跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(18.97.9.172) 您好!臺灣時間:2025/02/16 21:22
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:陳霓慧
論文名稱:八位學生數學教師教學認知和情意面互動的個案研究
指導教授:金鈐金鈐引用關係
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立臺灣師範大學
系所名稱:數學系
學門:數學及統計學門
學類:數學學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2006
畢業學年度:94
語文別:中文
中文關鍵詞:教師專業發展教學認知面教學情意面
外文關鍵詞:Teacher's professional developmentCognitive aspect of teachingAffectiive aspect of teaching
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:3
  • 點閱點閱:210
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:2
本研究透過問卷調查和因子分析法,從修讀台灣師大數學系一班教材教法課的46位學生中篩選出八名具代表性的個案,以個案研究法持續追蹤此八位個案學生教師的數學教學認知與情意(簡稱知情)面向間的互動情形,並探討影響知情優勢轉變的原因。研究的過程分成「知情競爭」、「知情實驗」和「知情沉澱」三個階段,配合問卷調查、個案晤談和教室觀察,蒐集個案的各類實徵資料,據此分析與詮釋個案的知情內涵與轉變情形。

研究的結果顯示,個案教學認知的發展可以強化情意的展現,而教學情意的實踐亦能使其體會認知面向的重要性,因此,認知和情意實為數學教學概念的一體兩面、無法分割。個案學生教師在三個研究階段中的知情狀態大致上都持續地擺盪,時而認知主導、時而情意優先、有時則兩者處於平衡的狀態。另外,這種教學知情優勢的轉變與師資培育者的介入、個案缺乏強而有力的PCK來展現教學信念和價值以及個案對情意因子認知的不足有關。本研究的結果應有助於數學師資培育者進一步掌握學生數學教師階段性的教學認知與情意面間的競爭和擺盪原因,據此也可設計相關的培育活動或課程,以促使學生教師進一步察覺與體會情意教學的重要性,而且同時促進此兩個面向的專業認知發展。
Through questionnaire survey and statistical factor analysis, eight cases were selected from a group of 46 students who participated in a class of mathematical teaching methods. Case study method was used to track the eight student cases for understanding their cognitive and affective interaction in mathematics teaching and tried to find out the influences and the change of cognition-affection. This research consists of three phases including the competitive, the experimental and precipitative stages of cognition-affection with questionnaire investigation, interview,and classroom observation. The author analyzed and interpreted the connotation and the chang of the cognition-affection interaction for the these cases.
The results showed that the cognitive development of teaching can strengthen the represention of affective aspect of teaching , and practice of affective teaching can also let the students realize the importance of cognition. Hence it seems that cognition and affection are a unity of the two sides of students’ pedagagical concepts. During three research stages, the situation of cognition and affection for the cases was continuously swinging, sometimes the cognitive leads, sometimes the affective overrides, and sometimes the two are balance. In addition, the change of the advantage for cognition and affection was related to the teacher educators’ intervention, the absence of powerful PCK for the student teachers to represent their belief and value of teaching and the absence of the cognition for those affection factors of teaching mathematics. The results of the study might be useful for mathematics teacher educators to understanded the reasons why cognition and affection of student teachers competition and swings in every stages. In view of the above, they could design relative educational activity or curriculum in order to educate students teachers to realize the importance of affective aspect of teaching mathematics further, and promote the professional cognitive development of the two aspects at the same time.
第一章 緒論................................................1
第一節 研究的背景和動機......................................1
第二節 研究的問題和目的......................................5
第二章 文獻探討.............................................7
第一節 數學教師的專業發展....................................7
第二節 專業發展的認知面向...................................15
第三節 專業發展的情意面向...................................20
第四節 專業發展的認知與情意面互動............................27
第三章 研究方法............................................35
第一節 研究場域和對象......................................35
第二節 個案研究法..........................................39
第三節 研究設計和資料收集...................................43
第四節 資料分析............................................52
第五節 研究限制............................................58
第四章 研究結果............................................61
第一節 穩定型.............................................61
第二節 擺盪型.............................................85
第三節 知情互動的跨個案分析................................108
第五章 討論和省思.........................................113
第一節 學生教師教學認知與情意的互動..........................113
第二節 學生教師認知與情意的優勢轉變.........................115
第三節 學生教師知情互動研究的困難............................118
第六章 結論和建議.........................................121
第一節 研究結論和啟示......................................121
第二節 接續研究的建議.....................................123
參考文獻..................................................125

附錄目次

附錄一:研究問卷類資料.....................................131
附錄二:教學觀察類資料.....................................152
附錄三:訪談類資料.........................................155
附錄四:人造物資料.........................................203
一、 中文部分

教育改革審議委員會(1995)。第二期諮議報告書。台灣省:行政院。
金鈐(2004)。行政院國家科學委員會補助專題研究計劃期中進度報告─職前中學數學教師教學信念和價值的評量研究(2/3)。國立台灣師範大學數學系。
范良火(2003)。教師教學知識發展研究。上海市:華東師範大學出版社。
教育部(1994)。師資培育法。台北市:教育部。
教育部(2001)。國民中小學九年一貫課程暫行綱要。台北市:教育部。
教育部(2003)。國民中小學九年一貫課程正式綱要。台北市:教育部。
許秀聰(2005)。一位資深高中數學教師重構教學概念的行動研究。台北市:國立台灣師範大學碩士論文(未出版)。
張春興(1989)。張氏心理學辭典。臺北市:東華書局。
張繼元(2005)。六位學生數學教師教學價值認同的個案研究。台北市:國立台灣師範大學碩士論文(未出版)。
陳育琳(1999)。影響國中學生對於數學科所獲價值之因素探就。彰化市:國立彰化師範大學碩士論文(未出版)。
陳英娥和林福來(2004)。行動研究促進初任數學教師的教學成長。科學教育學刊,12(1),83-105。
陳松靖(2002)。三位學生教師數學教學概念轉變歷程的個案研究。台北市:國立台灣師範大學碩士論文(未出版)。
黃凱旻(2002)。一個輔導中學數學實習教師教學概念轉變的行動研究。台北市:國立台灣師範大學碩士論文(未出版)。
葉重新(2001)。教育研究法。台北市:心理出版社。
饒見維(2003)。教師專業發展─理論與實務(二版)。台北市:五南圖書出版股份有限公司。
Bogdan, R. C., & Biklen S. K. (1998). Qualitative Research for Education: An Introduction to Theory and Method (3rd ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon. [黃光雄主譯(2003):質性教育研究理論與方法。台北市:濤石文化事業有限公司。]
Yin, R. K. (1994). Case Study Research Design and Methods. CA: Sage. [尚榮安譯(2001)。個案研究法。台北市:弘智文化事業有限公司。]
Skemp, R. S. (1989). The Psychology of learning Mathematics. Mahwah:Lawrence Erlbaum Publishers. [許國輝譯(1995):數學學習心理學。台北市:九章出版社。]
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basis of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory (2nd ed.). CA: Sage. [吳芝儀和廖梅花合譯(2003):質性研究入門─紮根理論研究方法。台北市:濤石文化事業有限公司。]


二、英文部分

Aspin, D. N. (2000). Values, beliefs and attitudes in education: The nature of values and their place and promotion in schools. In M. Leicester, C. Modgil, & S. Modgil (Eds.), Education, culture and values Vol.2 (pp. 130-143). London : Falmer Press.
Ball, D. L., & Bass, H. (2000). Interweaving content and pedagogy in teaching and learning to teach: Knowing and using mathematics. In Jo Boaler (Ed.), Multiple perspectives on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 83-104). Westport: Ablex Publishing.
Ball, D. L., Lubienski S. T., & Mewborn D. S. (2001). Research on Teaching Mathematics: The Unsolved Problem of Teachings' Mathematical Knowledge. In Virginia, Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (4th ed) (pp. 433-455). Washington: AERA.
Bishop, A. J., Seah, W. T., & Chin. C. (2003). Value in mathematics teaching-the hidden persuaders? In A. J. Bishop, M. A. Clements, C. Keitel, J. Kilpatrick, & F.K.S.. Leong (Eds.), Second international handbook of mathematics education (pp. 717-765). Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Boaler, J. (1999). Participation, knowledge and beliefs: A community perspective on mathematics learning. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 40, 259-281.
Brown, S., Cooney, T., & Jones, D. (1990). Mathematics teacher education. In W. R. Houston (Ed.), Handbook of research on teacher education (1st ed.) (pp. 469-497). New York: Macmillan.
Brown, C. A., & Borko, H. (1992). Becoming a mathematics teacher. In A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 209-239). New York: Macmillan.
Calderhead, J., & Gates, P. (1993) Introduction. In J. Calderhead, & P. Gates (Eds.), Conceptual reflection in teacher development (pp. 1-10). London:Flamer Press.
Carr-Saunders, A. W., & Wilson, P. A.(1933). The Professions. Oxford: University of Oxford Press.
Chapman, O. (2002). Belief structure and inservice high school mathematics teacher growth. In G. C. Leder, E. Pehkonen, & G. Torner (Eds.), Beliefs: a hidden variable in mathematics education? (pp. 177-193). Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Cooney, T.J. (1994). Teacher education as an exercise in adaptation. In D. B. Aichele, & A. F. Coxford (Eds.), Professional development for teachers of mathematics: 1994 year book (pp. 9-22). Reston, VA: NCTM.
Cooney, T. J. (2001). Considering the paradoxes, perils, and purposes of conceptualizing teacher development. In F. L. Lin, & T. J. Cooney (Eds.), Making sense of mathematics teacher education (pp. 9-31). Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Cooney, T. J., & Wiegel, H. G. (2003). Examining the mathematics in mathematics teacher education. In A. J. Bishop, M. A. Clements, C, Keitel, J. Kilpatrick, & F. K. S. Leung (Eds.), Second international handbooks of mathematics education (Part Two, pp. 795-828). Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Christensen, D. (1996). The professional knowledge-research base for teacher education. In W.R. Houston (Ed.), Handbook of research on teacher education (2nd ed.) (pp. 38-52). New York: Macmillan.
Dewey, J. (1933). How we think:A restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative process. Lexington,MA:D. C. Heath.
Fennema, E., & Franke, M. L. (1992). Teachers’ knowledge and its impact. In Grouws, A. (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 147-164). New York: Macmillan.
Fereshteh, H. (1996). The nature of teaching, effective instruction, and roles to play: a social foundations’s perspective. Contemporary Education, Vol. 68, No. 1, 73-75.
Fraenkel , J. R. (1977). How to teach about values : An analytic approach. Prentice–Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.
Goldin, G. A. (2002). Affect, meta-affect, and mathematical belief structures. In G. C Leder, E. Pehkonen, & G. Torner (Eds.), Beliefs: a hidden variable in mathematics education? (pp. 59-71). Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Gomez-Chacon, I. M. (2000). Affective influences In the knowledge of mathematics. Education Studies in Mathematics, 43, 149-168.
Green, T. F. (1971). The activities of teaching. New York:McGraw-Hill.
Gudmundsdöttir, S. (1990). Values in pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 41(3), 44-52.
Halstead, J. M. (1996). Values and values education in schools. In J. M. Halstead, & M. J. Taylor (Eds.), Values in education and education in values (pp. 3-14). London: Falmer Press.
Hansen, D. T. (2001). Teaching as a moral activity. In W. R. Houston (Ed.), Handbook of research on teacher education (4nd ed.) (pp. 826-857). New York: Macmillan.
Hersh, R. (1986). Some proposals for revising the philosophy of mathematics. In T. Tymoczko (Ed.) (1981), New directions in the philosophy of mathematics (pp. 9-28). Boston:Birkhävser.
Jaworski, B. (2001). Development mathematics teaching: Teachers, teacher educators, and researchers as co-leaners. In F. L. Lin, & T. J. Cooney (Eds.), Making sense of mathematics teacher education (pp. 295-230). Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Jaworski, B. & Gellert, U. (2003). Education new mathematics teachers-Integrating theory and practice, and the roles of practicing teachers. In A. J. Bishop, M. A. Clements, C, Keitel, J. Kilpatrick, & F. K. S. Leung (Eds.), Second international handbooks of mathematics education (Part Two, pp. 830-875). Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Karplus, R., Lawson, A., Wollman, W., Apple, M., Bernoff, R., Howe, A., Rusch, J., & Sullivan, F. (1977). Science Teaching and Development of Reasoning, University of California, Berkeley, CA.
Koehler, M. S., & Grouws, D. A. (1992). Mathematics teaching practices and their effects. In Grouws, D. A. (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning. New York: Macmillan.
Lerman, S. (2001). A review of research perspectives on mathematics teacher education. In F. L. Lin, & T. J. Cooney (Eds.), Making sense of mathematics teacher education (pp. 33-52). Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Ma, L. (1999). Knowing and teaching elementary mathematics:Teachers’ understanding of fundamental mathematics in China and the United States. Mahwah:Lawrence Erlbaum Publishers.
McLeod, D. B. (1988). Affective issues in mathematical problem solving: Some theoretical considerations. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 19, 134-141.
McLeod, D. B. (1992). Research on affect in mathematics education: A reconceptualisation. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 575-596). New York: Macmillan.
Mewborn, D. S. (1999). Reflective thinking among preservice elementary mathematics teachers. Journal for Research in Mathematical Education, 30(3), 316-341.
Noddings, N. (1992). Professionalization and mathematics teaching. In D.A. Grovws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 209-239). New York: Macmillan.
Rokeach, M. (1980). Beliefs attitudes and values. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Research, 15(2), 4-14.
Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and Teaching: Foundations of the New Reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1-22.
Simon, M. (1994). Learning mathematics and learning to teach: Learning cycles in mathematics teacher education. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 26, 71-94.
Steinbring, H. (1998). Elements of epistemological knowledge for mathematical verbal problems. Journal for Research in Mathematical Education, 10, 195-210.
Thompson, A. G. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and conceptions: A synthesis of the research. In A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 127-146). New York: Macmillan.
Tzur, R. (2001). Becoming mathematics teacher-educators: Conceptualizing the terrain through self-reflective analysis. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 4, 259-283.
Wilson, M. R., & Cooney, T. J. (2002). Mathematics teacher change and development. In G.C. Leder, E. Pehkonen, & G. Torner (Eds.), Beliefs: a hidden variable in mathematics education? (pp. 127-147). Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Zaslavsky, O., Chapman, O., & Leikin, R. (2003). Professional development of mathematics educators: Trends and tasks. In A. J. Bishop, M. A. Clements, C, Keitel, J. Kilpatrick, & F. K. S. Leung (Eds.), Second international handbooks of mathematics education (pp. 877-917). Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
1. 黃鴻釗。〈紛爭不息的印度和巴基斯坦〉,《歷史月刊》,175期。民91年8月,頁45-51。
2. 張雅君。〈印巴核試爆後中共的南亞安全政策〉,《中國大陸研究》,43卷2期。民89年2月,頁17-18。
3. 張雅君。〈印度核子試爆與中共威脅論〉,《中國大陸研究》,41卷5期。民87年5月,頁1-2。
4. 張如倫。〈印巴衝突與反恐戰爭〉,《國防雜誌》,18卷4期。民91年10月,頁48-59。
5. 陳文賢。〈印度與巴基斯坦的核武競爭〉,《問題與研究》,38卷12期。民88年12月。
6. 潘進章。〈印巴克什米亞衝突之探討〉,《國防雜誌》,18卷5期。民91年11月,頁95。
7. 劉金源。〈王冠上的寶石-英國殖民統治下的印度〉,《歷史月刊》,175期。民91年8月,頁29-37。
8. 陳文賢。〈美國反恐行動下的印度和巴基斯坦關係〉,《國際事務季刊》,2期。民91年,頁104-121。
9. 胡敏遠。〈從結構現實主義論印度國家安全策略〉,《問題與研究》,43卷5期。民93年9、10月,頁31-58。
10. 柯玉枝。〈二○○二年印巴衝突中美國的角色〉,《問題與研究》,42卷6期。民92年11、12月,頁129-143。
11. 周煦。〈印巴之爭的原因、經過及大國之介入〉,《歷史月刊》,175期。民91年8月,頁38-44。
12. 林碧炤。〈國際衝突的研究與處理方法〉,《問題與研究》,35卷3期。民85年3月,頁1-28。
13. 宋鎮照,〈南亞印巴關係緊張與中美區域戰略佈局〉,《海峽評論》,139期。民91年7月, 頁13-18。
14. 吳玉山。〈仍是現實主義的傳統:九一一與布希主義〉,《政治科學論叢》,17期。民91年12月,頁1-32。
15. 吳玲君。〈美國與南亞區域安全:國家利益與策略〉,《美歐月刊》,11卷1期。民國85年1月,頁4-19。