臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

摘要
隨著企業間競爭日趨激烈，為了使來自不同領域之員工能於合作時產生最大效益，企業皆體認團隊合作已經成為永續的競爭優勢。團隊成員往往具備不同知識技能及功能背景的成員，以符合執行任務本身的需要；然而，個體具有不同之人格特質，並對於其追求之目標抱持不同的態度，例如是否僅對於薪酬等激勵因此感到興趣，或對於內在動機具有高需求。內在動機意指工作本身特質與其對個體造成之吸引力，例如成就感、個人興趣等。本研究依循Hoegl & Gemuenden (2001) 之研究成果，以團隊品質作為團隊績效之指標，進一步探討團隊成員人格特質與內在動機是否對團隊品質產生影響。
本研究進行對象為參與教育部顧問室所推動的「創意的發想與實踐巡迴課程計畫」課程、來自十一所南部大專院校之修課學生。使用描述性統計、因素分析、信度分析、獨立樣本t檢定、變異數分析與多元線性迴歸分析，得到下列結論：
1. 內在動機對團隊品質有顯著正向影響。
2. 創造性人格特質對團隊品質有部分顯著正向影響。
並根據研究發現提出以下建議：
1. 組織可透過任務設計，進一步誘發個體內在動機。
2. 雇用具有創造性人格特質者，將有助於提升團隊品質
3. 導入能夠培養創造性人格特質之課程。

Abstract
The importance of teamwork is highlighted nowadays in business management. To smooth the operation and strengthen the competitiveness of an organization, recruiting professionals from diversified fields to build cross-functional teams is extremely needed. Nevertheless, individuals may have diverse personality, hold different attitude to their work or are driven by different incentives, including extrinsic or intrinsic motivation. Based on the research of Hoegl & Gemuenden in 2001, this study take teamwork quality as the feature of teamwork performance and discuss how team member’s personality and intrinsic motivation affect the result of teamwork quality.
This subjects were consisted of groups of students from 11 colleges who took the nationwide course “The Discovery and Application of Creativity”launched by the Consulting Division in Ministry of Education. We collected the questionnaire spread from these students after course and analyze the data with statistical methods of descriptive statistics, factor analysis, reliability analysis, ANOVA, t test, multiple regression. The major results of this study are as following:
1. Intrinsic motivation has significant positive influence on teamwork quality.
2. Personality partly influences teamwork quality.

目 錄
第一章 緒論…………………………………………………………………1
第一節 研究動機…………………………………………………………1
第二節 研究目的…………………………………………………………3
第二章 文獻探討……………………………………………………………4
第一節 內在動機…………………………………………………………4
第二節 創造性人格特質………………………………………………15
第三節 團隊品質………………………………………………………26
第三章 研究設計與實施…………………………………………………31
第一節 研究架構與假設………………………………………………31
第二節 研究對象與資料蒐集程序……………………………………33
第三節 變項定義與量測………………………………………………35
第四節 資料分析方法…………………………………………………39
第五節 樣本特性分析………………………………………………41
第六節 量表信度分析…………………………………………………42
第四章 研究結果…………………………………………………………46
第一節 描述性統計分析………………………………………………46
第二節 創造性人格特質與內在動機之個人屬性差異分析…………47
第三節 創造性人格特質與內在動機對團隊品質之影響……………50
第五章 結論與建議………………………………………………………53
第一節 研究結論………………………………………………………53
第二節 研究建議………………………………………………………57
第三節 研究限制與後續研究建議……………………………………59
參考文獻……………………………………………………………………61
附錄一 問卷………………………………………………………………66

參考文獻
中文部份
李青芬、李雅婷、趙慕芬（合譯），1993，組織行為學。台北：華泰書局。（Robins, S.P.1992. Organizational Behavior.）
李建道，2002，創造力人格、工作環境認知與研發績效關聯性研究。碩士論文，中興大學企業管理學系，台中
張春興，1989，張氏心理學辭典。臺北：東華書局。
張翊祥，2004，團隊成員人格特質組合對團隊效能影響之研究—以團隊互動過程為中介變項。碩士論文，中原大學企業管理學系，中壢。
沈明權，1999，個人特質、組織特性與組織創新之研究。碩士論文，國立中央大學人力資源管理研究所，中壢。
吳佩芳、林文政，2001，管理才能與工作動機對工作績效之影響－以K公司為例。http://www.ncu.edu.tw/~hr/new/conference/7th/pdf/6-1.pdf
孫淑芬、房美玉，2000，個人特徵、工作動機與組織承諾關係之探討－以N公司為例。http://www.ncu.edu.tw/~hr/new/conference/6th/pdf/2-a-1.pdf
郭誌光，2001，個人創造力、組織創新氣候、及組織創新績效之關係－台北市廣告公司的實證研究。碩士論文，國立中正大學勞工研究所，嘉義。
楊牧青，2000，工作特性、人格特質與工作滿意度關係之研究－以高雄港務局員工為例。碩士論文，國立成功大學交通管理科學研究所，台南。
陳秀娟譯，1998，生命的心流。台北：天下遠見。
鄭勝泰，2002，人格特質對工作績效影響之探討─以某運輸服務業之T公司為例。碩士論文，國立中央大學人力資源管理研究所，中壢。
謝榮桂，1999，高科技研發人員創造力人格評鑑量表與系統之建立—以資訊與半導體業為例。碩士論文，中央大學人力資源管理研究所，中壢。
饒瑞霖，2000，創造力攸關之內外在環境特質與內外在動機之關係—學童與廠商跨領域之比較研究。碩士論文，中央大學企業管理研究所，中壢。
英文部份
Amabile, T. M. 1988. A Model of Creativity and Innovation in Organisations. Research in Organisational Behaviour, Greenwich: JAI Press
Amabile, T. M. and Gryskiewicz, S. S. 1987. Creativity in the R&D Laboratory. Technical Report No. 30, Center for Creative Leadership, Greensboro, NC
Amabile, T. M., Hill, K.G., Hennessey, B.A. & Tighe, E.M.1994. The work preference inventory: Assessing intrinsic and extrinsic motivational orientations. Journal of Personality and social Psychology, 66(5): 950-967.
Ancona, D. C. & Caldwell, D. F. 1992. Demography and Design: Predictors of New Product Team Performance, Organization Science, 3: 321-341.
Arnold H. J. 1976. Effects of performance feedback and extrinsic reward upon high intrinsic motivation. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 17: 275-288.
Back, K. 1951. Influence Through Social Communication, Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 46: 9-23.
Bern, D. J. 1967. Self-perception: An alternative interpretation of cognitive dissonance phenomena. Psychological Review, 74: 183-200.
Bettenhausen, K. L. 1991. Five years for groups research: What we have learned and what needs to be addressed, Journal of Management, 17: 345-381.
Bobic, M., Davis, E., and Cunningham R. 1999. The Kirton Adaption-Innovation Inventory, Review of Public Personnel Administration, 19: 18-31.
Brewer, M. 1979, Ingroup bias in the minimal intergroup situation: A cognitive-motivational analysis, Psychological Bulletin, 86: 307-324.
Brief, Arthur P. & Aldag, Ramon J. 1977. The Intrinsic Extrinsic Dichotomy Toward Conceptual Clarity. Academy of Management Review, 2(3): 496-500.
Cartwright, D. 1968. The Nature of Group Cohesiveness, D. Cartwright and A. Zander (Eds.), Group Dynamics: Research and Theory: 91-109. London: Tavistock.
Cattell, R. B. 1950. A systematic theoretical and factual study, New York: McGraw-Hill.
Cattell, R. B. 1965. The scientific analysis of personality, Baltimore: Penguin Books.
Cox, T. H., Lobel, S. A. & Mcleod, P. L. 1991. Effects of ethnic group cultural differences on cooperative and competitive behavior on a group task, Academy of Management Journal, 34: 827-847.
Deckop, J.R. & Cirka, C.C. 2000. The risk and reward of a double-edged sword: Effects of a merit pay program on intrinsic motivation. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 29(2): 400-418.
Deci, E.L. 1971. Effects of externally mediated rewards on intrinsic motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 18(1): 105-115.
Deci, E.L.1975. Intrinsic motivation. New York: Plenum Press.
Deci, E. L.,Cascio,W. F. & Krussel, J. 1973. Sex differences, positive feedback, and intrinsic motivation. Paper presented at the meeting of the Eastern Psychological Association, Washington, D.C.
Deci, E.L. & Richard M. Ryan.1985. Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior. New York: Plenum Press.
Finkelstein, S. & Hambrick, D. C. 1996. Strategic Leadership: Top Executives and Their Effects on Organization, St. Paul: West.
Fisher, C.D. 1978. The effects of personal control, competence, and extrinsic reward systems on intrinsic motivation. Journal of Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 21: 273-288.
Gatewood, R. D. & Field, H. S. 1998. Human Resource Selection (4th ed.). TX: The Dryden Press.
Goodman, P. S., Ravlin, E., & Schminke, M. 1987. Understanding Groups in Organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, Greenwich : JAI Press.
Green, P. L. & Plsek, P. E. 2002. Coaching and Leadership for the Diffusion of Innovation in Health Care: A Different Type of Multi-Organization Improvement Collaborative. Joint Commission Journal on Quality Improvement, 28(2): 55-71
Guzzo, R. & Dickson, M. 1996. Teams in organizations: Recent research on performance and effectiveness, Annual Review of Psychology, 83: 307-338
Herzberg, F.1968. One more time: How do you motivate employees? Harvard Business Review, Jan-Feb: 53-62.
Jackson, S. E. & Ruderman, M. N. 1995. Diversity in Work Teams: Research Paradigms for A Changing Workplace, Wasington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Jackson, S. E., Stone, V. K., & Alvarez, E. B. 1992, Socialization amidst diversity: Impact of demographics on work team oldtimers and newcomers, Research in Organizational Behavior, CT: JAL Press.
Jehn, K. A. 1995. A multimethod examination of detriments of intragroup conflict, Administrative Science Quarterly, 40: 256-282.
Jehn K. A. 1997. A qualitative analysis of conflict types and dimensions in organizational group, Administrative Science Quarterly, 42: 530-557.
Jordan, P. C. 1986. Effects of an extrinsic reward on intrinsic motivation: a field experiment. Academy of Management Journal, 29(2): 405-412.
Kirton, M. J. 1976. Adaptors and Innovators: A description and measure, Journal of Applied Psychology, 61:622-629.
Kirton, M. J. 1989. A theory of cognitive. In Kirton, M.J.(Edt.) Adaptors and Innovators: Styles of creativity and Problem solving, New York: Routledge
Kirton, M. J. 1989. Adaptors and Innovators at Work. In Kirton, M.J.(Edt.) Adaptors and Innovators：Styles of creativity and Problem solving, New York:Routledge
Lawrence, B. S. 1997. The black box of organizational demography, Organization Science, 8: 1-22.
Lepper, M. R., Greene, D., & Nisbett, R. E. 1973. Undermining children''s intrinsic interest withextrinsic reward: A test of the "overjustification" hypothesis. Journal of Personalityand Social Psychology, 28: 129-137.
Levin, J. M. & Moreland, R. L. 1990. Progress in Small Group Research. Annual Review of Psychology, 41: 585-634.
Lu, L. 1999. Work motivation, job stress and employees’ well-being. Journal of Applied Management Studies, 8(1): 61-72.
Marks, M. A., Mathieu, J. E. & Zaccaro, S. J. 2001. A Temporally Based Framework and Taxonomy of Team Processes, Academy of Management Review, 26(3): 356-375.
Messick, D. & Massie, D. 1989. Intergroup relations, Annual Review of Psychology, 40: 45-81.
Mischel, W. 2003. Introduction to Personality: Toward An Integration 7th edition, Indianapolis: Wiley Press.
Oldman, G. & Cummings, A. 1998, Creativity in organizational context, Productivity, 39: 187-194.
Pelled, L. H., Eisenhardt, K. M. & Xin, K. R. 1999. Exploring the black box: An analysis of work group diversity, conflict, and performance, Administrative Science Quarterly, 44:1-28.
Schrader, S. & Goepfert, J. 1996. Structuring manufacturer-supplier interaction in new product development teams: An empirical analysis, In H. G. Gemuenden, T. Ritter, A. Walter (eds.), Proc. 12th Internat. Conf. Industrial Marketing and purchasing (1). 557-598. Universitaet Karlsruhe, Karlsruhe, Germany.
Steers, R. M. 1997. Introduction to Organizational Behaviors, New York: HarperCollins Publishers
Sternberg, R.J., & Lubart, T. I. 1995. Defying the crowd: Cultivating creativity in a culture of conformit, New York: Free Press.
Thibaut, J. W. 1950. An experimental study of the cohesiveness of underprivileged groups, Human Relations, 3: 251-278.
Thite, M. 2000. Leadership Styles in Information Technology Projects, International Journal of Project Management, 18: 235-241.
Thomas, K. W. 2000. Intrinsic Motivation And How It Works. Training, 37(10): 130-135.
Wang, W. & Horng. 1999. Creative thinking ability, cognitive type and R&D performance, R&D Management, 29: 247-254.
Williams, K. Y. & O’Reilly, C. A. 1998. Demography and diversity in organizations: A review of 40 years of research, in Staw, B. M. & Sutton, R. M. (Eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior, CT: JAI Press
Zalesny, M. D., Salas, E. & Prince, C. 1995. Conceptual and Measurement Issues in Coordination: Implications for Team Behavior and Performance, Research in Personal and Human Resources Management, 13: 81-115.