參考文獻
中文部分
吳毓瑩(2000)。從基本的確認到水準的期待--探討美國從基本能力測驗到課程標準評量之轉變。教師天地,109,18-29。吳毓瑩(2004)。效度。出自王文中、呂金燮、吳毓瑩、張郁雯、張淑慧合著,教育測驗與評量(pp.59-94)。台北:五南。
吳毓瑩〈2005〉。最低能力還是最高目標?標準設立的隱含意義。發表於2005學習、教學、與評量國際研討會。台北:台灣師大。
李嘉惠〈2004〉。父母對國中生英語成績之影響。國立高雄師範大學英語學系碩士班。林生傳〈1994〉。教育社會學。高雄,復文。
林義男(1988)。國小學生家庭社經背景、父母參與及其學業成就的關係。輔導學報,11,95-141。林義男(1993)。國中學生家庭社經背景、父母參與及其學業成就的關係。輔導學報,16,157-212。教育部〈2000〉。國民小學九年一貫課程暫行綱要。
教育部〈2003〉。國民小學九年一貫課程綱要。
郭生玉〈2002〉。心理與教育研究法。台北:精華。
郭怡汾(2000)。社經地位、地區剝奪與老人存活狀況。國立臺灣大學衛生政策與管理研究所碩士論文。陳昱瑜(2004)。提早學習英語對高中生英語聽讀能力的影響。國立高雄師範大學英語學系碩士論文。陳淑惠(2005)。台灣學生學習成就評量資料庫2005年台灣學生英語學習成就之趨勢調查研究期中報告。台北:作者。
張郁雯(2004)。信度。出自王文中、呂金燮、吳毓瑩、張郁雯、張淑慧合著,教育測驗與評量(頁95-128)。台北:五南。
陳雅萍〈2004〉。國中新生英語實力差異與其家庭背景關係之調查。國立高雄師範大學英語學系碩士論文。楊銀興〈2000〉。傳統評量與新式評量之比較及國小教師對實施新式評量相關問題覺知情形之研究。國立台灣師範大學教育研究所博士論文。謝孟穎(2003)。家長社經背景與學生學業成就關聯性之研究。教育研究集刊,49(2),255-287。鍾筱美〈2003〉。國民小學兒童英語學習成就與國語識字能力之調查研究-以屏東縣國小一至三年級兒童為例。屏東師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文。簡曉琳(2004)。國小學童英語學習策略、學習動機與學業成就相關之研究-以彰化縣近郊學校為例。大葉大學教育專業發展研究所碩士論文。聶澎齡(2004)。台灣國小畢業學童英語能力之因素分析。國立高雄師範大學英語學系碩士班。英文部分
American Educational Research Association , American Psychological Association, and National Council on Measurement in Education. (1999). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
Crocker, L., & Algina, J. (1986). Introduction to classical and modern test theory. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Deanna, L. M. & Pere, M.(2004). Setting Standards in Education:Choosing the Best Method for your Assessmrnt and Population. Education Testing Service.Unpublished paper
Ellis, R. (1994). The study of second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ellis, R. (1997). SLA research and language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Erwin, T. D., & Wise, S. L..(2003). Standard setting. EBSCO Publishing.
Ferdous, A. & Plake, B.(2003).The use of Subsets of Test Questions in an Angoff Standard Setting Method. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the national council on measurement in education. (Chicago, IL, April 22-24, 2003).
Flanagan, J. C. (1951). Units, scores, and norms. In E. F. Lindquist (Ed.), Educational measurement . Washing, DC: American Council on Education.
Green, D. R.(2001). Interpreting the result of three different standard setting procedural. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Seattle, WA, April 14, 2001.
Hansen, I. V.(1985). Sex Differences in English Achievement. Highway one. 8(1-2),259-73
Jaeger, R. M. (1989). Certification of student competence. In R. L. (Ed.), Educational measurement . New York: American Council on Education/Macmillan.
Kaplan, D.(1993). The Impact of BIB-Spiralling Induced Missing Data Patterns on Goodness-of Fit Tests in Factor Analysis. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA, April 20-24, 1992.
Lewis D. M., Mitzel H. C., & Green, D. R.(1996). Standard Setting:A Bookmark Approach, presented at the CCSSO National Conference on Large Scale Assessment.
Linn, J. (2003). The bookmark standard setting procedural: strength and weakness. The centre for research in applied measurement and evaluation. The university of Alberta, Canada. Unpublished paper.
Linn, R. L., Ground, N. E.(2000). Measurement and assessment in teaching. Upper Saddle River, N. J.: Merrill.
MacIntyre, P. D., Baker, S. C., Clement, R., and Donovan, L. A.(2002). Sex and age effects on willingness to Communicate, anxiety, perceived competence, and L2 motivation among junior high school French immersion students. Language Learning, 52(3),537-64
Messick, S. (1992). Validity of test interpretation and use. In M.C. Alkin (Ed.), Encyclopedia of educational research, (1487-1495). New York: Macmillan.
Phakiti, A. (2003). A closer look at gender and strategy use in L2 reading. Language learning, 53(4),649-702.
Skaggs, G. ( 2001). Item disordinality with the bookmark standard setting procedural. Paper presented at the 2001 annual meeting of the national council on measurement in education, Seattle, WA.
U.S. Department of Education (1996). Goals 2000: A progress report. Washington, D. C.: The author.