臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

影響行為的產生是會受到人格特質的影響，在組織行為研究裡，馬基維利主義傾向經常做為預測個人運用權術行為的指標，具有此一性格者，往往會視為善用權術去影響他人，以謀取利益者。於此，本研究乃試圖探討馬基維利主義傾向與上影響行為之關聯以及個人特徵對其關係是否產生干擾效果。
本次研究共計發出2828份問卷，有效問卷為2761份，有效問卷回收率97.63﹪。向上影響行為透過因素分析後，得出五個構面：分別是「向上謀略」、「理性說服」、「印象管理」、「逢迎」、「施壓」。經由關聯分析後，發現馬基維利主義傾向與向上影響行為之構面：「向上謀略」、「印象管理」、「逢迎」、「施壓」呈現非常顯著正相關。其次以二因子變異數分析結果，發現：1.「性別」對於「向上謀略」、「逢迎」產生干擾效果，2.「年齡」對於「印象管理」產生干擾效果，3.「任職機構性質」對於「向上謀略」、「理性說服」、「印象管理」、「逢迎」產生干擾效果。

Influence behaviors have generally been affected by personality. In organizational research, Machiavellianism has commonly been defined as the need to develop and defend one’s power and success. Thus, Machiavellianism more likely that personality may predict use of these influence tactics. The purpose of this study is to examine the relationships of Machiavellianism and upward influence tactics, and examine the moderating effect of demographic variables.
This study selected 2828 business employee to answer the questionnaire, and there are 2761 copies valid return. A factor analysis, there are five dimensions of upward influence tactics: upward device, rational persuasion, impression management, ingratiation and pressure. The result showed that (1) there are hypotheses supported for strongly positive relationship between Machiavellianism and upward influence tactics, (2) the moderating effect of demographic variables were partly supported in this study.

第一章 緒論
第一節 研究背景與動機……………………………………………….1
第二節 研究目的……………………………………………………….3
第三節 研究流程……………………………………………………….3
第二章 文獻探討
第一節 馬基維利之相關文獻………………………………………….5
第二節 向上影響行為之相關文獻…………………………………….13
第三節 馬基維利主義與向上影響行為之文獻……………………….20
第三章 研究方法
第一節 研究架構……………………………………………………….22
第二節 研究假設……………………………………………………….23
第三節 操作性定義與測量工具……………………………………….25
第四節 實證資料蒐集方法與樣本特性……………………………….29
第五節 資料分析方法………………………………………………….32
第四章 資料分析結果
第一節 項目分析……………………………………………………….34
第二節 因素分析與信度分析………………………………………….43
第三節 各研究變項之描述性統計…………………………………….46
第四節 馬基維利主義與向上影響行為之關係……………………….48
第五節 人口統計變項對馬基維利主義與向上影響行為之干擾分析.50
第五章 結論與建議
第一節 研究發現與結論……………………………………………….69
第二節 研究建議……………………………………………………….73
第三節 研究限制……………………………………………………….76
參考文獻……………………………………………………………..……….77
附錄一 抽樣機關及問卷回收情形統計表…………………………………..84
附錄二 馬基維利主義正式施測項目分析結果……………………………..85
附錄三 向上影響行為前測項目分析結果…………………………………..86
附錄四 問卷…………………………………………………………………..88

一、中文部分：
何金銘（2001），統計法輯要，台南：台灣復文。
何金銘（2005），項目分析：量表中「不良題項的篩除技術」，上課講義。
余定中（1984），組織內員工向上影響之研究，政治大學企管研究所碩士論文
吳明隆、涂金堂（2005），SPSS與統計應用分析，台北：五南圖書公司。
呂健忠譯（2003），李維羅馬史疏義，（Machiavelli, N. Discourses on the First Ten books of Titus Livy,1522），台北：左岸文化。
李秀珠，遲嫻儒（2005），組織中上行影響策略之研究：西方及中國式上行影響模式之比較，第80期，頁89-126。
李青芬、李雅婷、趙慕芬合譯（1994），組織行為學，（Robbins, S. P. Organizational Behavior, 9nd ed.），台北：華泰書局。
林震岩（2006），多變量分析：SPSS的操作與應用，台北：智勝文化。
邱政皓（2005），量化研究與統計分析- SPSS中文視窗版資料分析範例解析：台北：五南圖書公司。
郭玉生（1986），心理與教育測驗，台北：精華書局。
陳文德（1988），霸術 商用馬基維利兵法，台北：遠流。
陳姿秀（2003），馬基維利主義傾向者對主管與同事的差別評價：以國軍軍官為實証對象，中華管理評論，第6卷，第5期，頁97-107。
黃光國（1985），人情與面子：中國人的權力遊戲，現代化與中國化論集，頁125-153，台北：桂冠。
葉光輝（1983），人情取向、分配方式與工作表現，台灣大學心理研究所碩士論文。
劉仲矩（1995），馬基維利傾向與工作成效及工作滿足關係之研究-以壽險業人員維利，淡江大學國際企業學研究所碩士論文。

二、英文部分：
Ahmed, S. M. S., & Stewart, R. A. C. 1981. Factor analysis of the Machiavellian Scale. Social Behavior and Personality, 9（1）:113-115.
Anusorn, S. 1993. Ethical perceptions of marketer: the interaction effects of Machiavellianism and organizational ethical culture. Journal of bussiness ethics, 12（5）:407-418.
Aziz, A. 2004. Relationship between Machiavellianism and absence rate: an empirical study. International Journal of Management, 12（4）:445-450.
Aziz, A., May, K., & Crotts, J. C. 2002. Relations of Machiavellian behavior with sales performance of stockbrokers. Psychological Reports, 90: 451-460.
Aziz, A., & Meeks, J. 1990. A new scale for Machiavellianism. （Unpublished paper, School of Business and Economics, College of Charleston, Charleston, SC）
Bass, K., Barnett, T., & Brown, G. 1999. Individual difference variables, ethical judgments, and ethical behavioral intentions. Business Ethics Quarterly, 9（2）:183-205.
Calhoon, R. P. 1969. Niccolo Machiavelli and the twentieth century administrator. Academy of management Journal, 12: 205-212.
Christie, Richard and Geis, Florence L.1970. Studies in Machiavellianism, New York: Academic Press.
Corzine, J. B., Buntzman, G. E., & Busch, E. T. 1999. Machiavellianism in U. S. bankers. International Journal of Organizational analysis, 7（1）:72-83.
Corzine, J. B. 1997. Machiavellianism and management: a review of single-nation studies exclusive of the USA and cross-national studies. Psychological Reports, 80:291-304.
David & James（1978）, “Sex Difference in the Relationship between Machiavellianism and Self-Disclosure”, Psychology Reports, Vol.42, pp.715-721.
Falbo, T. 1977. Multidimensional scaling of power strategies. Personality and Social Psychology, 35（8）:537-547.
Farmer, S. M., Maslyn, J. M. 1999. Why are styles of upward influence neglected? Making the case for a configurational approach to influences. Journal of Management, 25（5）:653-682.
Farmer, S. M., Maslyn, J. M., Fedor, D. B., & Goodman, J. S. 1997. Putting upward influence strategies in context. Journal of Organizational behavior, 18:17-42.
Farmer, S. M., Fedor, D. B., Goodman, Jo. S., & Maslyn, J. M. 1993. Factors affecting the use of upward influence strategies. Best Paper Proceedings of the Academy of Management, Atlanta, GA.
Flynn, S., Reichard, M. & Slane, S. 1987. Cheating as a function of task outcome and Machiavellianism. The Journal of Psychology, 121（5）: 423-427.
Fry, W. R. 1985. The effect of dyad Machiavellianism and visual success in integrative bargaining outcomes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 11（1）:51-62.
Fu, P. P., & Yukl, G. 2000. Perceived effectiveness of influence tactics in the United States and China. Leadership Quarterly, 11（2）:251-266.
Gable, M., Hollon, C., & Dangello, F. 1992. Managerial structuring of work as a moderator of the Machiavellianism and job performance relationship. The Journal of Psychology, 126（3）:317-325.
Gable, M., Hollon, C., Dangello, F.1990. Relating locus of control to Machiavellianism and managerial achievement. Psychological Reports, 64（1）:339-343.
Gable, M., Topol, M. T. 1989. Machiavellianism and job satisfaction of retailing executives in a specialty store chain. Psychological Reports, 64（1）:107-112.
Gable, M., & Topol, M. T. 1988. Machiavellianism and the department store executive. Journal of Retailing, 64（1）:68-84.
Gemmill, G. R., & Heisler, W. J. 1972. Machiavellianism as factor in managerial job strain, job satisfaction, and upward mobility. Academy of Management Journal, 15:51-62.
Grams, W. C., & Rogers, R. W. 1989. Power and personality: effect of Machiavellianism, need for approval, and motivation on use of influence tactics. The Journal of General Psychology, 117（1）:71-82.
Hunt, S. D., & Chonko, L. B. 1984. Marketing and Machiavellianism. Journal of Marketing, 48:30-42.
Hunter, J. E., Boster, F. J., & Gerbing, D. W. 1982. Machiavellian beliefs and personality: construct invalidity of the Machiavellian dimension. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43（6）:1293-1305.
Jones, W. H., Nickel, T. W., & Schmidt, A.1979. Machiavellianism and self-discourse. The Journal of Psychology, 102: 33-41.
King, W. C. Jr., & Miles, E. W. 1995. A Quasi-experimental assessment of the effect of computerizing Non-Cognitive paper and pencil measurement: A test of Measurement equivalence.Journal of Applied Psychology, 80:643.651.
Kipnis, D., & Schmidt, S. M. 1988. Upward influence styles: relationship with performance evaluations, salary and stress. Administrative science Quarterly, 33（4）:528-542.
Kipnis, D., Schmidt, S. M., Swaffin-Smith, C., & Wilkinson, I. 1984. Patterns of managerial influence: shotgun managers, tacticians, and bystanders. Organizational Dynamics, 12（3）:58-67.
Kipnis, D., Schmidt, S. M., & Wilkinson, I. 1980. Intraorganizational influence tactics: explorations in getting one’s way. Jouanl of Applied Psychology, 65（4）:440-452.
Kline, P., & Cooper, C. 1984. An investigation of the items in the Machiavellian scales. The Journal of Social Psychology, 124: 251-252.
Kline, P.1983. Machiavellianiam and authoritarianism. Personality Study and Group Behavior, 3:6-11.
Kuo, H. K., & Marsella, A. J. 1977.The meaning and measurement of Machiavellianism in Chinese and American college students. The Journal of Social Psychology, 101: 165-173.
Leary, Knight and Barnes（1986）, “Ethical Ideologies of the Machiavellian”, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol.12,:75-80.
Lee, D. R., & Sweeney, P. J. 2001. An assessment of influence tactics used by project managers. Engineering Management Journal, 13（2）:16-24.
Machiavelli, N. 1908. The Prince. (by W. K. Marriott）. New York, E. P. Dutton & co. （Original work published 1513）. pp.141-145
Macrosson, W D K, Hemphill, D J. 2001. Machiavellianism in Belbin team roles. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 16（5）:355-363.
McDonald, J. M., & Gooding C. W. 2005. Leadership and upward influence: a survey of business school deans. Southern Business Review, 30（2）:21-26.
Moss, J. 2005. Race effects on the employee assessing political leadership: a review of Christie and Geis’（1970）Mach IV measure of Machiavellianism. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 11（2）:26-33.
Mudrack, P. E. 1989. Age-related differences in Machiavellianism in an adult sample. Psychological Reports, 64:1047-1050.
Okanes, M. M. and Murray, L. W. 1982. Machiavellianism and achievement orientations among Foreign and American master’s studies in business administration. Psychological Reports, 50:519-526.
Pandey, J., & Rastogi, R. 1979. Machivellianism and ingratiation. The Journal of Social Psychology, 108: 221-225.
Panitz, E. 1989. Psychometric investigation of the Mach IV scale measuring Machiavellianism. Psychological Reports, 64:963-968.
Porter, L. W., Allen, R. W., & Angle, H. L. 1981. The politics of upward influence in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 3:109-149.
Ralston, D. A., Giacalone, R. A., & terpstra, R. H. 1994. Ethical perceptionsof organizational politics: a comparitive evaluation of American and HongKong Managers. Journal of Business Ethics, 13（2）:989-999.
Ralston, D. A., Gustafson, D. J., Mainiero, L., & Umstot, D. 1993. Strategies of upward influence: a cross-national comparison of Hong Kong and American managers”, Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 10（2）:157-175.
Ralston, D. A. 1985. Employee ingratiation: The role of management. Academy of Management Review, 10: 477-487.
Rao, A., Schmidt S. M., & Murray, L. H. 1995. Upward impression management: goals, influence strategies, and consequences. Human Relations, 48(2)：147-167.
Reimers, J. M., & Barbuto, J. E. 2002. A framework exploring the effects of the Machiavellian disposition on the relationship between motivation and influence tactics. Journal of Leadership and Organization Studies, 9（2）:29-41.
Ricks, J., & Fraedrich, J. 1999. The paradox for productive sales but poor management reviews. Journal of Business Ethics, 20:197-205.
Schilit, W. K., & Locke, E. A. 1982. A study of upward influence in organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 27:304-316.
Schmidt, S. M., & Kipnis, D. 1984. Managers’ pursuit of individual and organizational goals. Human Relations, 37（10）:781-794.
Schriesheim, C. A., & Hinkin, T. R.. 1990. Influence tactics used by subordinates: a theoretical and empirical analysis and refinement of the Kipnis, Schmidt, and Wilkinson subscales. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75（3）:246-257.
Tong, J. T. , & Ralston, D. A. 2002. Moving toward a global understanding of upward influence strategies: an Asian perspective with directions for cross-cultural research. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 19:373-404.
Vecchio, R. P., & Sussmann, M. 1991. Choice of influence tactics: individual and organizational determinants. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 12:73-80.
Vleeming, R. G. 1979. Machiavellianism: a preliminary review. Psychological Reports, 44:295-310.
Wastell, C., & Booth, A. 2003. Machiavellianism: an alexithymic perspective. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 22（6）:730-744.
Wilson, D. S., Near, D. C., & Miller, R.R. 1996. Machiavellianism: a synthesis of the evolutionary and psychological literatures. Psychological Bulletin, 119（2）:285-299.
Xin, K. R., & Tsui, A. S. 1996. Different strokes for different folks? Influence tactics by Asian-American and Caucasian-American manager. Leadership Quarterly, 7（1）:109-132.
Yukl, G., Guinan, P. J., & Sottolano, D. 1995. Influence tactics used for different objectives with subordinates, peers,and superiors. Groups & Organization Studies, 20（3）:272-296.
Yukl, G., Falbe, C. M., & Youn, J. Y. 1993. Patterns of influence behavior for managers. Group & Organizatin Management, 18（1）:5-28
Yukl, G., & Tracey, J. B. 1992. Consequences of influence tactics used with subordinates, peers, and the boss. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77（4）:525-535.
Yukl, G., & Falbe, C. M. 1990. Influence tactics and objectives in upward, downward, and lateral influence attempts. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75（2）:132-140.
Zook, A. 1985. On measurement of Machiavellianism. Psychological Reports, 57:982.