臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

摘要
本研究主要目的為探討國小弱視學生在閱讀過程中，分別使用放大鏡與放大印刷文字兩種閱讀媒介對於其閱讀效率的影響。針對六個弱視學生個案，分析閱讀媒介對其閱讀效能之影響與差異性，採個案研究方法進行量化分析並以半結構式訪談及觀察行為進行質性分析。在量的分析方面，閱讀速度和閱讀距離，除個案三外，印刷放大文字皆優於放大鏡放大文字。而閱讀理解率和誤讀率，個案之間較無一致的趨勢。在半結構式訪談方面，多數個案認為印刷放大文字較優於放大鏡放大文字，因印刷放大文字較方便及輕便。不同閱讀媒介對於閱讀速度、閱讀速理解率、閱讀距離、類型誤讀率、總誤讀率和閱讀正確率，並無顯著差異之影響。然而不同的閱讀方式對於閱讀速度及閱讀距離有顯著差異之影響，但對閱讀理解並無顯著影響。綜上所述，研究者認為針對個案閱讀效能而言，若需選其一並考量實際面，則建議弱視生的主要閱讀媒介以印刷放大文字為優先選擇。

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of using two different kinds of reading media, the magnifier and the enlarged characters, on reading efficiency while the students were reading. Six students with low vision were recruited into this study. Quantity and quality methods were used to analyze the effects of using different kinds of reading media on reading efficiency.
For the part of quantity analysis, using the enlarged characters seemed better than the magnifier on the reading speed and reading distance, except the 3rd subject. However, there was no consistent trend on reading comprehension and ratio of error reading in terms of two different kinds of reading media. For the part of quality analysis, most subjects thought using the enlarged characters seemed better than using the magnifier due to the easiness and convenience. There were no significant effect of using different kinds of reading media on reading speed, reading comprehension, reading distance, ratio of error reading type, common error reading and ratio of accurate reading. However, there were significant effects of reading methods for reading speed and reading distance, but not for reading comprehension. In sum, in terms of reading efficiency, the results of this study suggested the students with low vision to use the enlarged characters as their main tool while reading.

中文摘要 I
英文摘要 II
目次 III
表目次 VI
圖目次 VIII

第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究動機 1
第二節 研究目的 5
第三節 待答問題與研究假設 5
第四節 名詞釋義 7
第二章 文獻探討 9
第一節 弱視對閱讀的影響 9
第二節 閱讀媒介評量之重要性 16
第三節 弱視學生的閱讀材料與光學輔具之相關研究 18
第三章 研究方法 28
第一節 研究對象 28
第二節 研究工具 29
第三節 研究設計 30
第四節 研究程序 31
第五節 資料收集及分析 32
第四章 結果與討論 37
第一節 個案閱讀效能分析與建議 38
第二節 閱讀媒介之閱讀效能 58
第三節 閱讀效能間之相關性 62
第五章 結論與建議 65
第一節 結論 67
第二節 研究建議 68
第三節 研究限制與未來研究方向 68
參考文獻 70
中文 70
英文 72
附錄 76

參考文獻

中文部分：

毛連塭（民81）。視覺障礙兒童輔導手冊。教育部第二次全國特殊兒童普查工作執行小組。
朱經明（民86）。特殊教育與電腦科技。台北：五南。
佐藤泰正（1974）。弱視兒讀解力研究，讀書科學，70。
李永昌、陳文雄、朱淑玲（民89）。國中小視障學生大字體課本使用現況及效果研究。教育部委託研究。
李連珠（民81）。早期閱讀發展釋疑之一：兼談家庭閱讀活動。載於台中師範學院主編：幼兒教育年刊，5，109－126。國立台中師範學院。
杞昭安（民79）。視覺障礙兒童教育。載於王文科主編（民89）：特殊教育導論。台北：五南。
林慶仁（民88）。國中以上弱視學生光學輔具工具使用與認知之現況調查。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告（NSC87-2413-H-024-012）。
林慶仁（民88）。論視覺障礙學生大字體課本或資料的使用。啟明院通訊，44，9-12。
林慶仁（民90）。光學輔具協助弱視者與弱視生的歷史發展。啟明院通訊，46，13-18。
林慶仁（民90）。我國視障混合教育計畫各縣市實施概況的內容分析。視覺障礙教育學術研討會會議手冊暨論文集，27-45。
施能宏（民88）。淺談學童的閱讀理解。國教輔導，38(5)，19-23。
徐文志（民85）。弱視學生的漢字辨識。國小特殊教育，20，37-40。
張自（民82）。淺談弱視學生的定向行動教學。載於特教季刊，47，5-9。台北：國立臺灣師範大學特殊教育系。
張訓誥（民77）。我國弱視學生的教育問題探討。特殊教育季刊，27，1-10。
張勝成（民79）。弱視學生閱讀書寫能力的探討。特殊教育學報，5，113-158。
張勝成（民84）。弱視兒童文字教學。特教園丁，10(3)，12-13。
張勝成（民84）。弱視兒童閱讀教學。特教園丁，10(2)，36-38。
莊素貞（民90）。弱視大字閱讀軟體與一般放大印刷體對弱視學生閱讀效率影響之比較。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告（NSC89-2413-H-142-009）。
莊素貞（民93）。弱視生閱讀媒介評量之研究：以印刷放大文字與電腦擴視文字為例。台北：五南。
陳淑絹（民86）。「指導—合作學習」策略應用於國小閱讀教學之理論探討。台中師院學報，11，66-110。
楊怡婷（民84）。幼兒閱讀行為發展之研究。國立台灣師範大學家政教育研究所碩士論文。
萬明美（民85）。視覺障礙。台北：五南。
劉佑星（民78）。「視」而可見—如何指導弱視學生善用光學輔助器材。國教之友，41(3)，5-8。台南：國教之友社。
劉信雄（民88）。訊息處理理論對視障學生教學之啟示。載於杞昭安主編：視覺障礙教育之理論與實務。台北：中華視覺障礙教育學會。
鄭漢文（民79）。弱視學生的教育輔導。國教之聲，23(3)，26-29。
盧羨文（民87）。閱讀理解。台北：書林。

英文部分：

Barraga, N. C. (1964). Increased visual behavior in low vision children (Research Series Np.13). New York: American Foundation for the Blind.
Barraga, N. C. & Erin, J. N. (1992). Visual handicaps & learning. (3rd ed). Austin, Texas. Pro-Ed.
Bateman, B. (1962). Reading and psycholinguistic process of partially children, C. E. C. Research Monography, 5, 46.
Corn, A. & Ryser, G. (1989). Access to print by students with low vision. Journal of Visual Impairment and Blindness, 83, 340-349.
Corn, A. (1986). Low Vision and Visual Efficiency. Foundation of Education for Youth and Children with Blindness and Visual Handicap: Theory and Practice. New York: American Foundation for the Blind.
Corn, A. L. & Koenig, A. J. (2002). Literacy for Students with Low Vision: A Framework for Delivering Instruction. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 96, 305-321.
Corn, A. L. & Koenig, A. J. (1996). Foundations of Low Vision: Clinical And Functional Perspectives. New York: AFB Press.
Corn, A. (2000). Assistive Devices and Technology. IN Silverstone, Barrage (Eds) The lighthouse handbook on vision impairment and vision rehabilitation. p903-920. Oxford New York: Oxford University Press.
Corn, A. L. ,Wall, R .S. , Jose , J.K., Wilcox ,K.,& Perez ,A. (2002). An Initial Study of Reading and Comprehension Rates for Students Who Received Optical Devices. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, May, 322-334.
Council for Executives of American Residential Schools for the Visually Handicapped. (1990). Literacy for blind and visually impaired school-age students. RE: view, 22, 159-163.
Eakin, W.M., & Mcarland (1960). Type, printing, and the partially seeing child. Pittsburgh: Stanwix.
Fellenius, K. (1996). Reading Competence of Visually Impaired pupils in Sweden. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 90, 237-245.
Geruschat, D.,& Smith, A. (1997). Low vision and mobility. In B.Blasch, w. weiener, & R. Welsh (Ed.) Foundations of orentation and mobility. New York, NY: American Foundation for the blind.
Gompel, M. and others (2002). Reading and Spelling Copetence of Dutch Children With low vision. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 96,435-447.
Goodrich & Bailey (2000). A history of the field of vision Rehabilitation from the perspective of low vision. IN Silverstone, Barrage (Eds) The lighthouse handbook on vision impairment and vision rehabilitation. p675-715. Oxford New York: Oxford University Press.
Goodrich, G. L., & Sowell , V. M. (1996). Low Vision: A history in pogress. In. A. Corn & A. J. Koenig (Eds.) Foundations of Low Vision: Clinical And Functional Perspectives. New York: American Foundation for the Blind.
Koenig, A. J. & Holbrook, M. C. (1995). Learning media assessment of students with visual impairments: A resource guide for teachers. 2nd Edition Austin, Tx: Texas School for the Blind and Visually Impaired.
Koenig, A. J., & Holbrook, M. C. (1989). Determining the reading medium for students with visual impairments: A diagnostic teaching approach. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 83, 296-302.
Koenig, A. J. (1996). The selection and instruction of learning media assessment for students with low vision. In. A. Corn & A. T. Koening (Eds.)Foundation of low vision: Clinical and functional perspectives. New york, NY: American Foundation for the Blind.
Koenig, A. J., & Ross, D. B. (1991). A Procedure to Evaluate the Relative Effectiveness of Reading in large and Regular Print. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, May, 198-204.
Lovie-Kitchin, J. E., Bevan J.D., Hein B.(2001).Reading performance in children with low vision. Clinical and Experimental Optometry, 84, May, 148-154.
Lussenhop K., & Corn A. L. (2002). Comparative Studies of the Reading Performance of Students With Low Vision .RE: View, 34, 57-69.
Mangold, S., & Mangold, P. (1989). Selecting the most appropriate primary learning medium for students with functional vision. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 83, 294-296.
Morris, O. F. (1973). Reading performance of normally sighted and partially. sighted third and fourth grade students using regular print and large print (doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota).
Pattillo, S. T., Heller, K.W., Smith M. (2004). The Impact of a Modified Repeated-Reading Strategy Paired With Optical Character Recognition on the Reading Rates of Students with Visual Impairments. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 98, 28-46.
Peck, O. S. (1933). Reading ability of sight Saving class pupils in Cleveland, Ohio. Sight Saving Review, 3, 115-126.
Smith, J. K., & Erin, J. N. (2002). The Effects of Practices With prescribed Reading Glasses on Students With Low Vision. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 96, 765-783.
Sykes, K. C. (1971). A comparison of the effects of standard print and large print in facilitating the reading skills of visually impaired students. Education of the Visually Handicapped, 3, 97-105.
Wilkinson, M. (2000). Low vision devices: An overview. IN Mary A. & Carol F. (Eds) Looking to learn: promoting literacy for student with low vision. p117-137. New York: American Foundation for the blind.
Wittaker, S. G., & Lovie-Kitchin, J. (1993). Visual requirements for reading. Optometry and Vision Sciences, 70, 54-65.
World Health Organization (2002). Towards a Common language for Functioning, Disability and Health: ICF (The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health), p1-20. Retrieved May 1, 2004, from the World Wide Web: http://www3.who.int/icf/icftemplate.cfm
Zimmerman, G. (1996). Optic and low vision devices. In A. Corn and A. Koenig (Eds.) Foundation of low vision: Clinical and functional perspectives. New York: American Foundation for the Blind.