). New York: Teachers College Press.
Tessero, K. (n.d.) The newspaper: A living textbook. LitSite Alaska. Retrieved September 28,2004, from
http://litsite.uaa.alaska.edu/workbooks/newstext.html.
Thaiss, C. (1984). Language across the curriculum. ERIC Digest. Urbana, IL: ERIC/RCS(ERIC ED250 699).
Thanasoulas, D. (2002). Motivation and motivating in the foreign language classroom. The Internet TESL Journal, 8 (11). Retrieved March 9, 2006 from
http://iteslj.org/Articles/Thanasoulas-Motivation.html.
Tompkins, G. E. (2003). Teaching writing: Balanced process and product (4th ed.).Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Tribble, C. (1996). Writing. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Tsai, Sheng-chu (1998). The effects of cooperative learning on teaching English as a foreign language to senior high school students. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Kaohsiung Normal University.
Vygostky, L.S. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Ur, P. (1996). A course in language teaching: Practice & theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wang, Y. (2004). English magazines = motivation + improved EFL writing skill. English Teaching Forum, 48(1), 24-28.
Warschauer, M., Shetzer, H., & Meloni, C. (2000). Internet for English teaching. Alexandria,VA: Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages.
Wells, M. C. (1993). At the junction of reading and writing. Journal of Reading, 36(4), 294-302.
White, R. V. (1987). Writing advanced. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Williams, R. (1971). The local English-medium newspaper in English. English Language Teaching Journal, 28(1), 47-48.
Willis, J. (1996a). A flexible framework for task-based learning. In J. Willis & D. Willis(Eds.), Challenge and change in language teaching (pp. 52-62). Oxford, UK: Heinemann Group.
Willis, J. (1996b). A framework for task-based learning. Essex, England: Longman Group Ltd.
Willis, J. & Willis, D. (Eds.) (1996). Challenge and change in language teaching. Oxford:Heinemann Group.
Willis, J. (1998). Task-based learning: What kind of adventure? Japan Association for Language Teaching Website. Retrieved August 2, 2004, from
http://langue.hyper.chubu.ac.jp/jalt/pub/tlt/98/jul/willis.shtml.
Yalden, J. (1987). Principles of course design for language teaching. New directions in language teaching. East Lansing, MI: National Center for Research on Teacher Learning (ERIC ED356 627).
Yang, Yea-huey (2004). The effects of cooperative learning on English learning and learning attitudes of junior high EFL students. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Kaohsiung Normal University.
Yao, Shu-fang (2004). A study of integrating reading and writing in a senior high school classroom. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Chung Cheng University.
Zamel, V. (1992). Writing one's way into reading. TESOL Quarterly, 26(3), 463-485.
李振清。Li, C. C. (1984)。實用功能取向的英教材設計。載於黃自來,黃運驊,顏藹珠,徐美苓主編,英語文教學論集 (39-50頁)。台北市: 文鶴出版有限公司。
江皆慶、江皆瑤。Jiang, J. Q. & Jiang, J. Y. (2004)。93年學科能力測驗英文考科試題分析。台北市: 龍騰文化出版公司。
徐淑雅。Hsu, S. Y. (2003)。92年指定考試科目英文考科試題分析。龍騰文化大考特刊。Retrieved August 13, 2004, from
http://www.lungteng.com.tw/publish/y92asetest/92431.htm
郭慧敏。Kao, H. M. (2004)。大學入學九十三學年度指定科目考試英文考科試題詳解與
分析。台北市: 三民書局。
張武昌。Chang, W. C. (2006)。台灣高中生英文學科能力考試之調查報告:中小學一貫
課程體系指引各領域學科能力草案分區公聽會。台南市: 台南一中。
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top