跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(18.97.14.87) 您好!臺灣時間:2025/02/13 05:04
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:王莉莉
研究生(外文):Li-li Wang
論文名稱:大學生在電腦輔助語言學習中心之文化學習觀感
論文名稱(外文):EFL College Students’ Perceptions of Culture Learning at a CALL Center
指導教授:林 至 誠
指導教授(外文):Chih-cheng Lin
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立臺灣師範大學
系所名稱:英語學系
學門:人文學門
學類:外國語文學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2006
畢業學年度:94
語文別:英文
論文頁數:141
中文關鍵詞:電腦輔助多媒體學習中心學生觀點語言學習軟體文化學習
外文關鍵詞:CALL self-learning centerstudent perceptionslanguage learning programsEFL culture learning
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:415
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:6
中文摘要
文化教學的目標是為了培養學生具備跨文化意識。文化學習大多決定於學生自己。如果教師指導文化學習能適當地引起學生動機,學習者將會自我引導學習。影片有一種能讓聲音文字顯示幫助學生理解及培養學生思辨之能力。關於學生如何看待將多媒體學習軟體整合入課堂上的學習的研究是很重要的。大部分研究也指出仔細的吸取學生的反應是有效教學的基礎。文獻也顯示欣賞文化相關的影片有助於培養學生語言學習的動機。因此本研究主要希望了解大學生對於透過欣賞自學中心的電影來學習語言中關於文化學習及語言能力的看法。
參與本研究的學生是九十三學年度的26班913位大學一年級學生。配合「大學英語文課程模式之建構與實踐」計畫,師大在第四年度中(九十三年度),於自學中心新增「經典電影」、「莎士比亞動畫」此二項目,因電影、文學亦屬文化範疇之一,因此本研究欲從學生的觀點來分析透過「經典電影」、「莎士比亞動畫」學習英文時,針對語言及文化學習部分之影響。研究問題為(一)學生對於使用經典影片來學習英文的看法。(二)學生對於透過影片學習語言中的文化語言及語言學習之觀感。
本研究採線上問卷調查法,前面1至7題屬量性,第8題為質性來分析符合上下學期都有看過指定的四部電影的篩選標準之151位學生的語言和文化學習。另外從這 151位學生中再篩選出上學期及下學期前往自學中心超過40次以上的學生,用訪談法來進一步了解其動機及語言、文化學習。質性和量性同時並重的分析是為了更了解學習者使用影片學習語言的行為及從特定影片中所得的文化學習。
研究發現,此種透過富含文化的電影學習英文方式提高學生前往自學中心學習英文的動機。學生認為經由電影裡的情境可建構基本的文化知識,透過描述、比較,可以啟發其內在思考;而透過文化價值觀的傳遞,可學習到社會化及如何欣賞不同的文化。至於語言能力的培養,大部分學生除了認為電影最能助於聽力(38.69%)外,對寫(35.97%)及說(11.44%)的表達能力也有助益。此外,高級班的同學對透過影片學習英文的觀感相對於中級、初級同學都較高;且,在回答開放式問題時,高級班的同學多針對「文化」部分作答,而中級、初級班的同學多針對「語言技巧」部分及「看法」部分作答。就針對文化部分作答中,高級和中級的同學可觸及到文化學習較深的第三層面—文化認同,而初級同學的文化學習部分中只觸及到第一層—文化事實和第二層—文化比較。另外,在訪談的同學中,六位符合篩選的標準中就有三位是高級班的同學,其針對文化學習提出了更深入的看法。研究的結果看出,此種透過影片自我學習英文的方法吸引較多的高級班同學。
研究建議,為了提升學生的文化學習,老師應該整合和課堂所學相關的影片,同時也準備一些問題讓學生可以反思。觀賞電影後的線上作答題目應再針對文化議題進行更深入之探討,或引導學生分組出題蒐集成資料庫,且可由師長帶領觀賞特定電影觀賞,並於觀賞後討論學習單。
ABSTRACT
The instructional goal of culture is to equip learners with intercultural proficiency, cultural competence and cross-culture awareness. Culture learning depends in large part on student themselves. If well-motivated by the ways teachers instruct culture, learners will be willing to self-direct to further discovery. Films had a function that allowed audio texts to be visually displayed which aids comprehension and develops learners’ intuitive and creative thinking. Research concerning the students' perspectives of integrated use of multimedia programs in the classroom is crucial. And it was asserted that serious elicitation of student feedback is a fundamental feature of effective teaching. It was also assumed that viewing culture-related films would better motivate students toward language learning. Therefore, this research mainly aims to explore college students’ perceptions of culture elements and language skills involved in viewing films in the English learning process at a CALL self-learning center.
The subjects of this study were freshmen enrolled in thirty-three English classes during the academic year 2004. The instrument included one on-line survey questionnaire and focused interviews. There are seven quantitative questions and one open-ended question in the on-line questionniare while there are seven interview questions. The quantitative and qualitative analyses were to investigate 151 selected students’ perceptions of viewing films, and their culture learning from specific film content.
The findings showed that affectively, their motivation of heading for the self-learning center is increased. In terms of cultural competence, students construct culture knowledge more effectively, and their critical thinking was also cultivated from viewing films which could be validated from on-line feedback and interview. And with culture values conveyed to students, they learn how to appreciate different cultures. In terms of language development, not surprisingly, 38.69% of the students’ responses showed that their listening ability was improved. Furthermore, there were 35.97% and 11.44% of the participants reponding to the improvement of written abilities and oral skills. In terms of different perceptions among the three proficiency levles, it showed that compared with other two proficiency levels, high-level students held the most positive attitude toward using culture-related films to learn English. The difference mainly occurred between high-level studnets and mid-level students. In addition, high-level students commented more on “Culture” when answering open-ended question while low-level and mid-level students commented more on “Language” and “Opinion” these two categories. Besides, low-level students’ responses to the open-ended question were only related to culture learning levels 1 and 2, that is, cultural facts and understanding, while mid-level and high-level studnets could discuss deeper into culture learning level 3, that is, cultural identity.
The pedagogical implications are that in order to maximize students’ culture learning and langauge skills, teachers can integrate related films into their curriculum and simultaneously prepare guided questions for students to reflect upon. The Center can establish a quiz database in which each film can have quizzes and culture-related testing items to investigate participants’ language and culture learning.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
中文摘要 i
ABSTRACT iii
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS v
TABLE OF CONTENTS vi
LIST OF TABLES ix
CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION 1
1.1 Background 1
1.2 The Purpose of the Study 2
1.3 The Significance of the Study 3
1.4 Research Questions 4
CHAPTER II LITERATURE REVIEW 5
2.1 Culture Learning 5
2.1.1 Cross-Cultural Awareness 7
2.1.2 Film-based Learning Approach 8
2.2 Advantages of The CALL Center 11
2.2.1 Learner Autonomy 12
2.2.2 Individualization 12
2.2.3 Learning Performance Records 13
2.2.4 Feedback 14
2.3 Students’ Perceptions of Applying CALL Activities to EFL Learning 15
2.3.1 Students’ Perceptions of Applying CALL Activities to EFL Learning in Improving EFL Students’ Language Skills 16
2.3.2 Students’ Perceptions of Applying CALL Activities to EFL Learning in Developing Cross-cultural Awareness 17
2.3.3 Students’ Perceptions of Applying CALL Activities to EFL Learning in Enhancing Motivation 20
2.4 Instructors’ Roles 23
2.5 Summary 25
CHAPTER III METHODOLOGY 26
3.1 Participants 26
3.1.1 Initial Participants 26
3.1.2 Interviewees 28
3.2 Activities 28
3.2.1 Types of Materials 29
3.2.2 Schedule for Designated films 29
3.3 Procedures 30
3.3.1 Instructional Design of the Project 31
3.3.2 Interaction of the Center and Freshmen English Curriculum 31
3.4 Research Instruments 32
3.5 Data Analysis 33
3.5.1 The On-line Questionnaire 34
3.5.2 Focused Interviews 35
CHAPTER IV RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 37
4.1 Results 37
4.1.1 Students’ Responses to Questions 1 to 7 on the on-line Questionniare 38
4.1.2 Students’ Perceptions of “What I have learned” in terms of Culture, Language Skills and Opinion on the on-line Questionnaire 53
4.2 Discussion 58
4.2.1 The Students’ Perceptions of Culture-related Film and Animation 58
4.2.2 The Students’ Reactions to Culture-related Films in terms of Culture and Language Skills 68
4.2.3 Summary 85
CHAPTER V CONCLUSION 86
5.1 Findings 86
5.1.1 Students’ Positive Perceptions of Culture-related Films 86
5.1.2 Students’ Reactions to Culture Learning and Language Skills 87
5.2 Pedagogical Implications 89
5.3 Limitation of the Thesis 90
5.3.1 Self-reported Nature 90
5.3.2 Lack of Integration of Self-learning at the Center into Class Instruction 90
5.4 Suggestions for Future Research 91
5.4.1 Deciding on Films 91
5.4.2 Keeping Learning Log 92
5.4.3 Adapting Survey Questionnaire 92
References 95
Appendix A-1 The Schedule of the First Semester 100
Appendix A-2 The Schedule of the Second Semester 101
Appendix B-1 Hamlet Quiz Items 102
Appendix B-2 Romeo & Juliet Quiz Items 103
Appendix B-3 Roman Holiday Quiz Items 104
Appendix B-4 Little Women Quiz Items 105
Appendix C On-line Survey Questionnaire 103
Appendix D Semi-structured Interview Questions 106
Appendix E Background Information of Students’ Visits of the Center in Full Year 107
Appendix F Background Information of Visits in Each Department 108
Appendix G Responses of Questions 1 to 7 to the Four Films among Three Levels 109
Appendix H-1 T-Test of Means of Responses to Old Movies and Animations 110
Appendix H-2 Paired Samples Test of Responses to Roman Holiday and Little Women 111
Appendix H-3 Paired Samples Test of Responses to Hamlet and Romeo & Juliet 112
Appendix I-1 One-way Analysis of Variance for Three Levels on Seven Questions 113
Appendix I-2 Multiple Comparisons of the Three Levels in Questions 1, 2, 5, and 7 114
Appendix J-1 Students’ Responses of “What I have learned” to Roman Holiday 116
Appendix J-2 Students’ Responses of “What I have learned” to Hamlet 118
Appendix J-3 Students’ Responses of “What I have learned” to Romeo & Juliet 120
Appendix J-4 Students’ Responses of “What I have learned” to Little Women 123
Appendix K-1 Summary of Interview Transcript of S17 (High-level) 125
Appendix K-2 Summary of Interview Transcript of S66 (Mid-level) 127
Appendix K-3 Summary of Interview Transcript of S5 (High-level) 130
Appendix K-4 Summary of Interview Transcript of S99 (Mid-level) 133
Appendix K-5 Summary of Interview Transcript of S18 (High-level) 136
Appendix K-6 Summary of Interview Transcript of S131 (Low-level) 139
Appendix L The Top Ten Films Viewed at the Center 141
References
ACTFL (American Council on the Teaching of Foreign Languages). Standards for Foreign Language Learning: Executive Summary. Available from http://www.actfl.org/i4a/pages/index.cfm?pageid=3324
Adair-Hauck, B., Willingham-Mclain, L. & Youngs, B. E. (1999). Evaluating the integration of technology and second language learning. CALICO Journal Vol:17:2, p. 269-306.
Barkhuizen, G. P. (1998). Discovering learners’ perceptions of ESL classroom teaching/learning activities in a South African context. In TESOL Quarterly, 32, 85-108.
Baś, K. (2004). Young adults’ attitude towards foreign culture. Thesis at Uniwersytetu im. A. Mickiewicza w Poznaniu. Available from http://elex.amu.edu.pl/ifa/studies/post-grad/psnjo/bas.pdf
Benson, P. & Voller, P. (1997). Autonomy & independence in language learning. N. Y.: Addison Wesley Longman Limited.
Byram, M., & Morgan, C. (1994). Teaching-and-learning language-and-culture. In Multilingual Matters, No. 100. Multilingual Matters Limited.
Chang, S. C. (2005). Integrating cultural education into EFL Class for intercultural communication. In SOOCHOW Journal of Foreign Languages and Cultures, 19, 204-221.
Chang, Y. F. (n.d.). 《資訊科技融入英語教學之模式與過程》 [The Model and the process of integrating information technology into English teaching]. p.1-10. Retrieved August 13, 2005, from http://www.isst.edu.tw/s44/quarterly/49/quartery-49-1.htm
Chao, C. C. (2003). Constructing a language learning environment for the new century: The theoretical framework underlying the foreign language self-learning center at Soochow University. In SOOCHOW Journal of Foreign Languages and Cultures, 18, 1-16.
Chapelle, C. & Jamieson, J. (1986). Computer-assisted language learning as a predictor of success in acquiring English as a second language. TESOL Quarterly, Vol. 20, No. 1, p. 27-46.
Chapelle, C. A. (2003). English Language Learning and Technology: Lectures on applied linguistics in the age of information and communication technology. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Chiu, M. H. (1998). Incorporating Chinese cultural aspects into English language teaching. In Proceedings of 1998 Conference of School of Foreign Languages and Cultures, Soochow University Culture Awareness in Language Education. p. 194-213.
Coleman, J. A. (1998). Evolving intercultural perceptions among university language learners in Europe. In Byram, M. & Fleming, M. (eds.), Foreign Language Learning in Intercultural Perspective, 45-75. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Damen, L. & Savignon, S. J. (1987). Culture Learning: The Fifth Dimension in the Language Classroom. USA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
Ebersole, S. (2000). Uses and gratifications of the Web among students. Journal of computer-mediated communiction (JCMC), Vol. 6:1. Available from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol6/issue1/ebersole.html
Egbert, J. L. & Jessup, L.M. (1996). Analytic and systemic analyses of computer-supported language learning environments. TESL-EJ on-line journal. Vol. 2. No. 2. p.1-19. Available from http://www.kyoto-su.ac.jp/information/tesl-ej/ej06/a1.html
Egbert, J. & Hanson-Smith, E., Editors. (1999). CALL Environments: Research, Practice, and Critical Issues. Virginia: Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages, Inc. (TESOL).
Egbert, J. (2005). CALL Essentials Principles and Practice in CALL Classrooms. Virginia: Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages, Inc. (TESOL).
Ekmekci, F. Ö. (1997). Students’ reflection on the ELT syetem atYadim. Perspectives in English Language Teaching, pp.137-148.
Ellis, R. (1994). The study of second language acquisition. New York: Oxford University Press.
Gago, N. (2000). Application of computer-based technology to the teaching of writing in Spanish as a foreign language: A Case Study. Available from http://kitkat.wvu.edu:8080/files/1477.1.Gago_N_Theis.pdf
Gene, B. & Bada, E. (2005). Culture in language learning and teaching. In The Reading Matrix. Vol.5, No.1, p.73-84.
Guzley, R. M., Avazino, S. & Bor, A. (2001). Simulated computer-mediated/ video-interactive distance learning: A test of motivation, interaction satisfaction, delivery, learning & perceived effectiveness. Journal of computer-mediated communiction (JCMC), Vol. 6:1. Available from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol6/issue3/guzley.html
Hall, J. K. (2002). Teaching and Researching Language and Culture. London: Pearson Education.
Hanvey, R.G. (1987). Cross-cultural awareness. In Scarcella, R. C.& Oxford, R. L. (Eds.), The Tapestry of Language Learning: The individual in the communictive classroom. Boston: Heinle & Heinle Publishers.
Heusinkveld, P. R. (1997). Pathways to Culture: Readings on Teaching Culutre in the Foreign Language Class. USA: Interculturl Press.
Hinkel, E. (1999). Culture in Second Language Teaching and Learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hofsoy, M. B.(2001). Network-based EFL: Motivational aspects of using networked computers in the EFL classroom. Master’s thesis, University of Bergen.
King, J. (2004). Enhancing english teachers’ facilitative skills. In SOOCHOW Journal of Foreign Languages and Cultures, Vol. 16, pp. 57-73.
Lasagabaster, D. & Sierra, J. M. (2003). Students’ evaluation of CALL software programs. Available from http://www.tandt.co.uk/journals
Lee, K. C. (2001). Selecting and integrating CALL software programs into the EFL classroom. Paper presented at the Information Technology & Multimedia in English Language Teaching Conference, Hong Kong, June 1-2, 2001).
Lessard-Clouston, M. (1997). Towards an understanding of culture in L2/FL education Ronko: K.G. Studies in English, 25, 131-150. Available from http://iteslj.org/Articles/Lessard-Clouston-Culture.html
Lin, C. C. (2005).《師大語言自學中心與大一英文課程的互動》[The interaction between language self-learning center and Freshmen English Course at NTNU].《教育部提升大學基礎教育計畫》[MOE Project—How to Improve College Basic Education].
Lin, L. Y. (2003). Learner motivation in the film-based classroom: The learner-centered approach. Selected Papers from the Thirteenth International Symposium on English Teaching. p. 538-546.
Lin, L. Y. (2005). Students’ perceptions of the learner-centered approach in film-based instruction. In Hwa Kang Journal of English Language and Literature, No. 10, pp. 53-70.
Liu, H. C. (2002). Development of a Web project for English learning and teaching: Linking theories and practice. In Asian Journal of English Language Teaching 12, 211-227. The Chinese University Press. Available from http://www.cuhk.edu.hk/ajelt/vol12/art10.html
Liu, T. J., Wang, S. Y. & Lian, J. K. (2003).《當電子書包進入教室:高互動學習環境之系統建置與應用模式》 [When e-bookbags enter inter the classroom]. 《教育研究月刊第99期》 [Journal of Education Research, Vol. 99]. p. 110~119.
Lizzio, A, Wilson, K. & Simons, R. (2002). University students’ perceptions of the learning environment and academic outcomes: implications for theory and practice. Studies in Higher Education, Vol. 27, No. 1, pp. 27-52.
Lu, Q. X. (2003). The Effects of Using Cross-cultural E-mail Exchange Projects on Developing Taiwanese Junior High School Students’ Linguistic Skills and Cultural Awareness: A Case Study of Seventeen Junior High School Students. Master’s thesis, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei, July.
Lynch, T. (1996). Teaching listening. In Communication in the Langauge Classroom. (pp. 88-103). New York: Oxford University Press.
National I-lan University. (2003). 《國立宜蘭大學e化學園計畫》[National I-lan University e-campus plan]. Retrieved August 13, 2005, from http://www.niu.edu.tw/english/html/6/htm
National Taiwan Normal University. (2005). Construction and Implementation of College English Language Curriculum. p.1-27. English Department.
Nunun, D. (1997). Designing and adapting materials to encourage learner autonomy. In Benson, P. & Voller, P. (Eds.), Autonomy & Independence in Language Learning, 192-203. N. Y.: Addison Wesley Longman Limited.
Omaggio, A. C. (1986). Teaching Language in Context-Proficiency-Oriented Instruction. Boston: Heinle and Heinle Publishers.
Paige, R. M., Jorstad, H. (n.d.). Culture learning in language education: A review of the literature. Available from http://www.carla.umn.edu/culture/resources/litreview.pdf
Pennycook, A. (1997). Cultural alternatives and autonomy. In Benson, P. & Voller, P. (Eds.), Autonomy & Independence in Language Learning, 35-53. N. Y.: Addison Wesley Longman Limited.
Povey, J. F. (1967). Literature in TESL programs: The language and the culture. TESOL Quarterly. Vol. 1, No. 2, p. 40-46.
Roby, W. B. (n.d.). Technology in the service of foreign language learning: The case of the language laboratory. In Foreign Language Learning. TESOL QUARTERLY, Ch. 19, p. 523~541.
Ryan, S. M. (1997). Preparing learners for independence: resources beyond the classroom. In Benson, P. & Voller, P. (Eds.), Autonomy & Independence in Language Learning, 215-224. N. Y.: Addison Wesley Longman Limited.
Saury, Rachel E. (1998). Creating a psychological foundation for the evaluation of pre-packaged software in second language learning. In Ed-Media/Ed-Telecom 98 World Conference on Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia & World Conference on Educational Telecommunications. Proceedings (10th, June 20-2, 1998).
Scarcella, R. C.& Oxford, R. L. (1992). The Tapestry of Language Learning: The individual in the communictive classroom. Boston: Heinle & Heinle Publishers.
Seelye, H. N. (1997). Teaching Culture: Strategies for Intercultural Communication. USA: National Textbook Company.
Shiao, C. K. & Tun, W. C. (2002). Students’ perceptions of English learning through ESL/EFL websites. In TESL-EJ, Vol. 6. No.1. Available from http://www-writing.berkeley.edu/TESL-EJ/ej21/a2.html
Stapleton, P. (2000). Culture’s role in TEFL: An attitude survey in Japan. Language, Culture and Curriculum, Vol. 13, No. 3, p.291-305.
Stepp-Greany, J.(2002). Students’ perceptions on language learning in a technological environment: Implications for the new millennium. Language Learning & Technology, Vol. 6, No.1, pp. 165-180. Available from http://llt.msu.edu/vol6num1/steppgreany/
Tseng, Y. H. (2002). A lesson in culutre. ELT Joural, Vol. 56/1, p.11-21.
Vogel, D., Shroff R (et al.) (2002). Student e-Leaning intrinsic motivation: A qualitative analysis. The 6th Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems. Available from http://www.pacis-net.org/file/2002/118.PDF
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
1. 王慶福(2000)。當男孩愛上女孩:人際依附風格類型搭配、愛情關係與關係適應之研究。中華輔導學報,8,177-201。
2. 伊慶春、吳明燁(2002)。婚姻其實不只是婚姻:家庭結構因素對於婚姻滿意度的影響。人口學刊,26,71-95。
3. 李良哲(1997)。婚姻衝突因應行為歷程模式之驗證研究。國立政治大學學報,74,53-94。
4. 利翠珊(1997)。婚姻親密情感的內涵與發展。中華心理衛生學刊,10(4),101-128。
5. 利翠珊(2000)。婚姻親密情感的內涵與測量。中華心理衛生學刊,12,29-51。林顯宗(1998)。青少年的心靈改革-從兩性親密關係談起。中山人文社會科學期
6. 卓紋君(1998)。當代心理學界對愛情的研究與方向。中華心理衛生學刊,11(3),87-107。
7. 邱文彬、林美珍(1999)。大學生發展成熟的人際關係中親密性能力的發展:自我揭露與自主性之年級與性別差異的探討。教育心理學報,31(1),37-62。
8. 修慧蘭(1998)。從家庭發展週期談學生行為問題。學生輔導,59,62-72。
9. 陳貞夙(1997)。青少年對於兩性互動的態度與看法研究。學生輔導,48,126-138。
10. 陳金英、馬祖琳(2003)。台灣大學生的愛情觀、愛情關係與適應之研究。中華家政學刊,34,71-88。
11. 黃玲蘭(2002)。親密關係中的衝突與誤解-從兩性社會行為的差異談起。諮商與輔導,202,19-23。
12. 劉惠琴(2001)。大學生戀愛關係的維持歷程。中華心理衛生學刊,14(3),1-32。
13. 陳靜怡,「臺灣居民閒暇時間與休閒型態之分析--以民國76-83年為背景探討發展概況與推測未來發展」,國立臺灣體育學院學報,民國90年6月。
14. 藍科正、黃茂源,「臺灣地區全時受僱者時間運用之實證分析」,臺灣銀行季刊,87年3月,頁93-123。
15. 蘇瑛敏,「臺灣婦女生活時間變化與各國之比較」,婦女與兩性研究通訊,85年09月,頁4-14。